Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

1…5960626465…150

Comments

  • #1832
    francois
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,610 ✭✭✭francois


    TaurenDruid wrote: »
    /begins to insert standard response about the right to free speech not being an entitlement to spout hate speech, then stops when they notice the poster has a sum total of 7 posts to their name...

    Seems to be a pattern emerging of new accounts, posting the same Andrew Anglin play-book comments in a couple of threads (Yaxley-Lennon, NZ shooting etc) repeated an tedium


  • #1833
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Jackman25 wrote: »
    Its interesting to note the difference between this thread and the Louise O'Neill thread. On the LON thread, the lefties were plaintively whining about people keeping the thread going and why not just ignore her.
    The same ilk are happily piling into this thread.

    For the record I think both are batshyt.
    Pretty sure Louise O'Neill isn't running hate speech rallies...


  • #1834
    musiknonstop
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 289 ✭✭musiknonstop


    batgoat wrote: »
    If I recall correctly it was around Gemma's views on vaccines and such. So entirely solid. Gemma has a tendency to legally threaten everyone who disagrees with her so not an isolated incident.

    Fiona O'L claimed Gemma was anti-vax. Gemma claimed that was an outrageous slur and her lawyers would be looking into it. Gemma claimed to be anti-nothing apart from corruption. We know she's anti-vax so it seems she was not telling the truth back then.

    https://youtu.be/diX07k6wGPI?t=1


  • #1835
    Mr. CooL ICE
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,855 ✭✭✭✭Mr. CooL ICE


    DS86DS wrote: »
    If Gemma was a Leftist spouting Left Wing ideas, this thread would have been closed after 5 minutes and the OP banned.

    This is not true.

    However, if the OP started the thread, dumped a 1+ hour long political video, in a forum that is not for politics, without contributing any sort of discussion themselves, despite previously being told by mods not to, then yeah, the thread "might have been closed after 5 minutes and the OP banned".


  • #1836
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,961 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    rgossip30 wrote: »
    You tell me .

    well somebody else to has to as Iona certainly wont.


  • Advertisement
  • #1837
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,961 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    jeremyj1968 wrote: »
    Well whatever you think about O'Doherty, she should have been allowed to have a meeting without it being shut down. I mean if the hotel refused to have a traveller meeting it would be all over Joe Duffy, but because it is someone who is considered conservative it is fine. She is not right on everything but if she wants to hold a meeting then she should be allowed to do so.

    But unfortunately it seems that most of the people in Ireland are happy to get their news from Joe Duffy and Denis O'Brien instead of actually thinking for themselves, so good look to them.

    batshyt crazy conspiracy theorist is not a protected class of people.


  • #1838
    Jackman25
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 456 ✭✭Jackman25


    batgoat wrote: »
    Pretty sure Louise O'Neill isn't running hate speech rallies...

    I have no idea what Gemma is at and I don't care. What hate speech rally is she running?


  • #1839
    DS86DS
    Closed Accounts Posts: 691 ✭✭✭DS86DS


    Mark Rippetoe wrote: »
    This is not true.

    However, if the OP started the thread, dumped a 1+ hour long political video, in a forum that is not for politics, without contributing any sort of discussion themselves, despite previously being told by mods not to, then yeah, the thread "might have been closed after 5 minutes and the OP banned".

    Yeah, sure.


  • #1840
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,961 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Jackman25 wrote: »
    I have no idea what Gemma is at and I don't care. What hate speech rally is she running?

    perhaps educate yourself about her before criticising those that are opposed to her.


  • #1841
    Jackman25
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 456 ✭✭Jackman25


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    perhaps educate yourself about her before criticising those that are opposed to her.

    Why bother. She is about as relevant as Jim Corr and deserves about as much attention.


  • Advertisement
  • #1842
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,961 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Jackman25 wrote: »
    Why bother. She is about as relevant as Jim Corr and deserves about as much attention.

    so why bother posting in a thread about her?


  • #1843
    Jackman25
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 456 ✭✭Jackman25


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    so why bother posting in a thread about her?

    Just found it interesting the difference in attitude when its a thread on a lefty feminist.


  • #1844
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,961 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Jackman25 wrote: »
    Just found it interesting the difference in attitude when its a thread on a lefty feminist.

    As i said earlier you need to educate yourself about gemma before commenting.


  • #1845
    The Nal
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,021 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Jackman25 wrote: »
    Just found it interesting the difference in attitude when its a thread on a lefty feminist.

    Shes not a feminist.


  • #1846
    Jackman25
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 456 ✭✭Jackman25


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    As i said earlier you need to educate yourself about gemma before commenting.

    Why would I need to myself about someone that is supposedly from the title of the thread "batshyt crazy". The exact detail of Gemmas "content" is not relevant to my point.

    Anyway, don't let me keep you from the good work of saving us all from Gemma and her handful of disciples.
    Continue on with the thread.


  • #1847
    Jackman25
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 456 ✭✭Jackman25


    The Nal wrote: »
    Shes not a feminist.

    I was talking about LON.


  • #1848
    Bannasidhe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Jackman25 wrote: »
    Just found it interesting the difference in attitude when its a thread on a lefty feminist.

    Interesting that despite your proclaimed lack of interest in G O'D you could make the effort to draw a false equivalency between someone being a "lefty feminist" and someone who has been seen to repeatedly engage in hate speech, shut down criticism, engage in wild conspiracy theories, show scant regard to the families of murder victims etc etc.

    Smells like yet more deflection.


  • #1849
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Jackman25 wrote: »
    I have no idea what Gemma is at and I don't care. What hate speech rally is she running?

    She's regularly being racist, antisemitic and homophobic... That's the type of people she caters to.


  • #1850
    ollkiller
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭ollkiller


    batgoat wrote: »
    She's regularly being racist, antisemitic and homophobic... That's the type of people she caters to.

    The same type of people who instead of doing anything to better their own existence blame others for their life being ****. Always the easy choice of blaming immigrants, big pharma etc etc. How about you take the hard choice for once and put some work into your own life.


  • #1851
    Grayson
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,867 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    DS86DS wrote: »
    If Gemma was a Leftist spouting Left Wing ideas, this thread would have been closed after 5 minutes and the OP banned.

    Because that's what happened to the Louise O'Neill thread?


  • Advertisement
  • #1852
    Jackman25
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 456 ✭✭Jackman25


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Interesting that despite your proclaimed lack of interest in G O'D you could make the effort to draw a false equivalency between someone being a "lefty feminist" and someone who has been seen to repeatedly engage in hate speech, shut down criticism, engage in wild conspiracy theories, show scant regard to the families of murder victims etc etc.

    Smells like yet more deflection.

    The equivalence is the "batshyt crazy" not the content.


  • #1853
    Annasopra
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Jackman25 wrote: »
    The equivalence is the "batshyt crazy" not the content.

    Deflect. Deflect. Deflect.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • #1854
    Ash.J.Williams
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,268 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    lbc2019 wrote: »
    Any update on that venue?
    Ivan2019 wrote: »
    Fine Gael
    Bringing Isis into Ireland...

    Welcome to boards


  • #1855
    Jackman25
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 456 ✭✭Jackman25


    Joeytheparrot wrote: »
    Deflect. Deflect. Deflect.

    Fair enough. I'll let ye get back to the good work and get off the thread.


  • #1856
    TaurenDruid
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,279 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    padd b1975 wrote: »
    They would have taken it down on the back of their own legal advice I'd imagine, which tells me that whatever guff O'Leary was spouting wasn't all that solid.

    The "guff" O'Leary was spouting was that vaccinating your kids saves lives; and that it's dangerous, stupid and - dare I say it, batshyt crazy - to give your child a drink you've bought off the internet that contains bleach, with the intention of "curing" their autism.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • #1857
    Annasopra
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    TaurenDruid wrote: »
    The "guff" O'Leary was spouting was that vaccinating your kids saves lives; and that it's dangerous, stupid and - dare I say it, batshyt crazy - to give your child a drink you've bought off the internet that contains bleach, with the intention of "curing" their autism.

    Oh yeah and that vaccines dont cause autism. O'Doherty is promoting the old bull sh īt about vaccines causing autism.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • #1858
    rgossip30
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,812 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    Jackman25 wrote: »
    Fair enough. I'll let ye get back to the good work and get off the thread.

    You are only allowed to be critical and call her nasty names on this thread.


  • #1859
    Bannasidhe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Jackman25 wrote: »
    The equivalence is the "batshyt crazy" not the content.

    That you think being left-wing and/or a feminist is comparable to being a homophobic, racist, publicity hungry, hate monger who will use murders to spread a message of division and fear are equivalent in any way, shape, or form says more about you than any one else.

    Also you need to up your deflection game.


  • #1860
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    rgossip30 wrote: »
    You are only allowed to be critical and call her nasty names on this thread.

    In fairness, you appear to be completely uncritical of her...


  • Advertisement
  • #1861
    Annasopra
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    rgossip30 wrote: »
    You are only allowed to be critical and call her nasty names on this thread.

    If you feel you can prove she isnt an extreme hate monger please do

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement