Yulewolf - A Werewolf Christmas Carol Game Thread

I think that today and this evenings discussion will be quite useful later in the week.

The bandwagon on Fiona is surprising tbh. While I think she is a wolf, and I've been suspicious of her since yesterday, she is a very easy target for wolves to jump on today in order to blend in.

Katie WW wrote: »

#FFA1: Isla, Conor, Ewan. Have all posted today, but haven't really interacted with anyone or made any comments.

Player Name Choice 1 Choice 2 Choice 3
Henry WW Fiona WW Angus WW Riona WW
Brendan WW Desmond WW Fiona WW Holly WW
Clodagh WW Fiona WW Gabriel WW Desmond WW
Barbara WW Angus WW Fiona WW Riona WW
Desmond WW Brendan WW Fiona WW
Fiona WW Oisin WW Ewan WW Brendan WW
Riona WW Brendan WW Mary WW Henry WW
Conor WW Gabriel WW Mary WW
Angus WW Katie WW Fiona WW
Isla WW Fiona WW Riona WW
Gabriel WW Fiona WW Clodagh WW
Derry WW Angus WW Riona WW Fiona WW
Katie WW Isla WW Conor WW Ewan WW

Results:

Fiona WW 9
Riona WW 4
Brendan WW 3
Angus WW 3
Desmond WW 2
Mary WW 2
Gabriel WW 2
Ewan WW 2
Oisin WW 1
Henry WW 1
Holly WW 1
Katie WW 1
Clodagh WW 1
Conor WW 1

Katie WW wrote: »

I like Henry's posts, feels town to me. Same with Brendan.
Fiona's Tiny Tim post is a bit sus, but haven't seen anythign else to deserve that much a bandwagon.
Nigel has made a few ISOs, but all ended up being neutral. He didn't push anyone really

I want Nigel peeked or interrogated tbh.

Angus WW wrote: »

Katie - complaining about clogging up a thread with multi posts despite posting up fluff which clogs up the thread. Has contributed nothing.

As I said before, D0 fluff =/= D1 fluff. Everyone posts fluff on D0, its part of the fun, and there's not really anything to go on.

After the munch, clogging up the thread only helps the wolfs. It makes it harder to read for town and there's no reason you can't just say '10 posts of fluff' instead of quoting every single one of them.

None of my D1 posts have been fluff.

Henry WW wrote: »

The bandwagon on Fiona is surprising tbh. While I think she is a wolf, and I've been suspicious of her since yesterday, she is a very easy target for wolves to jump on today in order to blend in.

Right I'm dead, just leave me go die! 9 ****ing FFAs, unreal bandwagon! Cause I reckon Oisin is a wolf Madness! Village shooting itself in the foot.

Fiona WW wrote: »

Right I'm dead, just leave me go die! 9 ****ing FFAs, unreal bandwagon! Cause I reckon Oisin is a wolf Madness! Village shooting itself in the foot.

My FFA on you never mentioned Oisin actually.

Angus has a bit of a delicate ego around his massive ISO multquote posts, and as much as I'd to like OMGUS - overall I think he's town. Wrong about me, but I feel he's too 'out there' to be a wolf.

Fiona WW wrote: »

Right I'm dead, just leave me go die! 9 ****ing FFAs, unreal bandwagon! Cause I reckon Oisin is a wolf Madness! Village shooting itself in the foot.

Why should you not die?

Sorry all, on a late shift today so only catching up now.

I have to be honest I don't think this Fiona bandwagon is doing us any favours at all. At the same time Fiona you haven't really helped yourself, for me, especially when you ask for a peak to be put forward. I put that as a bad point towards you. YOu probably gain a half point back because you didn't ask to be peaked first, rather someone first suggested you be and you asked for it to be brought on.


Katie, stands out a bit more to me at the moment. Not a lot to go on, but has mostly contributed little today and the main points she made is how she doesn't like the ISO posts in the manner in which they are made. It sparked a worthy debate but I feel it was very dismissive without coming back with something better. For comparative purposes, Brendan made it clear he doesn't particularly like the approach/format of the ISOs done today, but argued, with Angus, why that was the case and explained it rationally. Katie didn't. Finally for me, Katie's FFA is basically low posters who haven't posted or interacted much. While at the heart of it, I see the rationale, but for me, it just screams as being a really lazy effort to get an FFA without having to think too hard or to give much away.
All of these combined has me thinking Katie is top of my FFA tonight.

I am struggling for a third right now but I would probably have to put Nigel in at number 3. Simply because he ISOd Gertie today, which I had already done, and it seemed odd to me that he'd effectively just do what I had already done. It wasn't the act of ISO in isolation. I suppose also, he was eager off the blocks in the game which might suggest an eager wolf/SK. To be honest it's a flakey enough set of reasons, but I like to try complete a full FFA as much as possible.

FFA1
1. Katie WW
2. Fiona WW
3. Nigel WW

Henry WW wrote: »

All of them.
Yes.
Possibly.

So even though OP says

Scrooge & the evil spirits have an alpha and a power blocker, and may be able to increase their numbers or risk their numbers being decreased, either by design or by accident.

You think all the wolves are currently active.

Interesting

Riona WW wrote: »

I’m not voting for you FiFi x

Thanks hun xoxox

Ewan WW wrote: »

So even though OP says

Scrooge & the evil spirits have an alpha and a power blocker, and may be able to increase their numbers or risk their numbers being decreased, either by design or by accident.

You think all the wolves are currently active.

Interesting

No. I think all the current wolves are actively posting on the thread today.

There’s still 30 mins to go we could get a CFD going on Brendan?