Family of seven sleep in Garda station Mod note post one

One eyed Jack wrote: »

The only difference being that she actually didn’t settle for what she had and quite rightly she went about fighting for more. There’s absolutely no reason in the world anyone here complaining about her couldn’t do exactly the same thing as she has done, and they have numerous advantages over her already in terms of opportunities to do it.

Do you even read half the ****e you post? You've no idea where I started in life, what I've settled for or even if I've settled for it yet. And if you believe what she's doing is the right way to provide a better life for her and her kids then you're as bad as she is.

Wile E. Coyote wrote: »

Do you even read half the ****e you post? You've no idea where I started in life, what I've settled for or even if I've settled for it yet. And if you believe what she's doing is the right way to provide a better life for her and her kids then you're as bad as she is.

You’re the person referring to yourself as a gobshìte. Far be it for me to contradict you on that score, and quite frankly I don’t care where you started from, it’s where you are now that you’re giving it welly because you don’t like the fact that you feel you’re working to pay for someone else’s lifestyle.

I’ve already stated early on in the thread that I don’t agree with what she’s doing, but I don’t expect her to care that I don’t agree with what she’s doing either as her priority is herself and her family, as you can be rest assured anyone else’s priority is themselves and their families.

Many of these Facebook entitled warriors are just laughing their socks off at those who pay for their lifestyles, is this true or not.

Yes, unsuitable in that’s not a 4 bedroom forever house?

Wile E. Coyote wrote: »

Would I be happy getting a house for nothing? Absolutely.

Would I be happy having a house in Drumcondra that I paid nothing for? Absolutely.

Do you know what I'd do if I wasn't happy? I'd get off my arse and do something about it myself. I wouldn't expect everything to be just handed to me on a silver plate.

I'd a 14km bus journey to school every day, on a transport service down the country that was a lot worse than whats available in Dublin. When my kids are going to school they'll have the exact same journey to make. I'm not going to sit and bitch all day that their school is too far away and expect someone to give me a different house.

miss cash isn't getting a house for nothing, she will be paying for that house. she will be paying rent at a below market rate, which will be partly subsidized by the state. this is due to her income.
in rural areas, schools will often be a bit away for some people, therefore it's not comparible to how far schools in towns and cities should be from the residents of those areas.

tretorn wrote: »

Okay then.

.We will give you ten thousand euros for every year until you have reached the age of thirty without having a baby and after you are thirty we will give you twenty thousand euros if you agree to be sterilised.

There are very few obstreticians who would have a quandary about permanently sterilising someone who has no job, no home, no savings and who has seven or eight children.

i presume you have asked all of the obstetricians in the country their view on that idea, to come to this conclusion?

tretorn wrote: »

The Cashes of this world want everything for nothing though so if you give them the child benefit without them having to produce a child they may go for it. It is a lot cheaper to pay them not to have children than it is to supply house after house to these big clans


The children have to be looked after but we could use food vouchers and clothes vouchers. We would need to make sure these vouchers couldnt be traded in for cash to be spent at the off licence.

My friend works in a supermarket, she says you wouldnt believe the carry on of the travellers. The men send the teens in to rob crisps and while the security staff respond to this the adult males lift cart loads of alcohol and just walk out the door, this goes on all the time.

i'd think that to both set up your voucher system and then police it sufficiently to insure they could never be traded for cash would cost so much that the whole thing would be unviable. but that's a guess on my part.

freshpopcorn wrote: »

Where does Miss Cash get her cash from to pay her rent?

Don't bother. EOTR never answers this question. Ever.

Well, tickle me pink

Mongfinder General wrote: »

The problem is some of us are paying for it. She is taking it from me and the people who work for a living. She and her like are dragging the rest of us out of prosperity and into a **** pit of an existence. That’s what I give a ****e about. You’re probably some minimum wage punk who has fcuk all to lose and everything to gain by encouraging like behavior.

The problem is actually that public funds are wasted on outsourcing and administration and whatever is left is then used to provide an inadequate service to ‘service users’ (fancy term for people who are homeless).

The woman in question in this particular case isn’t taking anything from you or I personally, nor is she and her like dragging you or I out of prosperity, and I don’t know about you but I’m not in a shìt pit of an existence nor would I ever claim to be. If you are, then you may be entitled to avail of services to get you out of the shìt pit, as is anyone else who qualifies for any assistance they receive from the State.

To that end, it doesn’t matter how much I earn, or how much I pay in tax, it doesn’t matter how much you earn or how much you pay in tax either. We’d be paying it anyway regardless of how many people there were like the woman in question in this particular case, because most of it isn’t going to provide for services, it’s going to provide for salaries, and they aren’t minimum wage punks either. Why even hire minimum wage punks when there are all sorts various Government employment schemes that service providers can avail of to meet their staffing requirements that cost them nothing?

In fact the only thing you got right in that post is that I have nothing to lose by the woman in question in this particular case carrying on as she does. That’s not to say I approve of either her attitude or her behaviour, but certainly I can understand what has driven her to the point where she chose to take matters into her own hands rather than continue to be dependent upon service providers who continue to provide a sub-standard service funded by the State.

One eyed Jack wrote: »

I did say suitable accommodation, and if she and her family have had to be housed several times already over the years that would suggest to me that the accommodation she is being housed in continues to be unsuitable.

She was evicted multiple times , several house she lived In were wrecked but they were fine when her and her family moved in ,
She even owns her own mobile home don't talk about that either ,she owns a car but people are moaning because she might have to get a bus or occasional Luas ,

But let's keep blaming everyone but her

One eyed Jack wrote: »

No, let’s put the blame squarely where it belongs - on the people who continue to provide unsuitable accommodation for people who continue to be housed in unsuitable accommodation. They are responsible for putting her in accommodation which is unsuitable for her and her family, and they are responsible for ensuring that the accommodation and services they provide for her and her family are suitable so that she isn’t constantly being evicted and wrecking the accommodation she is being placed in. She and her family are their responsibility. It’s up to the service provider to provide services which are appropriate for the needs of their service users. That’s what the State are funding them for!

You must be some clown if you believe what you say there !!! Cash gets evicted cause she and her offspring trash places they’re put because they have no respect. She must be a bad one when the halting sites from where she came from won’t have her !!

I really hope she’s put next door to where you live .. you’ll get on great I’d say