Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Extension of Abortion Services To Northern Ireland

13

Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    gctest50 wrote: »
    ah - deflect deflect deflect

    I said i dont like the way de peeeeples taxes go towards feeding child murderers, see here

    Your analogy is way out. The State has a responsibility for its citizens/residents, whether that be healthcare or incarceration (or execution if the constitution and law changed to meet your wish).

    The State doesn't have the same responsibility to citizens and residents of other nations. Directly funding healthcare costs of non-Irish UK residents is not the same as funding incarceration costs of Irish citizens in Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,534 ✭✭✭gctest50


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    So is it fair to assume you are pro death penalty and .....

    Can't read ?
    gctest50 wrote: »
    ......

    Capital punishment is a bad idea because of false imprisonment
    SafeSurfer wrote: »

    and pro abortion?

    I'm Pro- Choice


    all that sounds like stuff out of a new Anti-Choice Handbook

    I suppose they'd have lots of .pdffiles


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,007 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    gctest50 wrote: »
    ah - deflect deflect deflect

    I said i dont like the way de peeeeples taxes go towards feeding child murderers, see here :





    Capital punishment is a bad idea because of false imprisonment

    no deflection. i'm well aware of what you said hence i responded to it.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭Calhoun


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Minister for Health Simon Harris wants to extend free abortion services provided in the Republic of Ireland to those living in the north.
    At a time of trolley crisis, record waiting lists and pressure throughout the health system is this an altruistic gesture to residents of another jurisdiction or cynical political maneuvering?

    When it was not possible in ireland, hospitals in Liverpool ect looked after the women of Ireland and from what I heard engaged as much as they could with services here to keep it smooth.

    I think this is the right thing to do and Ireland and it's people should be proud to do it. To do otherwise would be very selfish.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    Calhoun wrote: »
    When it was not possible in ireland, hospitals in Liverpool ect looked after the women of Ireland and from what I heard engaged as much as they could with services here to keep it smooth.

    I think this is the right thing to do and Ireland and it's people should be proud to do it. To do otherwise would be very selfish.

    This was paid for by the people who went over to get the abortion though. It was not freely provided by the hospitals in Liverpool. British taxpayers did not pay for Irish women to get abortions. Northern Irish women have been able to avail of free abortions in Britain while Irish women had to pay, there was no reciprocity.

    I think the right thing for Ireland to do is to spend its health budget on providing the best healthcare possible for people in Ireland. If non-Irish people want to avail of abortion here, they should pay the costs associated.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    Amirani wrote: »
    This was paid for by the people who went over to get the abortion though. It was not freely provided by the hospitals in Liverpool. British taxpayers did not pay for Irish women to get abortions.

    I think the right thing for Ireland to do is to spend its health budget on providing the best healthcare possible for people in Ireland. If non-Irish people want to avail of abortion here, they should pay the costs associated.


    It was heavily subsidised. Women travelling for abortions to the UK for abortion in a private clinic for a special rate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,608 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Calhoun wrote: »
    When it was not possible in ireland, hospitals in Liverpool ect looked after the women of Ireland and from what I heard engaged as much as they could with services here to keep it smooth.

    I think this is the right thing to do and Ireland and it's people should be proud to do it. To do otherwise would be very selfish.


    Agreed. Great gesture.

    Not sure why it should be free though,for Irish or N Irish.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭Dalomanakora


    kneemos wrote: »
    Agreed. Great gesture.

    Not sure why it should be free though,for Irish or N Irish.

    Because for Irish people, if they can't afford an abortion, guess who's going to pay for the kiddo they sure as hell can't afford?


    The government. The taxpayers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭Calhoun


    Ah I didn't know that there was a charge I thought it was only the flight costs ect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Calhoun wrote: »
    When it was not possible in ireland, hospitals in Liverpool ect looked after the women of Ireland and from what I heard engaged as much as they could with services here to keep it smooth.

    I think this is the right thing to do and Ireland and it's people should be proud to do it. To do otherwise would be very selfish.

    Northern Irish residents can already access free abortion services in the UK and also have their transport costs to the UK paid for.

    The UK government never paid for Irish citizens abortions or paid for their travel costs to the UK.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    eviltwin wrote: »
    It was heavily subsidised. Women travelling for abortions to the UK for abortion in a private clinic for a special rate.

    We should try to offer affordable (and perhaps subsidised) abortion care to Northern-Irish women here, particularly those of limited means. Happy to have it free for Irish residents though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,007 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Calhoun wrote: »
    When it was not possible in ireland, hospitals in Liverpool ect looked after the women of Ireland and from what I heard engaged as much as they could with services here to keep it smooth.

    IMO it's a hospital's job and duty to look after patients that visit it, whether from the country or not. britain allows the use of facilities to paying patients from abroad and i'd imagine we do as well. i believe therefore that we don't owe the uk anything.
    Calhoun wrote: »
    I think this is the right thing to do and Ireland and it's people should be proud to do it. To do otherwise would be very selfish.

    i don't agree. as much as i see northern ireland's people as irish, they are currently under uk rule, as much as i dislike it. therefore i don't believe we have any obligation to fund them using our facilities and services whatever they may be until such time as they return to irish rule. fair is fair.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,072 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Bit of sand in the eye of the DUP which is great.

    And laughable at people arguing the costs to the state of an abortion vs. not having an abortion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,097 ✭✭✭amcalester


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    And we could eliminate the childrens scoliosis waiting list by building a new theatre in Crumlin for €2 to €3, million, potentially a fraction of the cost of providing free abortion services to non citizens who can avail of free services under their own health care system for little more than the price of a train ticket to Dublin.

    You’re not too good at fractions, at €2 to €3m for the scoliosis unit this is multiples of the cost of providing abortions to NI residents.

    But let’s be honest it’s not about the cost for you, you just don’t women having access to abortions at all. You’re hiding behind the financials as a way of making it harder for NI women to access abortion services.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 829 ✭✭✭Ronaldinho


    astrofool wrote: »

    And laughable at people arguing the costs to the state of an abortion vs. not having an abortion.

    It's not all about the direct costs.

    How does the fact that it's free affect peoples' attitudes to unprotected sex and especially unprotected casual sex? If Pascal's got you covered, so to speak, then maybe we see a lot more unnecessary abortions because people who otherwise would have used contraception can't be arsed, which may also put people at greater risks of contracting an STD.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    Ronaldinho wrote: »
    It's not all about the direct costs.

    How does the fact that it's free affect peoples' attitudes to unprotected sex and especially unprotected casual sex? If Pascal's got you covered, so to speak, then maybe we see a lot more unnecessary abortions because people who otherwise would have used contraception can't be arsed, which may also put people at greater risks of contracting an STD.

    No woman in her right mind would see abortion as an alternative to contraception. It's physically gruelling, painful and not a pleasant experience to have.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,990 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    Ronaldinho wrote: »
    I don't get why the procedure is to be made free for all. Why not limited to medical card holders, for free?

    I don't get why healthcare isn't free for all. Why limit it to medical card holders?

    Better again, just introduce a €5 GP visit fee to all to prevent abuses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,421 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    Ronaldinho wrote: »
    I don't get why the procedure is to be made free for all. Why not limited to medical card holders, for free?


    Because for Harris, cancer patients should pay but aborting people should be made as easy as possible. After all it is more important to be rid of your children than cancer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,189 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    It's a different jurisdiction, let the politicians sort out their own mess on that side of the border.

    Harris should concentrate on sorting out the problems in the health service here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    amcalester wrote: »
    You’re not too good at fractions, at €2 to €3m for the scoliosis unit this is multiples of the cost of providing abortions to NI residents.

    But let’s be honest it’s not about the cost for you, you just don’t women having access to abortions at all. You’re hiding behind the financials as a way of making it harder for NI women to access abortion services.

    You will note but omit to quote my use of the word potentially. You also only look at the cost of abortion provision for one year whereas of course the cost is ongoing and cumulative.

    You accuse me of just highlighting the financial implications of the provision of abortion services to non residents to make abortion services more difficult for women from Northern Ireland to access.
    It is legitimate to point out that the extension of provision of abortion services to Northern Ireland and its funding by the Irish taxpayer was never a part of the abortion referendum debate. If it was, concerns could have been raised at the time.
    Minister Harris is unilaterally and without a mandate from the electorate extending abortion services to a jurisdiction for which he has no mandate at all.
    To highlight this isn’t to be pro choice or anti choice it is simply a statement of fact.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 829 ✭✭✭Ronaldinho


    eviltwin wrote: »
    No woman in her right mind would see abortion as an alternative to contraception. It's physically gruelling, painful and not a pleasant experience to have.

    That's fair. But I wonder would adolescents get that right now. And in the case of a drunken hook-up - I can't help thinking that a couple is going to be more inclined to 'chance it' since the procedure is free.
    n97 mini wrote: »
    I don't get why healthcare isn't free for all. Why limit it to medical card holders?

    Because there's a finite amount of resources at the Govt's disposal (that could & should be spent a lot more effectively but that's for another thread).

    Those that can pay, should pay.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭Calhoun


    eviltwin wrote: »
    It was heavily subsidised. Women travelling for abortions to the UK for abortion in a private clinic for a special rate.

    This was the impression i got also, from listening to some of the stories from the people running the service over there during the referendum it seemed like it was more than just a money spinning opportunity.

    You got a real sense that they cared for the welfare of these women and they were at the end of their tether in being able to support them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,097 ✭✭✭amcalester


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    You will note but omit to quote my use of the word potentially. You also only look at the cost of abortion provision for one year whereas of course the cost is ongoing and cumulative.

    You accuse me of just highlighting the financial implications of the provision of abortion services to non residents to make abortion services more difficult for women from Northern Ireland to access.
    It is legitimate to point out that the extension of provision of abortion services to Northern Ireland and its funding by the Irish taxpayer was never a part of the abortion referendum debate. If it was, concerns could have been raised at the time.
    Minister Harris is unilaterally and without a mandate from the electorate extending abortion services to a jurisdiction for which he has no mandate at all.
    To highlight this isn’t to be pro choice or anti choice it is simply a statement of fact.

    I quoted your entire post, nothing was omitted.

    Has Harris actually said it will be free to NI residents?

    BBC are reporting that they’ll have to pay while RTÉ makes no mention of who pays, patient or taxpayer.

    So, would you support these women being treated if they pay for it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    Ronaldinho wrote: »
    That's fair. But I wonder would adolescents get that right now. And in the case of a drunken hook-up - I can't help thinking that a couple is going to be more inclined to 'chance it' since the procedure is free.

    Possibly but after one it might make them rethink. It's really no alternative to using contraception. Mind you, one would hope that access to contraception, especially for teenagers, would become easier and more affordable too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    eviltwin wrote: »
    No woman in her right mind would see abortion as an alternative to contraception. It's physically gruelling, painful and not a pleasant experience to have.

    I don’t want to get into the whole abortion debate again but 40% of UK abortions are to women who have had more than one abortion with 50 women each having had 8 abortions in 2015.

    So it would seem that having had an experience of abortion which is undoubtedly traumatic and unpleasant and painful many women repeat the experience multiple times. There may be all sorts of reasons for this which are beyond their control of course and no contraception is always 100% effective.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    amcalester wrote: »
    I quoted your entire post, nothing was omitted.

    Has Harris actually said it will be free to NI residents?

    BBC are reporting that they’ll have to pay while RTÉ makes no mention of who pays, patient or taxpayer.

    So, would you support these women being treated if they pay for it?

    Absolutely. I don’t believe that abortion should be offered for free to residents of another jurisdiction simply because it is abortion.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,608 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Apparently he wants it free to prevent private abortion clinics.
    When he says free does he mean part of general medical services,all healthcare is free bar doctor and hospital fees,and prescriptions of course.


    https://touch.boards.ie/thread/2057880548/55/#post108632640


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭Calhoun




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,072 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Ronaldinho wrote: »
    It's not all about the direct costs.

    How does the fact that it's free affect peoples' attitudes to unprotected sex and especially unprotected casual sex? If Pascal's got you covered, so to speak, then maybe we see a lot more unnecessary abortions because people who otherwise would have used contraception can't be arsed, which may also put people at greater risks of contracting an STD.

    That's the response I expected, "women can't be trusted so will get abortions if they're free rather than use contraception, so we should charge them money to make them own up to their decision, and if they can't pay it, having a baby would be good punishment for them".

    I'm disappointed you didn't want to go down the route of what it costs to raise a child for the state vs. having an abortion (given those most likely to use those services are also most likely to be reliant on the state for welfare).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,990 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    Ronaldinho wrote: »
    Because there's a finite amount of resources at the Govt's disposal (that could & should be spent a lot more effectively but that's for another thread).

    Those that can pay, should pay.

    Those that "can pay" are those earning above a particular threshold. It's arbitrary. Doesn't mean they can actually pay. Many don't, as they've trouble coming up with €60 for a GP visit, and instead hope the problem will go away. Some will end up seriously ill in the health system, costing the state multiples of what low-cost primary care would cost.


Advertisement
Advertisement