Strokestown **Mod Note in Post #4461**

Billcarson

Thatnastyboy wrote: »

Posted about the outstanding revenue bill & quarry debt on facebook there,


Got a straight up threat & picture of my house sent to me



Safe to say - I am out.

Does that not show you though the level of anger that is out there .people have had enough. * not that I agree with someone threating you btw

gandalf

Bambi wrote: »

That's an auld worn out cliche at this stage, Dublin was not the country. British soldiers were being spat at outside the pale after the rising. One observer noted that the longer that week went on the more sympathetic people became because the rebels were putting up a fight instead of some half arsed fiasco that fizzled out after a day or two

Spat at ROFLOL!!!! In O'Connell Street they were being fired at with live rounds. Feckin Chulchies only half doing things

The fact stands that the Rising at the time was not popular for a number of reasons. It took the belligerent action of the occupier to cement the momentum of the Rising into a full Independence movement which helped achieve this imperfect Republic. I'm glad it did, I like my country and I like what we have achieved in our first 100 years. The one thing I would like to see vanquished is this inferiority complex that makes people feel like they are owed something and they can't take responsibility for their actions.

MrMusician18

Billcarson wrote: »

Does that not show you though the level of anger that is out there .people have had enough. * not that I agree with someone threating you btw

Had enough of what? Paying their bills?

Ush1

blinding wrote: »

Do we know if the Three People put on the Side of the Road were responsible for any of this ?

Won't somebody please think of the three people at the side of the road! /HelenLovejoy

seamus

Geuze wrote: »

Yes, 177k in VAT fraud means many times this in turnover.

These are not poor people.

They probably are on paper.

Like that guy who had his house searched on foot of a Revenue warrant and they found €17m in cash hidden around the house (which he claimed was fully tax compliant), you can be sure that if these people operate bank accounts, then they have the bare minimum of money in them.

They're constant shysters & money hoarders. "My money is mine and no government can have it!"

The irony is that those defending these people are their sworn enemies.

OldGoat

relax carry on wrote: »

Worth pointing out again the penalty owed by the guy in this case was 100% of the tax owed. That's highest penalty available to Revenue. It means that he acted deliberately in underpaying/underdeclaring his VAT. He knew what he was doing in other words. He also compounded the deliberate action by being uncooperative. Non cooperation increases the penalty to 100%.

The defenders of these people would want to step away from tabloid rags and social media for a while and assess the information critically for a while before deciding if they wish to continue their unconditional support.

Their support for their neighbours will dissipate when they get to bidding in the land auction.

blinding

Ush1 wrote: »

Won't somebody please think of the three people at the side of the road! /HelenLovejoy

Go sit on the side of the road . It should improve you life experience .

gandalf

Billcarson wrote: »

Does that not show you though the level of anger that is out there .people have had enough. * not that I agree with someone threating you btw

It demonstrates the level of thuggery surrounding this especially when all that person did was point out the facts of this case. But for a certain element in this society any excuse to act the "hard lad".

Thatnastyboy

Billcarson wrote: »

Does that not show you though the level of anger that is out there .people have had enough. * not that I agree with someone threating you btw

Anger at what though? Facts? Had enough of what, paying their bills?


There's a revolution happening alright - a revolution against intelligence, fact and reason.

Ush1

blinding wrote: »

Go sit on the side of the road . It should improve you life experience .

I don't need to "sit on the side of the road" in this illustrative pretense, all my bills are paid in full.

Feisar

Some drivel being spouted on FB.

mynamejeff

Billcarson wrote: »

Does that not show you though the level of anger that is out there .people have had enough. * not that I agree with someone threating you btw

your lack of understanding of this issue would suggest that you are a teenager or some one with the inability to understand .

you defending people who pretended to be innocent victims but have been discovered to be fraudsters

Wanderer78

Feisar wrote: »

Some drivel being spouted on FB.

is it worth having an account on facebook?

blinding

Ush1 wrote: »

I don't need to "sit on the side of the road" in this illustrative pretense, all my bills are paid in full.

Good little Ush1 . Hope fully the Bailiffs with Loyalist thugs in tow never have to knock down you door .

Ush1

Wanderer78 wrote: »

is it worth having an account on facebook?

Sure it'll help Zuckerberg on the way to another ivory back scratcher, I'm sure you'll be happy to help.:)

Billcarson

MrMusician18 wrote: »

Had enough of what? Paying their bills?

That keep rising. Richer getting Richer, poorer getting poorer. Are you that detached from the goings on in this country.

Billcarson

Wanderer78 wrote: »

is it worth having an account on facebook?

And here

Ush1

blinding wrote: »

Good little Ush1 . Hope fully the Bailiffs with Loyalist thugs in tow never have to knock down you door .

I exercise a little more precaution with my finances than "hope".

Plumbthedepths

Wonder who Cabot will think will buy the property?

eagle eye

Thatnastyboy wrote:

Anger at what though? Facts? Had enough of what, paying their bills?

Anger at thugs from Northern Ireland being brought down here to evict someone.
No way should thugs have any involvement.

Laneyh

Billcarson wrote: »

Does that not show you though the level of anger that is out there .people have had enough. * not that I agree with someone threating you btw

Level of anger does not give license to harass and threaten others.
Vigilantism is dangerous and will end up in people and animals in the this case getting hurt.

The problem with vigilantism is the vigilantes will always assume they're 100% in the right. When someone merely points out factual information they're threatened
That is no way to live

Guy:Incognito

blinding wrote: »

Do we know if the Three People put on the Side of the Road were responsible for any of this ?

Yes. We do. 110% in fact. Now will you ever **** off with this ****.

Billcarson

Billcarson wrote: »

Does that not show you though the level of anger that is out there .people have had enough. * not that I agree with someone threating you btw

shame on you for this response

ignorant, vapid and offering nothing but insultsnand pub discourse to thread, topped off with a *shrug* "people are angry" when someone says theyve been sent threats by these thugs on social media

Thatnastyboy

eagle eye wrote: »

Anger at thugs from Northern Ireland being brought down here to evict someone.
No way should thugs have any involvement.

Right, I don't like how it was carried out as much as the next man, but please tell me this much - what does a private company hiring another private company to provide a service have to do with forming a revolution against the state?

eagle eye

It's about the thugs who came down from Northern Ireland.
They hired thugs to do their bidding. It's like what criminals would do.

gandalf

eagle eye wrote: »

Anger at thugs from Northern Ireland being brought down here to evict someone.
No way should thugs have any involvement.

So who is acceptable to you to carry out this unsavory work?

Thatnastyboy

eagle eye wrote: »

It's about the thugs.

I thought it was about the banks taking a generational home from a bunch of elderly people?

eagle eye

gandalf wrote:

So who is acceptable to you to carry out this unsavory work?

Any normal, honest, decent person.

gandalf

eagle eye wrote: »

It's about the thugs who came down from Northern Ireland.

No it's not about people not taking responsibility for their debts and leaving the premises as they were instructed to do by the High Court. They left themselves open to the eviction action no matter who carried it out. What did they expect waiting there to be evicted? A pat on the back?

Guy:Incognito

eagle eye wrote: »

Anger at thugs from Northern Ireland being brought down here to evict someone.
No way should thugs have any involvement.

They're not thugs. They're lovely people. Now that's that **** sorted as well and we can move back to the actual issue of the thread, the serial piss taker(s) with multiple outstanding debts refusing to give the bank their house back.