Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Why does our national stadium hold only 50K?

135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,306 ✭✭✭piplip87


    Should have been more joined up thinking between organisations. Aviva should have been made slightly longer and wider to accomadate GAA games. Where as the bigger Rugby/Soccer games could be played in Croke Park. Makes plenty of sense to hold All Ireland Quater finals in the Aviva and Ireland vs All Blacks in Croker.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,620 ✭✭✭OldRio


    piplip87 wrote: »
    Should have been more joined up thinking between organisations. Aviva should have been made slightly longer and wider to accomadate GAA games. Where as the bigger Rugby/Soccer games could be played in Croke Park. Makes plenty of sense to hold All Ireland Quater finals in the Aviva and Ireland vs All Blacks in Croker.

    I take it you haven't read any of the numerous posts on this thread explaining the exact reason the Aviva is the size it is?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    Because any one that was part of defining its capacity was ever going to experience not being able to get a ticket into it. They probably wouldnt even have to pay for one. That colours ones views on how many other people you will build the stadium to hold.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,293 ✭✭✭✭Mint Sauce


    From memory Croker was always near to, or sold out for the few years they hosted 6 nations games, but fans were further from the play area of the pitch, even more so for soccer.

    So just going by the Rugby attendances, its a shame that Landsdowne Road only has a 50k Capacity, but it has been well publicised, or so I thought, that the reduced capacity was due to the planning restrictions from local residents, resulting in a single tier stand, which kinda also makes the stadium look unfinished.

    But then look at the recent soccer attendances, and they would be lucky to fill Tallaght.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,610 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    No. They wanted to stay living in havelock square...


    Which also amounts to wanting more money to sell up..... everyone has their price


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,763 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    VinLieger wrote: »
    Which also amounts to wanting more money to sell up..... everyone has their price

    You think so? How about those that value quality of life and community over the size of their bank account.

    They do exist even though you might struggle to believe it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,687 ✭✭✭andekwarhola


    Restricted by location.

    Maybe i'm wrong about the logistics, and I undestand the history part of it but I thought it would have made more sense to sell the old site (for undoubtedly a huge sum) and relocate to a green field site further out and build a bigger stadium.

    Same with Croke Park actually, given the issues they have with parking and with hosting concerts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,218 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Restricted by location.

    Maybe i'm wrong about the logistics, and I undestand the history part of it but I thought it would have made more sense to sell the old site (for undoubtedly a huge sum) and relocate to a green field site further out and build a bigger stadium.

    Same with Croke Park actually, given the issues they have with parking and with hosting concerts.

    Financially yes the stadium could probably be out of the city and worked out cheaper but stadiums in cities tend to have better atmosphere not just in the ground but the buzz around the area too and that helps sell tickets especially for smaller games. Leinster get between 40,000 and practically full houses for their games there, it would be significantly lower if it was away from the city as the day trippers out for the event are far less likely to bother.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,763 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Restricted by location.

    Maybe i'm wrong about the logistics, and I undestand the history part of it but I thought it would have made more sense to sell the old site (for undoubtedly a huge sum) and relocate to a green field site further out and build a bigger stadium.

    Same with Croke Park actually, given the issues they have with parking and with hosting concerts.

    It's possible that the global economy status at the time of the refurbishment influenced the strategy. Plans for Stadium Ireland (Bertie Bowl) and Eircom Park fell through at the same time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,763 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    salmocab wrote: »
    Financially yes the stadium could probably be out of the city and worked out cheaper but stadiums in cities tend to have better atmosphere not just in the ground but the buzz around the area too and that helps sell tickets especially for smaller games. Leinster get between 40,000 and practically full houses for their games there it would be significantly lower if it was away from the city as the day trippers out for the event are far less likely to bother.

    Leinster play most of their Pro14 games in Donnybrook.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,218 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Leinster play most of their Pro14 games in Donnybrook.

    Yes I know


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,261 ✭✭✭Pauliedragon


    TCM wrote: »
    The national stadium has a capacity of 83000 plus.
    A national stadium should be owned and run by the state and/or local government like most civilised countries. Therefore its rented out to any organisation that wishes to pay the fee. That way there should be no fighting over who uses it and it hopefully pays for itself overtime.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,170 ✭✭✭troyzer


    Leinster play most of their Pro14 games in Donnybrook.
    salmocab wrote: »
    Yes I know

    No they don't. They haven't played in Donnybrook in over 10 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,763 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    troyzer wrote: »
    No they don't. They haven't played in Donnybrook in over 10 years.

    RDS. My mistake. Point still stands.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,218 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    RDS. My mistake. Point still stands.

    Actually I didn’t spot you said Donnybrook either, what I said about Leinster is true though they sell 40K plus for the games there but if that was in the outer suburbs they would lose sales


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭biko


    What are you talking about?
    The National Stadium holds only 2000


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,687 ✭✭✭andekwarhola


    salmocab wrote: »
    Financially yes the stadium could probably be out of the city and worked out cheaper but stadiums in cities tend to have better atmosphere not just in the ground but the buzz around the area too and that helps sell tickets especially for smaller games. Leinster get between 40,000 and practically full houses for their games there, it would be significantly lower if it was away from the city as the day trippers out for the event are far less likely to bother.

    Don't buy that. Loads of people attending the stadia, especially Croke Park, are actually coming from outside the city to events.

    Better atmosphere is entirely subjective. Provide facilities outside and people would enjoy themselves.

    Lower tickets sales is another supposition as well. We're talkling about the Dublin suburbs, not Mongolia. The GAA, for example, could run a lot more events without issues if the stadium was located in a different location.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,170 ✭✭✭troyzer


    RDS. My mistake. Point still stands.

    The RDS is too small. Since the start of December there have been 40,000 in Lansdowne and sellouts against Connacht, Ulster and Toulouse for this week in the RDS (an 18,000 seater).

    The redevelopment will bump it up to 20,000 and Leinster do have their 12-13,000 for the quiet games around internationals but could probably do with a 25,000 seater stadium.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,170 ✭✭✭troyzer


    Don't buy that. Loads of people attending the stadia, especially Croke Park, are actually coming from outside the city to events.

    Better atmosphere is entirely subjective. Provide facilities outside and people would enjoy themselves.

    Lower tickets sales is another supposition as well. We're talkling about the Dublin suburbs, not Mongolia. The GAA, for example, could run a lot more events without issues if the stadium was located in a different location.

    Have you ever been to a stadium outside the city like Stade de France or Twickenham?

    It's awful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,218 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Don't buy that. Loads of people attending the stadia, especially Croke Park, are actually coming from outside the city to events.

    Better atmosphere is entirely subjective. Provide facilities outside and people would enjoy themselves.

    Lower tickets sales is another supposition as well. We're talkling about the Dublin suburbs, not Mongolia. The GAA, for example, could run a lot more events without issues if the stadium was located in a different location.

    Croker possibly due to the unusual usage of the stadium, Aviva would be poorer for an outer location.


  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 56,584 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    piplip87 wrote: »
    Should have been more joined up thinking between organisations. Aviva should have been made slightly longer and wider to accomadate GAA games. Where as the bigger Rugby/Soccer games could be played in Croke Park. Makes plenty of sense to hold All Ireland Quater finals in the Aviva and Ireland vs All Blacks in Croker.
    No thanks.

    Watching Rugby in Croke Park was ok as a temporary thing, but the size of the GAA pitch is just too big to share with the other two sports.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    Because people who own very small houses at the Havelock Square end objected when it was being redeveloped and that's why that end had to be lower than the rest.

    Haven't read the whole thread yet so apologies if this has been mentioned, but the Lansdowne rugby club has a pitch adjacent which, had they been willing to sell, would have allowed the stadium to be oriented at a different angle and thus the same height all the way around without obstructing that sunlight. They were apparently offered moronic amounts of money and a relocation to land very close by and for some asinine reason they refused to budge, and as the project was already running over time, the stadium ultimately decided to give up on their negotiation and proceed with the redesigned Aviva.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,170 ✭✭✭troyzer


    awec wrote: »
    piplip87 wrote: »
    Should have been more joined up thinking between organisations. Aviva should have been made slightly longer and wider to accomadate GAA games. Where as the bigger Rugby/Soccer games could be played in Croke Park. Makes plenty of sense to hold All Ireland Quater finals in the Aviva and Ireland vs All Blacks in Croker.
    No thanks.

    Watching Rugby in Croke Park was ok as a temporary thing, but the size of the GAA pitch is just too big to share with the other two sports.

    I mostly agree but you'd imagine a bit of joiined up thinking might have allowed it to work.

    Maybe mount the bottom tier on tracks and you can roll them back a few metres for GAA.

    The Arizona Cardinals stadium has a retractable pitch, it must be possible


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,055 ✭✭✭JohnnyFlash


    Love heading to Landsdowne Road to watch a rugby match in the Aviva. Perfect location. Have a good rattle of pints in Ringsend or Baggot Street first, then head in nicely toasted to watch the game. Great atmosphere in the place.


  • Administrators Posts: 56,584 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Haven't read the whole thread yet so apologies if this has been mentioned, but the Lansdowne rugby club has a pitch adjacent which, had they been willing to sell, would have allowed the stadium to be oriented at a different angle and thus the same height all the way around without obstructing that sunlight. They were apparently offered moronic amounts of money and a relocation to land very close by and for some asinine reason they refused to budge, and as the project was already running over time, the stadium ultimately decided to give up on their negotiation and proceed with the redesigned Aviva.
    Where would they go?

    Their location is likely worth a lot more to them than money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,442 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Croke Park holds over 82...oh wait.

    Croke Park is the de facto national stadium lets be honest.
    It is even lent to the less fortunate sporting organisations where required.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,170 ✭✭✭troyzer


    Croke Park holds over 82...oh wait.

    Croke Park is the de facto national stadium lets be honest.
    It is even lent to the less fortunate sporting organisations where required.

    What makes it the national stadium? Rugby and soccer combined are far more popular than the GAA and Lansdowne is their home stadium.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,763 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    troyzer wrote: »
    What makes it the national stadium? Rugby and soccer combined are far more popular than the GAA and Lansdowne is their home stadium.

    If we are having a pointless argument ;),

    Croke Park has a better claim to be the national stadium given that hurling and football are more identifiable as being irish sports than rugby or soccer and so their stadium deserves the 'national stadium' accolade.

    Could also debate the popularity thing above possibly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,442 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    troyzer wrote: »
    What makes it the national stadium? Rugby and soccer combined are far more popular than the GAA and Lansdowne is their home stadium.

    Quality, heritage, culture and historical aspect.
    I would argue that soccer is not a popular regular spectator sport for the majority of Irish soccer fans unless it is the English Premier League. If the Irish soccer team footballers did not play in England most 'Irish fans' would never have heard of them.
    This is part of the reason that the AVIVA is only 55k because the FAI knew they could not handle it.
    Basically the FAI have tried to drag the IRFU down to thier level, and the IRFU put up with it until the lease expires on the AVIVA, and the IRFU are in sole control again.

    The fact it is called the AVIVA as well has a real 'selling it's soul' aspect about it as well.
    For the majority of Irish people Croke Park is the de facto national stadium untainted by stadium 'naming'.

    When there is a really big event on in need of hosting invariably Croke Park hosts it, The Special Olympics, The Pope, U2 etc.

    All other stadiums in Ireland pale in comparison to it.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,587 ✭✭✭✭Collie D


    troyzer wrote: »
    What makes it the national stadium? Rugby and soccer combined are far more popular than the GAA and Lansdowne is their home stadium.

    If you’re using attendance as a metric Gaelic football is more popular than both combined. If you include hurling then GAA attendances are almost twice as high as rugby and soccer combined.


Advertisement
Advertisement