Werewolf - The Hunger Games

Fiona WW · 27-05-2019 06:44PM

Fiona WW wrote: »

Right then, I know I haven't been as active today as I'd like to be, but I have been skimming throughout the day, so here's a quick read on people that have the higher post counts

Gertrude - Focused on by Henry for saying that Clodagh is probably a wolf but not necessarily. Not really seeing what all the commotion is about here

Henry - The opposite side of this argument. Seems focused on Gertrude for thinking Clodagh is probably village. Claims to speak on behalf of his backroom, probably true since there would be several people to refute this - if that room exists

Phil - Very focused on the gifts, and wherever they ended up

Clodagh - As I stated earlier, best to be left alone for now to see how things unfold

Conor - Referred to villagers as "you people" - claims it was a grammatical error

Gabriel - Seems very helpful today, asking questions and trying to unpack the mechanics

Will try to do an ISO on a few more people with fewer posts and with numbers around mine.

In the meantime, if anyone has any questions they'd like to ask me - opinions on specific people, or any questions directed towards me that I may have missed - please fire away. I'm here to contribute as much as I can for most of the day now

Fiona WW wrote: »

Okay, more quick summaries:

Barbara - Two posts yesterday, nothing today

Brendan - Low post-count, but catching up now, will see how that goes

Wendy - Low post-count, throwing pot-shots at random people as she goes

Angus - Correctly points out potential problem with Henry's backroom.

Tegan - Doesn't seem to have openly accused anyone yet, aside from one claim of pocketing

Liam - No new posts today, see my summary from yesterday

Holly - Happy to see Clodagh lynched. Interested to see if her opinion changes now

Eva - Decent enough FFA, with no other accusatory posts prior to it

Steve - Quick to accuse Oisin yesterday. Asking questions of ill significance today

Frank - Nothing of significance that I can see. Not adding much to the conversation

Jake - First to point out Conor's possible slip. Pointed out Conor and Holly's comments towards Clodagh

Riona - Currently thinks I'm the SK based on a gif

Oisin - Thin reasoning behind his FFA, hasn't contributed much

Desmond - Most of his posts today concern Conor - who he claims to have already voted for - or the number of players

Doris - In a game like this, I find it hard to believe that you knew what 'Dandy' was, but not RNG

I think that covers everyone.

My #FFA1 is:

Conor
Steve
Doris

Desmond WW · 27-05-2019 06:46PM

I suppose I should add an #FFA1

Wendy - accused me of being a wolf due to my first post. I politely asked her to expand on this and gave all day. I also made reference to joining a wagon on her. She has since posted a few times including her meanderings so she was up to date with thread and yet she has chosen to ignore me.

Riona - I’m currently 2/3 through an ISO off her and a couple of things stand out. I’m on the road now for a bit but once I’m home and on laptop, I’ll post it

Currently have no 3rd

Tegan WW · 27-05-2019 06:47PM

Tegan WW wrote: »

Evening all back on for a little bit.

#ffa1

Gabriel: Lots of posts, very helpful. But so much helpful and nice. It seems most of his posts are hedged to make sure nothing comes back to him, with a touch of casting shade on players attempts to solve.

Oisin: basically for that reaction to being accused - that was a hell of a pushback to a fairly standard D0 cage rattle

Conor: Realise it looks omgus, but your ffa is weak as dishwater.

Other notables are liams comments on staged interactions; Phil, who is a top three poster but has very little actually in them bar questions and bants (I also don't get his earlier attempt to focus on the traps but maybe I've missed something) and Clodagh's odd behaviour

Also, If Liam is a wolf Id doubt Phil is, same for Oisin and Clodagh

Henry WW · 27-05-2019 06:47PM

I think it's madness going after Conor.

I think there are much more obvious targets treading water.

Eva is one. Fiona is another. Holly is a third. Oisin is a fourth.

