When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

Timberrrrrrrr · 27-03-2019 10:53AM

rgossip30 wrote: »

You counted each one good on ye want to live in Chernobyl.

Not counted, just aware over the years of how many i have had, same with stitches.

What has Chernobyl got to do with anything?

27-03-2019 10:55AM

Birneybau wrote: »

If all the cranks are banned, well, this thread is dead. An therefore worthless. We NEED their opinions to mock, and I'm not joking.

Plenty more available and some even have a resurrection.

rgossip30 · 27-03-2019 10:56AM

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Do you support the hate-filled homophobia they were banned for?

I don't go raving mad about it.

ohnonotgmail · 27-03-2019 10:56AM

DubInMeath wrote: »

Plenty more available and some even have a resurrection.

How very christian of them

ohnonotgmail · 27-03-2019 10:57AM

rgossip30 wrote: »

I don't go raving mad about it.

that is not what i asked. They were banned for hate-filled homophobia Not because they support Gemma. Why do you have an issue with that?

rgossip30 · 27-03-2019 10:59AM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Not counted, just aware over the years of how many i have had, same with stitches.

What has Chernobyl got to do with anything?

Maybe you are a unique being immune from radation

rgossip30 · 27-03-2019 11:01AM

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

that is not what i asked. They were banned for hate-filled homophobia Not because they support Gemma. Why do you have an issue with that?

You trying to stir something up because you are bored. I don't give a toss about it.He was entitled to his opinion only.

ohnonotgmail · 27-03-2019 11:02AM

rgossip30 wrote: »

You trying to stir something up .

I am asking a question. One you seem strangely reluctant to answer. I think people will draw their own conclusions from that.

ollkiller · 27-03-2019 11:08AM

rgossip30 wrote: »

You trying to stir something up because you are bored. I don't give a toss about it.

Nah, you can't answer a question. It's not that hard. Here's an example.

What's your favourite colour? My answer is green.

See how hard that was. So how about you answer the question that was asked and then give your deflection tactic or your detailed response.

Hotblack Desiato · 27-03-2019 11:11AM

rgossip30 wrote: »

Being replaced by Islam is more wonderful .

Yeah I can really see the praying five times a day, no pork no alcohol catching on with the in-a-church-five-times-if-it's-a-busy-year-for-funerals, pint-drinking rasher-sangitch-eating Irish :rolleyes:

Unless of course, instead of conversions you're here to peddle the population replacement racist conspiracy theory, same as Gemma does?

rgossip30 · 27-03-2019 11:13AM

ollkiller wrote: »

Nah, you can't answer a question. It's not that hard. Here's an example.

What's your favourite colour? My answer is green.

See how hard that was. So how about you answer the question that was asked and then give your deflection tactic or your detailed response.

I don't support the poster he was entitled to post without ridicule and nasty comments. Be off now.

Bannasidhe · 27-03-2019 11:14AM

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Do you want her thousands of hours of youtube videos fact checked?

They could sentence Lisa Smith to do it as her punishment for falling for the same snake oil/different sales team.

:pac:

Hotblack Desiato · 27-03-2019 11:18AM

rgossip30 wrote: »

I know that there was a theory before that all itcould take was one x-ray to spark a cancer.The mass X ray program 40 odd years ago was abolished out of concerns.

Because giving someone an x-ray that might have a million-to-one chance of sparking a cancer is worth it, if you have reasonable suspicion they have TB or another serious illness

But if you x-ray a million people on the off-chance that you might find a handful with TB, statistically you've just caused one lung cancer to some very unfortunate person.

So once TB was more or less under control, giving people a radiation dose for little or no benefit couldn't be justified any more.

EVERY dose of radiation given to a patient for any reason has to be clinically justified. The dose must also be kept as low as reasonably achievable.

MRIs involve no ionizing radiation, but try telling that to the Gemma fans getting their knickers in a knot about 5G and don't have a clue about physics, statistics or epidemiology.

ohnonotgmail · 27-03-2019 11:20AM

rgossip30 wrote: »

I don't support the poster he was entitled to post without ridicule and nasty comments. Be off now.

But he wasn't entitled to post homophobic comments. Do you agree with that?

gmisk · 27-03-2019 11:20AM

rgossip30 wrote: »

I don't support the poster he was entitled to post without ridicule and nasty comments. Be off now.

If the posts are ridiculous, nasty and aggressively homophobic then he/she really isn't entitled to here, hence they were banned, thankfully.

ohnonotgmail · 27-03-2019 11:20AM

Bannasidhe wrote: »

They could sentence Lisa Smith to do it as her punishment for falling for the same snake oil/different sales team.

:pac:

Ah here. Nobody deserves that.

The Nal · 27-03-2019 11:21AM

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

But he wasn't entitled to post homophobic comments. Do you agree with that?

But most very religious people are homophobic so hes just being himself. They are his core beliefs.

rgossip30 · 27-03-2019 11:24AM

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Because giving someone an x-ray that might have a million-to-one chance of sparking a cancer is worth it, if you have reasonable suspicion they have TB or another serious illness

But if you x-ray a million people on the off-chance that you might find a handful with TB, statistically you've just caused one lung cancer to some very unfortunate person.

So once TB was more or less under control, giving people a radiation dose for little or no benefit couldn't be justified any more.

EVERY dose of radiation given to a patient for any reason has to be clinically justified. The dose must also be kept as low as reasonably achievable.

MRIs involve no ionizing radiation, but try telling that to the Gemma fans getting their knickers in a knot about 5G and don't have a clue about physics, statistics or epidemiology.

Would you live beside a mast ?

Acosta · 27-03-2019 11:30AM

Birneybau wrote: »

If all the cranks are banned, well, this thread is dead. An therefore worthless. We NEED their opinions to mock, and I'm not joking.

Head over to the GOD thread on the proc langers angry man's forum if you want a good laugh

Timberrrrrrrr · 27-03-2019 11:33AM

rgossip30 wrote: »

Maybe you are a unique being immune from radation

Maybe you just don't understand how x-rays work. Colour me surprised :rolleyes:

rgossip30 · 27-03-2019 11:36AM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Maybe you just don't understand how x-rays work. Colour me surprised :rolleyes:

You are not qualified to discuss it .

Timberrrrrrrr · 27-03-2019 11:39AM

Acosta wrote: »

Head over to the GOD thread on the proc langers angry man's forum if you want a good laugh

Link?

Bannasidhe · 27-03-2019 11:44AM

Acosta wrote: »

Head over to the GOD thread on the proc langers angry man's forum if you want a good laugh

Just dipped my toe in there and thought Nope.
Not reading that.
Angry langers everywhere.

Annasopra · 27-03-2019 11:58AM

rgossip30 wrote: »

Well if one wants to be critical it would help.to prove a point.

How exactly do you fact check every unfounded claim in her hundreds of hours of videos? You can of course do it but then its completely impractical. By the time you have thoroughly researched and checked 1 video she might 15 more up.

The other aspect is that many the things she says are probably not checkable anyway.

For a statement to be fact checked it has to have been presented as fact in the first place. You cant for example fact check when she says "I think that"

Annasopra · 27-03-2019 12:01PM

rgossip30 wrote: »

I don't go raving mad about it.

I dont think anyone has gone raving about the homophobia in this thread. It was pointed out that comparing lgbt people to paedophiles is particularly nasty and insidious.

The Nal · 27-03-2019 12:05PM

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

For a statement to be fact checked it has to have been presented as fact in the first place. You cant for example fact check when she says "I think that"

"I've heard people say...." is the standard for alt-right liars.

Hotblack Desiato · 27-03-2019 12:06PM

rgossip30 wrote: »

Would you live beside a mast ?

I'll answer your question if you can tell me what masts have got to do with x-rays?

Because if you're just going to reply with constant whack-a-mole non-sequitur conspiracy wacko guff, I'm out.

rgossip30 · 27-03-2019 12:09PM

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

I dont think anyone has gone raving about the homophobia in this thread. It was pointed out that comparing lgbt people to paedophiles is particularly nasty and insidious.

To be against homophobia is a fashion back in the day it was commies.What would you do how would you feel if a gay lad felt you up ?

Sephiroth_dude · 27-03-2019 12:12PM

Mod

Stop talking about a poster who is thread banned and get back on topic please.

Bannasidhe · 27-03-2019 12:15PM

rgossip30 wrote: »

To be against homophobia is a fashion back in the day it was commies.What would you do how would you feel if a gay lad felt you up ?

I imagine he'd feel the same way as any woman who has been felt up by a straight lad without her permission.

When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

Comments