Strokestown **Mod Note in Post #4461**

I don't know about the rest of you, but I think the real question here is what do Jerry Beades and Tom Darcy have to say about the matter.

klaaaz wrote: »

A loyalist eviction squad has been evicted in Roscommon! The comments on the video has been quite supportive of the raid, this is maybe a turning point in the eviction war.

How’s it goin, Paul Murphy.

What “eviction war”? One or two people being evicted every few months is hardly a war. Bleedin’ SJW snowflake lefty keyboard warriors.

Omackeral wrote: »

but facebook said...

But we bailed out the wanker bankers...

Why isn't Sean Quinn being evicted

The gardai are nothing but the banks enforcers

Yada yada..


See all this bullshit - this type of overinflated emotional hysterical nonsense is how you end up with crap like Brexit on your hands. Mob rule by bottomfeeders who won't pay for anything.


Guess I'm just a tan-bootlicker now too.

blinding wrote: »

Were the three people in the house fully aware that their home was being put up as collateral for these loans .

I'd say they were as they would have had to offer the property as collateral when looking for the money. The banks can't just put a mortgage on an asset without the knowledge or permission of the owners

blinding wrote: »

Were they all capable of agree-ing that their sole home should be put up as collateral

I'd say they are as the courts have found no reason not to grant possession based on the default of the loan - and the court cases seem to have been ongoing for years - so I am assuming that they had legal advise and argued this point .. if it was

blinding wrote: »

. Do all of these People have a claim on that home ? Have they signed off their right to that home ? Are all their names on the debts ?

this also would have been a matter for the courts and the courts have granted possession. Only those who own the property can put it up as collateral

Thatnastyboy wrote: »

But we bailed out the wanker bankers...

Why isn't Sean Quinn being evicted

The gardai are nothing but the banks enforcers

Yada yada..


See all this bullshit - this type of overinflated emotional hysterical nonsense is how you end up with crap like Brexit on your hands. Mob rule by bottomfeeders who won't pay for anything.


Guess I'm just a tan-bootlicker now too.

No your either a fg or ff bootlicker. Revolution is coming so be on your guard..

Kermit.de.frog wrote: »

The man is a tax defaulter.

Next you will be one of the goons telling us how the rich have everything rigged and all that ****e.

This guy is a TAX DEFAULTER.

Should be in jail.

What about all the bankers that ruined this country why are they not in jail????

Billcarson wrote: »

What about all the bankers that ruined this country why are they not in jail????

It's this literally whataboutery?!

MrMusician18 wrote:

It's this literally whataboutery?!

Tis a fair point though

Billcarson wrote: »

No your either a fg or ff bootlicker. Revolution is coming so be on your guard..

I had to check if you were being sarcastic there, turns out not



Revolution for what? against what? Against lenders taking action on unperforming loans by calling in what was secured against them?

Revolution for the protection of tax defaulters? Revolution for the protection of people who don't pay their tabs to local businesses?


I have no political affiliation, however I am capable of informed thought and opinion. You should try it too!

Feisar wrote:

Can you explain to me how it was "the bankers" that ruined this country?

Flooding the country with cheap credit, pushing up asset prices, in turn causing a rapid rise in debt, particularly private debt, maybe

€1k a month likely wouldn’t even cover the interest on a €500k debt. At 3% the interest would be €15k p.a. And at 5% it would be €25k.

As already mentioned banks are business not charities. At some point they have to decide to cut their losses and the only solution may be eviction. If this doesn’t happen, then the rest of us that pay our mortgage every month, and some struggling to do so, are continually subsidizing those who can’t or just chose not to.

It never ceases to amaze me on these threads.

"We bailed out the banks, so people should also be bailed out"

These two situations are not the same and people need to understand this. We need a functioning banking sector to run an economy.

One of the reasons (not the only) our interest rates are higher than Europe is because of our reluctance to evict people. Remember the eviction from one property makes that property available for someone else to purchase.

To help reduce interest rates we need competition. From a business perspective why would any new bank enter the market if it could not take possession of a property if the owners were not paying their mortgage.

People took loans and are unable to pay them back. This is a part and parcel of life. Not everything in life works out. Repossessions are part of a normal property market.

Nobody wants to see people get evicted but at the same time why should people be allowed remain in a property and not pay their mortgage (including restructure ones).

All repossessions have gone through the Courts before they are granted.

Ah look there is a certain cabal in this country that latch onto every excuse but the most pertinent one. Which in this case is the debtors have no one to blame but themselves for their predicament. This person has form for financial mismanagement and deception given the judgements against him.

What I don't understand is the SJW latching onto their cause because in reality to me it's cut and dry. There are far more deserving cases of people in financial difficulty out there that could do with external support but then again it doesn't offer the opportunity to "bash a Northie" now does it!