Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Peter Casey believes Travellers should not be recognised as an ethnic minority

19394969899333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,856 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    You're arguing with someone who feels that it is justifiable during a housing crisis to build stables to accompany free houses ( free to the McCarthy families, courtesy of the taxpayer) instead of homes for homeless families.

    Nope Himan3000 more lies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    So the 'source' says. You and I know Johnny how that attribution 'sources say' is
    handy hide behind for media to run stories that have no bearing in fact.
    For all we know the 'source' is some disgruntled loyalist ex RUC man with a grudge.

    I will let this 'story' develop a wee bit more before I give it the time of day tbh.

    Source is named
    Assistant chief constable Alan Todd added: “The PSNI routinely work with visiting heads of state and other key figures visiting Northern Ireland and make full provisions for their safety in line with their requirements.”

    and the Sinn Fein candidate has rolled in behind it
    Sinn F presidential candidate Liadh Ni Riada said President Higgins’ claim about his transportation had been disputed by the PSNI.

    She added: “They reject this security claim [and] say it would be ‘inconceivable’ that the President of Ireland would not have been afforded security if it had been requested.

    “It is clear now that Michael D Higgins’ claim has caused considerable anger within the PSNI.
    link

    This is gonna put eggs on a lot of faces.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    Nope Himan3000 more lies.


    Your posts are still there. Although you ducked giving a straight answer repeatedly to another poster.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    This is gonna put eggs on a lot of faces.


    Nice to see Higgins being shown to be no different than any other politician. Happy to cost the taxpayer 10's of thousands to use the Lear jet when a car ride would have sufficed. Champagne socialist if ever there was one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 55,069 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    Nice to see Higgins being shown to be no different than any other politician. Happy to cost the taxpayer 10's of thousands to use the Lear jet when a car ride would have sufficed. Champagne socialist if ever there was one.

    And wasn't it Casey who broke the story.
    Casey having a very good week all round.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,856 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Source is named


    and the Sinn Fein candidate has rolled in behind it

    link

    This is gonna put eggs on a lot of faces.

    Not the same un-named source that said 'it is inconceivable etc etc.' He was the person giving the official line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,856 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    Your posts are still there. Although you ducked giving a straight answer repeatedly to another poster.

    Find one where I did what you said?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭The high horse brigade


    Find one where I did what you said?

    It's probably not possible search for a single post from you because you have a gazillion posts on this thread


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Wheeliebin30


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    You're arguing with someone who feels that it is justifiable during a housing crisis to build stables to accompany free houses ( free to the McCarthy families, courtesy of the taxpayer) instead of homes for homeless families.

    There are no free houses hitman;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    And wasn't it Casey who broke the story. Casey having a very good week all round.


    Yeah he said it on the Virgin one debate, I think Higgins described it first as another fantasy charge then siad it was a security issue but insisted he drove to Derry weeks earlier. Still nothing though on whether there was any turth in Casey's other claim that Higgins once objected to a halting site being built.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    Find one where I did what you said?


    Along the lines of 'if the council agreed to build stables they should be built'. How can you justify building stables in the present housing crisis is beyond me .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    There are no free houses hitman


    I know this dude and we may have clashed by times but there is always a cost. Sometimes there is no cost to the end user.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,856 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    Yeah he said it on the Virgin one debate, I think Higgins described it first as another fantasy charge then siad it was a security issue but insisted he drove to Derry weeks earlier. Still nothing though on whether there was any turth in Casey's other claim that Higgins once objected to a halting site being built.

    Yes there is. Galway Co Co say they have no records of MDH objecting to an application.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    Not the same un-named source that said 'it is inconceivable etc etc.' He was the person giving the official line.

    Francie even LnR has come out now and commented on it, if you check this thread my first comment about any of this was the private jet story.

    MDH is coming across as a great champagne socialist, he's no different than the rest win his snout in the trough.

    Casey played a blinder here. More to come I hope.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,856 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    Along the lines of 'if the council agreed to build stables they should be built'. How can you justify building stables in the present housing crisis is beyond me .

    If the council agreed to build them stables, I would be asking them same thing.
    If they didn't, no problem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,856 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Francie even LnR has come out now and commented on it, if you check this thread my first comment about any of this was the private jet story.

    MDH is coming across as a great champagne socialist, he's no different than the rest win his snout in the trough.

    Casey played a blinder here. More to come I hope.

    So what if Ni Riada has come out and commented? It's an election, I wouldn't expect anything less.

    There is nothing confirmed here. We do need it clarified though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭dav3


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    Still nothing though on whether there was any turth in Casey's other claim that Higgins once objected to a halting site being built.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/peter-casey-denies-mixing-up-michael-d-higgins-and-ff-mayor-1.3668462
    Mr Casey suggested that Mr Higgins objected to a halting site near his home in 1968. Mr Higgins said that was inaccurate.

    Presidential candidate Peter Casey has denied he made a mistake when he accused President Michael D Higgins of having objected to a Traveller halting site in Galway in 1968.

    Galway City Council has been unable to shed light on the claim, made during the Virgin Media One presidential debate hosted by Pat Kenny on Wednesday night, despite Mr Casey claiming that the objection was “on the public record”.

    However, a former Fianna Fáil mayor with a similar surname, businessman Michéal O hUiginn, has said that he was one of a majority of councillors who objected to plans by Galway’s local authority in 1968 to provide a hardstand in Rahoon, where Traveller families had been camped.

    Mr Ó hUiginn noted that Mr Higgins was not on the council at the time, and he has no recollection of him being involved in what transpired at Rahoon. Both men were at university together, and both served terms as mayor of Galway.

    Mr Ó hUiginn said the 1968 case was the one and only time he had objected to a halting site, and he had done so as there were concerns about its location next to a cemetery and in what was then a rural area on the outskirts of the city.

    Just another one of the many balls up by Casey.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    If the council agreed to build them stables, I would be asking them same thing. If they didn't, no problem.


    So again if an agreement was made several years ago to build stables you still believe it would be appropriate in the present climate with resources stretched? Btw 900 families seeking housing in Tipp, the families in question turning down houses because they didn't come with 2 stables and half an acre. Indefensible tbh.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,736 ✭✭✭Yer Da sells Avon


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    Still nothing though on whether there was any turth in Casey's other claim that Higgins once objected to a halting site being built.

    There was no truth in it whatsoever. Apparently he may have confused him with a Fianna Fail councillor by the name of Michéal Ó hUiginn.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Wheeliebin30


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    I know this dude and we may have clashed by times but there is always a cost. Sometimes there is no cost to the end user.

    It’s all good my man, we have common ground and we must stand it.....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,856 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    So again if an agreement was made several years ago to build stables you still believe it would be appropriate in the present climate with resources stretched? Btw 900 families seeking housing in Tipp, the families in question turning down houses because they didn't come with 2 stables and half an acre. Indefensible tbh.

    Are you saying Co Co's should welch on agreements? I think if you extend that across the board you end up with chaos.

    The family say the houses are no good to them, and that they are happy to let them go to homeless people.
    It's typical Co Co paralysis that they haven't reallocated them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    So what if Ni Riada has come out and commented? It's an election, I wouldn't expect anything less.

    There is nothing confirmed here. We do need it clarified though.

    Francie that looks to me like a pretty official statement from the PSNI,
    Assistant chief constable Alan Todd added: “The PSNI routinely work with visiting heads of state and other key figures visiting Northern Ireland and make full provisions for their safety in line with their requirements.”

    I thought it hard to believe at first that the President of Ireland wouldn't have had security provided for him while in another part of the island, and now they (PSNI) Seem to want to come out and defend themselves - rightly so if Higgins is spoofing to defend his use of a Lear jet while simultaneously sending his official car on ahead to Belfast to wait for him arriving by air.

    Higgins said that he was did so after security advice, the offical security forces deny this.

    Not sure if it's an intentional pun, but Higgins purpose in Belfast was quite ironic.
    In May, he spoke at Queen’s University Belfast on the 20th anniversary of the Good Friday Agreement around the concepts of remembering, forgiving, forgetting, and imagining
    :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Wheeliebin30


    There was no truth in it whatsoever. Apparently he may have confused him with a Fianna Fail councillor by the name of Michéal Ó hUiginn.

    How convenient.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    The family say the houses are no good to them, and that they are happy to let them go to homeless people. It's typical Co Co paralysis that they haven't reallocated them.


    I asked you earlier are you really that naive to think anyone else other than the McCarthys will be able to live in those houses in any type of comfort?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Wheeliebin30


    There was no truth in it whatsoever. Apparently he may have confused him with a Fianna Fail councillor by the name of Michéal Ó hUiginn.

    How convenient.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35 terminator2018


    The RTE poll thats coming out is very fake news
    I'll be sticking another 20 on President Casey for the win
    Anyone i spoke to won't be voting or will be voting Casey
    MAKE IRELAND GREAT AGAIN
    AND HIGGINS SHOULD BE GOING TO JAIL FOR THE WAY HE'S SQUANDERING MONEY
    10K FOR GROOMING HIS FILTHY MUTT DOGS FFS
    the ordinary person struggling now to get winter shoes or coats for their children
    and the mongos calling Casey a racist should be ashamed of themselves


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,249 ✭✭✭holyhead


    The two women Robinson and McAleese did a fine job as Presidents. Higgins has again turned it into a retirement home for politicians. We the people and the office of President deserve better.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,736 ✭✭✭Yer Da sells Avon


    How convenient.

    Nah, Casey was definitely mistaken (either that or lying). There is no record of Michael D Higgins objecting to a halting site. There is, however, a record of Michéal Ó hUiginn objecting on one occasion in 1968, before Michael D was a councillor. Judging by his conduct throughout this campaign (before any of the anti-traveller stuff), I doubt Casey will have the decency to acknowledge that he was wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 55,069 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    There was no truth in it whatsoever. Apparently he may have confused him with a Fianna Fail councillor by the name of Michéal Ó hUiginn.

    Ha ha and has Micheal O hUiginn access to the Govt jet too.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,856 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Hitman3000 wrote: »
    I asked you earlier are you really that naive to think anyone else other than the McCarthys will be able to live in those houses in any type of comfort?

    Is this the 'would you live next to a halting site' question?

    It isn't a halting site, they have lived there for 50 years.

    Are you saying they would intimidate the new tenants?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement