TaurenDruid wrote: » /begins to insert standard response about the right to free speech not being an entitlement to spout hate speech, then stops when they notice the poster has a sum total of 7 posts to their name...
Jackman25 wrote: » Its interesting to note the difference between this thread and the Louise O'Neill thread. On the LON thread, the lefties were plaintively whining about people keeping the thread going and why not just ignore her. The same ilk are happily piling into this thread. For the record I think both are batshyt.
batgoat wrote: » If I recall correctly it was around Gemma's views on vaccines and such. So entirely solid. Gemma has a tendency to legally threaten everyone who disagrees with her so not an isolated incident.
DS86DS wrote: » If Gemma was a Leftist spouting Left Wing ideas, this thread would have been closed after 5 minutes and the OP banned.
rgossip30 wrote: » You tell me .
jeremyj1968 wrote: » Well whatever you think about O'Doherty, she should have been allowed to have a meeting without it being shut down. I mean if the hotel refused to have a traveller meeting it would be all over Joe Duffy, but because it is someone who is considered conservative it is fine. She is not right on everything but if she wants to hold a meeting then she should be allowed to do so. But unfortunately it seems that most of the people in Ireland are happy to get their news from Joe Duffy and Denis O'Brien instead of actually thinking for themselves, so good look to them.
batgoat wrote: » Pretty sure Louise O'Neill isn't running hate speech rallies...
Mark Rippetoe wrote: » This is not true. However, if the OP started the thread, dumped a 1+ hour long political video, in a forum that is not for politics, without contributing any sort of discussion themselves, despite previously being told by mods not to, then yeah, the thread "might have been closed after 5 minutes and the OP banned".
Jackman25 wrote: » I have no idea what Gemma is at and I don't care. What hate speech rally is she running?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » perhaps educate yourself about her before criticising those that are opposed to her.
Jackman25 wrote: » Why bother. She is about as relevant as Jim Corr and deserves about as much attention.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » so why bother posting in a thread about her?
Jackman25 wrote: » Just found it interesting the difference in attitude when its a thread on a lefty feminist.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » As i said earlier you need to educate yourself about gemma before commenting.
The Nal wrote: » Shes not a feminist.
batgoat wrote: » She's regularly being racist, antisemitic and homophobic... That's the type of people she caters to.
Bannasidhe wrote: » Interesting that despite your proclaimed lack of interest in G O'D you could make the effort to draw a false equivalency between someone being a "lefty feminist" and someone who has been seen to repeatedly engage in hate speech, shut down criticism, engage in wild conspiracy theories, show scant regard to the families of murder victims etc etc. Smells like yet more deflection.
Jackman25 wrote: » The equivalence is the "batshyt crazy" not the content.
lbc2019 wrote: » Any update on that venue?
Ivan2019 wrote: » Fine Gael Bringing Isis into Ireland...
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Deflect. Deflect. Deflect.
padd b1975 wrote: » They would have taken it down on the back of their own legal advice I'd imagine, which tells me that whatever guff O'Leary was spouting wasn't all that solid.
TaurenDruid wrote: » The "guff" O'Leary was spouting was that vaccinating your kids saves lives; and that it's dangerous, stupid and - dare I say it, batshyt crazy - to give your child a drink you've bought off the internet that contains bleach, with the intention of "curing" their autism.
Jackman25 wrote: » Fair enough. I'll let ye get back to the good work and get off the thread.
rgossip30 wrote: » You are only allowed to be critical and call her nasty names on this thread.
