Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Nazi Art

  • 01-10-2018 09:42PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,626 ✭✭✭


    Where did all the artwork liberated by the Monuments Men go to?
    Just watching Forbidden History and got to wondering where it all went?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭Snotty


    I think the "dogs playing poker" is in the White House now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,787 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Where did all the artwork liberated by the Monuments Men go to?
    Just watching Forbidden History and got to wondering where it all went?

    I knew Hitler was a painter. Never heard of Monuments Men or Forbidden History.


  • Posts: 5,422 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The bargepole is broken, hence this insightful comment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,266 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Back to the museums or galleries they came out of, or the owners, if they could be traced that is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,275 ✭✭✭Your Face


    It's all on Adverts.ie


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,887 ✭✭✭Atoms for Peace


    The final remaining member of the flying hellfish, left alive, will inherit it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,622 ✭✭✭Ninthlife


    I read last year German police raided a flat in Munich that contained numerous paintings and antiques stolen by the Nazis from Jewish families.

    The occupier of the flat would sell a high priced item every couple of years and use the proceeds to live off


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    Whatever way you look at, this is one fine piece of art :



    The visuals are quite superb in so much of, even if you dont like Hitler that much.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,099 ✭✭✭CFlat


    Ninthlife wrote: »
    I read last year German police raided a flat in Munich that contained numerous paintings and antiques stolen by the Nazis from Jewish families.

    The occupier of the flat would sell a high priced item every couple of years and use the proceeds to live off

    He wasn't The Highlander by any chance?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,961 ✭✭✭indioblack


    I knew Hitler was a painter.

    "Hitler, there was a painter. He could paint an entire apartment in one afternoon. Two coats!"
    The Producers.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Back in the 90's I was offered an original Hitler watercolour/gouache of a farmyard scene for around 800 quid IIRC. I was tempted TBH. Both for the historical aspect and it was actually well done and decorative. He was pure shite at painting people and the like, but his landscapes and architectural stuff was pretty decent. Again IIRC he wanted to be an architect? He certainly had some talent for art. In my humble a better talent than one of his nemesis' Churchill, whose watercolours are heavy handed.

    I didn't go for it in the end as A, my dad reckoned "it'll do you no good to have that prick's art on your wall", and B, I had other avenues where the 800 quid was sorely needed. In retrospect I'm sorry I didn't buy. Investment wise it would be worth at least an added zero, and for me the best thing to do with historical items that may cause discomfort is to render them more inert by modern usage. Swords into ploughshares kinda thing.

    I say that typing on my laptop which resides on top of a WW2 ammo box for a Junkers JU 87 "PanzerKnacker" turned into a laptop table. When I enjoy a boiled egg of a morning, it usually sits in a U-Boat eggcup. For me, that's how you think about, integrate and defuse a past that needs thinking about, integrating and defusing.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Posts: 2,032 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Whatever way you look at, this is one fine piece of art :



    The visuals are quite superb in so much of, even if you dont like Hitler that much.

    Directed by a woman too. Way ahead of their time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,283 ✭✭✭Chorcai


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Back in the 90's I was offered an original Hitler watercolour/gouache of a farmyard scene for around 800 quid IIRC. I was tempted TBH. Both for the historical aspect and it was actually well done and decorative. He was pure shite at painting people and the like, but his landscapes and architectural stuff was pretty decent. Again IIRC he wanted to be an architect? He certainly had some talent for art. In my humble a better talent than one of his nemesis' Churchill, whose watercolours are heavy handed.

    I didn't go for it in the end as A, my dad reckoned "it'll do you no good to have that prick's art on your wall", and B, I had other avenues where the 800 quid was sorely needed. In retrospect I'm sorry I didn't buy. Investment wise it would be worth at least an added zero, and for me the best thing to do with historical items that may cause discomfort is to render them more inert by modern usage. Swords into ploughshares kinda thing.


    Jake and Dino Champman did a whole series of works where they "prettified" Hitlers work. They explain it here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    Poor old Adolf was quite an accomplished landscape artist but he wasn't from the right social class for the establishment. One wonders how the course of history could have run very differently had his ability been recognised. Too Germanic for my taste not to mention my pocket.

    Hitler%2Bpainting.jpeg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,887 ✭✭✭Atoms for Peace


    What do you call a traveller with a panzer tank?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,961 ✭✭✭indioblack


    Del.Monte wrote: »
    Poor old Adolf was quite an accomplished landscape artist but he wasn't from the right social class for the establishment. One wonders how the course of history could have run very differently had his ability been recognised. Too Germanic for my taste not to mention my pocket.

    Hitler%2Bpainting.jpeg
    Have to add this one:
    "I can't get the f...ing trees right - damn, I will kill everyone in the world!"
    Eddie Izzard.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Back in the 90's I was offered an original Hitler watercolour/gouache of a farmyard scene for around 800 quid IIRC. I was tempted TBH. Both for the historical aspect and it was actually well done and decorative. He was pure shite at painting people and the like, but his landscapes and architectural stuff was pretty decent. Again IIRC he wanted to be an architect? He certainly had some talent for art. In my humble a better talent than one of his nemesis' Churchill, whose watercolours are heavy handed.

    I didn't go for it in the end as A, my dad reckoned "it'll do you no good to have that prick's art on your wall", and B, I had other avenues where the 800 quid was sorely needed. In retrospect I'm sorry I didn't buy. Investment wise it would be worth at least an added zero, and for me the best thing to do with historical items that may cause discomfort is to render them more inert by modern usage. Swords into ploughshares kinda thing.

    I say that typing on my laptop which resides on top of a WW2 ammo box for a Junkers JU 87 "PanzerKnacker" turned into a laptop table. When I enjoy a boiled egg of a morning, it usually sits in a U-Boat eggcup. For me, that's how you think about, integrate and defuse a past that needs thinking about, integrating and defusing.




    PanzerKnacker is my word of the day for today.

    Where can I find one?

    Would make a good chat up line - "Wanna come back to mine to see my PanzerKnacker?"


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    His art is boring and conservative, Vienna at the start of the century was home to the Secession, the likes of Klimt and Wagner and a desire to break free from the stuffy, rigid styles of the past centuries in art and architecture. You needed either vision and talent to make a start, both to succeed and Hitler had neither


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭wally79


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Back in the 90's I was offered an original Hitler watercolour/gouache of a farmyard scene for around 800 quid IIRC. I was tempted TBH. Both for the historical aspect and it was actually well done and decorative. He was pure shite at painting people and the like, but his landscapes and architectural stuff was pretty decent. Again IIRC he wanted to be an architect? He certainly had some talent for art. In my humble a better talent than one of his nemesis' Churchill, whose watercolours are heavy handed.

    I didn't go for it in the end as A, my dad reckoned "it'll do you no good to have that prick's art on your wall", and B, I had other avenues where the 800 quid was sorely needed. In retrospect I'm sorry I didn't buy. Investment wise it would be worth at least an added zero, and for me the best thing to do with historical items that may cause discomfort is to render them more inert by modern usage. Swords into ploughshares kinda thing.

    I say that typing on my laptop which resides on top of a WW2 ammo box for a Junkers JU 87 "PanzerKnacker" turned into a laptop table. When I enjoy a boiled egg of a morning, it usually sits in a U-Boat eggcup. For me, that's how you think about, integrate and defuse a past that needs thinking about, integrating and defusing.

    Yes, these would be German as well?
    That's right.
    Nothing from the Allied side?
    No, that sort of thing wouldn't interest me at all.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    PanzerKnacker is my word of the day for today.

    Where can I find one?
    Good luck with that one. Extremely rare these days. They only built a couple of dozen of the aircraft so bits and bobs attached to them were rare enough in the first place. Mind you can get all sorts of WW2 ammo crates on ebay which would make good if odd coffee tables.
    His art is boring and conservative, Vienna at the start of the century was home to the Secession, the likes of Klimt and Wagner and a desire to break free from the stuffy, rigid styles of the past centuries in art and architecture. You needed either vision and talent to make a start, both to succeed and Hitler had neither
    Oh true R, but at the time 99% of working artists weren't doing the Modernist stuff and 99% of the public weren't buying it. Boring and conservative was the order of the day. Still is to a large extent. Few enough people's houses contain "modern art" even today. He could have worked as an illustrator for magazines, postcards and the like.
    wally79 wrote:
    Yes, these would be German as well?
    That's right.
    Nothing from the Allied side?
    No, that sort of thing wouldn't interest me at all.
    :D

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Suckler


    Your Face wrote: »
    It's all on Adverts.ie

    Swap your Vermeer or Klimt for a 1.1 VW Polo no tax no NCT ? Some old gardening tools in the boot I'll throw in as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Back in the 90's I was offered an original Hitler watercolour/gouache of a farmyard scene for around 800 quid IIRC. I was tempted TBH. Both for the historical aspect and it was actually well done and decorative. He was pure shite at painting people and the like, but his landscapes and architectural stuff was pretty decent. Again IIRC he wanted to be an architect? He certainly had some talent for art. In my humble a better talent than one of his nemesis' Churchill, whose watercolours are heavy handed.

    I didn't go for it in the end as A, my dad reckoned "it'll do you no good to have that prick's art on your wall", and B, I had other avenues where the 800 quid was sorely needed. In retrospect I'm sorry I didn't buy. Investment wise it would be worth at least an added zero, and for me the best thing to do with historical items that may cause discomfort is to render them more inert by modern usage. Swords into ploughshares kinda thing.

    I say that typing on my laptop which resides on top of a WW2 ammo box for a Junkers JU 87 "PanzerKnacker" turned into a laptop table. When I enjoy a boiled egg of a morning, it usually sits in a U-Boat eggcup. For me, that's how you think about, integrate and defuse a past that needs thinking about, integrating and defusing.

    You racist nazi bigot!!!

    Seriously, imagine if you were a person anywhere in the public eye, could you imagine the lynchmob after you now.

    The headlines.
    Wibbs admires Nazi art!
    Has collection!
    <photo of father ted nazi priests with giant swastika in background>


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    You racist nazi bigot!!!

    Seriously, imagine if you were a person anywhere in the public eye, could you imagine the lynchmob after you now.
    I suppose it depends on the person involved. Lemmy of Motorhead fame was an avid collector of nazi memorabilia, flags, uniforms, daggers, that sorta thing, including at one point a tank. As you do..

    20160301175116.jpg

    Now if a holier than thou Hollywood type did similar I'd say there'd be hell to pay alright. It depends on why someone collects that sorta thing. Most I'd reckon would just be collectors and that happens to be their thing, a few no doubt would be Neo nazi types. Not good. A true nazi nutbag would have hated someone like Lemmy going around wearing that stuff. Good I say.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,365 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Wibbs wrote: »
    I suppose it depends on the person involved. Lemmy of Motorhead fame was an avid collector of nazi memorabilia, flags, uniforms, daggers, that sorta thing, including at one point a tank. As you do..

    20160301175116.jpg

    Now if a holier than thou Hollywood type did similar I'd say there'd be hell to pay alright. It depends on why someone collects that sorta thing. Most I'd reckon would just be collectors and that happens to be their thing, a few no doubt would be Neo nazi types. Not good. A true nazi nutbag would have hated someone like Lemmy going around wearing that stuff. Good I say.


    That is not a tank.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,741 ✭✭✭Effects


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Back in the 90's I was offered an original Hitler watercolour/gouache of a farmyard scene for around 800 quid IIRC.

    It was probably a fake. Lots of them knocking about.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    That is not a tank.
    as I typed it I just knew... :D Shorthand for the non anal; tank. For the anal; Jagdpanzer(though technically it's kinda still a "tank").
    Effects wrote: »
    It was probably a fake. Lots of them knocking about.
    Possibly E, though provenance was pretty solid and it was pre the interwebs and the massive rise in the number of collectors(of anything) and the need to feed the market with fakes.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    Wibbs wrote: »
    , and for me the best thing to do with historical items that may cause discomfort is to render them more inert by modern usage. Swords into ploughshares kinda thing.

    Awful lot more sensible and useful approach I think than the current trend of trying to erase/whitewash history, pull down statues and all that guff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,365 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Wibbs wrote: »
    as I typed it I just knew... Shorthand for the non anal; tank. For the anal; Jagdpanzer.


    Jadgpanzer 38 to be exact.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Now if a holier than thou Hollywood type did similar I'd say there'd be hell to pay alright. It depends on why someone collects that sorta thing.

    Maybe people realized that Lemmy wouldn't have given 2 ****s :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,926 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Where did all the artwork liberated by the Monuments Men go to?
    Just watching Forbidden History and got to wondering where it all went?

    People are still trying to recover stolen property: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/02/french-court-orders-return-of-looted-painting-to-jewish-family?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other


Advertisement
Advertisement