WereWolf: A 13 player Seer game

Whiplashy wrote: »

That close to lynch it can end up in getting innocents lynched.

quickbeam wrote: »

I knew it wouldn't.....

Whiplashy wrote: »

A wolf would know.....

Baggly wrote: »

If anyone is peeked good by Ecto, its sully. And im not 100% on that.

Green&Red wrote: »

Well it didnt take you long to get around to FFAing me now did it? Yourself and Strawbs must be having a right laugh in the backroom. Neither of you had to vote for me to get me to the top of the FFA list but you decided to bail in anyway.


Your reasons BTW are complete BS which makes me think you’re more likely to be the wolf than Strawbs although its very plausible that you both are.

I’d ask people to actually read what you’ve wrote here, you expect someone to come out as seer and everyone to just ignore it? Do you think the wolves are ignoring it? Maybe you can tell us what you’re saying in the BR? Because you can be 100% sure, yes 100% sure, they are discussing Trit claiming Seer. But what the village is meant to stay quiet?
Does that make any sense to anyone?
Maybe if we don’t talk about it we can make it like it never happened?

Theres literally no rationale to this thinking, you want to kill off the people who question a claim that is almost definitely bogus? How does that help the village?


For what is worth I think Baggly is wolfy and Duffman has me pocketed with his Tusk fluff post. On that did you not say you liked that post? Or am I misremembering?

Went and checked, no I’m not misremembering



So one of the few good posts in the thread to date and you think that person is one of the three wolfiest?
This is laughable

Green&Red wrote: »

This is some weak defence QB, at least have the courage of your convictions?
A villagers would have some reason for having Duffman there and try and back it up.

Can you remember back to 1pm, when Tusk switched between Baggly and Duffman on his FFA? This was your reaction



So you're noting Tusk's flip flopping but you do it like its not biggie now?

As for your second point, I wholeheartedly disagree, its not like we're solving some complex puzzle, Trit is either the seer or their not, its binary, I'd give any one on the list here the compliment that they can work out those scenarios. Its us the village that need to work out why Trit is claiming seer and what it means for the village, as Trit says himself chaos is a ladder.

And if that BS reasoning is your actual reason then you should have Duffman and Sully on your list for the exact same reasoning>

Would you not consider that a wolf would shut up and keep stum and see what would develop? That would be what I would do if I was a wolf

Green&Red wrote: »

Baggly hasn't been giving me great vibes so I said I'd ISO him and clarify it for myself




Straight in with Trits reveal, I like the tone of this post. Followed by a bit of explaining to Trit. Again I like the feel of his posts, possible unintentional pocketing of myself there as it echos what I was thinking at the time.



Then a lot of fluffly posts before calling me out for being defensive. Again I cant really argue, I felt QB and Strawbs were bandwagonning me, so while I dont like the content I can't really argue with the context.



He then calls out QB for nothing from what I can see, a 10k fluff post? I don't like this post.



Asks Tusk to explain why he was on his list, this has a wolf on wolf feel to me but maybe thats just being suspicious. He does follow it up with Tusk on his FFA but I'd be more convinced if he votes that way when its close




Lastly calls out QB on her spurious reasoning which I 100% agree with.


So interesting ISO, I'm probably still on the fence

Green&Red wrote: »

Tusk was in my FFA purely on the basis of Duffmans ISO of him and his fluff