Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

WereWolf: A 13 player Seer game

1414244464757

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,288 ✭✭✭✭Kolido


    Apart from gnr, do we think anyone was actually cleared by ecto?

    There is qb but I dont know what that cfd was about. She would have got her third peek last night, so I guess she wouldnt of had time to drop anything from that.

    A vil core would be good, especailly as I've been absent so much.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Clarabel wrote: »
    your reaction on D1 vs today about accusations are remarkably different. I know you said you're trying not to be defensive but you're almost horizonal with laidbackness now.

    what's up with that?

    HE IS A WOLF


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    If anyone is peeked good by Ecto, its sully. And im not 100% on that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,288 ✭✭✭✭Kolido


    Baggly wrote: »
    Okay, let's see if I can do wagonomics now based on me being N0 cleared and GnR being N1 found:
    Baggly wrote: »
    If anyone is peeked good by Ecto, its sully. And im not 100% on that.

    This doesnt make sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    The top quote is actually from QBs post which i quoted and then deleted the tags.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,318 ✭✭✭kitten_k


    Kolido wrote: »
    Apart from gnr, do we think anyone was actually cleared by ecto?

    There is qb but I dont know what that cfd was about. She would have got her third peek last night, so I guess she wouldnt of had time to drop anything from that.

    A vil core would be good, especailly as I've been absent so much.
    Baggly wrote: »
    If anyone is peeked good by Ecto, its sully. And im not 100% on that.

    Yea I quoted a post earlier where Ecto joked that Sulli was her N0 peek. No way of knowing if it was her leaving breadcrumbs or just a joke.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,288 ✭✭✭✭Kolido


    Kolido wrote: »
    This doesnt make sense.

    Oh wait, you first post was based on that assumption, ok I get it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,762 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red


    IS there anythign to be said for leaving me alive and learning something off me?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Yes there is something to be said for it.

    The thing to be said being 'no'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Clarabel


    Baggly wrote: »
    Okay, let's see if I can do wagonomics now based on me being N0 cleared and GnR being N1 found:





    D1

    Ok so why does GNR move onto SM on d1. Who is he trying to save? Comes back to Kitten again. On thread it wasnt very clear who was in the running. Reluctant to say it was Kitten he was trying to save. Could be he was hopping on a safe bulked out wagon. But why do so late and last?

    Conceivable wolves split wagons. Id say likely. Duffers would be the next wolf if thats the case. It looks like he voted late but he didnt - Kitten and i just got in early on Tusk. This could have been a vote where he was expecting people to row in behiind him to obscure him in the wagon trail.

    Whipper on Kitten. Well i dont see them both being wolves on a team. So if one is a wolf, the other isnt imo.

    Kolido on QB and QB on me are throwaway votes and are very annoying. Cant really interpret them much.

    Sully on SM is interesting. Early wagon joiner. Conceivable this was a village error. Could have been a d1 wolf stick no matter what type deal. Surprised Sully didnt twig SM not behaving wolfy tbh.

    Clara on SM - for now i buy that it was a wagony throwaway vote. Its mid wagon, so insulated on both sides. Hard to read that vote by itself.

    D2

    Duffers on the tusk wagon. Got on early again. Hidden in the wagon trail.

    GNR on me with Kolido. It would be ballsy to have two wolves on the one player; especially since i wasnt under much heat yesterday evening. No inconceivable. Could have been planned that way.

    Kitten and Whipper on Clara - Hmmm this is tricky as i dont think they are on the same team as per above. Is the kitten vote on Clara self pres? She has been very fluffy otherwise.

    Sully on Kitten - Kitten was under pressure yesterday. Not unreasonable to hop on Kitten for your vote. Sully was online last night trying to do a CFD however. Cant have been so gung ho on Kitten then. Reads like it doesnt matter where her vote goes, as everyone is a valid target. Ectos hint on sully keeps her away from wolf lean for me.

    QB on Kolido. Another throwaway vote ALMOST LIKE SOMEONE IS TRYING TO INVALIDATE VOTE ANALYSIS.

    Kolido on both votes - no idea what he is doing. Seems to be taking pot shots at outliers. Again, not helpful.

    Clara on Tusk - it was the killing vote. Could have been self pres. But thats not exclusively a wolf trait. Hard to read.

    Conclusions:

    Village
    Baggly
    Kitten
    Sully
    Clara
    Kolido
    QB
    Whipper
    Duffers
    GNR
    Wolf

    this is great, great!
    I have questions please.

    I'm not sure I follow your thoughts on kitten, on D1 why are you reluctant to say it was kitten? There was a bit of noise on D1 evening when it was tusk, kitten and me in the running. I know I'm good and tusk is good.

    Is it cause you don't see whip and kit being on the same team? WhipperCat I do :) Actually looking at the votes I don't, it was too close on D1 for wolf whip to vote for wolf cat

    D2 - you've mentioned that Sully as potentially bad for started CFD last night but actually it was QC starting with myself egging her on and Sulli joining in. I feel like this has been left out and perhaps clears QB where it shouldn't?

    I don't fel Duff as strongly as you, but I think you are nail on the head with whip. Can you help me a little more here, Duff voted tusk both days, so what he was being a bit erratic as a villager it was an easy one to get caught up in. Why you reading him as net wolf to GnR?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Clarabel


    Green&Red wrote: »
    IS there anythign to be said for leaving me alive and learning something off me?

    well you not answerig questions, so what do we learn?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Clarabel wrote: »
    this is great, great!
    I have questions please.

    I'm not sure I follow your thoughts on kitten, on D1 why are you reluctant to say it was kitten? There was a bit of noise on D1 evening when it was tusk, kitten and me in the running. I know I'm good and tusk is good.

    Is it cause you don't see whip and kit being on the same team? WhipperCat I do :) Actually looking at the votes I don't, it was too close on D1 for wolf whip to vote for wolf cat

    D2 - you've mentioned that Sully as potentially bad for started CFD last night but actually it was QC starting with myself egging her on and Sulli joining in. I feel like this has been left out and perhaps clears QB where it shouldn't?

    I don't fel Duff as strongly as you, but I think you are nail on the head with whip. Can you help me a little more here, Duff voted tusk both days, so what he was being a bit erratic as a villager it was an easy one to get caught up in. Why you reading him as net wolf to GnR?

    So you answered your first question yourself.

    Second question re: Duffer; its the timing of the votes. I think he was trying to get mid wagon each day. As a hiding spot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Oh and re: the CFDs; they are mostly always a terrible idea. Please stop doing them. There were 3 of ye in it in fairness. But thankfully (i think) none of ye acting on one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Clarabel


    Baggly wrote: »
    So you answered your first question yourself.

    Second question re: Duffer; its the timing of the votes. I think he was trying to get mid wagon each day. As a hiding spot.


    Thanks - i did answer the question but wanted to leave the verbal diarrhoea in there
    okay re duffers, not sure I get it, but you're the master at this.

    What about QB/ Sully re CFD?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    I am no master of this. Its very healthy for you and everyone else to question me and to draw up your own conclusions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Clarabel


    Baggly wrote: »
    Oh and re: the CFDs; they are mostly always a terrible idea. Please stop doing them. There were 3 of ye in it in fairness. But thankfully (i think) none of ye acting on one.

    OKAY, my bad. But they only bad for your waganomics right? If as we were doing last nigt which is just to test the waters then they are good?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Explain to me how they would be good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,288 ✭✭✭✭Kolido


    There is only one good reason for doing a cfd. If its started by the seer and they peeked a wolf. Still risky but under no other circumstance do I like them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    I understand where you are coming from. But if that were to become a defacto rule, what happens when someone false claims seer to get someone killed. Maybe real seer isnt around to counter. Maybe real seer ends up dead.

    If seer reveals with 10 mins to go, there is a bigger issue.

    If seer reveals, it should be with plenty of time or no time, so that village have time to adjust, or so that wolves dont have time to adjust.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,762 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red


    Clarabel wrote: »
    Green&Red wrote: »
    IS there anythign to be said for leaving me alive and learning something off me?

    well you not answerig questions, so what do we learn?
    Nobody asked me any questions!
    I’ll answer any question you have


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Clarabel


    i was going to claim seer at 9:59 last night to draw the munch. Is that what you mean by no time?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,288 ✭✭✭✭Kolido


    Oh I mean in hindsight, it would appear an ok idea. At the time it would be a terrible idea except to the real seer and they were starting it.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 16,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭quickbeam


    Baggly wrote: »
    QB on Kolido. Another throwaway vote ALMOST LIKE SOMEONE IS TRYING TO INVALIDATE VOTE ANALYSIS.

    He was my guess for wolf. I'd been saying it since early (he was one of a few) and then when he came with a lazy FFA response. Sully had allayed my fears with her response. He was my natural choice.

    So a vote off-wagon may not be useful, but if I'd gone with the wagon and voted for Tusk, who I didn't think was a wolf, would that have been helpful either? We agreed yesterday that impure votes were not useful (unless it caught a wolf).

    I suggested a CFD to get the thread talking. Nothing else. I didn't join the Tusk CFD.

    Interesting though, we wondered what a flip green on Tusk would provide. I'm glad that it did tell us at least that there wasn't a wolf saving a teammate in the top two in D1.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    You looking forward to your big day in Aug?

    You all sorted for it?

    Who are the other wolves?

    How was that food you got in Fermoy yesterday?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Clarabel


    Baggly wrote: »
    HE IS A WOLF
    Clarabel wrote: »
    your reaction on D1 vs today about accusations are remarkably different. I know you said you're trying not to be defensive but you're almost horizonal with laidbackness now.

    what's up with that?
    Green&Red wrote: »
    Nobody asked me any questions!
    I’ll answer any question you have

    really?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Good point QB!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,249 ✭✭✭duffman13


    Right folks, I'm up to my neck today but going on Ectos death GnR is a wolf, QB I'm leaning towards and starting to think the Baggly GnR interaction was pure horse**** yesterday.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Clarabel wrote: »
    really?

    are_you_kidding_me_rage_face_meme_poster-r3726a85aa584458cad9751d80824bbf6_jih_8byvr_540.jpg


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 16,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭quickbeam


    Clarabel wrote: »
    i was going to claim seer at 9:59 last night to draw the munch. Is that what you mean by no time?

    I actually did try to soft claim. Nobody seemed to notice. When I said that I knew the CFD wasn't risking the seer, I had meant to imply that it was because it was me. Only, I only thought if it late, and thread was closing, and I'd no time to make up who I had supposedly peeked.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    duffman13 wrote: »
    Right folks, I'm up to my neck today but going on Ectos death GnR is a wolf, QB I'm leaning towards and starting to think the Baggly GnR interaction was pure horse**** yesterday.

    So your thesis is a 3way wolf buss?


Advertisement