Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Who's your favourite at debating?

24

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,115 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    RWCNT wrote: »
    I'm a fan of both of these but in fairness they do response videos as opposed to live debates.

    A lot of those people make good money from their social media presence and big ticket events so wouldn't be well disposed to being shown up. Also, I don't think back-and-forth debate lends itself too well to deconstructing another person's points.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭Woke Hogan


    Jordan Peterson is not a public intellectual. A public intellectual would release more than two books in a twenty year period, and neither of them would be pop psychology self help books for useless geeks looking for a father figure. He's the Canadian Dr Phil.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭i71jskz5xu42pb


    A lot of those people make good money from their social media presence and big ticket events so wouldn't be well disposed to being shown up.

    Peterson was making near $1m per year on just on Patreon before he quit it.
    Plus money for his "shows" (you'd think Borris Johnson money)
    Presumably there's other revenue streams.

    If I was making that kind of cash I'd play it safe as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,275 ✭✭✭Your Face


    George Hook


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,924 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    Woke Hogan wrote: »
    Jordan Peterson is not a public intellectual. A public intellectual would release more than two books in a twenty year period, and neither of them would be pop psychology self help books for useless geeks looking for a father figure. He's the Canadian Dr Phil.

    He knows what he's doing and caters for a very specific type of young male who laps him up.

    I've a few mates who bring him up constantly as if they're under the enchantment of David Koresh, it's embarrassing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,115 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    Wibbs

    I heard he shouted at a cat once. :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo


    RWCNT wrote: »
    I don't complain about this much as it usually turns up in threads where there's other stuff I'd rather discuss but I ****ing hate everyone being described as "alt right" these days. Alt rightists want to create an all-white ethnostate, they're fascist nutters and as far as I'm aware, there's very few of them.

    The labelling of anyone you don't agree with using the catch all term alt right is lazy at best.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 274 ✭✭Auntie Semite


    Many mentioned here are hardly Alt Right
    For example Jordan Peterson is despised by the Alt Right

    Christopher Hitchens was a master of debate.
    Peter Hitchens is a great debater.
    Sam Harris
    Camille Paglia (personal favourite)

    Tim Pool who I wouldn't regard as a debater as such did extremely well versus Jack Dorsey of twitter on Joe Rogan last night.

    Nick Fuentes pretty good for someone so young.
    J F Gariepy
    Vox Day

    Not nessecarily endorsing all the characters above just enjoy listening to them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    Of all the people mentioned I think Hitchens was in fact the greatest charlatan, and in fact had the most destructive effect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,858 ✭✭✭Church on Tuesday


    Anthony Fantano.

    Don't agree with all of his opinions regarding music but the man is very well informed in general matters.

    He destroyed that idiot Paul Joseph Watson.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭orourkeda1977


    greencap wrote: »
    George Galloway was a good orator in his time.

    Assfcked the US senate en masse, in their own house.

    Bosco could have done that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,555 ✭✭✭Roger Hassenforder


    Of all the people mentioned I think Hitchens was in fact the greatest charlatan, and in fact had the most destructive effect.

    You gonna elaborate?


    2zgyyv4.jpg
    Indeed!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,184 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Ian O Doherty.

    That's why you rarely see him on RTE any more because he destroys the lefties on the panel in minutes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    You gonna elaborate?


    2zgyyv4.jpg
    Indeed!

    What’s the point of that picture?

    Hitchens was a major supporter of the iraq war, his historical knowledge was weak to say the least, and he was banging the drums for more wars (Iran for instance) towards the end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,115 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    Ian O Doherty.

    UnequaledCoordinatedBison-size_restricted.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,423 ✭✭✭Badly Drunk Boy


    Christoper Hitchens.... Alt Right?

    For gods sake man.
    He mightn't be Alt Right but he was Oft Wrong...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 274 ✭✭Auntie Semite


    Angela Nagle is great (Irish too)

    Jimmy Dore

    Roger Scruton


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,291 ✭✭✭lbc2019


    Ian O Doherty.

    That's why you rarely see him on RTE any more because he destroys the lefties on the panel in minutes.

    Lolz


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,736 ✭✭✭Yer Da sells Avon


    Tacklebox wrote: »
    My favourite would probably be Christopher Hitches, he really had his facts right along with good wit and knock out potential.

    The ultimate charlatan. A social-climbing arse-licker with a decent turn of phrase. I prefer his brother. At least his views - as batshit as some of them may be - are sincerely held.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,858 ✭✭✭Church on Tuesday


    You gonna elaborate?


    2zgyyv4.jpg
    Indeed!

    er, not sure why my I'm underlined, I'm not particularly religious if that's what your getting at in spite of the user name :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 274 ✭✭Auntie Semite


    Thomas Sowell


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 746 ✭✭✭GinAndBitter


    Joan Burton.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 636 ✭✭✭Angliru


    Biggins. Lad got a horn from seeing a new post in a thread just so that he could start being contrary all over again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,555 ✭✭✭Roger Hassenforder


    er, not sure why my I'm underlined, I'm not particularly religious if that's what your getting at in spite of the user name :D

    My bad!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 419 ✭✭Tacklebox


    I must look up some of these recommendations and watch the banter, excitement and reactions to these power house debating techniques....

    Jordan Peterson is good.

    I prefer watching these debates and debating friends who are not triggered easily and can stay with the debate without walking out, crying to the judiciary etc

    I think its easier to be a spectator rather than being shut down and getting infractions and warnings.

    A lot of debaters mentioned on this thread would have been banned here quite frequently, including Hitchins and Milo Yiannopoulos, Ben Shapiro too more than likely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,187 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    Chanty Binx sounds like a Star Wars character and looks a bit like one too. Milo comes across as just being a cnut rather than anyone with anything new to say.

    Most of the social media crowd are just looking to make fun of the fringe lefty liberal bleeding heart commies who have lost touch with reality or the MAGA hat wearing rabid right-wing racists who want to lynch everyone and their dog from scaffolds made out of the last bits of the rainforest.
    If people didn't take it so seriously it wouldn't be so invasive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,808 ✭✭✭Man Vs ManUre


    I like Ming Flanagan’s style. He manages to make his point, get a good slagging in on the opposition, and is able to take the moral high ground on all he goes up against.
    The mario roses stock sketch of Ming n’ Mick or Mick n’ Ming was genius. It should have had its own weekly half hour show.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 419 ✭✭Tacklebox


    kowloon wrote: »
    Chanty Binx sounds like a Star Wars character and looks a bit like one too. Milo comes across as just being a cnut rather than anyone with anything new to say.

    Most of the social media crowd are just looking to make fun of the fringe lefty liberal bleeding heart commies who have lost touch with reality or the MAGA hat wearing rabid right-wing racists who want to lynch everyone and their dog from scaffolds made out of the last bits of the rainforest.
    If people didn't take it so seriously it wouldn't be so invasive.

    Im on neither side of the debates, i just find it entertaining to watch the way they don't really get offended.

    Chanty Binx is scary though, I met a few like her at a stand in Galway one Saturday.

    I found them a hostile bunch, another place I have come across something similar is at body and soul.
    Myself and my friend lounging in the hot tubs in the forest and these bints concluding that we were looking at them, they were clones of Chanty.
    He was singing some old English folk song which was a bit offensive...
    One had to be removed she was very tough and took a dislike to my gay friend, sure he was as camp as Julian Cleary and a bit like Milo.
    He had all the answers and knew how to wind them up...

    The whistling gypsy rover he was singing... Sure they took offence to it....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    Ian O Doherty.

    That's why you rarely see him on RTE any more because he destroys the lefties on the panel in minutes.


    To be fair, that's mostly due to the idiocy of some of the Irish left who equate their number of like minded twitter followers with their intelligence. As Franz mentioned earlier with regard to Sam Harris debating the religious, it's a bit easy.



    I wouldn't put him in the same league as the Hitchens brothers.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,856 ✭✭✭BalcombeSt4


    Norman Finkelstein, Noam Chomsky & when he was alive Tony Benn.


Advertisement
Advertisement