Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Off The Ball Official Thread <Mod Note - Post #1, #533, #6651>

1252253255257258334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 611 ✭✭✭redbuck


    monstermag wrote: »
    Is that Richie l hear doing voice-over adds on radio stations?

    I think he does D.I.D. Electrical anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,454 ✭✭✭✭BPKS


    monstermag wrote: »
    Is that Richie l hear doing voice-over adds on radio stations?

    Is it Richie that filled in for Tom Dunne when he was sick?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,834 ✭✭✭robo


    BPKS wrote: »
    Is it Richie that filled in for Tom Dunne when he was sick?

    Yep and he did a good job of that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,322 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    robo wrote: »
    Yep and he did a good job of that

    I'd say his preffered job would be full time in T Dunne slot. Loves his music.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭monstermag


    robo wrote: »
    Yep and he did a good job of that

    He's the Jimmy Mcgee of music


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 996 ✭✭✭Murdoc90


    Would love to see Kerr replace Giles on a Thursday night. You could hear it in Nathan's voice that he was curling up into a big ball of cringe at times last season with some of his responses and points of view. Like an auld fella at a bar who you nod and agree with to just get to the point so you can get away. Completely out of touch with the modern game. All these old stories of the 60's and 70's (in fairness its usually Nathan who pushes for it) have no absolutely no relevance to the game now.

    Also they need to make more time for Kenny Cunningham, only wheeling him out for CL nights is major under usage. I feel he adds a lot more than Kilbane, who seems to have been and molded by the BBC to basically be a robot. No personality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,322 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Murdoc90 wrote: »
    Would love to see Kerr replace Giles on a Thursday night. You could hear it in Nathan's voice that he was curling up into a big ball of cringe at times last season with some of his responses and points of view. Like an auld fella at a bar who you nod and agree with to just get to the point so you can get away. Completely out of touch with the modern game. All these old stories of the 60's and 70's (in fairness its usually Nathan who pushes for it) have no absolutely no relevance to the game now.

    Also they need to make more time for Kenny Cunningham, only wheeling him out for CL nights is major under usage. I feel he adds a lot more than Kilbane, who seems to have been and molded by the BBC to basically be a robot. No personality.

    I like kilbane. Thought in particular in his first year he clearly got a lot of interviews with mates of his.
    He was on much less last year I thought.

    Agree, I really like KC. Thought he was on a bit more than just CL nights but that certainly was his main focus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,539 ✭✭✭ghostdancer


    monstermag wrote: »
    Is that Richie l hear doing voice-over adds on radio stations?
    yep, probably more ads with him on the breaks than ads without him at this stage :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,217 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    Murdoc90 wrote: »
    Would love to see Kerr replace Giles on a Thursday night. You could hear it in Nathan's voice that he was curling up into a big ball of cringe at times last season with some of his responses and points of view. Like an auld fella at a bar who you nod and agree with to just get to the point so you can get away. Completely out of touch with the modern game. All these old stories of the 60's and 70's (in fairness its usually Nathan who pushes for it) have no absolutely no relevance to the game now.

    Also they need to make more time for Kenny Cunningham, only wheeling him out for CL nights is major under usage. I feel he adds a lot more than Kilbane, who seems to have been and molded by the BBC to basically be a robot. No personality.
    One of the best suggestions on here in a while imo! I'd tune into OTB specifically to listen to Kerr. The man is a legend, is really insightful with his analysis and knowledge, and is passionate for the game. I feel he is underused in general by the media.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭monstermag


    yep, probably more ads with him on the breaks than ads without him at this stage :pac:

    I wonder is there some products he wouldn't put his voice to like maybe electrical appliances made in China with cheap labour and poor working conditions.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,867 ✭✭✭dr.kenneth noisewater


    Excellent interview with Jason Quigley on atm. Not a boxing fan bu great honesty from a boxer a week after his first loss. Worth a listen back


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,834 ✭✭✭robo


    Excellent interview with Jason Quigley on atm. Not a boxing fan bu great honesty from a boxer a week after his first loss. Worth a listen back

    This is what OTB does best - gets sports people to talk about what goes on in their head. Somehow the boxers sound even rawer than most other sports, Eric Donovans interview a few months ago still sticks in my head when he spoke about the stumbling blocks he had to face through the years & to hear now how he is in a great place after turning Pro. They show the grit of whats needed to be an athlete & how its not just down to putting a few birdies in front of millions or getting that winning punch in the ring.

    The worst interviews are the rugby guys - I could have missed a good one, but they are so "trained" on what to say and how to promote themselves (and I get that they are thinking of outside the rugby pitch), but its just a marketing PR job when they are on OTB.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,177 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    The younger more professional and dare I say institutionalised rugby players give bland and boring interviews

    With all that’s been going on off the pitch in the rugby world, it’s sad but that’s the way they are drilled

    Think of the questions and stories that could be told if they were genuinely interested in giving a good interview. But no. Won’t happen.

    PRed within an inch of their lives mainly

    Few of the older guard like ROG , Darcy and heaslip are interesting to listen to but the new lot- nah


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,177 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    Heard carbery on otb lately and it really did come across as an advertorial for milk (he is brand ambassador for avonmorr I think it is)

    Jasus it was bland boring radio

    Otb presenters made it worse if anything too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,322 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    robo wrote: »
    This is what OTB does best - gets sports people to talk about what goes on in their head. Somehow the boxers sound even rawer than most other sports, Eric Donovans interview a few months ago still sticks in my head when he spoke about the stumbling blocks he had to face through the years & to hear now how he is in a great place after turning Pro. They show the grit of whats needed to be an athlete & how its not just down to putting a few birdies in front of millions or getting that winning punch in the ring.

    The worst interviews are the rugby guys - I could have missed a good one, but they are so "trained" on what to say and how to promote themselves (and I get that they are thinking of outside the rugby pitch), but its just a marketing PR job when they are on OTB.

    I'll see if I can find one Keith Earl's did with Joe last year some time.
    Thought it was excellent. They went in to the mental struggles he had with playing for a time and he seemed to enjoy talking about it.

    Enjoy the boxing interviews like you said. Think having Andy Lee involved helps to make people relax enough to really engage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,834 ✭✭✭robo


    Agree Andy Lee seems to make the boxers comfortable to speak - they hear how he talks and is at ease to talk about the aches & pains (mentally & physically) of pro life of an athlete.

    On Keith Earls - must dig out that interview as I missed it, he is a player that shows so much passion on the pitch but has had hard times through the years, what is it Munster players, they seem to talk more freely than Leinster PR/marketing guys, I just tune out now when the Leinster guys talk. Maybe Carbery will pick that up in the training fields of Munster :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,217 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    Anyone hear the "newsround" segment (7:00 - 7:30) last night. I was driving home from work, flicking between stations when I heard Nathans voice so tuned in. The lads were discussing Championship Manager (the video game) and it was absolutely brilliant, I haven't laughed so much at an OTB piece since the Second Captains crew were in charge. In the grand scheme of things, it was just a bit of inane, harmless banter, but I prefer that to when the presenters (mainly Joe + Ger) indulge in political/social topics.

    For me, Nathan is the pick of the presenters too, he just seems more genuinely invested in sport, and seems more authentic when having the craic with the other guests/co-presenters. He can be self-deprecating in a way that feels totally contrived when Ger does it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,322 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Anyone hear the "newsround" segment (7:00 - 7:30) last night. I was driving home from work, flicking between stations when I heard Nathans voice so tuned in. The lads were discussing Championship Manager (the video game) and it was absolutely brilliant, I haven't laughed so much at an OTB piece since the Second Captains crew were in charge. In the grand scheme of things, it was just a bit of inane, harmless banter, but I prefer that to when the presenters (mainly Joe + Ger) indulge in political/social topics.

    For me, Nathan is the pick of the presenters too, he just seems more genuinely invested in sport, and seems more authentic when having the craic with the other guests/co-presenters. He can be self-deprecating in a way that feels totally contrived when Ger does it.

    Newsround most nights is light hearted with them taking the mick out of each other at times.

    I like Nathan (think he's best at that light hearted stuff) but prefer Joe for most topics as I think he asks better questions.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,438 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    I think it's unfair to compare a boxer to a footballer or rugby player's interview.

    A footballer/rugby player will do a lot of media per year and also represents a club and it's players and coaches. If he/she answers a question or puts something out there then some of the other players will be asked to comment on it, or in a few weeks they'll be asked about it again.

    A boxer will do far less media and is representing themselves, so anything they answer won't affect anyone else.

    A footballer will have a lot more profile than a rugby player who will have a lot more profile than a boxer. Well maybe not so much more with the footballer or rugby player but either way they'll be more well known than most boxers. Footballers and rugby players aren't there to sell themselves but boxers are imo.

    Simply put if I were a footballer or rugby player I'd be saying very little in interviews but if i were a boxer I'd be much more open. Remember it's also perfectly acceptable for a boxer to be critical of their opponents in a way that's the complete opposite of a footballer or rugby player.

    Also yeah I think Nathan is pretty good too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 Dowend


    Anyone else find John Duggan insufferable?

    If he's not gloating about all the major sports events he's been to in his 18+ years of journalism he's speaking nonsense about sports he's claiming to be an expert on.

    No idea why they go to him for golf/racing tips, he stumbles his way through both. He clearly has very little knowledge of the game of golf compared to the Golf Weekly crew in particular. His lack of racing knowledge is evident when they have Johnny Ward on, who actually knows what he's talking about. You can even tell that Johnny cringes when they are both on at the same time talking racing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,322 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Dowend wrote: »
    Anyone else find John Duggan insufferable?

    If he's not gloating about all the major sports events he's been to in his 18+ years of journalism he's speaking nonsense about sports he's claiming to be an expert on.

    No idea why they go to him for golf/racing tips, he stumbles his way through both. He clearly has very little knowledge of the game of golf compared to the Golf Weekly crew in particular. His lack of racing knowledge is clearly evident when they have Johnny Ward on, who clearly knows what he's talking about.

    I always viewed him as a reporter. There to report on events rather than to analyse. Can't say I was ever waiting to hear his personal take on an event as such.

    Never heard him claiming to be an expert.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,396 ✭✭✭mr_edge_to_you


    Dowend wrote: »
    Anyone else find John Duggan insufferable?

    If he's not gloating about all the major sports events he's been to in his 18+ years of journalism he's speaking nonsense about sports he's claiming to be an expert on.

    No idea why they go to him for golf/racing tips, he stumbles his way through both. He clearly has very little knowledge of the game of golf compared to the Golf Weekly crew in particular. His lack of racing knowledge is evident when they have Johnny Ward on, who actually knows what he's talking about. You can even tell that Johnny cringes when they are both on at the same time talking racing.

    I really enjoy listening to him. I don't think he portrays himself as an expert but he's a massive sports fan.

    Regarding interviews in general, I think Joe is pretty good at bringing people out of their shell.

    I presume the rugby players are trained to be bland and boring. The IRFU is one massive propaganda machine. I'm a huge rugby fan but as each year goes on it seems that the Irish players are nothing more than glorified marketing professionals - work in marketing/PR during the week and play the odd game of rugby at the weekend. If the IRFU can't put your name or face to one it's brands without controversy, you're skillset can be dispensed with. The brand comes first. The aforementioned interview with Earls being a rare exception.

    Thought this line attributed to Robbie Henshaw last week promoting the new World Cup jersey was particularly mundane:

    "Canterbury has produced a range of kit that ticks all the boxes from a player perspective in terms of functionality, comfort and design. First and foremost the kit needs to stand up to the physical and environmental challenges that await us in Japan, but it also needs to look good on and off the pitch, for players and fans alike."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,867 ✭✭✭dr.kenneth noisewater


    Cliona Foley has to be the worst contributor on the paper review, cant understand how they keep getting her back on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,509 ✭✭✭Miley Byrne


    Cliona Foley has to be the worst contributor on the paper review, cant understand how they keep getting her back on.

    It's the auld gender quotas, isn't it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,959 ✭✭✭diusmr8a504cvk


    Dowend wrote: »
    Anyone else find John Duggan insufferable?

    If he's not gloating about all the major sports events he's been to in his 18+ years of journalism he's speaking nonsense about sports he's claiming to be an expert on.

    No idea why they go to him for golf/racing tips, he stumbles his way through both. He clearly has very little knowledge of the game of golf compared to the Golf Weekly crew in particular. His lack of racing knowledge is evident when they have Johnny Ward on, who actually knows what he's talking about. You can even tell that Johnny cringes when they are both on at the same time talking racing.
    He's like someone you'd have on a teleshopping channel, unbelievable cringe.
    Cliona Foley has to be the worst contributor on the paper review, cant understand how they keep getting her back on.
    I said the same previously.
    There's a big "Your ma" energy off of Cliona Foley. A postage stamp would fit her knowledge of sport on the back of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,322 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    He's like someone you'd have on a teleshopping channel, unbelievable cringe.


    I said the same previously.

    As also said previously, 25 years sports journalist covering 100 All Irelands across various codes, Olympics and Football championships.

    Can't figure out why she is on..

    She made a point on gender quotas herself yesterday that there shouldn't be women appointed to the board of the FAI just because of quotas, that anyone appointed to it should be capable of performing a role.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,959 ✭✭✭diusmr8a504cvk


    As also said previously, 25 years sports journalist covering 100 All Irelands across various codes, Olympics and Football championships.
    If I could care less, I would.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,056 ✭✭✭applehunter


    John Duggan comes across well on radio.

    His attempts at an epic tweet are terrible though.

    I’d say we would be kindred spirits.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,056 ✭✭✭applehunter


    Cliona Foley has to be the worst contributor on the paper review, cant understand how they keep getting her back on.

    Sport is the realm of men.

    Stop trying to fix something that isn’t broken.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,508 ✭✭✭u140acro3xs7dm


    It's the auld gender quotas, isn't it

    Until they find a female reporter/contributor of better quality, she isn't going anywhere. I'm not saying she doesn't know her sport, but she definitely doesn't belong on the radio.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement