Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Divorce Referendum!

  • 22-05-2019 12:51AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,286 ✭✭✭✭


    I think the result of this will be a yes vote by over 80%+

    What do you think the result will be?

    Also has there being any debate on this matter on TV or has anybody called for a Yes/No vote?
    Apart from Fine Gael calling for a Yes vote I haven't heard anything else about it.
    There isn't even a mention of it in the Parish newsletter.


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 115 ✭✭Yermande


    I think the result of this will be a yes vote by over 80%+

    What do you think the result will be?

    Also has there being any debate on this matter on TV or has anybody called for a Yes/No vote?
    Apart from Fine Gael calling for a Yes vote I haven't heard anything else about it.
    There isn't even a mention of it in the Parish newsletter.

    I'd say 65-70%.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,170 ✭✭✭troyzer


    I think the result of this will be a yes vote by over 80%+

    What do you think the result will be?

    Also has there being any debate on this matter on TV or has anybody called for a Yes/No vote?
    Apart from Fine Gael calling for a Yes vote I haven't heard anything else about it.
    There isn't even a mention of it in the Parish newsletter.

    My understanding is that the typical Catholic right who would oppose this aren't going to bother, they lost the war 20 years ago and this was inevitable. They haven't a prayer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    You know it's a done deal when Iona have said they won't oppose it.

    Would the requirement for balance in referendum discussions be the reason there has been no real attention given to this in the media ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,170 ✭✭✭troyzer


    eviltwin wrote: »
    You know it's a done deal when Iona have said they won't oppose it.

    Would the requirement for balance in referendum discussions be the reason there has been no real attention given to this in the media ?

    The likes of RTÉ keep a clock of every minute they give to each side of a referendum during the campaign. I doubt it'll be necessary in this case but it's there when some inevitable ****wit up the side of a mountain files for an injunction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,609 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    People will get a ballot paper on Friday and wonder what the hell is this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,584 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    I think the result of this will be a yes vote by over 80%+

    What do you think the result will be?

    Also has there being any debate on this matter on TV or has anybody called for a Yes/No vote?
    Apart from Fine Gael calling for a Yes vote I haven't heard anything else about it.
    There isn't even a mention of it in the Parish newsletter.
    I think you are correct.

    Everyone has a family member that has been through a 5 yr marriage followed by ten yr divorce. It can't go on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,591 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    Lisa needs braces.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,787 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    kneemos wrote: »
    People will get a ballot paper on Friday and wonder what the hell is this.

    People with a university education should be able to figure it out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,880 ✭✭✭Canis Lupus


    If the holy rollers can't stop gay marriage they've no chance with divorce.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,266 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Will the "home to vote" people come home this time?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,960 ✭✭✭✭JupiterKid


    Yes, this referendum has been very low key and has been completely overshadowed by the European and to a lesser extent, the local elections.

    I’d say it will comfortably pass.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 159 ✭✭hank scorpio89


    Divorce referendum...you flipping flipper!its the knackers yard for you pal!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,980 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    People with a university education should be able to figure it out.

    Ture but what about the majority of the voting public?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Force Carrier


    tuxy wrote: »
    Ture but what about the majority of the voting public?

    They're divorced from reality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,285 ✭✭✭Sam Quentin


    If you love her let her go!?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,801 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    bit strange putting two questions into one. in this case its a no brainer but i wouldn't like this to set a precedent. What if you wanted to answer yes to one and no to the other? you dont have that choice here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,339 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    I think you are correct.

    Everyone has a family member that has been through a 5 yr marriage followed by ten yr divorce. It can't go on.

    My 7 year marriage was ended 16 years later! In a foreign divorce!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭TuringBot47


    Just as long as we're not voting for gay divorce.
    Since they fought so hard for gay marriage, they should take it seriously.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,010 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I've not idea what the turnout will be, nor do I really care. :o

    Getting married is for ticks!
    Honestly, who in their right mind would get married from 2019 on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,419 ✭✭✭ToddyDoody


    Div Ref 2019


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,647 ✭✭✭✭OldGoat


    What I found strange about the ref is that there are two distinct questions asked yet only one vote. So, if you support one of the arguments but not the other you're ****ed.

    I'm older than Minecraft goats.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,737 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Just as long as we're not voting for gay divorce. Since they fought so hard for gay marriage, they should take it seriously.


    So if their marriage breaks down, they should take their misery serious? Sorry, I'm not sure what you're getting to here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    It still shouldn't be two years.
    If you both decide you want to be rid of each other then it shouldn't be up to a court to say how long you must be separated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,609 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    bear1 wrote: »
    It still shouldn't be two years.
    If you both decide you want to be rid of each other then it shouldn't be up to a court to say how long you must be separated.


    If you both want a divorce how do they prove you haven't been separated for several years?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,956 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    bear1 wrote: »
    It still shouldn't be two years.
    If you both decide you want to be rid of each other then it shouldn't be up to a court to say how long you must be separated.

    I would go even further and say that it should be up to one person.

    There should not need to be two. If one person wants out then the marriage is over.

    Also, agree that there should be no time stipulation. The counter argument is that they won't "quickie divorces" but I don't see what the fear is.

    If people want to stay married they will stay married, making divorce easier will not lead to an increase.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    kneemos wrote: »
    If you both want a divorce how do they prove you haven't been separated for several years?

    Why do they need to prove anything?
    I and the wife want a divorce, we go and file.
    We are told nope you must be apart for 2 years first.
    It restricts you completely and just drags it out longer than needed.


  • Posts: 7,344 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    eviltwin wrote: »
    You know it's a done deal when Iona have said they won't oppose it.

    Oh I dunno - their hateful nonsense likely _helped_ us get the right result in the more recent referendums.

    I wonder if their staying shtum this time is a wise tactical move we should actually be concerned about.

    Getting those people talking - is often the best thing we can do on some issues.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭DavyD_83


    There was a 'debate' on Sean O'Rourke last week, the lady brought on for no side was somebody who had a history of campaigning against divorce in the past.
    Even she didn't really care about trying to stop this. She said that she had recommended 2yrs back in 1995 and didn't understand why it had been set at 4.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭Credit Checker Moose


    Will the "home to vote" people come home this time?
    No need. We save our efforts for fights that need fighting.


Advertisement
Advertisement