Fiona WW · 27-05-2019 06:50PM

Henry WW wrote: »

I think it's madness going after Conor.

I think there are much more obvious targets treading water.

Eva is one. Fiona is another. Holly is a third. Oisin is a fourth.

Happy to respond to any concerns you may have

Henry WW · 27-05-2019 06:54PM

It's mainly the tasky serial killer picture you posted right out of the gates.

Oisin WW · 27-05-2019 06:56PM

Henry WW wrote: »

I think it's madness going after Conor.

I think there are much more obvious targets treading water.

Eva is one. Fiona is another. Holly is a third. Oisin is a fourth.

And I thought we were going to be friends

Fiona WW · 27-05-2019 06:58PM

Trust me, I'm not that brave, or stupid

It was a Day 0 gif that I posted for the hell of it

It had no meaning whatsoever, and it wasn't a task of any kind

Gabriel WW · 27-05-2019 06:58PM

Holly ISO

Holly WW wrote: »

Victory shall be ours

I brought this up before, her opening post - again who is the ours she's referring to. If people are going to hang Conor on what to me seems like a typo then this needs to be discussed as much.

Holly WW wrote: »

I think it's clear that everyone bar me is evil and obviously those who agree I'm good are not evil

Her response to me which is... meh.

Holly WW wrote: »

Well I think we see who is evil

Responds to Clodagh who text slapped her.

Holly WW wrote: »

Not when you slap someone from your area

I must have missed this before - how does she know Clodagh is her district? Did Clodagh reveal in a backroom or something, or is this wolfy TMI?

Holly WW wrote: »

Seem awfully eager for the wolves info

Again pressing Clodagh on asking a mech question. Meh I don't really like this, it kinda stifles the line of thought.

Holly WW wrote: »

I'm also good

Ok, that remains to be seen...

Holly WW wrote: »

Can we all agree for a movie franchise that badly ripper off another film that this song was a belter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3hTW9e20d8

More fluff.

Holly WW wrote: »

What it feels like rn

Holly WW wrote: »

Gif is missing

Her present gif and repost. This gives me pause. Does a wolf who wins a prize post this on thread?

Holly WW wrote: »

Now then let's have a look at what happened. Really clodagh throwing the toys out because people go against you, no argument. Vested interest in dying, trying to throw heat off someone?

Again pushing hard on Clodagh, this is after quit-gate.

Holly WW wrote: »

Nothing in it, the day before a the real game start always feels like christmas

Her response to me asking her about the present gif. Dunno, seems lacking, but I guess if there wasn't anything in it then...?

That gif seems more appropriate for an opening post though not midway into n0, after a prize gets awarded.

Holly WW wrote: »

[HTML][/HTML]

Either throwing a tantrum and not helping the district or else a wf trying to get a free day in... Either way I know how I'm voting

Holly WW wrote: »

Wolf not wf

Here we go again, another press on Clodagh, including the peter griffin gif as she's pretty adamant Clodagh should die.

Holly WW wrote: »

Not really if someone really wanted out there are subs to take their place. Surely that renders her tantrum as posturing and why bother if you are good

Holly WW wrote: »

Can't wonder about even more what ifs, someone is saying vote them out. Fine I will. Happy to get rid of someone not bothered playing. Why keep someone around longer when they don't want to play to sacrifice someone else who could be good and engaging with the game

Sub talk... don't really wanna get into that tbh.

Holly WW wrote: »

Sound like you have been hurt before.... Like in a previous hungar games?

Responds to Gertie I think, needling him on previous games? Wolf trying to set villagers on each other based on prior games?

Holly WW wrote: »

Somewhere in one of the districts has to be a double agent. If the wolf team successfully identify or munch them or something along those lines they get access to the wolves lair. I'd not be in favour of outing who you are in brs. Unless you can back up your claim with some real proof

Mech talk about the backroom discussion earlier. Probably the most constructive post she has had.

Overall I don't like Holly's iso much at all. She's even more focused on Clodagh than Conor was tbh.

The mention of the district gives me the shivers tbh, I feel this is the more damning part of Holly's iso.

No progression on any other players either, just fluff and a bit of mech talk....

I'd defo be down with lynching Holly based off her current posts.

Jake WW · 27-05-2019 06:59PM

I’ve had my vote in on Conor since lunch.

But my #FFa1 would be Conor and Holly. A third name might go on latter, but I feel others are either even balanced on my suspicions scale, or just haven’t registered.

Liam WW · 27-05-2019 06:59PM

#FFA1

1.Conor - not a fan of his FFA or making people lock clear previous to that, his "you people post" stands out

2. Fiona - SK style post and Abi killed after posting suspicions on her = perhaps pushing FIona for lynch was why they munched ABi though
3. Steve/Clodagh/Oisin - Gut from stirring for Steve - Steve and Oisin wouldn't be on the same team I'd think but he did rect very strongly and it stood out as extra defensive - Codagh isn't acting like a roled villager at least

The problem here is it's day 1 and we have nothing concrete to work off so those flimsy reasons are the best I have right now after being off thread but trying to read it all day I've voted but if I get to a computer later I might change it if I get to re-read when things might stand out better

Barbara WW · 27-05-2019 06:59PM

Alright all, been afk all day, I'll do a bit of catch up now and get a vote in but I won't be able to contribute properly till tomoro hopefully

Angus WW · 27-05-2019 07:01PM

Gabriel WW wrote: »

These are Babs only two posts. Don't ignore her people, if she's voting in the lynches then she needs to be taken out.

Definitely time to improve but needs to up their game.

Before anyone says it, i'm not trying to pocket Gabriel, but I've just realised based on this post that I've not looked at Barbara, Brendan or Tegan today...

Babs - I've nothing to go on. I'm reluctant to let this go with so few posts…
Brendan - says he's trying to catch up but I'm struggling to form an opinion with so few posts.
Tegan - few posts but I'm getting a villagey feel (it's all gut though, no real reason why… less fluffy than others maybe?)

I'm not strong enough on any of these to change my FFA, but I'd be looking for more tomorrow or I'd need to consider them as low flying wolves.

P.S. Eva, I've got my eye on you too. I do think you've posted more of substance today though, and having looked at my own postings I've been fairly quiet myself (quality over quantity!).

Gabriel WW · 27-05-2019 07:04PM

Tegan WW wrote: »

Evening all back on for a little bit.

#ffa1

Gabriel: Lots of posts, very helpful. But so much helpful and nice. It seems most of his posts are hedged to make sure nothing comes back to him, with a touch of casting shade on players attempts to solve.

Oisin: basically for that reaction to being accused - that was a hell of a pushback to a fairly standard D0 cage rattle

Conor: Realise it looks omgus, but your ffa is weak as dishwater.

Other notables are liams comments on staged interactions; Phil, who is a top three poster but has very little actually in them bar questions and bants (I also don't get his earlier attempt to focus on the traps but maybe I've missed something) and Clodagh's odd behaviour

Eh.... not sure what you're getting at with the shade casting Tegan. I had a back and forth with Conor over his readslist alright...

Ironically you've FFA'd him for that very list?

My posts aren't hedged, they are the opinions of a villager who hasn't got enough info to be so gung ho on anyone specifically right now, hence the ISOs.

Angus WW · 27-05-2019 07:18PM

I hate to say this, but I'm getting more uncomfortable with Conor. Hopefully he'll come on here to defend himself. I'm not promising my FFA list is in exact order as I was compiling it while trying to catch up on the hours where I had some meetings and jumped back and forward a bit.

Assuming it's approximately right:
- Conor appeared in 2 of the first 4 FFAs (50%).
- He appeared in 2 of the first 6 FFAs (33.33%)
- 4 of the first 8 FFAs (50%)
- 4 of the first 10 FFAs (40%)
- 5 of the first 12 FFAs (42%)
- 7 of the first 15 FFAs (47%)

I just feel like there is a lot of bandwaggoning here. Maybe everyone is getting the same bad vibes and maybe i'm just second;-guessing myself, but I have a bad feeling about this.

Conor WW · 27-05-2019 07:19PM

Angus WW wrote: »

You're an odd duck Conor. As well as the other faults pointed out in this ISO, you say that I commented on the two wolves munched. In the same post I commented on every other player apart from 3 which I noted.

I was leaning village on you but this is a very wolfy post for me.

Hands up that was just laziness, I was on the page that recaps all ur posts and it looked like the post was short so I didn't click into it
My bad

Conor WW · 27-05-2019 07:21PM

Jake WW wrote: »

Quoting Conor here cause he and Holly both used the same expression in a very short time. Could be coincidental.

Reading back over Clodagh's "rage quit", what strikes me is Holly is really the only one who goes all in on using it to justify a vote tonight. Everyone else seems to take a step back or state they won't vote for Clodagh. Holly makes it a point to say she will. Everyone else is happy to let the situation calm. Holly tries to use it to rally people.

Its not a whole lot, but it does feel a bit like Holly needs to find any excuse to justify a vote tonight, even if it's a bad one, and seizes the opportunity quite hastily.

Point of information: before that I had already said I didn't think we should vote Clodagh, gave my reasons, which I stand by

Conor WW · 27-05-2019 07:22PM

Welcome back Clodagh, hope all is good again!

WerewolfGM · 27-05-2019 07:29PM

A sponsor has delivered two gifts.

Gabriel WW · 27-05-2019 07:32PM

Blargh, you grabbed my attention there Tegan so here's your very own dedicated post!

Tegan WW wrote: »

Evening all, I see things have been getting active in here so.

Opening post... ok. NAI.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Wasn’t aware you were dead tbh. Over a day to lynch so a lot can happen in that time

Responding to Oisin and the 'avenge me' comment. I like this post, it's logical and villagery. Good start.

Unfortunately that's everything from night 0.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Afternoon all

Rip to Mary and abi. Not sure why they would have been targeted, especially Mary with 2 posts. I’m assuming all players are split between a number of communal backrooms. We may find that things that are said in there will influence the morning kills also. If there are village players who knew who Mary was in there they would do well to sleuth and discuss in there also

This is interesting. Discussion of the communal backrooms and a very good point re: the dead (Mary being the focus here but it works for both tbh).

Makes me wonder if there was anything off thread that might have made Abi/Mary a target. Don't wanna get too bogged down in it though.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Nothing in the op that reads like a day phase trapping ability. Could be the result of a gift I guess or possibly one of the mod secrets

Mech talk, but you can see Tegan has informed herself and read the OP properly anyways. Not really alignment indicative but I like that anyways.

Tegan WW wrote: »

That’s supposed to be a night phase action I think. It might kick in during the day but it should be effective before now if it’s a night action.

Roleblock talk, again very to the point. NAI again.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Ah go on, add flavor instead. Double brownie points if the flavor is helpful in catching baddies

Meh. Fluff. At a minimum for Tegan though, so that's a bonus I suppose?

Tegan WW wrote: »

Might still be a little early to be highlighting low posters. Plenty of time and if people aren’t reasonably active by say tomorrow afternoon we can revisit

Fair point again when (Phil or Henry I think) brings up the low posters. Unless there's something inherently wolfy that you think you see, leave them till tomorrow imo.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Why do you think this? Specifically, as opposed to being say compromised in some other way

Responds to Frank stating that the trap might stop someone from posting. I can't see any mechanic that would stop players from posting on the game thread myself tbh.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Every game we have a low posting wolf.....we also have four or five low posting villagers. We have plenty of time and tools to figure out the difference, including modkills and seer peeks. Not saying we ignore them forever just that we have a more sophisticated strategy than kill the quiet ones.

My money would be on one quiet wolf in a format like this with the rest being more active.

More talk about low posters, not sure I agree with her points here though - why just one? I've been in games with multiple low posting wolves, don't limit your scope.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Why not? The trapping?

Responds to Jake about a mention of a legit post count.

Tbh I have no clue what this means (or the post from Jake).

Tegan WW wrote: »

In that case she better start talking to us about her role, since one way or another there’s a target on her now

Talking about Clodagh possibly being roled. Not gonna go there, I see the merits in her post though

Tegan WW wrote: »

One for Phil’s left pocket and one for his right....

Accuses Phil of pocketing. Ok, interesting.

Tegan WW wrote: »

And why would that make anyone good?

And responding to Phil who stated he was on the same wavelength as Conor and Henry. Again, I have to agree. That triangle is likely to contain some pocketing imo.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Evening all back on for a little bit.

#ffa1

Gabriel: Lots of posts, very helpful. But so much helpful and nice. It seems most of his posts are hedged to make sure nothing comes back to him, with a touch of casting shade on players attempts to solve.

Oisin: basically for that reaction to being accused - that was a hell of a pushback to a fairly standard D0 cage rattle

Conor: Realise it looks omgus, but your ffa is weak as dishwater.

Other notables are liams comments on staged interactions; Phil, who is a top three poster but has very little actually in them bar questions and bants (I also don't get his earlier attempt to focus on the traps but maybe I've missed something) and Clodagh's odd behaviour

Her FFA. Interesting choices, I've addressed the points made to me already.

Her reasoning for Conor is kinda weird, I mean she's barely engaged with him at all, and kinda went after Phil for pocketing. She does allude to Phil in player salad beneath the FFA but... eh, it's day 1. Maybe give her a pass? It's a kinda bandwagony FFA though with the exception of me.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Also, If Liam is a wolf Id doubt Phil is, same for Oisin and Clodagh

Eh, don't be ruling these things out just yet. Wait till we get more info on who exactly Phil, or Liam - or Oisin/Clodagh (though I'd be kinda with you on the Oisin/Clodagh read atm).

Overall it's a villagery ISO, with a few caveats. FFA is kinda bandwagony, I don't like that.

I'd like her and Jake to address the post I highlighted above too with legit post counts/the trapping. Doesn't make much sense to me tbh.

Another thing is the immediate assumption there's one low posting wolf, it might be the case but it could also be the case that all four are hiding in the reeds (or indeed in the mid range).

Aside from the FFA though I'm leaning village for now anyways.

Conor WW · 27-05-2019 07:38PM

Right it looks like i could be lynched this evening, so I'll put this out there before I am
Raging I didn't think of this earlier as it would have closed off a loop hole

Basically I think definitely the priest and maybe the seer should come out anonymously to their BR

Positives of this are that if we have the priest we get reliable info on each death

Negatives
- The wolves/SK have already killed the priest and claim the role themselves, slightly less than 10% chance of this being the case
- We have two people come forward as priest - this we can get around at their death - Players A&B claim to be priest. Both agree to be present at 9pm and 10am to give their answers. If one of them dies then the other should be saying a wolf is dead unless they are the wolf themselves. The permutations on that need to be worked out but it will give us some information

Likewise for the Seer. I have a feeling Henry already has someone in his group claiming a role? What if that's a wolf, maybe that role could be claimed by another group?

I've suggested putting this information out there in my group and I've gotten no response. I believe it can only help the village

So - our BR is called The Capitol, i believe there are four BRs of 6 members each, we have 6 in ours, unless there are people arriving late.
Somebody said earlier they thought the capitol was for the wolves, its not. I would presume the wolves have their own BR separate to all this. I think it means a wolf in each BR but it means the two people Kandiss is looking for is in a BR with another RV, surely that can be useful

Doris WW · 27-05-2019 07:41PM

Fiona WW wrote: »

Holly - Happy to see Clodagh lynched. Interested to see if her opinion changes now

Eva - Decent enough FFA, with no other accusatory posts prior to it

Steve - Quick to accuse Oisin yesterday. Asking questions of ill significance today

Frank - Nothing of significance that I can see. Not adding much to the conversation

Jake - First to point out Conor's possible slip. Pointed out Conor and Holly's comments towards Clodagh

Riona - Currently thinks I'm the SK based on a gif

Oisin - Thin reasoning behind his FFA, hasn't contributed much

Desmond - Most of his posts today concern Conor - who he claims to have already voted for - or the number of players

Doris - In a game like this, I find it hard to believe that you knew what 'Dandy' was, but not RNG

I think that covers everyone.

My #FFA1 is:

Conor
Steve
Doris

So you are putting me on your FFA because I knew who Dandy was and didn’t know what an RNG was? Has to be the flimsiest reasons ever!!

Anyway just on to vote for lynch. Watching BGT, will check in again later

Conor WW · 27-05-2019 07:42PM

On people asking me to defend myself, if you're not trying to get on a bandwagon then you're facilitating it.

As I said earlier I wouldn't have gone after Clodagh like i did if i was a wolf, it would make zero sense. I would wait and kill her tomorrow morning and try and avoid the BG protecting her.

Going after me for watery FFAs, WTF do you expect me to say, well I saw Tegan shoot Mary so thats why i think its him
Someone has an FFA of two people and I'm there because they have a bad feeling about me FFS and mine are called watery!

If I was a wolf you can be 100% certain I wouldn't make some schoolboy error like saying you instead of us, i;ve explained it, thats all i can do.

How about you look at what I'm actually saying and judge me on that.

Tegan WW · 27-05-2019 07:43PM

Gabriel WW wrote: »

Blargh, you grabbed my attention there Tegan so here's your very own dedicated post!

Opening post... ok. NAI.

Responding to Oisin and the 'avenge me' comment. I like this post, it's logical and villagery. Good start.

Unfortunately that's everything from night 0.

This is interesting. Discussion of the communal backrooms and a very good point re: the dead (Mary being the focus here but it works for both tbh).

Makes me wonder if there was anything off thread that might have made Abi/Mary a target. Don't wanna get too bogged down in it though.

Mech talk, but you can see Tegan has informed herself and read the OP properly anyways. Not really alignment indicative but I like that anyways.

Roleblock talk, again very to the point. NAI again.

Meh. Fluff. At a minimum for Tegan though, so that's a bonus I suppose?

Fair point again when (Phil or Henry I think) brings up the low posters. Unless there's something inherently wolfy that you think you see, leave them till tomorrow imo.

Responds to Frank stating that the trap might stop someone from posting. I can't see any mechanic that would stop players from posting on the game thread myself tbh.

More talk about low posters, not sure I agree with her points here though - why just one? I've been in games with multiple low posting wolves, don't limit your scope.

Responds to Jake about a mention of a legit post count.

Tbh I have no clue what this means (or the post from Jake).

Talking about Clodagh possibly being roled. Not gonna go there, I see the merits in her post though

Accuses Phil of pocketing. Ok, interesting.

And responding to Phil who stated he was on the same wavelength as Conor and Henry. Again, I have to agree. That triangle is likely to contain some pocketing imo.

Her FFA. Interesting choices, I've addressed the points made to me already.

Her reasoning for Conor is kinda weird, I mean she's barely engaged with him at all, and kinda went after Phil for pocketing. She does allude to Phil in player salad beneath the FFA but... eh, it's day 1. Maybe give her a pass? It's a kinda bandwagony FFA though with the exception of me.

Eh, don't be ruling these things out just yet. Wait till we get more info on who exactly Phil, or Liam - or Oisin/Clodagh (though I'd be kinda with you on the Oisin/Clodagh read atm).

Overall it's a villagery ISO, with a few caveats. FFA is kinda bandwagony, I don't like that.

I'd like her and Jake to address the post I highlighted above too with legit post counts/the trapping. Doesn't make much sense to me tbh.

Another thing is the immediate assumption there's one low posting wolf, it might be the case but it could also be the case that all four are hiding in the reeds (or indeed in the mid range).

Aside from the FFA though I'm leaning village for now anyways.

The legit post counts bit is basically cause I don't get Jake's point. I was trying to understand what he meant, possibly that if someone couldn't post they'd look like a low poster. I could also have been that backroom chat would be happening I guess. Overall though I cant explain it because I cant explain what Jake meant.

On the low posting wolf, yes fair point. My starting point is usually that they'll spread themselves out a bit in most games. There could be more than one in the lows but from previous games there's also likely to be several villagers who can't/ won't post more. Basically we'll get to the lows but they're not where we should start imho.

On the phil/conor/henry thing, its a fair point. I just haven't worked this one out yet. For now I'm tagging Conor but yeah ok

Phil WW · 27-05-2019 07:43PM

Sorry guys I don't have a lot of time tonight. Votes have to be in by 9 right? I will get one in at least. May not be able to post a lot. My main suspect is steve as he jumped on oisin which i think was dodgy.

Tegan WW · 27-05-2019 07:45PM

Conor WW wrote: »

Right it looks like i could be lynched this evening, so I'll put this out there before I am
Raging I didn't think of this earlier as it would have closed off a loop hole

Basically I think definitely the priest and maybe the seer should come out anonymously to their BR

Positives of this are that if we have the priest we get reliable info on each death

Negatives
- The wolves/SK have already killed the priest and claim the role themselves, slightly less than 10% chance of this being the case
- We have two people come forward as priest - this we can get around at their death - Players A&B claim to be priest. Both agree to be present at 9pm and 10am to give their answers. If one of them dies then the other should be saying a wolf is dead unless they are the wolf themselves. The permutations on that need to be worked out but it will give us some information

Likewise for the Seer. I have a feeling Henry already has someone in his group claiming a role? What if that's a wolf, maybe that role could be claimed by another group?

I've suggested putting this information out there in my group and I've gotten no response. I believe it can only help the village

So - our BR is called The Capitol, i believe there are four BRs of 6 members each, we have 6 in ours, unless there are people arriving late.
Somebody said earlier they thought the capitol was for the wolves, its not. I would presume the wolves have their own BR separate to all this. I think it means a wolf in each BR but it means the two people Kandiss is looking for is in a BR with another RV, surely that can be useful

This isn't a bad idea I think. Anyone see any flaw with it? Only danger I can think of is if players have been id'd in the backrooms

Frank WW · 27-05-2019 07:49PM

More gifts. Be interested to see what the story is with those.

@Gabriel the Jake post count thing was explained by him. He was basically saying that people are posting in BRs too so the number of posts here on this thread might not reflect the total number of game posts.

Fiona WW · 27-05-2019 07:52PM

Doris WW wrote: »

So you are putting me on your FFA because I knew who Dandy was and didn’t know what an RNG was? Has to be the flimsiest reasons ever!!

Anyway just on to vote for lynch. Watching BGT, will check in again later

Knowing an obscure game-related acronym but not knowing a basic one says inconsistency to me. Which say possible lie, which says possible wolf

Frank WW · 27-05-2019 07:54PM

Fiona WW wrote: »

Knowing an obscure game-related acronym but not knowing a basic one says inconsistency to me. Which say possible lie, which says possible wolf

To be fair...Dandy is the name of a player not an obscure game related acronym.

Fiona WW · 27-05-2019 07:56PM

Frank WW wrote: »

To be fair...Dandy is the name of a player not an obscure game related acronym.

It's an obscure name-related acronym, that other people - myself included - didn't know

Werewolf - The Hunger Games

Comments