Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Second Captains

1215216218220221338

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,799 ✭✭✭corwill


    deisedude wrote: »
    Really impressed with the balanced discussion on the Mayo ladies GAA saga.

    Sh1ts all over the echo chamber that is Off the Ball coverage and their ridiculously one sided take on the matter

    I haven't gotten to it yet, and what I've read about it has left me puzzled, and with a sense that no one wants to voice what's actually behind the whole thing. Anyone care to share facts on the ground, not filtered through one ideology or another?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,777 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    corwill wrote: »
    I haven't gotten to it yet, and what I've read about it has left me puzzled, and with a sense that no one wants to voice what's actually behind the whole thing. Anyone care to share facts on the ground, not filtered through one ideology or another?

    Seems to be quite a few things at play..

    I think Peter Leahy wanted to reduce the role that Cora Staunton had within the camp. Reading between the lines it seems that there was a bit of a Carnacon clique - which often resulted in a bit of back chatting and maybe something that Peter Leahy rightly or wrongly saw as a challenge to his authority..

    Then he had words with one of the girls on her own - to which she felt intimidated but really a bit of a one on one bollocking doesn't sound that unusual..

    Some of the terms used by the girls are heavy handed and as of yet unjustified..

    I don't know - all seems to be something that got way out of hand and there's nobody like sports administrators to encourage small problems to grow in to enormous problems..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,588 ✭✭✭✭dastardly00


    People thought that Ken was actually on Liveline?! :pac::pac::pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 851 ✭✭✭Pidae.m


    People thought that Ken was actually on Liveline?! :pac::pac::pac:

    My sub was up at the time and a few months later I asked my brother was Ken on liveliness :):)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,795 ✭✭✭dulux99


    Excellent pod today. Was pleasantly surprised by the coverage of the ladies football - I was expecting the worst when I heard Sinead O'Carroll was in studio, but she was fair and balanced. The boxing guy (Costello) was a great guest

    Agreed, most enjoyable episode in a while. The pod just works better with 3 people, Mark should be in the seat every time eoin is off imo


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 392 ✭✭Footoo


    “We’ll be talking to Miguel Delaney.....”

    Is there a more depressing combination of words in the English language?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,138 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    For all the laughing at the joke that is PSG, ken talked about them more than all the other games combined. The non English games barely got a mention. Apparently Valencia Juve was one moment, the score wasn't even mentioned never mind how the game went. No mention of bayerns win either. PSG is the new Mourinho?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,252 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Footoo wrote: »
    “We’ll be talking to Miguel Delaney.....”

    Is there a more depressing combination of words in the English language?

    "We'll be talking to Gabrielle Marcotti..."

    or

    "We'll be talking Graham Hunter..."

    Thankfully we don't have to listen to either of those two gasbags a lot these days.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,779 ✭✭✭✭Ol' Donie


    Arghus wrote: »
    "We'll be talking to Gabrielle Marcotti..."

    or

    "We'll be talking Graham Hunter..."

    Thankfully we don't have to listen to either of those two gasbags a lot these days.

    Oh, it's so true.

    The Golazzo podcast is brilliant except for Marcotti.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭n!ghtmancometh


    Arghus wrote: »
    "We'll be talking to Gabrielle Marcotti..."

    or

    "We'll be talking Graham Hunter..."

    Thankfully we don't have to listen to either of those two gasbags a lot these days.

    Graham Hunter is entertainingly delusional, same for Marcotti. Delaney is just an annoying voiced gob****e. I'd welcome a poll for all SC subscribers on Delaney ever being allowed to appear on the pod again. I would be extremely confident we'd never have to hear from him again.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,783 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    Arghus wrote: »
    "We'll be talking to Gabrielle Marcotti..."

    or

    "We'll be talking Graham Hunter..."

    Thankfully we don't have to listen to either of those two gasbags a lot these days.

    Never a truer word spoken on this thread. Marcotti is bad but mother of Jesus Graham Hunter is the single most insufferable, up his own arse, loving the sound of his own voice condescending man I’ve ever heard.

    Let me ask you a question but first it’ll ramble for 10 minutes, throw in the words Ronaldo and Messi then get to the question/answer.

    Jeeeeeeeesus Christ.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,903 ✭✭✭Brock Turnpike


    Graham Hunter is entertainingly delusional, same for Marcotti. Delaney is just an annoying voiced gob****e. I'd welcome a poll for all SC subscribers on Delaney ever being allowed to appear on the pod again. I would be extremely confident we'd never have to hear from him again.

    Well that's clearly never going to happen. Not to mention the fact that Ken and Miguel are good mates.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,608 ✭✭✭jaykay74


    I can't remember the last time Graham Hunter was on. Can't be the last couple of years...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    jaykay74 wrote: »
    I can't remember the last time Graham Hunter was on. Can't be the last couple of years...

    He's on Off the Ball regularly. Even that's too much of him on the airwaves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,608 ✭✭✭jaykay74


    Patww79 wrote: »
    He's on Off the Ball regularly. Even that's too much of him on the airwaves.

    I listened to his own podcast a few times when he started it basically because I was interested in those being interviewed but gave up when I just couldn't listen to him anymore despite the guests.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 955 ✭✭✭Salvation Tambourine


    jaykay74 wrote: »
    I listened to his own podcast a few times when he started it basically because I was interested in those being interviewed but gave up when I just couldn't listen to him anymore despite the guests.


    I've completely stopped listening to it as well despite knowing that there are some really interesting guests, stories and information on it. I just can't handle Hunter.

    Every footballer he interviews seems to be the reason he loves football.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,138 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    jaykay74 wrote: »
    I listened to his own podcast a few times when he started it basically because I was interested in those being interviewed but gave up when I just couldn't listen to him anymore despite the guests.

    I listened to the first 20 or 30 too, some good interviews but agree with you, Hunter was too annoying to continue. He'll compare everyone to Iniesta. "Kevin Kilbane, you were a great player in your youth, your playing style reminds me a bit of Andres Iniesta".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,799 ✭✭✭corwill


    corwill wrote: »
    ... the constantly erroneous, unctuous scutter-trumpet, Graham Hunter. It's hard to believe he's a real person, rather than some attempt at satire gone badly wrong.

    I stand by the above, can't stand him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,957 ✭✭✭Dots1982


    I gave up on hunter’s pod when he went deep with le tissier on his youth playing cricket after doing the same with Phil Neville a few eps earlier. The moyes interview was horrendous aswell.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,252 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Great to see so much hate.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,783 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    Arghus wrote: »
    Great to see so much hate.

    461844.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭JuanJose


    Any thoughts on Friday's political podcast?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,029 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    Mourinho's number one fan, the esteemed Duncan Castles is on today's football pod.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,795 ✭✭✭dulux99


    Mourinho's number one fan, the esteemed Duncan Castles is on today's football pod.
    Haha I'm looking forward to that, can't remember him being on before?

    Some good content hopefully this week, lots happened over the weekend across soccer, boxing, and lots to speak about in the golf world with Tigers win and the Ryder Cup this weekend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,799 ✭✭✭corwill


    Mourinho's number one fan, the esteemed Duncan Castles is on today's football pod.

    I'd go on a 3 week cycling holiday on a tandem with Hunter, rather than share an elevator for a single storey with Castles.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,137 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    corwill wrote: »
    I'd go on a 3 week cycling holiday on a tandem with Hunter, rather than share an elevator for a single storey with Castles.
    That bad?! I'm going to listen just to hear how painful he is!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,799 ✭✭✭corwill


    That bad?! I'm going to listen just to hear how painful he is!

    Unlike Hunter, it's not so much a question of their delivery as the quality of the person. Or complete and utter lack thereof.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,777 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Yesterday's football podcast was a terrible bore. Ended up skipping through it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,795 ✭✭✭dulux99


    lawred2 wrote: »
    Yesterday's football podcast was a terrible bore. Ended up skipping through it.

    Are you implying that Ken spending the majority of a podcast rehashing the same old points about jose mourinho is tedious? Blasphemy!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 861 ✭✭✭tomwaits48


    thought Duncun Castles was fairly balanced yesterday...Ken is very tedious when it comes to Jose....


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement