Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread V - No Pic/GIF dumps please

1292293295297298320

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭fash


    robinph wrote: »
    I wish they would stop letting brexiteers away with saying things like "France or Germany wouldn't accept the backstop so why should the UK have to". Ian Duncan Smith was the one repeating that line today on the news.

    France or Germany are not in a situation where one region of their country is tied through non EU treaties to another country which isn't leaving. They know this and we know it, but the media keep repeating the lies for them as if it is a valid statement and so confusing the UK population who are not aware of it.

    Actually both Germany and Italy have enclaves in backstop-style relationships with Switzerland (I.e . they are within the Swiss customs Union) - if it's good enough for the Germans and Italians, why is it not good enough for the UK?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭fash


    listermint wrote: »
    Ireland won't be leaned on.

    That has been reiterated several times today.

    Why people persist in this nonsense is beyond me
    Long term, it would be as damaging to the EU to lean on Ireland as it would have been to allow the UK to split the 4 freedoms.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,385 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Water John wrote: »
    BTW Brady 1922 Committee has asked to meet TM tomorrow??? 48.

    There were rumours earlier today that they were about to meet the number but reporters, and MPs, discounted it probably because it's been expected numerous times already.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Hurrache wrote: »
    There were rumours earlier today that they were about to meet the number but reporters, and MPs, discounted it probably because it's been expected numerous times already.

    Lot of journalists tweeting just right now that 48 has been reached.


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,959 Mod ✭✭✭✭DOCARCH


    Lot of journalists tweeting just right now that 48 has been reached.

    Jaysus! Chaos is bad enough without more chaos!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,385 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Lot of journalists tweeting just right now that 48 has been reached.

    Seems to be the case. One person suggested she'll be applying for asylum when she lands in Dublin tomorrow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Hurrache wrote: »
    Seems to be the case. One person suggested she'll be applying for asylum when she lands in Dublin tomorrow.

    Next time she pops over she'll need a visa.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    DOCARCH wrote: »
    Jaysus! Chaos is bad enough without more chaos!

    It'll be fine. Boris will take over and sort everything out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    Water John wrote: »
    People might need to learn the history of Strasbourg and how it has moved back and forth between France and Germany.

    Strasbourg is having issues of it's own (as of 2hrs ago), possibly a non-eu aspect to it, but nothing confirmed, as he hasn't be caught as of yet.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-46530265


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,959 Mod ✭✭✭✭DOCARCH


    Can she survive?

    Quite possibly!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty



    I can't see how. The opposition, ERG and DUP will probably vote against her.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,840 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    If the moderate MPs can agree on one alternative, she's a gonner.
    DUP have no vote in the Tories.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,776 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    I can't see how. The opposition, ERG and DUP will probably vote against her.

    Its a Tory party internal no confidence vote, she will win, but if it's close she may resign.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,837 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    DOCARCH wrote: »
    Quite possibly!

    If she does they can't hold another vote for 12 months on her leadership.

    The whole thing beggars belief, just when you think that it can't get any more chaotic there is always something more that happens, honestly they're a laughing stock at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    I can't see how. The opposition, ERG and DUP will probably vote against her.

    It's only a vote for Tory members


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Here's the thing. If she survives, there can't be another heave against her for 12 months.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,991 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    I can't see how. The opposition, ERG and DUP will probably vote against her.
    The DUP don't get to vote. Only Tory MPs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    It's only a vote for Tory members

    Of course. I was thinking of Corbyn putting down a vote. But he funked that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,840 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Maybe he happened to be correct to leave the Tories fester, esp after yesterday's chicken run.
    Lb have said it's not a question of if but when they table a no confidence motion.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Water John wrote: »
    Maybe he happened to be correct to leave the Tories fester, esp after yesterday's chicken run.
    Lb have said it's not a question of if but when they table a no confidence motion.

    Yeah, that was Yates's take on it on Newstalk today. Let them tear each other apart and then step in. But the 48 may have taken his option away depending on how the vote goes. 120 days to Brexit and the Tories are focused on party politics. Rome, Nero, fiddle etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    Of course. I was thinking of Corbyn putting down a vote. But he funked that.

    He might still. Especially now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    He might still. Especially now.

    He might indeed. That would be some mess. Two votes of no confidence at the same time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,817 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    I think the word 'clusterf##k' was invented just for Brexit.

    What a mess.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,440 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Here's the thing. If she survives, there can't be another heave against her for 12 months.

    Is that correct? This vote refers only to the Tory Party leadership doesn't it? It has nothing to do with the Parliament per se, only that those voting are all MPs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,594 ✭✭✭munsterlegend


    Strazdas wrote: »
    Is that correct? This vote refers only to the Tory Party leadership doesn't it? It has nothing to do with the Parliament per se, only that those voting are all MPs

    There can’t be another Tory internal vote against her for 12 months. Of course she could always be toppled in a vote of no confidence in the government.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    Strazdas wrote: »
    Is that correct? This vote refers only to the Tory Party leadership doesn't it? It has nothing to do with the Parliament per se, only that those voting are all MPs

    Yeah if she wins the Tory leadership challenge then she's untouchable for a year (in theory but this is brexit after all) a parliamentary vote of no confidence can come whenever.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Strazdas wrote: »
    Is that correct? This vote refers only to the Tory Party leadership doesn't it? It has nothing to do with the Parliament per se, only that those voting are all MPs

    Yup. According to Tory rules there can't be another vote for 12 months.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,847 ✭✭✭intellectual dosser


    If it were to come to a parliamentary vote would 48 + Labour + DUP + SNP do it?

    I understand some parties (DUP, maybe some ERG members) may not fancy a general election.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    If it were to come to a parliamentary vote would 48 + Labour + DUP + SNP do it?

    I understand some parties (DUP, maybe some ERG members) may not fancy a general election.

    Everyone against the Tories would have the numbers hence the need for the DUP's support in the first place . I believe.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement