Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

"Non book readers" - Season 8 Episode 5 "The bells" - Spoilers post 2 forward

1568101138

Comments

  • Administrators Posts: 55,209 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    leggo wrote: »
    It's the same people every week man. It's a formula at this stage...

    Come in.

    Criticise the writing for bits they didn't understand.

    Get corrected.

    Argue about the meaning of simple concepts like the word "opinion" or the concept of turning left because they've been too patronising to everyone else so can't just say, "Oh yeah, I got mixed up, my bad" when proven wrong.

    Watch the next episode.

    Start again.

    You missed the bit where leggo gets annoyed that people don't buy that he's the only person who understands the story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,943 ✭✭✭nix


    awec wrote: »
    I think anyone who now claims that the visions in season 2 were a hint as to what was coming last night is a bull****ter.

    A vision of a wintery throne room, deserted and covered in snow, to hint at Kings Landing being destroyed by a dragon?

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSvjOxtnLiCfoXb7CrFnmBUPnr1jBzDmn4gCjBf-Hb0ioaHsaIl

    I don't believe the vision means what you think it means. Too much mental gymnastics required to have it add up. I don't have an explanation for it, and I'm not going to pretend like I have one either, like I'm some sort of genius seeing things that nobody else is willing to see. Maybe the visions were of events that never came to pass? Maybe they didn't really know the ending back then? Maybe it was more symbolic than literal? It definitely wasn't foreshadowing it being burnt to pieces.

    Word!

    I'm not saying i do either, but gloom, snow and walking to the North from the throne room, I'm leaning towards night king/Undead/white walkers presence as opposed to Dany and her dragon :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,279 ✭✭✭NuMarvel


    You're all going to look very foolish when we discover next week that the white stuff in Dany's vision turn out to be the packing chips left over from her moving in boxes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,943 ✭✭✭nix


    leggo wrote: »

    Argue about the meaning of simple concepts like the word "opinion" or the concept of turning left because they've been too patronising to everyone else so can't just say, "Oh yeah, I got mixed up, my bad" when proven wrong.

    Haha you haven't proved anybody wrong though, you just respond with weak arguments ignoring whats been told and then you do a mind flip thinking you have just won the argument. :confused:


  • Posts: 18,046 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Lads, it's been debated for years that it was ash, not snow, because there was the dragon shadow flashforward.

    I really don't think it's worth discussing. The extreme emphasis on her Dad's madness in book and show means it all makes sense.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 840 ✭✭✭peddlelies


    Whatever your opinion on the plot, they really captured the sense of destruction and mayhem at ground level brilliantly with all those panned shots and slow motion sequences. I felt that was lacking in the battle vs the White Walkers, it never really portrayed the proper scope of the battle. Someone posted that the random citizen asking Arya did he see his wife was stupid, I'd say it conveyed the sense of shock rather well.

    I thought it was a very good episode but this season has felt rushed overall. Can't wait for next week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,061 ✭✭✭leggo


    awec wrote: »
    I think anyone who now claims that the visions in season 2 were a hint as to what was coming last night is a bull****ter.

    A vision of a wintery throne room, deserted and covered in snow, to hint at Kings Landing being destroyed by a dragon?

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSvjOxtnLiCfoXb7CrFnmBUPnr1jBzDmn4gCjBf-Hb0ioaHsaIl

    I don't believe the vision means what you think it means. Too much mental gymnastics required to have it add up. I don't have an explanation for it, and I'm not going to pretend like I have one either, like I'm some sort of genius seeing things that nobody else is willing to see. Maybe the visions were of events that never came to pass? Maybe they didn't really know the ending back then? Maybe it was more symbolic than literal, Dany all alone in the throne room? It definitely wasn't foreshadowing it being burnt to pieces.



    Here's what we see. The video is right there if you wanna click play and watch it with me.

    It's snowing in winter. Dany enters the Throne room, the roof is blown off (how would the NK do this?), she walks up to the Throne then hears a baby crying, then goes beyond the wall and into the tent that Drogo died in. There she sees Drogo with her child. She speculates that she's dead and doesn't know it. Drogo suggests that they're waiting for her before going to the Night Lands. She considers staying with them but then decides to go back.

    We later see in a Bran vision a dragon flying over the destructed Red Keep.

    It's just a MASSIVE coincidence that, despite them knowing how it'd all play out because all involved parties have said that GRRM told them, she's since gone beyond the wall and destroyed the Red Keep with a dragon in winter? Okay. I'm the one who's clutching.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,043 ✭✭✭vetinari


    Thought that was a great episode!
    I really disliked the battle of Winterfell and parts of the last episode.
    Was watching last night's episode expecting it to be poor enough.
    Very pleasantly surprised.

    Daenerys's going into full genocidal mode was a bit of a stretch but within the confines of her character arc's possibilities.
    There's long been hints of a vicious side to her.
    Anyone (myself included) who complained about dragons being easily taken out by scorpions can have no complaints about this episode.
    A fast flying dragon should have a big advantage against stationary one shot at a time scorpions.
    It actually makes Rhaegal's death easier to understand now that it's shown that Dani can take lay waster to a fleet of ships if she chooses to.

    Jaime's and Cersei's end was done quite well. I thought they were going to escape right up to the end.
    They also did a good job of selling the idea that Cersei had a chance at winning. It made sense though that having a dragon would be a massive advantage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,943 ✭✭✭nix


    leggo wrote: »



    We later see in a Bran vision a dragon flying over the destructed Red Keep.

    No we dont, see a dragon flying over kings landing, its not a ruin at all, maybe a bitta smoke but nothing to signify dragon destruction.

    On close inspection, its actually chimney smoke also :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,061 ✭✭✭leggo


    nix wrote: »
    No we dont, see a dragon flying over kings landing, its not a ruin at all, maybe a bitta smoke but nothing to signify dragon destruction.

    You're right (see how easy that was???!). We see a repeat shot from Dany's vision of the Throne Room in winter and the dragon flying over KL.

    That all meant nothing though, despite it all happening, yeah?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    leggo wrote: »
    The Night King doesn't exist in the books. There's a character called 'The Night's King', who was a mystical figure like Bran the Builder, GRRM has as good as confirmed that the Night King we know from the show is D&D's invention. And he didn't exist then. A word hadn't been spoken about him and he didn't show up for two more seasons after the vision. We knew about the White Walkers, we had no idea they had a leader.

    Meanwhile, we DO know that they did know the ending to the books when they wrote it (again, this). So why would they foreshadow something that they weren't going to do when they knew what they were?

    Oh yeah. Snow. :confused::pac:

    Wrong thread dude


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,943 ✭✭✭nix


    leggo wrote: »
    You're right (see how easy that was???!). We see a repeat shot from Dany's vision of the Throne Room in winter and the dragon flying over KL.

    That all meant nothing though, despite it all happening, yeah?

    Lol she was always going to Kings landing though, it wasnt a big revelation :rolleyes:


  • Posts: 18,046 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    nix wrote: »
    No we dont, see a dragon flying over kings landing, its not a ruin at all, maybe a bitta smoke but nothing to signify dragon destruction.

    On close inspection, its actually chimney smoke also :confused:

    Just made this..

    pqxsTSz.jpg

    Top is the episode. Bottom is the vision.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Loved Jamie and Tyrion’s farewell and how hard Tyrion tried to save innocent people, possibly the most emotional scene in the entire series for me. Tyrion is probably the most redeemed and likable character left on the show.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,741 ✭✭✭Effects


    Drumpot wrote: »
    Tyrion is probably the most redeemed and likable character left on the show.

    Him and Sansa will be ruling together at the end of next week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,292 ✭✭✭Adamocovic


    Lads, it's been debated for years that it was ash, not snow, because there was the dragon shadow flashforward.

    I really don't think it's worth discussing. The extreme emphasis on her Dad's madness in book and show means it all makes sense.

    I remember it had been debated, but the script manuscript was gotten a hold of and it said:
    She looks up. The roof is missing and snow falls from the sky. [. . .] At the far end of the room, the Iron Throne waits for her, dusted with snow. Her dream made manifest.

    Also you can clearly see icicles. Think it was intentional ambiguous though as the Throne Room itself does look like it took fire damage.

    Perhaps the snow sitting on the throne she doesn't get to touch represents Jon Snow ;) or perhaps we're looking into it all too much.

    I agree probably not worth discussing too much. I don't have any problems with Dany going mad. Would have preferred to see it happen a little less rushed though and more of a built up. Basically the majority of the events that tipped her over the edge happened in last 2-3 episodes, in my preference I'd have liked to see it spread out a bit and gradually becoming more apparent. But won't be getting that now! :P


  • Posts: 18,046 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Drumpot wrote: »
    Loved Jamie and Tyrion’s farewell and how hard Tyrion tried to save innocent people, possibly the most emotional scene in the entire series for me. Tyrion is probably the most redeemed and likable character left on the show.

    While he could be at this stage, he didn't really have to redeem himself that much. He's never done anything bad.

    Jaime had an amazing arc of true redemption, until he didn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,061 ✭✭✭leggo


    nix wrote: »
    Lol she was always going to Kings landing though, it wasnt a big revelation :rolleyes:

    And on the subject of "George RR Martin outlined his planned ending (this) for them before the show even started so everything they foreshadowed they did with this in mind"...? We'll just ignore that and say they were wrong and it meant nothing (they weren't, they couldn't have been) instead of saying you whiffed* in thinking it was related to the Night King?

    *Like a lot of us, myself included, btw.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,943 ✭✭✭nix


    leggo wrote: »
    And on the subject of "George RR Martin outlined his planned ending (this) for them before the show even started so everything they foreshadowed they did with this in mind"...? [/SIZE]

    You keep saying this yet there's nothing but rumors and hearsay, what GRRM outlined for them hasn't been divulged and may never be, or wont be until awhile after the show ends and the dust settles.


    What we have to go on only is whats happened in the show, you keep trying to fortify your view with rumors and making **** up, like kings landing and the red keep in ruin for example, which the above image counters :rolleyes:

    EDIT: Typo's derp


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,678 ✭✭✭lawlolawl


    GRRM pretty much refuses to talk about the ending of the show now in interviews.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    While he could be at this stage, he didn't really have to redeem himself that much. He's never done anything bad.

    Jaime had an amazing arc of true redemption, until he didn't.

    That's true, I suppose redeeming in the sense that he finally stood up and became the leader that his intelligence deserved as opposed to just drinking it away in self pity. He sacrificed himself for the people and for his brother.

    Jamie's ending was disappointing although I suppose we cant have every character have an awesome sendoff. I suppose the NK put everybodys allegiance on hold and when he was gone there was no common enemy to keep them united!

    Ironic that the hound jumped to his death into fire, he really did want his brother dead. Families can be tough .....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,061 ✭✭✭leggo


    Oh come on. Do you want to sit here, on boards.ie now with everyone reading what you're saying, and be taken seriously in saying that, in the time that they spent with each other as GRRM outlined everything that he had planned for the ending that would serve as their goal to work towards with the show (which we've known about since the show started), that he was just like: "And you can do whatever you want with Danaerys, I don't have much planned there"?

    Then they put in a bunch of scenes that just happened to play out exactly what did end up happening...but that's all a coincidence? And those scenes actually meant what you thought they meant all along? With your big reasoning being: because it was snowing?!

    There's not admitting you're wrong and there's this. Hilarious. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Hmm great spectacle, not much else. Such a lazy option to just set fire to everything by a deranged Dany. Amusing too how the genius Euron couldn't get his sights sorted this time. Just as well there's only one left and no more battles to wage CGI war on!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,279 ✭✭✭NuMarvel


    From this recent interview, it doesn't look like D & D have been clued in on how the books will end. And maybe even GRRM doesn't either!
    How much of this season is from discussing the ending with George R.R. Martin?
    BENIOFF: [The concern] used to be that the books would spoil the show for people — and luckily it did not, for the most part. Now that the show is ahead of the books, it seems the show could ruin the books for people. So one thing we’ve talked to George about is that we’re not going to tell people what the differences are, so when those books come out people can experience them fresh.
    WEISS: It’s kind of nice for him because — obviously through necessity we’ve pulled out ahead — the show has become so different [in recent seasons] that people will have no way knowing from watching what will or won’t appear in the books. And honestly, neither do we.
    BENIOFF: We don’t. And George discovers a lot of stuff while he’s writing. I don’t think that final book is written in stone yet — it’s not written on paper yet. As George says, he’s a gardener and he’s waiting to see how those seeds blossom.

    I personally always thought that it was a case that GRRM gave the nod to the ending proposed by D & D, as opposed to them writing the ending he'd planned for the book. And just because he was happy with the ending they came up, it doesn't follow that this was the ending he had in mind.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,309 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Liam O wrote: »
    The fact that nothing makes any sense is probably a good place to start :p

    Inconsistencies galore with regards time passing, locations, character motivations etc.

    Dany literally saves humanity and 2 episodes later is destroying it.

    You’re making it out that bringing her army to Winterfell was a noble act to save humanity, when she didn’t want to do it until she realised she had no choice. She either took her troops up to fight at that point, stayed south fighting Cersei and then faced a much larger version of the NK’s army, or went back across the sea, giving up on everything she had worked towards.

    Throughout the seasons her character repeatedly did terrible things, but because it was to ‘bad’ people many watching shrugged their shoulders at the acts and what it showed about her character that not only did she have no problem carrying them out but many times appeared to revel in them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,678 ✭✭✭lawlolawl


    I loved that the hidden caches of wildfire ended up amounting to 4 or 5 puffs of fart gas.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    You’re making it out that bringing her army to Winterfell was a noble act to save humanity, when she didn’t want to do it until she realised she had no choice. She either took her troops up to fight at that point, stayed south fighting Cersei and then faced a much larger version of the NK’s army, or went back across the sea, giving up on everything she had worked towards.

    Throughout the seasons her character repeatedly did terrible things, but because it was to ‘bad’ people many watching shrugged their shoulders at the acts and what it showed about her character that not only did she have no problem carrying them out but many times appeared to revel in them.
    It does defy belief that she should suddenly flip once she found out that her lover was her nephew and potentially her king.


  • Posts: 21,740 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    When I think about the beginning of 'Thrones to the almost end it seems that love was the cause of the many mistakes and triumphs. Even as far back as Leanna Stark giving Jon to Ned for his protection. He was born out of love and given away because of it. Daenerys descent in to madness may have been inevitable but it was a broken heart that caused her to destroy Kings Landing. All of the losses she accumulated and her plea to Jon to not tell. Then Jaime returned to Cersei. I had really thought he would be the one to kill her but really there was no other ending for those two.

    I read someplace that their reunion ruined his redemption arc. I disagree because that fails to account for how complicated humans are. It is possible to be decent and to still love that one person who caused so much pain. Funnily enough Cersei for all her evil ways elicited the most sympathy from me. There was just something about her, a kind of brokenness underneath all the awful deeds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,292 ✭✭✭Adamocovic


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    You’re making it out that bringing her army to Winterfell was a noble act to save humanity, when she didn’t want to do it until she realised she had no choice. She either took her troops up to fight at that point, stayed south fighting Cersei and then faced a much larger version of the NK’s army, or went back across the sea, giving up on everything she had worked towards.

    Throughout the seasons her character repeatedly did terrible things, but because it was to ‘bad’ people many watching shrugged their shoulders at the acts and what it showed about her character that not only did she have no problem carrying them out but many times appeared to revel in them.

    Ya can't blame people too much for thinking she would resist turning into the mad queen :P

    6R8uAl4.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,612 ✭✭✭✭meeeeh


    Jaime had an amazing arc of true redemption, until he didn't.

    No matter how much he grew away from her, he always returned to her. He stood by her after she blew up the sept. He kept his word of fighting the dead but then he returned to her as he did every time before when she did something despicable. For me it was very much in character.

    Redemption is very romantic notion, most people stay who they really are. And Jamie was always a conflicted character. The only thing I didn't like was the love story with Brienne, I thought it was a bit redundant and there more to give Brienne a bit more to do.


Advertisement