Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Off The Ball Official Thread <Mod Note - Post #1, #533, #6651>

1208209211213214334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭Imhof Tank


    And what is this talk of a "work" environment creeping in to this?

    Amateur sport is not a work setting in a legal sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    There's absolutely no doubt but that the players believe they are justified. They are not doing this for the sport of it, clearly.

    But sometimes in any group dynamic, opinions and claims can become exaggerated, or assume greater significance than they deserve.

    Nothing that the group has said seems to merit the attention it has received. Frankly, it seems like a classic case of one (or a few?) dominant leaders shepherding the others into their personal crusade.

    I'll be happy to be proven wrong!

    It seems like this happened:



    I think Peter Leahy is the dog in this video.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Lads, I don’t know much about these individuals or their associations, but two of the back-room staff left as well don’t forget.

    Whatever about the players, but two members of Leahys own ticket walking out on him as well raises alarm bells in my opinion.

    Leahy passes it off as nothing, the players make out that it’s everything.

    I think it’s fair to say that what actually happened is somewhere in the middle and that neither side are giving us the true picture.


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Listening here and it seems the LGFA released that statement before knowing the details of the players press conference.

    Regardless of what’s happened here, the entire situation has been a complete and utter ****-show


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,498 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Faugheen wrote: »
    Listening here and it seems the LGFA released that statement before knowing the details of the players press conference.

    Regardless of what’s happened here, the entire situation has been a complete and utter ****-show

    Thats kinda what I think. They referenced what I think was clearly Cora Staunton's first interview with OTB as opposed to last nights press conference.
    'Furthermore, we wish to express our disappointment at further statements made in a radio interview, whereby the playing environment under the management was deemed as “unhealthy” and she “didn’t feel it was a safe environment”. These remarks have led us to release this statement and we are seeking further advice with regard to them. We must stress that at no stage in our meeting with them were these remarks used. They have further exacerbated the situation and are extremely unhelpful going forward.

    Even though that is from todays statement, I think it was written before last nights announcement.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,874 ✭✭✭dr.kenneth noisewater


    Faugheen wrote:
    Lads, I don’t know much about these individuals or their associations, but two of the back-room staff left as well don’t forget.


    Well one was the father of one of the players that walked and I believe the other was from Carnacoun so prob had to leave when all the club players left


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,611 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    Thats kinda what I think. They referenced what I think was clearly Cora Staunton's first interview with OTB as opposed to last nights press conference.



    Even though that is from todays statement, I think it was written before last nights announcement.

    It's not like they said much last night anyway apart from a few more empty accusations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,498 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Raisins wrote: »
    It was released this afternoon. It’s in direct response to the press conference. It’s an unbelievable mess now.

    No.

    https://twitter.com/offtheball/status/1042163858226307073


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭Imhof Tank


    Off The Ball

    @offtheball
    "We were not aware of mental health issues” – #Mayo Ladies’ county board secretary, Kevin McDonnell.
    He also confirmed that tonight was the first time he had heard Sarah Tierney talk of feeling 'isolated' & 'intimidated' under Peter Leahy.


    These guys are worse than Fox News on this story. They are making out like the mental health issues revelations change everything (and also a soft implication that the board shouldn't really have missed this from day 1). What yer man clearly meant was the players never mentioned mental health at any stage before Monday night and the old adage "it may harm your defence if you fail to mention something when questioned which you later rely on in evidence..........".

    Eoin (?) also seemed to have terrible trouble grasping how mediation works. If no deal is done, then what is said is always confidential and never to be repeated whether in a court later or in the media. That is the central plank of the whole mediation system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,022 ✭✭✭anthonyjmaher


    Interesting post by Woolly this morning. This is a clip from a match where Cora Staunton, who was back from Australia, would not let Sarah Rowe take the free kicks (as she had been through the season - before the Queen Bee landed back on Irish soil).

    https://twitter.com/Woolberto/status/1042331326932770816

    I wonder did Sarah Rowe feel intimidated, undermined and suffer mental health issues due to Cora Staunton's behaviour?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,539 ✭✭✭ghostdancer


    Well one was the father of one of the players that walked and I believe the other was from Carnacoun so prob had to leave when all the club players left
    yep, Carnacon club man. can't be going up against Queen Cora and the attempted coup....

    if anything, it's telling that all the rest of the management staff stayed, along with most of the squad too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,503 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Looks like these players tried to bluff us and had to show their hand...........and they only had a pair of 3s !!

    And when you have such a sh1t hand, you gotta play the joker card.......mental health in this case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,022 ✭✭✭anthonyjmaher


    They referenced Peter Leahy's statement calling on both sides to stay quiet and stop playing the fight through the media.

    Interesting that they said that they got texts from people questioning why they were giving the girls "a free pass". Adrian then went on with a half hearted defence of the OTB position and tried to persist with this facade that they gave fair quarter to both sides. At the end of the section he said that they contacted Peter Leahy weeks ago (which I think was supposed to give them impression that they had been welcoming of the opinions of both sides), but he wasn't prepared to go on to the show. In hindsight, it looks as though the OTB team took Leahy's reluctance to appear on their show as an admission of guilt and ran with that narrative.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,498 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    They referenced Peter Leahy's statement calling on both sides to stay quiet and stop playing the fight through the media.

    Interesting that they said that they got texts from people questioning why they were giving the girls "a free pass". Adrian then went on with a half hearted defence of the OTB position and tried to persist with this facade that they gave fair quarter to both sides. At the end of the section he said that they contacted Peter Leahy weeks ago (which I think was supposed to give them impression that they had been welcoming of the opinions of both sides), but he wasn't prepared to go on to the show. In hindsight, it looks as though the OTB team took Leahy's reluctance to appear on their show as an admission of guilt and ran with that narrative.

    Well, if it did happen like this, they couldn't have handled it much differently, could they?

    Why wouldn't he have gone on the show at the earliest opportunity?
    Similarly, the girls should seriously consider going on The GAA hour.

    If they offered him to go on, they are welcome of opinions from both sides. There is no giving that impression about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,874 ✭✭✭dr.kenneth noisewater


    Why wouldn't he have gone on the show at the earliest opportunity? Similarly, the girls should seriously consider going on The GAA hour.


    As he said on the GAA hour he only came on because of the stuff Cora said in OTB. He had planned on saying nothing at all. OTB seemed to have picked the players side so cant blame him for not wanting to go on with them after.

    I'd have serious questions about why the players who left only had 2 journalists at their press conference the other night which Richie did question last night as well in fairness. They obviously wanted an easy ride as well, the whole thing has become a big PR battle at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,503 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    The house of cards is starting to wobble badly.

    It's all about to come crashing down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,503 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    A good piece by Ewan, saying what we now all know is right:

    https://www.independent.ie/sport/gaelic-games/ladies-football/ewan-mackenna-women-in-sport-have-been-fighting-hard-for-parity-clearly-on-this-occasion-it-didnt-suit-some-37334309.html

    The ladies who rebelled aren't going to come out of this smelling of roses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,498 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    NIMAN wrote: »
    A good piece by Ewan, saying what we now all know is right:

    https://www.independent.ie/sport/gaelic-games/ladies-football/ewan-mackenna-women-in-sport-have-been-fighting-hard-for-parity-clearly-on-this-occasion-it-didnt-suit-some-37334309.html

    The ladies who rebelled aren't going to come out of this smelling of roses.

    And this in the Times today suggests that Peter is owed an apology but also asks the question if a former military instructor had enough of a problem with what was going on, maybe there is more to it.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/leahy-s-my-way-or-the-highway-approach-not-doing-him-any-favours-1.3634957

    If the ladies had said Monday night they were uncomfortable and Cora had maybe used the wrong words, they'd have egg on their faces but it would now be largely behind them. Surely they had advice to that effect. For them to reinforce their claims is still very curious to me.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,480 ✭✭✭bloodless_coup


    In this day and age where females can make accusations and the male will automatically lose his reputation and job, they thought they'd get away with it...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,503 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    doylefe wrote: »
    Is this day and age where females can make accusations and the male will automatically lose his reputation and job, they thought they'd get away with it...

    We aren't sure if this was their ultimate objective, but they must have known it was a distinct possibility. Harsh if all the man was guilty of was shouting at them, calling a few lazy and telling them they wre playing sh1te.

    But I think the minute the county board said that Leahy was going nowhere, had their full backing and would be manager next year, the girls were fecked. It was then that they decided rather than backing down a little and taking the heat, they decided to continue digging the hole, in the hope that the womens side would always be seen as the right one.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,498 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    doylefe wrote: »
    Is this day and age where females can make accusations and the male will automatically lose his reputation and job, they thought they'd get away with it...
    NIMAN wrote: »
    We aren't sure if this was their ultimate objective, but they must have known it was a distinct possibility. Harsh if all the man was guilty of was shouting at them, calling a few lazy and telling them they wre playing sh1te.

    But I think the minute the county board said that Leahy was going nowhere, had their full backing and would be manager next year, the girls were fecked. It was then that they decided rather than backing down a little and taking the heat, they decided to continue digging the hole, in the hope that the womens side would always be seen as the right one.

    I'm not so sure. There are a lot of them involved. And none have split ranks.
    And the doubling down has me still on the fence, as I have said.

    This isn't quite at the Roxanne Pallett level of manipulation but they are being seen in this way by a lot I think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,022 ✭✭✭anthonyjmaher


    I think Cora's halo starts to slip when you look at that video with the free kick. I mean she's just back from Australia, and lucky to be even included in the squad after having been away. A lot of teams would not have her back after not training with the team during the winter and league. And even with those concessions, she still thinks that she can take over the free kicks. Peter Leahy probably should have dropped her completely at that stage.

    And the other girl, who joined the team in January having been away, said that she had suggested to Peter Leahy that they bring in an unnamed former Mayo footballer to help with the defence. And then claimed that SHE felt undermined. Surely Leahy would have felt undermined by the suggestion that he wasn't coaching the defence properly.

    With regard to the former army person. I was thinking the same that surely an ex army employee would be used to discipline, authority, team environments etc etc and would not be involved in exaggerating the situation or making up false claims. But remember, this is the same army that were whinging all over social media that they had to sleep out in the Phoenix Park when the pope was here!

    Looking forward to reading McKenna's article, thanks for the link.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,498 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I think Cora's halo starts to slip when you look at that video with the free kick. I mean she's just back from Australia, and lucky to be even included in the squad after having been away. A lot of teams would not have her back after not training with the team during the winter and league. And even with those concessions, she still thinks that she can take over the free kicks. Peter Leahy probably should have dropped her completely at that stage.

    And the other girl, who joined the team in January having been away, said that she had suggested to Peter Leahy that they bring in an unnamed former Mayo footballer to help with the defence. And then claimed that SHE felt undermined. Surely Leahy would have felt undermined by the suggestion that he wasn't coaching the defence properly.

    With regard to the former army person. I was thinking the same that surely an ex army employee would be used to discipline, authority, team environments etc etc and would not be involved in exaggerating the situation or making up false claims. But remember, this is the same army that were whinging all over social media that they had to sleep out in the Phoenix Park when the pope was here!

    Looking forward to reading McKenna's article, thanks for the link.

    Something tells me you have a pretty entrenched view on this whole matter. I'm not sure what it is, can't put my finger on it. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    NIMAN wrote: »
    A good piece by Ewan, saying what we now all know is right:

    https://www.independent.ie/sport/gaelic-games/ladies-football/ewan-mackenna-women-in-sport-have-been-fighting-hard-for-parity-clearly-on-this-occasion-it-didnt-suit-some-37334309.html

    The ladies who rebelled aren't going to come out of this smelling of roses.

    This bit amused me.

    The we-share-everything-but-you-pay-for-dinner mentality

    But, then I can help think that when you think of it in terms of his Dublin financial unfairness arguments, it is more then a bit ironic

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 537 ✭✭✭Niles Crane


    NIMAN wrote: »
    A good piece by Ewan, saying what we now all know is right:

    https://www.independent.ie/sport/gaelic-games/ladies-football/ewan-mackenna-women-in-sport-have-been-fighting-hard-for-parity-clearly-on-this-occasion-it-didnt-suit-some-37334309.html

    The ladies who rebelled aren't going to come out of this smelling of roses.


    100% correct from McKenna women is sport (and life in general) seem to what parity/equality with men but only the good aspects of it.

    If you are playing top level sport you have to accept that getting a bit of a telling off every now and then and some industrial language being used is par for the course.I only played at junior b level and I'd say I was subjected to worse stuff than the Mayo ladies team were this year.

    Too many new age journalists seem to want to turn sport in an office like environment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,483 ✭✭✭✭BPKS


    This bit amused me.

    The we-share-everything-but-you-pay-for-dinner mentality

    But, then I can help think that when you think of it in terms of his Dublin financial unfairness arguments, it is more then a bit ironic

    Explain the irony


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 670 ✭✭✭sightband


    Have absolutely no idea what Giles is trying to say. This sounds like the most drunken nonsensical 4am in the morning conversation between two lads, the other falling asleep trying to humour the drunker of the two that wants to stay up gargling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,503 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    sightband wrote: »
    Have absolutely no idea what Giles is trying to say. This sounds like the most drunken nonsensical 4am in the morning conversation between two lads, the other falling asleep trying to humour the drunker of the two that wants to stay up gargling.

    Listened to him on the way home last night, first time I've heard Giles in a couple of months, and jesus he's getting worse.

    He sounds like a man of 90 who can't remember stuff just waffling on and on. He repeats every point he makes about 4 or 5 times and goes round in circles.
    But the presenter seems to let him to, can't keep him focused on anything and should intervene more often.

    Its a hard listen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭Imhof Tank


    NIMAN wrote: »
    Listened to him on the way home last night, first time I've heard Giles in a couple of months, and jesus he's getting worse.

    He sounds like a man of 90 who can't remember stuff just waffling on and on. He repeats every point he makes about 4 or 5 times and goes round in circles.
    But the presenter seems to let him to, can't keep him focused on anything and should intervene more often.

    Its a hard listen.

    Yeah it just isn't working lately with these younger presenters - not saying that's all their fault, just how it is.

    Then you listen to him on Dunphy's pod and he's very good IMO, like a completely different person.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    BPKS wrote: »
    Explain the irony

    Ewan McKenna sees the Mayo issue as women wanting equality.
    But when they get equality they are fine as long as it does not cost them anything.
    He sniggers at this concept and calls it:

    The we-share-everything-but-you-pay-for-dinner mentality

    But, it is what McKenna expects Dublin to do in a GAA context.

    Let another county (Dublin) pay for the rest so it can be equal.

    So he wants Dublin to share everything, finances, support, sponsorship and expertise.
    While the other counties pay nothing.
    That seems to be McKenna's version of GAA equality.
    The Dublin brand has to carry the rest.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement