Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Will Britain ever just piss off and get on with Brexit? -mod warning in OP (21/12)

1202203205207208328

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,794 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    I was responding to Francie and did ask several times if he had any issues with any other European queen (as in monarch) but as he persisted to referring only to the situation as it pertains in the UK I considered it was a given that in that instance 'queen' referred to Elizabeth II, Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and not, For example, Queen Margrethe II of Denmark whose role is not dissimilar to Elizabeth's but doesn't seem to interest Francie.

    Have you seen the title of the thread by any chance?

    I have the same opinion of any monarchy...as I said very clearly when asked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Have you seen the title of the thread by any chance?

    I have the same opinion of any monarchy...as I said very clearly when asked.

    Ask kermit if he's read the title of the thread. He's the one who asked me to be clear when the monarch I am referring to is Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rather than some other female monarch presiding over a European Constitutional monarchy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,794 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Ask kermit if he's read the title of the thread. He's the one who asked me to be clear when the monarch I am referring to is Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rather than some other female monarch presiding over a European Constitutional monarchy.

    You wondered why other monarchies 'didn't interest Francie'.

    You have your answer. You deal with Kermit yourself. ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭B0jangles


    I hope a little humour is ok?

    https://twitter.com/bencoates1/status/1176750116474163201

    (In case the tweet refuses to load, it's Kenyans taking the opportunity to talk about the UK in the same way as the UK's media habitually talks about Kenya and other countries in Africa.)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,794 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    FunLover18 wrote: »
    No, not only because of how it played out. Regardless of whether we agree with reasons for prorogation or how long it's for, the idea that the Queen should block the will of the elective flies in the face of both democracy and anti-royalism.


    Both scenarios are anti democratic.

    If parliament is sovereign then it is/should be the final arbiter.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    You wondered why other monarchies 'didn't interest Francie'.

    You have your answer. You deal with Kermit yourself. ;)

    Were I going to continue to discuss the role of a monarch in any European Constitutional Monarchy with you - which I am not - I will ensure that I shall clearly identify when I am referring to Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

    :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,794 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    B0jangles wrote: »
    I hope a little humour is ok?

    https://twitter.com/bencoates1/status/1176750116474163201

    (In case the tweet refuses to load, it's Kenyans taking the opportunity to talk about the UK in the same way as the UK's media habitually talks about Kenya and other countries in Africa.)

    :D:D Brilliant.

    Strip away all the pomp and nonsense across the water and it is a similar 'shambles' that they love pointing at elsewhere.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,794 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Were I going to continue to discuss the role of a monarch in any European Constitutional Monarchy with you - which I am not - I will ensure that I shall clearly identify when I am referring to Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

    :p

    Excuse me you! It is 'Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and of her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.' and don't you forget it!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    Both scenarios are anti democratic.

    If parliament is sovereign then it is/should be the final arbiter.

    You can't have it both ways Francie, you started this by claiming the Queen had suppressed democracy and was complicit in the prorugation when the only alternative was to deny the will of the elective, unless that is what you feel should have happened and given the fact the prorogation process exists, the Queen going along with it is the best outcome for democracy until a point in time where the process is altered or removed. Do you accept that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,794 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    FunLover18 wrote: »
    You can't have it both ways Francie, you started this by claiming the Queen had suppressed democracy and was complicit in the prorugation when the only alternative was to deny the will of the elective, unless that is what you feel should have happened and given the fact the prorogation process exists, the Queen going along with it is the best outcome for democracy until a point in time where the process is altered or removed. Do you accept that?

    My view from the get go, is that this 'tier of government is pointless/undemocratic/absurd' whatever happens when it is reached.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    My view from the get go, is that this 'tier of government is pointless/undemocratic/absurd' whatever happens when it is reached.

    So you're not going to answer the question?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,794 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    FunLover18 wrote: »
    So you're not going to answer the question?

    I already did in fairness FL.

    If I seemed to be dictating a course of action for the monarch 'as my preference' I apologise, that was not my intention.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Excuse me you! It is 'Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and of her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.' and don't you forget it!

    Nawh mate.
    She's Brenda.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,794 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I don't think I have seen so many deflated MP's as there are now in the Newsnight studio.

    The UK is in a strange and very volatile and dangerous place. Incredible really.

    Edit, should have been an 'in' instead of 'is'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,866 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    I don't think I have seen so many deflated MP's as there are now in the Newsnight studio.

    The UK is is a strange and very volatile and dangerous place. Incredible really.

    :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,794 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    :rolleyes:

    Are we 'not allowed' to discuss that too?

    Do you actually have an opinion on anything Timberrrr or do you just keep watch?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,866 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Are we 'not allowed' to discuss that too?

    Do you actually have an opinion on anything Timberrrr or do you just keep watch?

    You equated "The UK is a strange and very volatile and dangerous place" with the current political shenanigans frankie.

    Or are you now changing the subject? You jump around so many times a day with your Brit hatred i have to admit that it's sometimes difficult to follow your train of thought.

    How is the UK a volatile and dangerous place?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,941 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Are we 'not allowed' to discuss that too?

    Do you actually have an opinion on anything Timberrrr or do you just keep watch?

    nobody is stopping you from saying anything francie. I'm not sure that is even possible. spare us the victim complex. thats the second time today you have claimed that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    I was discussing Brexit - and it's knock on effects today with a colleague.

    We were discussing (or he was telling me) that the "UK has gone to fcuk" (his words).

    I had to stop him and then talk about a supplier, someone both of us know, who is an Englishman born and bred, yet has lived here for the last prob 8 years or more, and really one of the nicest and obliging guys you'd evern wish to meet.

    I don't think I'm far off the mark with what I told him, I told him that the vast majority of British people are like our mutual friend and supplier, and that it was the extreme upper, and equally extreme lower classes in Britain that were causing the havoc.

    The middle ground are being drowned out by the noise of the arseholes from the extremes of either end of the social class in Britain.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,794 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You equated "The UK is a strange and very volatile and dangerous place" with the current political shenanigans frankie.

    Or are you now changing the subject? You jump around so many times a day with your Brit hatred i have to admit that it's sometimes difficult to follow your train of thought.

    How is the UK a volatile and dangerous place??

    I edited the post, 'the UK is in a very volatile and dangerous place'.

    You had a PM today using language that is extremely provocative during a further entrenched debate where MP's having been getting death threats and one MP has died.
    You had a PM stating that he will ignore the will of parliament.

    The debate has gotten even more entrenched if that is possible. The PM has staked so much on getting what most people believe is an impossible deal that it looks to me that when the inevitable happens (an extension) there is the very real prospect of violence.

    How much of this do you think the debate can take?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,794 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    nobody is stopping you from saying anything francie. I'm not sure that is even possible. spare us the victim complex. thats the second time today you have claimed that.

    Can you guys spare us the 'Brit hating' ****e then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,623 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    I was discussing Brexit - and it's knock on effects today with a colleague.

    We were discussing (or he was telling me) that the "UK has gone to fcuk" (his words).

    I had to stop him and then talk about a supplier, someone both of us know, who is an Englishman born and bred, yet has lived here for the last prob 8 years or more, and really one of the nicest and obliging guys you'd evern wish to meet.

    I don't think I'm far off the mark with what I told him, I told him that the vast majority of British people are like our mutual friend and supplier, and that it was the extreme upper, and equally extreme lower classes in Britain that were causing the havoc.

    The middle ground are being drowned out by the noise of the arseholes from the extremes of either end of the social class in Britain.

    So Brexit is like Twitter?
    and parts of boards.ie


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    Padre_Pio wrote: »
    So Brexit is like Twitter?
    and parts of boards.ie

    Spot on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,761 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    I was discussing Brexit - and it's knock on effects today with a colleague.

    We were discussing (or he was telling me) that the "UK has gone to fcuk" (his words).

    I had to stop him and then talk about a supplier, someone both of us know, who is an Englishman born and bred, yet has lived here for the last prob 8 years or more, and really one of the nicest and obliging guys you'd evern wish to meet.

    I don't think I'm far off the mark with what I told him, I told him that the vast majority of British people are like our mutual friend and supplier, and that it was the extreme upper, and equally extreme lower classes in Britain that were causing the havoc.

    The middle ground are being drowned out by the noise of the arseholes from the extremes of either end of the social class in Britain.

    51% is not just the few percent at the top and bottom


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭Panrich


    lawred2 wrote: »
    51% is not just the few percent at the top and bottom

    How many of that 51% though had no deal in mind and chaos at borders with a likely return to violence in NI alongside a breakup of the U.K?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,761 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Panrich wrote: »
    How many of that 51% though had no deal in mind and chaos at borders with a likely return to violence in NI alongside a breakup of the U.K?

    Not sure but poll after poll shows that there is still a sizeable percentage that would still vote that way even after everything that they have seen and should have learned over the last three years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,271 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Padre_Pio wrote: »
    So Brexit is like Twitter?
    and parts of boards.ie

    and Ireland to be fair!

    In many ways we're no better. "Middle Ireland", "those who get up early", whatever you want to call it is similarly drowned out (or just ignored) here as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,941 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Can you guys spare us the 'Brit hating' ****e then?

    One is based in truth, the other isnt. i'll leave you to figure out which is which.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,794 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    One is based in truth, the other isnt. i'll leave you to figure out which is which.

    You could start by pointing out anything I have said on this thread that could be construed as 'hate for the British in general'.

    Take your time.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭SeaBreezes


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    and Ireland to be fair!

    In many ways we're no better. "Middle Ireland", "those who get up early", whatever you want to call it is similarly drowned out (or just ignored) here as well.

    I think though, our own violent past and oppression tends to temper the irish psyche.

    We have a live and let live philosophy in our culture and are very very slow to extremism.

    Also, our education is more rounded, and our media a little less biased. That helps too.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement