Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTICE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

1160161163165166334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12 Frances456


    Does anyone know some of the recent Vicarious Liability cases for tort?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 62 ✭✭Twinings2016


    yournerd wrote: »
    I do!

    any chance you could pm? thanks a million!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    lawless11 wrote: »
    Would anyone have a case to back "mutual exchange of promises can constitute consideration" - in contract? Thank you.

    Centrovincial Estates Plc v Merchant Investors Assurance Co Ltd 1983


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66 ✭✭lawlad101


    Not starting til Monday 8th.
    Anyone else only starting to memorize now? :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 110 ✭✭Smiley283


    lawlad101 wrote: »
    Not starting til Monday 8th.
    Anyone else only starting to memorize now? :(

    Don't fret over it.. doing up notes takes way longer than actually learning it all... just pick a topic and learn the basic principles and then start adding in cases as you go along.. you can do this!!

    Just don't compromise on getting 8 hours sleep and drink plenty of water and get out in fresh air.. you will make it harder on yourself to retain information otherwise!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 300 ✭✭Leraf


    They're generally out six weeks after the last exam. So I'd say the third Friday in November?




    6 weeks after the last Friday of the Exams. I would put that at the 30th November, no?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 189 ✭✭Supermax1988


    Leraf wrote: »
    6 weeks after the last Friday of the Exams. I would put that at the 30th November, no?

    23rd by my count?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 FE1 Lady


    Some people do some don't. Probably better to do them if u haven't studied law before. I didn't do them nor did many i know. More a case of having the finances to be honest.

    Cheers_ i have an undergraduate and masters in law. Took a two year break and went travelling and now I’m back staring into a book wondering “why did I come back to do these exams” I feel like I’m getting enough from the book alone but then panicked because maybe I’m missing the vital information or something that may be contained in the prep course. Thanks so much for Reply


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42 Fuguestate


    How are people learning off cases and info. I'm using the Quizlet flash card app. I find it very good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 FE1 Lady


    Ngannou54 wrote: »
    FE1 Lady wrote: »
    Quick Q - Did Many Sit Prep Courses for these Exams? Am I the only person who just bought material? This would put my mind at ease if any kind individual could enlighten me? :)

    I've passed 5 and I just bought materials. I couldn't afford prep courses. All my materials are second hand from donedeal.

    Thank you very much for your Reply. This is my first time sitting and to be honest I genuinely didn’t have the funds to do the courses so I bought my material of gumtree and I have been studying off the book entirely and some really kind people on here gave me reports etc. so thanks to all!

    As I don’t know anybody doing the FE-1s I just presumed that material would be enough and this week I have gone into a blind panic wondering am I the on,ya person who did this. Thanks so much for heads up.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,159 ✭✭✭yournerd


    Could anyone give me a brief run down on what changes the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2017 introduced?

    send me ur email i have good notes on this


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,901 ✭✭✭Gunslinger92


    Could anyone send me a constitutional grid or tell me what came up last sitting? I'd be very very grateful!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 Pollylou75


    What is the general consensus on bringing the sale of goods legislation into the contract exam. Is it foolish not to bring them in


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    Pollylou75 wrote: »
    What is the general consensus on bringing the sale of goods legislation into the contract exam. Is it foolish not to bring them in

    Very useful for a Consumer Protection question and it tends to come up every sitting


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40 Fe1hayes


    Just wondering anyone have tips for constitutional ? I sat my fe1's in march passing 3 quite well but failed const. I have been studying it constantly the last month but it's like a wall as much as I understand it ,the questions complete ly trow me ,the reports are unhelpful also.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6 Fe1hun18


    If anyone could send me an updated EU grid I’d really appreciate it :(:(:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17 Joanneom


    Fe1hayes wrote: »
    Just wondering anyone have tips for constitutional ? I sat my fe1's in march passing 3 quite well but failed const. I have been studying it constantly the last month but it's like a wall as much as I understand it ,the questions complete ly trow me ,the reports are unhelpful also.

    Im feeling the exact same way about it. From going through the reports I think the most important thing to do is read the questions extremely carefully and consider them. The essay questions are a good one to go for in Const as they are open to opinion and can give you a little wiggle room there, granted you have the law/ratio to back them up. I found in my undergrad the most important thing with Const was to not fear giving a reasoned opinion as it shows that you've considered the law in that area.

