Madeleine McCann

retro:electro wrote: »

Toxicology tests on the twins showed they were never given any sedatives at any stage. .

Tests were done months later......

retro:electro wrote: »

I’ve already discussed this case with you on other threads and I’ve absolutely no desire to indulge your nonsense and have round 2 over here.

No worries love. Off you go.

You don't have to engage with me, but I will keep posting anyway until a mod says otherwise which I will respect.

retro:electro wrote: »

Anyone hear anything more about the Netflix doc that’s in the making? Should be interesting

Sounds like you need to watch a few of them

retro:electro wrote: »

Why? Because I won’t accuse two people of murdering their child without merit?

Shame on me!

Not at all.


Just your overall lack of understanding on anything that went on.

retro:electro wrote: »

Don’t we all? Isn’t that the reason it’s still unsolved?

No, you can still understand the information that we have.


You don't seem to be very well informed on what's available


Many people argue she wasn't abducted here with informed opinions.


Then there's the others.

retro:electro wrote: »

Just because you don’t agree with my beliefs doesn’t mean they are ill informed or untrue. You’re basing your own theories on complete speculation and conjecture. Come back to me when you have something substantial to add.

It's nothing to do with disagreeing with you.


You've no idea what my theory is so just another example of you in with two feet without really understanding what's been discussed.

Spanish Eyes wrote: »

Follow the money.

Although I suppose the fund is a bit depleted now that Amaral won his case against them.

You must have followed the money so.
So where is this stashed money then and when are they going to start living the rock star lifestyle? How many years will it be before Gerry turns up to work in his Maserati?
Do you think they planned to kill her on holidays so they could start a Find Madeleine Fund?
Do you know the way they published their accounts every year to show where the money went? Do you think they got a crooked accountant to falsify them? How did the Met not uncover that fraud when they did their investigation?

chicorytip wrote: »

Steve F wrote:

I'm wondering if this is the scenario, then he somehow convinced her that she was just as much to blame as him and they would lose the twins?? Again Just putting this out there....

The only scenario which would have resulted in the other children being taken into care is if Madeleine had been knowingly, as opposed to accidentally, administered an overdose of some sort of strong and potentially fatal sedative which should never be given to children of that particularly young age. The father may have had access to such given the nature of his work. There are perfectly legal medications such as Calpol, Dozol which induce sleep in children and are available to buy without prescription.

Calpol is paracetamol which has no sedative effect whatsoever. It will ease away any aches and pains and reduce a temperature in child suffering from same, thus allowing them to settle and sleep but it will not sedate anyone. In a pain free individual a standard dose will have no perceptible affect at all.

gozunda wrote: »

The problem was the lapse of time before any of their other children were tested.

The real issue there is the lack of any proper investigation by UK authorities into the full circumstance of the parents relative to the disappearance of their daughter ...

If the sedative killed Maddie, why didn’t it kill the twins. They were much smaller.

Toots wrote: »

Have you reported any of these posts?

No but you;re clearly seeing them.

Do you need me to?

Why did Kate McCann refuse to answer the following questions when they were put to her at interview? I really don’t see the sense in it.


1. On May 3 2007, around 22:00, when you entered the apartment, what did you see? What did you do? Where did you look? What did you touch?

2. Did you search inside the bedroom wardrobe? (she replied that she wouldn’t answer)

3. (shown 2 photographs of her bedroom wardrobe) Can you describe its contents?

4. Why had the curtain behind the sofa in front of the side window (whose photo was shown to her) been tampered with? Did somebody go behind that sofa?

5. How long did your search of the apartment take after you detected your daughter Madeleine’s disappearance?

6. Why did you say from the start that Madeleine had been abducted?

7. Assuming Madeleine had been abducted, why did you leave the twins home alone to go to the ‘Tapas’ and raise the alarm? Because the supposed abductor could still be in the apartment.

8. Why didn’t you ask the twins, at that moment, what had happened to their sister or why didn’t you ask them later on?

9. When you raised the alarm at the ‘Tapas’ what exactly did you say and what were your exact words?

10. What happened after you raised the alarm in the ‘Tapas’?

11. Why did you go and warn your friends instead of shouting from the verandah?

12. Who contacted the authorities?

13. Who took place in the searches?

14. Did anyone outside of the group learn of Madeleine’s disappearance in those following minutes?

15. Did any neighbour offer you help after the disappearance?

16. What does 'we let her down' mean?

17. Did Jane tell you that night that she’d seen a man with a child?

18. How were the authorities contacted and which police force was alerted?

19. During the searches, with the police already there, where did you search for Maddie, how and in what way?

20. Why did the twins not wake up during that search or when they were taken upstairs?

21. Who did you phone after the occurrence?

22. Did you call Sky News?

23. Did you know the danger of calling the media, because it could influence the abductor?

24. Did you ask for a priest?

25. By what means did you divulge Madeleine’s features, by photographs or by any other means?

26. Is it true that during the searches you remained seated on Maddie’s bed without moving?

27. What was your behaviour that night?

28. Did you manage to sleep?

29. Before travelling to Portugal did you make any comment about a foreboding or a bad feeling?

30. What was Madeleine’s behaviour like?

31. Did Maddie suffer from any illness or take any medication?

32. What was Madeleine’s relationship like with her brother and sister?

33. What was Madeleine’s relationship like with her brother and sister, friends and school mates?

34. As for your professional life, in how many and which hospitals have you worked?

35. What is your medical specialty?

36. Have you ever done shift work in any emergency services or other services?

37. Did you work every day?

38. At a certain point you stopped working, why?

39. Are the twins difficult to get to sleep? Are they restless and does that cause you uneasiness?

40. Is it true that sometimes you despaired with your children’s behaviour and that left you feeling very uneasy?

41. Is it true that in England you even considered handing over Madeleine’s custody to a relative?

42. In England, did you medicate your children? What type of medication?

43. In the case files you were SHOWN CANINE forensic testing films, where you can see them marking due to detection of the scent of human corpse and blood traces, also human, and only human, as well as all the comments of the technician in charge of them. After watching and after the marking of the scent of corpse in your bedroom beside the wardrobe and behind the sofa, pushed up against the sofa wall, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?

44. When the sniffer dog also marked human blood behind the sofa, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?

45. When the sniffer dog marked the scent of corpse coming from the vehicle you hired a month after the disappearance, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?

46. When human blood was marked in the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?

47. When confronted with the results of Maddie’s DNA, whose analysis was carried out in a British laboratory, collected from behind the sofa and the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?

48. Did you have any responsibility or intervention in your daughter’s disappearance?

^ @redshoes

She and Gerry answered every single one of those questions, many times, on a voluntary basis prior to being made Arguidos.
They refused to answer any further questions after being made official suspects upon receiving legal advice.

Surely you understand that if she and Gerry refused to answer any single question at all from day one, that alone would have been enough leverage to be arrested, seeing as they’d have been obstructing the investigation by not cooperating???