Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Dock ASBO kids family dole says TD

«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,801 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    yeah, trial it as an idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,967 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    A politician/political party with elections on the horizon says what.....?

    .... Anything that will get their name in the papers and on social media.

    That's not to say that he's wrong BTW, just that it's more likely a vote-grabbing exercise than an actual serious proposal. The bleeding hearts would go nuts (far better to leave the feral folk with enough cash to get by, than risk them venturing into their leafy suburbs in search of more)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 818 ✭✭✭Hal3000


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    A politician/political party with elections on the horizon says what.....?

    .... Anything that will get their name in the papers and on social media.

    That's not to say that he's wrong BTW, just that it's more likely a vote-grabbing exercise than an actual serious proposal. The bleeding hearts would go nuts (far better to leave the feral folk with enough cash to get by, than risk them venturing into their leafy suburbs in search of more)

    Who cares ? Get it through and it'll be still around when he's gone. Agree, the bleeding hearts will be on soon about social inequality - understanding the issues firstly. I'm all for equality but deviant behaviour needs consequences.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,967 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Hal3000 wrote: »
    Who cares ? Get it through and it'll be still around when he's gone.

    My point was it'll never happen, but as your post demonstrates, it could win him a few votes all the same.

    Very easy to make populist statements (remember Leo being the man who was going to look out for the people who get up early?) when you've no intention/ability to actually deliver.

    (edit to your edit) Many of the bleeding hearts don't actually care about "social inequality" either you know. It's just a convenient looks-good means of ensuring that asbo-types are kept well away from their homes. See also the recent news of the Docklands developers avoiding the planning requirements for social housing in new developments, etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,344 ✭✭✭Littlehorny


    Member of Fianna Fail says something before an election, move along folks nothing to see here.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,439 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    Pkiernan wrote: »


    If you had quoted him properly as opposed to only focusing on what you imagine is the root cause and method of addressing the issues caused by antisocial behaviour, neither you nor he would still be saying anything useful.

    Here’s what he actually said -

    "Some parents are allowing their children to behave in such a way that they are out of control. They should take some responsibility for that. They should be penalised in some shape or form, either through fines or having their social welfare stopped," he told the Sunday Independent.

    However, Mr O'Dea said the ultimate responsibility for loutish behaviour by young people must lie with their parents. He has called for them to face sanctions.

    "If there is evidence where a parent doesn't know where their child is and what they are getting up to, especially in cases of anti-social behaviour, then action needs to be taken," he said. "Parents have a huge role in this and they should be forced to act when they otherwise don't."



    It’s as though he imagines parents aren’t aware of this already. As others have pointed out though, he hasn’t had anything useful to say in all his time as a TD.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭✭RobbingBandit


    Minister for defence posses with a gun like two bit gangster, shadow minister for social protection proposing an unsocial unprotected antisocial Draconian means to deal with situations which once he and his pals are back in charge of the decision making will mean less than nothing to them to garner a few votes.

    Politics in the Banana Republic they haven't gone away they're just waiting to come running back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Pkiernan wrote: »

    Recgonises, maybe. Dealing with - nope.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭El_Bee


    Pkiernan wrote: »


    Totally unfair sure how are they supposed to control their little angels ffs those poor mothers and sometimes fathers if they're around it's not their fault their kids are out all hours terrorizing people. Seriously though no TD in their right mind would campaign on any form of lowering of social welfare, just wouldn't happen regardless of the situation.


  • Posts: 14,242 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »

    (edit to your edit) Many of the bleeding hearts don't actually care about "social inequality" either you know. It's just a convenient looks-good means of ensuring that asbo-types are kept well away from their homes. See also the recent news of the Docklands developers avoiding the planning requirements for social housing in new developments, etc
    Because property developers are bleeding hearts? Or because bleeding hearts gravitate towards the docklands?

    You don't have to be Fr Peter McVerry and want to go live with the homeless to actually have some basic human empathy / decency, you know?

    When you wrote "Many of the bleeding hearts don't actually care about social equality", I was thinking you were going to follow it up with something solid. But it was just a rant, based on a feeling you have.

    Maybe you don't care about low-income households but that's on you, no need to drag everyone else into it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,967 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Because property developers are bleeding hearts? Or because bleeding hearts gravitate towards the docklands?

    You don't have to be Fr Peter McVerry and want to go live with the homeless to actually have some basic human empathy / decency, you know?

    When you wrote "Many of the bleeding hearts don't actually care about social equality", I was thinking you were going to follow it up with something solid. But it was just a rant, based on a feeling you have.

    Maybe you don't care about low-income households but that's on you, no need to drag everyone else into it.

    Look it up. The planning requirements are such that 10% of new builds have to be given over to social housing. In a recent Docklands apartment build the council have decided to allow the developer not adhere to this (citing costs) and will buy elsewhere.

    The reality here is that these are very expensive apartments that the developers know won't shift as well if 10% are occupied by social housing residents. Like it or not, those residents come with a stigma of antisocial behaviour (not undeserved in too many cases) and resentment of those who have paid full price. This isn't a new story of course - it's been going on for years and all over the country.

    If you'd actually bothered to read what I said, you'd have read that the true motivation of those who shout about inequality is often nothing at all to do with the welfare of the people concerned and more about themselves - again not solely restricted to housing either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭orourkeda1977


    Will docking their dole just convert them from ASBO into criminals.

    What they lose on dole money they'll steal it back some other way.

    Personally, I'd use several of them as an example. Put 10 or 20 of them into a wheelchair or a coma and put it up on youtube.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,234 ✭✭✭✭Cee-Jay-Cee


    Even if it were introduced it would never work because Mr & Mrs Scumbag would take court action (with free legal aid) to plead their case and tell how their hearts are broken with wee Jonny Scumbag and how they’re trying their best but he’s out of control blah blah whinge blah and stupid old decrepit ‘detached from reality’ Judge Fûckwit will take pity on them and let them off.

    But it’s a good idea all the same. It’s just a pity we can’t ever enact water right fool proof legislation that can tackle these issues.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 904 ✭✭✭pure.conya


    Hal3000 wrote: »
    Who cares ? Get it through and it'll be still around when he's gone. Agree, the bleeding hearts will be on soon about social inequality - understanding the issues firstly. I'm all for equality but deviant behaviour needs consequences.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHN18Rzhk_c


  • Posts: 5,422 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Talk is cheap. Get it done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 904 ✭✭✭pure.conya


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    Look it up. The planning requirements are such that 10% of new builds have to be given over to social housing. In a recent Docklands apartment build the council have decided to allow the developer not adhere to this (citing costs) and will buy elsewhere.

    The reality here is that these are very expensive apartments that the developers know won't shift as well if 10% are occupied by social housing residents. Like it or not, those residents come with a stigma of antisocial behaviour (not undeserved in too many cases) and resentment of those who have paid full price. This isn't a new story of course - it's been going on for years and all over the country.

    If you'd actually bothered to read what I said, you'd have read that the true motivation of those who shout about inequality is often nothing at all to do with the welfare of the people concerned and more about themselves - again not solely restricted to housing either.

    this avoidance goes on everywhere, same in Galway, a developer can offset their "obligation" in one estate by simply building more than the 10% in another estate


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,637 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    Even if it were introduced it would never work because Mr & Mrs Scumbag would take court action (with free legal aid) to plead their case and tell how their hearts are broken with wee Jonny Scumbag and how they’re trying their best but he’s out of control blah blah whinge blah and stupid old decrepit ‘detached from reality’ Judge Fûckwit will take pity on them and let them off.

    But it’s a good idea all the same. It’s just a pity we can’t ever enact water right fool proof legislation that can tackle these issues.

    I think this is a good idea, parents should be made responsible for the actions of their kids. They should make the fines a percentage of the parents income rather than a flat fine this way better off parents are going to feel the effects of the fine the same as a poorer parents.

    If the parents start using the excuse that they can't do anything about little Johnny Scumbag then the courts should have the powers to tag little johnny scumbag and put them on probation. Once the scumbags start having their life impacted by their actions then it may make them think about what they are doing.

    Yes it is not going to work for all but if it stops some folks then it is a good thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,782 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    It should only be docked if some counter measure is used to help that family, whether that is voluntary or involuntary.
    I mean just docking it is not going to fix an underlying problem.
    It has to be more than just docking.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,372 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    If these so called "parents" knew that their dole was at risk if little Anto went riot we might suddenly find a new sense of responsibility quickly emerging! I agree it should at least be trialed as a real deterrent.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭MrFresh


    Hal3000 wrote: »
    Who cares ? Get it through and it'll be still around when he's gone. Agree, the bleeding hearts will be on soon about social inequality - understanding the issues firstly. I'm all for equality but deviant behaviour needs consequences.


    it would probably be unconstitutional.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,007 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    If these so called "parents" knew that their dole was at risk if little Anto went riot we might suddenly find a new sense of responsibility quickly emerging! I agree it should at least be trialed as a real deterrent.

    unfortunately i very much doubt that we would find this in reality. if they are the type not to care about what their kids are doing, then i wouldn't be surprised if they were the type to be willing to suplament their lost dole via other means. either way they won't lose but we will.
    the way to deal with scumbag teenagers and children is to tag them or lock them up or both where possible, as these methods inconvenience the individuals acting up.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,496 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    First time Willie o dea has ever said anything valuable, don't see this playing well in Limerick city North however, still Willie can afford to loose some votes


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,012 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Yet if it's a wealthy family, sure hi-jinks, don't want to ruin his Rugby career or make him miss his exams.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,801 ✭✭✭Jurgen Klopp


    You fine them if a kid runs riot. Yet if a parent is stuck with an absolute **** if a young lad and so much as clatters them they'll be up in court!

    I can't imagine "grounding" "taking away their gadgets" or any of this modern "progressive" attempts at parenting will work on some of the young knacks that are the trouble!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,283 ✭✭✭KikiLaRue


    It's a beautiful day out lads. Like seriously, it's stunning.

    Just a thought, instead of getting into yet another argument 'hates the dole scroungers versus lefty liberal snowflakes', get away from your desk and get outside, enjoy a few minutes of sun, take a few deep breaths and appreciate everything you have.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Pkiernan


    KikiLaRue wrote: »
    It's a beautiful day out lads. Like seriously, it's stunning.

    Just a thought, instead of getting into yet another argument 'hates the dole scroungers versus lefty liberal snowflakes', get away from your desk and get outside, enjoy a few minutes of sun, take a few deep breaths and appreciate everything you have.

    I see them drinking 2 litres of Devils Bit with their Ma's dole money when it's sunny.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,487 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    If only Willie had a chance government so that he could implement his proposals...oh wait....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,275 ✭✭✭Your Face


    This will go well with the breakfast roll brigade.
    They're the only ones who really work, you know.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 818 ✭✭✭Hal3000


    KikiLaRue wrote: »
    It's a beautiful day out lads. Like seriously, it's stunning.

    Just a thought, instead of getting into yet another argument 'hates the dole scroungers versus lefty liberal snowflakes', get away from your desk and get outside, enjoy a few minutes of sun, take a few deep breaths and appreciate everything you have.

    I enjoyed the sun thank you very much. I also want to keep enjoying it without worrying about rogue little toerags who think they can do and act how they please. I don't care about people on the Dole, I just want consequences for Mammy's little scumbag when he decides to wreck the place !


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,624 ✭✭✭klaaaz


    Yet again, soundbites *win* over reality. If you want toerags from the lower class as well as the middle/upper class punished you need to pay more personal taxes to make it happen. Its frigging obvious nothing will change when the state cannot afford to lock up the many toerags in the country, you need to pay more personal taxes or keep grabbing your individual personal tax cuts at the detriment of overall society.


Advertisement
Advertisement