    I'm just so stuck with the vastness of the whole subject. Feeling very underprepared even though I've studied more than half the course. What have you studied?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13 Bashbag89


    Quick question n relation to tort and negligent mistatement?

    Can Negligent mistatement only impose liability when the loss suffered is financial? Or can it be equally applied in situations when a Pl relied on information and as a result suffered personal injury?

    Thanks!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 189 ✭✭Supermax1988


    Putting in another shout out for Contract/Tort/Equity predictions from Lawschool.ie
    If anyone on here has them and was willing to share I'd be eternally grateful!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 62 ✭✭Twinings2016


    Does anyone have any predictions for case notes in Constitutional???


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19 LawStudent2018


    Does anyone have any predictions for case notes in Constitutional???

    The only tip worth noting is that case notes rarely repeat themselves. In the last 6 sittings I believe 2-3 may have repeated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33 mariealice


    The only tip worth noting is that case notes rarely repeat themselves. In the last 6 sittings I believe 2-3 may have repeated.


    Ya , in desperation I went back through all the past papers and made a list and only maybe 6 or 7 cases notes were repeated since 2010 :/ I feel like they always try to throw in a recent one if there has been a big case in the last year or so so maybe a case like DPP v Doyle(2017) ? Other then that no clue. Not feeling too confident about constitutional!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    Bashbag89 wrote: »
    Quick question n relation to tort and negligent mistatement?

    Can Negligent mistatement only impose liability when the loss suffered is financial? Or can it be equally applied in situations when a Pl relied on information and as a result suffered personal injury?

    Thanks!!!

    I think it's only for financial loss as negligent misstatement is essentially a type of economic loss.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 140 ✭✭sapphire309


    mariealice wrote: »
    Ya , in desperation I went back through all the past papers and made a list and only maybe 6 or 7 cases notes were repeated since 2010 :/ I feel like they always try to throw in a recent one if there has been a big case in the last year or so so maybe a case like DPP v Doyle(2017) ? Other then that no clue. Not feeling too confident about constitutional!

    I remember last sitting I was expecting either Gilchrist v Sunday Newspapers or NVH v MJE to come up - Gilchrist came up but no sign of NVH as far as I can remember, so maybe give that judgment a read.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33 Heart Shaped Box


    yournerd wrote: »
    send me ur email i have good notes on this

    Is there any chance you'd be willing to share those with me also? I can (hopefully) find something to swap with you :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33 Heart Shaped Box


    First time sitting FE1s - if you are sitting subjects on both the first and second week which allow you to bring in legislation, does it make sense to come in on the first day and drop off ALL legislation to be checked?

    If you do that, is it the case that when you arrive to your first exam (i.e. the day after you dropped it all off) you'll be handed back your legislation for all subjects in one go, despite only needing it for 1?
    If so, doesn't that mean you could technically go changing your highlights/tabs etc for the exam you have a week later?


    Sorry if this makes no sense/is stupid - caffeine has frazzled my brain


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34 LegallyBlonde2


    Nope, they drop it on your desk the morning of your exam! so if your drop it in the day before your exam its on your desk on the morning of the exam or if you drop it in on the morning of your exam you get it dropped to you desk an hour after the exam begins!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11 byrne7


    First time sitting FE1s - if you are sitting subjects on both the first and second week which allow you to bring in legislation, does it make sense to come in on the first day and drop off ALL legislation to be checked?

    If you do that, is it the case that when you arrive to your first exam (i.e. the day after you dropped it all off) you'll be handed back your legislation for all subjects in one go, despite only needing it for 1?
    If so, doesn't that mean you could technically go changing your highlights/tabs etc for the exam you have a week later?


    Sorry if this makes no sense/is stupid - caffeine has frazzled my brain

    No, once you drop off your legislation, you don’t get it back until the actual exam. They leave it on your desk with your student number so once you hand it in, you have to be sure you won’t need it until the exam.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭TCPIP


    When they say that your Constitution must be unmarked, how unmarked do they mean? Can I highlight?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 140 ✭✭sapphire309


    TCPIP wrote: »
    When they say that your Constitution must be unmarked, how unmarked do they mean? Can I highlight?

    Highlight, underline and tab. No writing on the page other than simply underlining the text.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement