Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

2019 French Open

1679111216

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,731 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    Thiem an early break up. Complete collapse coming I expect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,764 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Thiem an early break up. Complete collapse coming I expect.


    Looks like it, will serve now for the 1st set.


  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    tough conditions at RG.

    Djokovic not handling them well so far and wants play stopped!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,731 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    josip wrote: »
    Looks like it, will serve now for the 1st set.

    I'd still favour Nole but this makes it very interesting alright.

    If thiem was to win, I don't think the final would be as one sided as some of their previous RG meetings.


  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    as regards people bemoaning the lack of new generation grand slam winners the fact that sportspeople in certain sports and particularly in tennis have changed their mindset and motivation on retirement age and on age-ability to compete (barring injury).

    people used say and players believed that you were pretty much finished at 30/32 in terms of winning grand slams. only Agassi to a certain extent proved that wrong before. that is obviously not the case as Federer, Nadal and Djokovic have proven. Although Fed is probably finished now at GS winning level but still very competitive. this is a recent enough development.

    these guys are obviously very exceptional players also so that mindset change coupled with sports science advances (smarter training, diet etc) has produced longevity not seen before with these exceptional players and meant that it has been harder for the younger guys to mark their mark.

    the newer guys are not as exceptional as the out-going guys either so that is also a factor.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,764 ✭✭✭✭josip


    glasso wrote: »
    tough conditions at RG.

    Djokovic not handling them well so far and wants play stopped!


    Yeah, his head is gone


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 948 ✭✭✭Dirkziggler


    Surely new is simply a matter of time and generations rather than success though. Will they be as good or successful as the big three? No. Or as good as Murray or Stan? Perhaps. They're definitely way more talented then Raonic, Cilic, Kyrgios etc.

    I'd have Del potro, Raonic(Fit) above them with Cilic and a prime Tsonga at their level currently.

    I feel it's a huge mental block for the nxtgens to Excell while the usual suspects are around cause maybe too much respect is shown.

    It will be great to see Andy playing doubles at Queen's hopefully he doesn't rush it.


  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]



    It will be great to see Andy playing doubles at Queen's hopefully he doesn't rush it.

    is there any serious hope of Murray getting back to the highest level - not really seeing anything approaching that hope being expressed?

    would love to see it but looks all rather like a ceremonial type return at this point - we'll see.


  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    what happened Goffin - he used to be neck-and-neck with Thiem in the rankings.

    down at 29/30 in the world now


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 948 ✭✭✭Dirkziggler


    glasso wrote: »
    what happened Goffin - he used to be neck-and-neck with Thiem in the rankings.

    down at 29/30 in the world now

    Injured his knee on clay 15 months ago hasn't gotten back there yet. Regarding Murray he's playing doubles in Queens and Wimbledon but possibly WC for Wimbledon depending on queens.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,731 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    I'd have Del potro, Raonic(Fit) above them with Cilic and a prime Tsonga at their level currently.

    I feel it's a huge mental block for the nxtgens to Excell while the usual suspects are around cause maybe too much respect is shown.

    It will be great to see Andy playing doubles at Queen's hopefully he doesn't rush it.

    Delpo I'd classify all on his own as an anomaly. Winning that US Open was incredible. First to beat Rafa and Roger en route to a grand slam I think? He just got absolutely cursed by long term injuries from an early age.

    The fact he's kept going and turning up and the business end of tournaments has been great but I've no doubt he could have been a multiple GS champ.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,764 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Play now suspended due to rain.
    Did Djokovic wanted it suspended earlier because of wind but Thiem wouldn't agree?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,731 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    Injured his knee on clay 15 months ago hasn't gotten back there yet. Regarding Murray he's playing doubles in Queens and Wimbledon but possibly WC for Wimbledon depending on queens.

    Think Murray would be mad to try and play singles at SW19. Back to playing doubles in six months is an incredible turnaround. Don't risk it any more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,184 ✭✭✭✭Pighead


    Ruiz Jr wrote: »
    How exactly will it be "very interesting" to see if he maintains his level on grass and hard court.

    We already know he won't from the past 7 years and from the hard court earlier this year.

    Nadal peaked in 2008-2013, he's 6 years past had best. It's unlikely he gets past the first week at Wimbledon and it,'s unlikely he wins any hard court tournaments this year. This is the same old boring story we've seen for the last 7 years. It's not interesting at all.
    A bit of a salty response but I'll let it go and address your points. You're saying he is 'past it' with regards to hard court without taking into account his injury problems since 2014. The guy has had one injury free season since then and guess what..... he won that US Open that year (2017). As Eagerer Beaverer has already pointed out he actually gave Novak a hell of a game last year at Wimbledon in the semi's. He then went on to reach the semi-finals of the US Open before he had to retire through injury.

    He has recently said that he is playing pain free for the first time in ages so as long as his body will hold out you would have to say he will be in the mix for hard court titles later on this year. When injury free the guy is a match for anybody on any court.


  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    josip wrote: »
    Play now suspended due to rain.
    Did Djokovic wanted it suspended earlier because of wind but Thiem wouldn't agree?

    not sure if it's the players choice.

    umpire basically said to Djokovic that the wind was the same as for the previous (Nadal - Fed) game and would only be stopped for wind due to "extreme wind".


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,310 Mod ✭✭✭✭mzungu


    Can't get over all those empty seats.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 695 ✭✭✭lostcat


    The wind has to be deemed 'dangerous' by the umpire to stop play, not sure what that means. Djokovic in danger here of getting lost in his own head rather than focusing on the task at hand (i.e. trying to get a read on thiems serve).

    i know its an outdoor sport, but a windy clay court is not a good look (would be easier on concrete or grass)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,764 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Djokovic breaks, will serve for the set


  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Djokovic to win from here - most likely outcome I suppose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 695 ✭✭✭lostcat


    glasso wrote: »
    Djokovic to win from here - most likely outcome I suppose.

    he might regret giving up that first set, even if he wins now it will be in 5 rather than 3 or 4..but as long as it finishes today neither player can have much complaint (apart from having to hire a man with a good clothes brush)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,764 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Thiem got obvious problems with dust in his eyes.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 948 ✭✭✭Dirkziggler


    Delpo I'd classify all on his own as an anomaly. Winning that US Open was incredible. First to beat Rafa and Roger en route to a grand slam I think? He just got absolutely cursed by long term injuries from an early age.

    The fact he's kept going and turning up and the business end of tournaments has been great but I've no doubt he could have been a multiple GS champ.


    I'm a big Delpo fan seen him at Delray Beach a few years ago fell in love with him as a guy, and what a talent when he has the serve on point he's dangerous as for a big man he rushes the net so good


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 948 ✭✭✭Dirkziggler


    josip wrote: »
    Thiem got obvious problems with dust in his eyes.

    He was a bad form when nole wanted it stopped at 4040 when nole had momentum on Dom's serve in second. So now leave him be


  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm a big Delpo fan seen him at Delray Beach a few years ago fell in love with him as a guy, and what a talent when he has the serve on point he's dangerous as for a big man he rushes the net so good

    most people like him because he hasn't won enough to divide opinion and the injury narrative.

    does comes across as a very nice guy and his forehand in top form is a spectacle but it's been a long time since that has been seen.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 948 ✭✭✭Dirkziggler


    glasso wrote: »
    most people like him because he hasn't won enough to divide opinion and the injury narrative.

    does comes across as a very nice guy and his forehand in top form is a spectacle but it's been a long time since that has been seen.

    He hit 11 BH winners across court against Goffin in Rome. Guys brilliant, and still only turned 30


  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    He hit 11 BH winners across court against Goffin in Rome. Guys brilliant, and still only turned 30

    I suppose I mean winning ATP Tournaments.

    He did win a big masters 1000 event but that's back in March 2018.

    Can't be always "coming back from injury".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,697 ✭✭✭Chivito550


    Pighead wrote: »
    A bit of a salty response but I'll let it go and address your points. You're saying he is 'past it' with regards to hard court without taking into account his injury problems since 2014. The guy has had one injury free season since then and guess what..... he won that US Open that year (2017). As Eagerer Beaverer has already pointed out he actually gave Novak a hell of a game last year at Wimbledon in the semi's. He then went on to reach the semi-finals of the US Open before he had to retire through injury.

    He has recently said that he is playing pain free for the first time in ages so as long as his body will hold out you would have to say he will be in the mix for hard court titles later on this year. When injury free the guy is a match for anybody on any court.

    I must say I find it amazing that Nadal’s injury problems miraculously disappear every clay court season, only to resurface not long afterwards, and last until the end of the Sunshine double the following spring. Rinse, repeat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,731 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    Chivito550 wrote: »
    I must say I find it amazing that Nadal’s injury problems miraculously disappear every clay court season, only to resurface not long afterwards, and last until the end of the Sunshine double the following spring. Rinse, repeat.

    Yeah like when he won the 2017 US or made the semi the following year...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,697 ✭✭✭Chivito550


    Yeah like when he won the 2017 US or made the semi the following year...

    Yep, and pulled out due to injury the following year.

    It's common knowledge that Nadal has never lost to anybody when healthy. He only ever loses when he is 'injured'.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,184 ✭✭✭✭Pighead


    Chivito550 wrote: »
    I must say I find it amazing that Nadal’s injury problems miraculously disappear every clay court season, only to resurface not long afterwards, and last until the end of the Sunshine double the following spring. Rinse, repeat.
    Could have sworn he pulled out of French Open a few years ago.


Advertisement