Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

New An Post logo

2»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,887 ✭✭✭Atoms for Peace


    Very bland and samey, the muted white look is now ubiquitous for Irish businesses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,419 ✭✭✭ToddyDoody


    Will the new logo do anything for the company's abysmal financial position?

    Actually they do make money.

    It's all a bit boring, they need to be hit by a big scandal to liven things up a bit?

    Like this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Post_Office_scandal


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,162 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    AddressPal is slow and could be improved but overall the postal service in Ireland is excellent and considerably more efficient than any private courier service!

    The Cork facility was only operating at 1/4 capacity for ages and they are only closing it now and they are moving from 3 under used letter sorting depots to 2 under used depots, that's not efficient. Just because your letter or parcel gets to your door doesn't mean that the company is efficient it just means that it did its job.

    Look at the delays they had over Christmas and how they dealt with Chinese parcels, they weren't efficient then.

    I'm not saying that the private courier companies are better but then who pays enough for their delivery to warrant a good service?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 516 ✭✭✭Lackadaisical


    I wonder will the closure of the Cork Mails Centre impact services though. I mean, does that potentially result in longer delivery times?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭Seanachai


    Very bland and samey, the muted white look is now ubiquitous for Irish businesses.

    It reminds me of the typeface and colours you see on an anti-virus software package


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 474 ✭✭Former Observer


    Bland. The old one was much nicer.

    Not sure I get the antipathy towards an post though. I find the service reasonable and I admire how they deliver mail to rural areas. If you want to write an email write an email. People will always want to write letters and send parcels too though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    Probably paid some design firm €300,000 for it too ...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 516 ✭✭✭Lackadaisical


    It just looks like yet another bland, corporate circle logo. Reminds me of umpteen other logos.

    They could have refreshed and modernized old logo.

    I’d assume they’ve some notion that they’re no longer primarily a letter processing company so they wanted to get rid of the symbol that is based on a stamp cancellation mark.

    It was actually a really slick logo though and was admired from a design point of view because of its elegant simplicity.
    All it needed was a bit of updating and some proper rules about display.

    It was also highly reproducible in physical formats like classy looking metal signage and all sorts of print formats, in colour or in monochrome.

    For a 1980s logo it was actually very modern and fits into present day graphic design very well.

    Its counterpart the Telecom Éireann logo was very much one that needed to go and was of its time.

    One of the issues with the old logo is that it was often reproduced badly - you’d see it slightly off scale on some of their signage.

    Anyway a bit late now. I guess we’ll have to get used to this new bland corporate image.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 532 ✭✭✭Turquoise Hexagon Sun


    Looks good. Updated, modern, refreshing. In line with more current logo trends. It's like the Google refresh from a few years ago. People didn't like it. But when you look at the old Google logo, it looks outdated.

    5384b5076bb3f78d6bdfdb97-750-265.jpg

    Logo design and branding is a much harder skill than people give it credit for. I would love to see some of the efforts of a new logo from some of the commenters here.

    People don't like change but in 6 months time when people see the logo more, it will look absolutely the norm and standard. Viewing the old logo in a couple of years time might re-enforce that a logo refresh was needed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭Seanachai


    Looks good. Updated, modern, refreshing. In line with more current logo trends. It's like the Google refresh from a few years ago. People didn't like it. But when you look at the old Google logo, it looks outdated.

    5384b5076bb3f78d6bdfdb97-750-265.jpg

    Logo design and branding is a much harder skill than people give it credit for. I would love to see some of the efforts of a new logo from some of the commenters here.

    People don't like change but in 6 months time when people see the logo more, it will look absolutely the norm and standard. Viewing the old logo in a couple of years time might re-enforce that a logo refresh was needed.

    I could see them re-introducing the gold\yellow into the logo, it doesn't have enough of an impact the way it is now.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,197 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    It’s not very inspiring to be honest, just white text on a green background. Would have thought if they were going to hand over tax payers money to change it that it may have been a bit less generic and most likely somewhat more striking to encourage brand awareness. Maybe when it’s to be seen on uniforms, vehicles etc it may strike more of a tone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 516 ✭✭✭Lackadaisical


    Wouldn’t be tax payers’ money. It’s a commercial semi state, but you’ll be paying for it when you buy a stamp.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,236 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    They even have a pride coloured version haha

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,266 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Must be immune to design wankery.

    I never chose a service for its logo, or chose a flight because the plane owned by the airline looked nice. A post office is a post office, if they provide a delivery service cheaper and/or better than somewhere else I'll use it. If not, ill use a competitor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭Seanachai


    Must be immune to design wankery.

    I never chose a service for its logo, or chose a flight because the plane owned by the airline looked nice. A post office is a post office, if they provide a delivery service cheaper and/or better than somewhere else I'll use it. If not, ill use a competitor.

    I think aesthetics in the built environment have an effect on our well-being, there's research that backs this up, if it doesn't affect you that's fair enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,499 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    Tbh I find it offensive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,188 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    Nikki Sixx wrote: »
    It’s genius and badly needed. Take an old logo and make it slightly different. Subtle change and yet an uncanny resemblance to the old logo. Bravo.

    It's new and yet safe and familiar, JJ Abrams would be proud.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,905 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    I preffered the old logo but did think it was getting a bit tired looking. They shouldn't have changed it completely they could have gone for an updated version of the old logo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,067 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    Noticed it on the wall of the post office in Galway yesterday. The kerning is fucking awful.


    An_post_logo.jpg


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 47 ShlugEireann


    Del2005 wrote: »
    A Euro to post a letter when an email takes seconds and they think that a new logo will get people back to posting letters.

    The last few weeks they have been using hired vans to deliver in my area. €5m would have bought a good few EV vans, which would be ideal for urban delivery and collection but no they get a new logo and still use filthy diesel.

    When I order only I don't check the delivery companies logo I check how reliable they are.

    I don't think they are trying to get people to send more letters. Their delivery business is pretty big anyways. They're not just about letters.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 532 ✭✭✭Turquoise Hexagon Sun


    I just think it's about modernizing a the look of a brand's service that has changed dramatically over the last 20 years and the new look represents a the company now, not what it was back in 80's/90's.

    A brand refresh was well overdue. I think a good business needs to do this every 10 years or so.

    I love the evolution of the Microsoft brand.
    m3.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 967 ✭✭✭Conchir


    I just think it's about modernizing a the look of a brand's service that has changed dramatically over the last 20 years and the new look represents a the company now, not what it was back in 80's/90's.

    A brand refresh was well overdue. I think a good business needs to do this every 10 years or so.

    I love the evolution of the Microsoft brand.

    Always loved the previous (1987) Microsoft logo.

    If we're talking software companies, Apple's first logo needs a mention:

    original_apple_logo.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭Seanachai


    I just think it's about modernizing a the look of a brand's service that has changed dramatically over the last 20 years and the new look represents a the company now, not what it was back in 80's/90's.

    A brand refresh was well overdue. I think a good business needs to do this every 10 years or so.

    I love the evolution of the Microsoft brand.
    m3.png

    I think it peaked with the 87' one, some things just can't be improved on visually, like wooden sash windows and the Gibson Les Paul.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,139 ✭✭✭✭PsychoPete


    They are also bringing back the green An Post vans


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,499 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    PsychoPete wrote: »
    They are also bringing back the green An Post vans

    And the orange trains and blue Garda cars.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 532 ✭✭✭Turquoise Hexagon Sun


    Conchir wrote: »
    Always loved the previous (1987) Microsoft logo.

    If we're talking software companies, Apple's first logo needs a mention:

    original_apple_logo.gif

    Yikes! How did I not see this before!?

    And yeah, suppose you have a good point. 1987 logo still looks fresh. But to me, the latest one, is so simple, it's going to be more timeless. Whether that's a good thing for bad thing. Probably will save a costly brand-refresh in 10 years time, if it doesn't look too out of place in the future.

    @Deftlefthand: Good point, Les Paul shall not be tampered with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,024 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    Just comparing the old Vs new logo, and I must say I think the old logo is much stronger in two ways. Firstly the green background is deeper & has much greater contrast with the word POST (which is white), I also like the yellow wavey lines on the old logo, signifying a stamp!

    The new logo looks washed out, the green is far to wishy washy, and the lettering is totally boring, although it does have the addition of 'an' which the old logo was missing.

    I prefer the old logo.


Advertisement
Advertisement