Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

I bet you didnt know that

1149150152154155200

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,523 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    New Home wrote: »
    If you mean kiwi as the fruit, then I definitely agree.

    the fruit should actually be called kiwifruit, not kiwi fruit.. or even more correctly called Chinese gooseberry. Kiwifruit came about for marketing purposes and in fact most of them are grown in China(55%+) rather than NZ


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭aoh


    BaZmO* wrote: »
    In the English language the word “set” has the most amount of different definitions for a given word.

    I remember when Channel 4 launched in the UK. Back then, you had to get someone out to tune your TV, and they would leave a sticker on the TV saying "I've joined the I've had my set set set" :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,741 ✭✭✭Badly Drunk Boy


    Water John wrote: »
    But Karen had the voice of an angel.
    Sonic Youth did a tribute to Karen Carpenter called 'Tunic (Song for Karen)' and in the video, Karen is in Heaven playing in a band called The Angels (with Elvis, Janis Joplin and Dennis Wilson from The Beach Boys). The name 'The Angels' is on her drum kit).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 415 ✭✭LLewellen Farquarson



    Whistling in a theatre is considered bad luck or bad form. Because in times passed, set crew & backstage crew used to whistle (in code?) to each other when it was time to change set, drop curtains, backdrops etc. If you walked backstage while whistling you might get a sandbag dropped on you!

    I thought it was because a lot of backstage crew were ex sailors (good at ropework) and whistling was used to give commands regarding the sail handling.

    Edit: sorry, we're both saying the same thing . The sailors gave whistled commands both on ship and backstage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,544 ✭✭✭EndaHonesty


    Kiwis have the shortest beak of any bird, despite it looking otherwise

    Not true.

    The only unique fact about a Kiwi bird beak is;
    The kiwi is the only bird in the world with external nostrils at the tip of its long beak.

    https://www.kiwisforkiwi.org/about-kiwi/kiwi-facts-characteristics/an-unusual-beak/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Zadkiel


    Not true.

    The only unique fact about a Kiwi bird beak is;



    https://www.kiwisforkiwi.org/about-kiwi/kiwi-facts-characteristics/an-unusual-beak/

    I think this came from the different measurement for the beak.
    Some measure from the tip of the beak to the nostrils and others from the tip of the beak to the feathers.

    If measuring from the tip of the beak to the nostrils then a Kiwi would have a very short beak indeed. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,544 ✭✭✭EndaHonesty


    Zadkiel wrote: »
    I think this came from the different measurement for the beak.
    Some measure from the tip of the beak to the nostrils and others from the tip of the beak to the feathers.

    If measuring from the tip of the beak to the nostrils then a Kiwi would have a very short beak indeed. :D


    The simple fact is; the nostrils are at the end of the beak, not the start of the beak.

    Any other characterization is incorrect.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 77,192 Mod ✭✭✭✭New Home


    So, if the beak is only the part from the nostrils to the tip, what's the rest called?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Zadkiel


    People "thinking" is the problem here.

    The simple fact is; the nostrils are at the end of the beak, not the start of the beak.

    Any other description is incorrect.

    I'm not disagreeing with where the Kiwi's nostrils are.
    Historically some measurements would be taken form the end of the beak to the nostrils and other times the measurement would be take from the end of the beak to the feathers of the face. This would provide a different measurement.

    'Unlike other birds, the nostrils end on the tip of this beak rather than at the base. (Because a bird's beak is generally measured from the tip to the nostril, this (technically) gives the kiwi the shortest beak of any bird.) While birds generally have hollow bones to save weight and make flight practicable, the flightless kiwi have marrow, in the style of mammals.'
    - http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Kiwi


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭Skylinehead


    New Home wrote: »
    So, if the beak is only the part from the nostrils to the tip, what's the rest called?

    Pre-beak :D


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 77,192 Mod ✭✭✭✭New Home


    Ah but of course! How silly of me. Do I feel like a fool, now!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,544 ✭✭✭EndaHonesty


    Zadkiel wrote: »
    I'm not disagreeing with where the Kiwi's nostrils are.
    Historically some measurements would be taken form the end of the beak to the nostrils and other times the measurement would be take from the end of the beak to the feathers of the face. This would provide a different measurement.

    Do you have a source for to show that there are/were two definitions for a beak's length?

    It's an apocryphal statement and continuing it's use is a disservice to this thread on facts...

    Edit: that newworldencyclopedia link doesn't give a reference either, IMO it's simply using the apocryphal statement as fact without basis.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    The 2019 Guinness Book of World Records has some fairly unusual official entries, including this:
    'Cat with most dice balanced on paw'

    Bibi, below has some dice here in purrrfect balance.
    YvGGla7.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Zadkiel


    Do you have a source for to show that there are/were two definitions for a beak's length?

    It's an apocryphal statement and continuing it's use is a disservice to this thread on facts...

    Edit: that newworldencyclopedia link doesn't give a reference either, IMO it's simply using the apocryphal statement as fact without basis.

    Who mentioned definition, i said methods of measurement. My post was a comment on where the confusion could possibly have come from but anyway...

    'Bill. Several types of bill measurements can be
    found in the modern literature. The most
    common and replicable is the bill length mea-
    25


    Several types of bill measurements can be
    found in the modern literature. The most
    common and replicable is the bill length mea-
    sured from the anterior edge of the nostril to
    the tip
    (Baldwin et al. 1931: 16). This measurement
    is popular because in most taxa both
    ends of the measurement are readily definable
    points where calipers can be placed. Two
    other methods, the lengths of total culmen
    and exposed culmen, attempt to measure the
    entire length of the bill. Total culmen measurements
    extend to the bill tip from the
    notch on the forehead where the base of the
    culmen meets the skull
    (usually just inside the
    feathers on the forehead; Baldwin et al. 1931:
    11). Exposed culmen measurements extend
    to the bill tip from the point where the tips of
    the forehead feathers begin to hide the culmen

    (Baldwin et al. 1931: 11). This is not an
    easily defined point, and hence this is the
    most variable of these bill measurements
    (pers. observ.).'

    ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 9: 23–30, 1998
    © The Neotropical Ornithological Society
    SUGGESTIONS FOR MEASURING EXTERNAL CHARACTERS OF
    BIRDS
    Kevin Winker
    University of Alaska Museum, 907 Yukon Drive, Fairbanks, Alaska, 99775, U.S.A.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 77,192 Mod ✭✭✭✭New Home


    Ok, one more question (maybe we should have a sister thread to this one for asking questions, but until then...): what's the difference between beak and bill? I think I know that chickens have beaks and ducks have bills, but is it only a matter of shape? In which case, what does a pelican have?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Zadkiel


    New Home wrote: »
    Ok, one more question (maybe we should have a sister thread to this one for asking questions, but until then...): what's the difference between beak and bill? I think I know that chickens have beaks and ducks have bills, but is it only a matter of shape? In which case, what does a pelican have?

    The terms are broadly interchangeable

    Pelican...bucket?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,587 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    New Home wrote: »
    Ok, one more question (maybe we should have a sister thread to this one for asking questions, but until then...): what's the difference between beak and bill? I think I know that chickens have beaks and ducks have bills, but is it only a matter of shape? In which case, what does a pelican have?
    The beak is the person sitting on the bench, the bill is the person who brings the defendant before the bench. ;-)


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 77,192 Mod ✭✭✭✭New Home


    The beak is the person sitting on the bench, the bill is the person who brings the defendant before the bench. ;-)


    And the Pelican is a Brief? :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,523 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    New Home wrote: »
    Ok, one more question (maybe we should have a sister thread to this one for asking questions, but until then...): what's the difference between beak and bill? I think I know that chickens have beaks and ducks have bills, but is it only a matter of shape? In which case, what does a pelican have?
    Nothing, synonymous terms.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭fergiesfolly


    There isn't this much discussion on a birds measurements in the "Most beautiful women in the world" thread.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Thanks for that, Drunk Boy. Lots of visual references to her anorexia/bulimia. Really the first well known person to succumb to it. Sad loss. Maria Callas the opera singer, said she was the best singer, in terms of voice and breathing control, that she'd ever heard.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,382 ✭✭✭Duffy the Vampire Slayer


    On the topic of languages in South America, the only Spanish creole language is spoken in a town on the Colombian coast. It was created by escaped African slaves. It only has a few thousand speakers at best.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palenquero

    Also, there are some small English speaking islands that are part of Colombia.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archipelago_of_San_Andr%C3%A9s,_Providencia_and_Santa_Catalina


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 77,192 Mod ✭✭✭✭New Home


    Number of living languages: 6912

    Number of those languages that are nearly extinct: 516

    Language with the greatest number of native speakers: Mandarin Chinese [See Top 30 languages]

    Language spoken by the greatest number of non-native speakers: English (250 million to 350 million non-native speakers)

    Country with the most languages spoken: Papua New Guinea has 820 living languages. [See Top 20 countries]

    How long have languages existed: Since about 100,000 BC

    First language ever written: Sumerian or Egyptian (about 3200 BC)

    Oldest written language still in existence: Chinese or Greek (about 1500 BC)

    Language with the most words: English, approx. 250,000 distinct words*

    Language with the fewest words: Taki Taki (also called Sranan), 340 words. Taki Taki is an English-based Creole spoken by 120,000 in the South American country of Suriname.

    Language with the largest alphabet: Khmer (74 letters). This Austro-Asiatic language is the official language of Cambodia, where approx.12 million people speak it. Minority speakers live in a handful of other countries.

    Language with the shortest alphabet: Rotokas (12 letters). Approx. 4300 people speak this East Papuan language. They live primarily in the Bougainville Province of Papua New Guinea.

    The language with the fewest sounds (phonemes): Rotokas (11 phonemes)

    The language with the most sounds (phonemes): !Xóõ (112 phonemes). Approx. 4200 speak !Xóõ, the vast majority of whom live in the African country of Botswana.

    Language with the fewest consonant sounds: Rotokas (6 consonants)

    Language with the most consonant sounds: Ubyx (81 consonants). This language of the North Causasian Language family, once spoken in the Haci Osman village near Istanbul, has been extinct since 1992. Among living languages, !Xóõ has the most consonants (77).

    Language with the fewest vowel sounds: Ubyx (2 vowels). The related language Abkhaz also has 2 vowels in some dialects. There are approximately 106,000 Abkhaz speakers living primarily in Georgia.

    Language with the most vowel sounds: !Xóõ (31 vowels)

    The most widely published language: English

    Language with the fewest irregular verbs: Esperanto (none)

    Language which has won the most Oscars: Italian (12 Academy Awards for Best Foreign Film)

    The most translated document: Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, written by the United Nations in 1948, has been translated into 321 languages and dialects.

    The most common consonant sounds in the world's languages: /p/, /t/, /k/, /m/, /n/

    Longest word in the English language: pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis (45 letters)

    * See previous posts.

    Source: http://www.vistawide.com/languages/language_statistics.htm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,872 ✭✭✭dball


    New Home wrote: »
    Longest word in the English language: pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis (45 letters)

    Did you know the longest word in the english language that doesnt repeat any letters is
    uncopyrightables??


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 77,192 Mod ✭✭✭✭New Home


    I do now! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,535 ✭✭✭valoren


    In April 2017, Oobah Butler, was a writer for Vice who had previously been bribed by restaurants to write good reviews i.e. they would pay him £10 to write a positive review despite never actually having a meal there. He decided to fake an entire restaurant to make the point that Trip Advisor was a false reality.

    It was named "The Shed at Dulwich”

    To get started, he needed to verify with Trip Advisor and used a cheap burner phone to do so. The restaurant now officially existed and was listed on the site. The location was given as 'The Shed' with the address listed as the road he lived on. It was also set up as 'an appointment-only restaurant'.

    A domain was bought, registered and the site was built. Meal names were given hipster-friendly names such as 'Lust', 'Empathetic' or 'Comfort' with the accompanying pretenious blurb stating that '...instead of meals, our menu is comprised of moods'.

    https://www.theshedatdulwich.com/

    The mood meals themselves were photographed and looked delectable.

    main-qimg-80d60233e0180b1c583608582a8c09a6

    main-qimg-761e77887bd51b83067c4ca71b263ee0

    main-qimg-08ee9c87a850fadcf6e9d0dfcd110e6e

    Trip Advisor confirmed and 'The Shed at Dulwich' was now officially the worst restaurant in London, ranked bottom, at #18,149

    The restaurant needed reviews. So Butler got friends and colleagues to submit detailed glowing reviews and high marks. This was to circumvent the anti-scam technology and was thus from different computers to enable the hoax.

    The Shed climbs the rankings.

    Then Butler's burner phone starts ringing for reservations. His stock response to queries says that they are booked solid for 6 weeks. Suddenly, due to the interest generated, the ranking is now at #1,456. Clearly the mystique, the allure and the exclusivity of The Shed was driving it up the ranking system. Over the next few months the phone rang incessantly but nobody ate at 'The Shed'.

    By August 2017, three months after setting up, The Shed is now ranked at #156.

    main-qimg-e20e7d52c8cb90290701735dc2bf34f7

    Companies start sending free samples, people stop Butler on his street asking if he knows where 'The Shed' is, speculative requests are sent for jobs at 'The Shed', the attention, the requests become incessant. Still no one has eaten a morsel of food in the restaurant and by winter 2017 it is ranked #30 in London. People from abroad start requesting reservations and then suddenly Butler get's an email from Trip Advisor titled "Information Request"

    Butler thinks he has been rumbled.

    The restaurant has received 89,000 views in search results in the past day
    Trip Advisor has been contacted by dozens of customers asking for information.

    And the reason for the email? Well, on the 1st of November, 2017, six months after it's listing, The Shed at Dulwich is now officially the #1 ranked restaurant in London. :pac:

    main-qimg-c9dd7e8be85d5beefe95a6817c7545e3

    A restaurant that doesn't exist becomes the highest ranked in one of the world’s biggest cities, on one of the internet's most trusted review sites.

    Butler, point made, contacts Trip Advisor to alert them of the prank to which the response is;

    "As there is no incentive for anyone in the real world to create a fake restaurant it is not a problem we experience with our regular community – therefore this 'test' is not a real world example."

    For starters
    main-qimg-93ab0cb0beec2aa1f6f9192c1669f7b7

    For Main
    main-qimg-014d2abe8f88a851dc00587dba8255b2

    For Dessert
    main-qimg-c245989ef59cc0da135909e461964a5a

    "The Shed at Dulwich"
    main-qimg-765e487fbc4582f6e7dfdad8be3e0051


  • Posts: 26,052 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Brilliant! ^


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    The Dunwich horror, indeed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,558 ✭✭✭✭Fourier


    Ipso wrote: »
    The Dunwich horror, indeed.
    The secret even lies in a shed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭KevRossi


    This is Celtic Park in Glsagow, capacity 60,400 and this version was built in 1998,

    If you look closely, you will see that the main stand on the left has pillars supporting it, while the end has none, even though it is the same depth.

    celticpark5.jpg

    The reason can be seen in the exterior photo here, the end stands are cantilivered, the main stand is not. Also note how the cantilivered structure protrudes over the outside of the stadium (part on the right), the one that is supported from within (on the left) does not.

    3997291.jpg?display=1&htype=0&type=responsive-gallery

    The reason for this is obvious in this next picture; There is a graveyard right behind the main stand and they could not get permission to build a structure that overhangs it.

    497341_5e7f5704.jpg

    There's a better view of the whole thing here on Google Maps: https://www.google.ie/maps/place/Celtic+Park/@55.850012,-4.2011141,271a,35y,270h,39.42t/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x4888414f6436db0f:0xf1778c849701d24!8m2!3d55.849696!4d-4.2055427


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 77,192 Mod ✭✭✭✭New Home


    Half inspired by/half stolen from another thread...

    In the mid-1800s, paper was made using rags, mostly cotton and linen. However, soon the raw material began to become scarce, so a new source was found: Egyptian mummies (of which, apparently, there was an abundance- by 1856, the New York Tribune was able to report that about two and a quarter million pounds of rags had been imported from Egypt.)! Their bandages were unravelled, torn into tiny pieces and pulped, just like rags used to be. It was a very cheap raw material, and duty-free, too, so, since it wasn't compulsory to declare its provenance, often the cargos were just recorded as "rags".
    Dard Hunter in his book Papermaking: The History and Technique of an Ancient Craft, relates the experiments of I. Augustus Stanwood in both ground-wood paper and mummy paper. During the American Civil War, Stanwood was hard-pressed for materials for his Maine mill. As such, he imported mummies from Egypt, stripped the bodies of their wrappings and used this material for making a brown wrapping paper for grocers & butchers.
    In 1881, the artist Laurence Alma Tadema famous for his romantic ancient Egyptian scenes saw his paint preparer grinding up a piece of a mummy. Realizing where “mummy brown” came from, he alerted his fellow painter, Edward Burne-Jones, together with some family members, the remorseful artists held an impromptu funeral burying a tube of mummy brown paint.

    Source (one of them, at least).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 81 ✭✭IvyTheTerrific


    Before the invention of synthetic urea, the only way to tan hides was to use urine. So urine was an important resource! In towns with a tanning industry, people would collect urine in large "piss pots" for the purpose.


  • Posts: 26,052 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Before the invention of synthetic urea, the only way to tan hides was to use urine. So urine was an important resource! In towns with a tanning industry, people would collect urine in large "piss pots" for the purpose.

    I bought a bag in Egypt, liked the one on display at a market and got one off the stall wrapped in a clear plastic bag, took it home still wrapped and when I took it out it brought tears to my eyes in a couple of different ways...it absolutely stank. I chose to believe it was probably animal urine used to tan it, aired it out for weeks, tried to clean it out with saddle soap, even Febrezed the beejezus out of it as a last resort but three months later the smell had barely faded. Nearly cried when I put it in the recycling stand. :(

    So, tanning via pee isn't a thing of the past just yet!


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Ancient Rome at one time had a piss tax. They also placed large cauldrons on streets to collect the stuff. Wasn't just for tanning either. They used it to wash clothes(steep, then rinse with water of course) and even as a mouthwash. Yep. They thought piss would clean and whiten teeth. They also added ground up pumice to piss to make toothpaste. And they were somewhat right. The ammonia(IIRC) in piss will whiten and clean teeth and kill bacteria. One Roman dude in denouncing a fellow politician called him "piss face" because his teeth were so white. Urine was added to mouthwashes until the 1600s.

    Diabetes was diagnosed by doctors who would taste piss. If it was sweet you had it.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Posts: 26,052 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I forgot about the clothes thing. Not quite as sweet smelling as Downey.

    Also shudder at the word p*ss! Much worse words don't bother me but there's something about that one. Maybe I need hypnosis to get to the root of it. :P


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 77,192 Mod ✭✭✭✭New Home


    IIRC, the ammonia in urine helped remove stains, including mould.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,126 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    The beak is the person sitting on the bench, the bill is the person who brings the defendant before the bench. ;-)
    "Doing bird 'cos of a canary. It ain't right gov."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,562 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    New Home wrote: »
    IIRC, the ammonia in urine helped remove stains, including mould.

    That mould will be one of the 5.1 million species of fungi. They are not plants, but a separate kingdom. Also in the living world only 4% of the mammals are wild animals. The rest are humans and their livestock. 70% of birds are domestic fowl. Only 1% of all life is found in the oceans.

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/may/21/human-race-just-001-of-all-life-but-has-destroyed-over-80-of-wild-mammals-study


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,309 Mod ✭✭✭✭mzungu


    Tokio%20Express%20damage%20_7.jpg

    The Tokyo Express was a container ship that is best known for being struck by a rogue wave on 13 February 1997. This caused her to lose cargo, including one container loaded with 4,800,000 pieces of Lego. Ever since, Lego pieces including octopuses, dragons, flippers and flowers have been washing up on Cornwall beaches and are commonly found after storms.

    Among the pieces lost were 418,000 swimming flippers, 97,500 scuba tanks, 26,600 life preservers, 13,000 spear guns, and 4,200 octopuses. Sea grass, cutlasses and dragons were also well-represented. Hence, this quirk of fate means that Cornwall residents often find nautical themed Lego pieces washing up on the beach. In another quirk of fate, none of the majority of non nautical themed Lego pieces that were lost have washed up on the beach.

    _76347419_cutlass_traceywilliams.jpg
    _76352126_legooctopuschallaborough.jpg
    _76347282_seaweed_bbc.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,562 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Among that detritus you can see some Sea Glass, which I wrote about on the thread a while back.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Only 1% of all life is found in the oceans.
    That's can't be right D. AFAIR the oceans make up closer to 60% of all life on earth? Consider that in a drop of seawater you can find on average 10 million viruses, a million bacteria and a few thousand other little living things.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,562 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Wibbs wrote: »
    That's wrong. AFAIR the oceans make up closer to 60% of all life on earth?

    You could be right. Scientists estimate that 86% of species remain undiscovered.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    You could be right. Scientists estimate that 86% of species remain undiscovered.

    They probably would want to remain undiscovered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,562 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Reading the Guardian link again, it is 1% of all biomass which lives in the oceans.

    Another surprise is that the teeming life revealed in the oceans by the recent BBC television series Blue Planet II turns out to represent just 1% of all biomass. The vast majority of life is land-based and a large chunk – an eighth – is bacteria buried deep below the surface.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,384 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Ancient Rome at one time had a piss tax. They also placed large cauldrons on streets to collect the stuff. Wasn't just for tanning either. They used it to wash clothes(steep, then rinse with water of course) and even as a mouthwash. Yep. They thought piss would clean and whiten teeth. They also added ground up pumice to piss to make toothpaste. And they were somewhat right. The ammonia(IIRC) in piss will whiten and clean teeth and kill bacteria. One Roman dude in denouncing a fellow politician called him "piss face" because his teeth were so white. Urine was added to mouthwashes until the 1600s.

    Diabetes was diagnosed by doctors who would taste piss. If it was sweet you had it.

    I visited Pompeii two years ago. As part of the tour, the guide showed a laundry where slaves washed clothes by stamping on them in large vats full of urine and bicarbonate. It was one of the worst jobs to have as the ammonia and bicarbonate would attack the skin causing it to crack and become infected. Thus most laundry slaves died young of gangrene.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    Zadkiel wrote: »
    Who mentioned definition, i said methods of measurement. My post was a comment on where the confusion could possibly have come from but anyway...

    'Bill. Several types of bill measurements can be
    found in the modern literature. The most
    common and replicable is the bill length mea-
    25


    Several types of bill measurements can be
    found in the modern literature. The most
    common and replicable is the bill length mea-
    sured from the anterior edge of the nostril to
    the tip
    (Baldwin et al. 1931: 16). This measurement
    is popular because in most taxa both
    ends of the measurement are readily definable
    points where calipers can be placed. Two
    other methods, the lengths of total culmen
    and exposed culmen, attempt to measure the
    entire length of the bill. Total culmen measurements
    extend to the bill tip from the
    notch on the forehead where the base of the
    culmen meets the skull
    (usually just inside the
    feathers on the forehead; Baldwin et al. 1931:
    11). Exposed culmen measurements extend
    to the bill tip from the point where the tips of
    the forehead feathers begin to hide the culmen

    (Baldwin et al. 1931: 11). This is not an
    easily defined point, and hence this is the
    most variable of these bill measurements
    (pers. observ.).'

    ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 9: 23–30, 1998
    © The Neotropical Ornithological Society
    SUGGESTIONS FOR MEASURING EXTERNAL CHARACTERS OF
    BIRDS
    Kevin Winker
    University of Alaska Museum, 907 Yukon Drive, Fairbanks, Alaska, 99775, U.S.A.


    And for such discussion, thus Boards.ie was created ... ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,579 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    The highest peak in Belize is called Doyle's Delight, in the Cockcomb mountain range.

    tumblr_lq5yodbXns1qmpg90o1_500.gif

    Strangely, It is named after Arthur Conan Doyle


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,733 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    valoren wrote: »
    "The Shed at Dulwich”

    If you search for it you can also find the story about when he actually opened and had some customers in. They bought frozen stuff from Iceland (the supermarket) and heated it in the microwave and the people thought it was amazing.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Reading the Guardian link again, it is 1% of all biomass which lives in the oceans.

    Another surprise is that the teeming life revealed in the oceans by the recent BBC television series Blue Planet II turns out to represent just 1% of all biomass. The vast majority of life is land-based and a large chunk – an eighth – is bacteria buried deep below the surface.
    Shoot me down in flames D, but I still don't buy it. 1) there is more water than land. 2) Even in the stygian depths there is life and lots of it, and that's the stuff we see with the Mark 1 Human Eyeball. The deep ooze at the bottom of oceans is positively teeming with bacteria and other microscopic life. Consider the white cliffs of Dover and their associated deposits in England and France. They're made up almost entirely of the microscopic skeletons of marine life deposited in an ancient and small enough sea. 3) if there are bacteria buried below the surface of the dry bits, there are almost certainly the same numbers buried below the wet bits. If not more, given water and energy is what feeds them. 4) then there's the sheer volume of water itself across all depths which contains both micro and macro organisms. Granted the lion's share of the latter and the most diverse is at shallower depths, but send down a collecting jar to say 3000 metres below sea level and a litre of seawater is going to be positively stuffed with a myriad of creatures.

    Could there be more biomass in the "dry" bits? I'd not have an issue with that D, but the claim that the entirety of the "wet" bits only has one percent of Earth's biomass? No way. That has got to be a typo, or some scientists were at the distillation kit in the lab and cooked up a doozie of a beverage.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,562 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    I suppose one way to look at it is that there is a lot of grass growing on land. Vast areas of the ocean floors would be devoid of plant life, just because of the enormous depths. So a lot more biomass on the land surface probably. I'm just guessing.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement