Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Boy, 13, stabbed in Dublin (possibly by an 8 year old boy)

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,010 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    You teach people violence against kids is ok and you end up with the cases where someone loses control or the kid fights back and it escalates

    Sorry but I need to disagree with you on this.
    I got many a clatter from my Mam when I was a kid and deserved it cause I was a little ****.
    I never attempted to hit her back, and certainly would never use a lump hammer or a knife as a weapon against someone.

    To suggest that a clip around the ear ends up in 8 year old kids stabbing people is wrong.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭PlaneSpeeking


    grahambo wrote: »
    Sorry but I need to disagree with you on this.
    I got many a clatter from my Mam when I was a kid and deserved it cause I was a little ****.
    I never attempted to hit her back, and certainly would never use a lump hammer or a knife as a weapon against someone.

    To suggest that a clip around the ear ends up in 8 year old kids stabbing people is wrong.

    Thank you! There is common sense after all!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,237 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    "The boy is suspected of stabbing a man three times, including in the chest and arm, after he stormed a house belonging to people that his family is allegedly feuding with."

    This is an eight-year-old child, not much more than a toddler from my perspective. There seems to be an entire sub-culture out there that most of use never encounter, but who appear to be getting steadily worse. :eek:


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    grahambo wrote: »
    Sorry but I need to disagree with you on this.
    I got many a clatter from my Mam when I was a kid and deserved it cause I was a little ****.
    I never attempted to hit her back, and certainly would never use a lump hammer or a knife as a weapon against someone.

    To suggest that a clip around the ear ends up in 8 year old kids stabbing people is wrong.

    Well good for you, but there's plenty of kids out there who weren't so lucky that their ma stopped with a clatter or 'deserved it'


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,285 ✭✭✭Summer wind


    I can’t believe this. It’s horrific like the plot of a film. What kind of a life has that 8 year old child had. It’s unbelievable that a small child would be capable of this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    And yet, you have people like One Eyed Jack regularly arguing here on Boards that parents with psychotic or psychopathic violent tendencies should not have their children removed from their case. This kind of sh!t is the inevitable result of allowing kids to be brought up in that kind of environment. I don't doubt for a second that the parents of those involved here are exactly the kinds of scumbags which regularly come up in these threads, and that in a thread involving just the parents, there would be people arguing that they should be allowed to retain custody of their kids despite being complete and total scumbags.

    Remember this video from a few months ago?



    You had people in threads here on Boards genuinely arguing that she's fit to look after that poor kid in the pram, while she's obviously off her head and flying into a violent, uncontrolled, destructive rage and engaging in wanton anti social behaviour.

    If we as a society are tolerant of people like that being parents, then how can we be surprised when kids grow up with scumbag tendencies? I'm assuming the kids in this case never had much of a chance to become anything other than scumbags themselves, given the description of a "family feud" - they've probably grown up seeing their parents resort to violence and vandalism as a solution to problems. Kid see, kid do.

    Incredibly depressing stuff.


  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And yet, you have people like One Eyed Jack regularly arguing here on Boards that parents with psychotic or psychopathic violent tendencies should not have their children removed from their case. This kind of sh!t is the inevitable result of allowing kids to be brought up in that kind of environment. I don't doubt for a second that the parents of those involved here are exactly the kinds of scumbags which regularly come up in these threads, and that in a thread involving just the parents, there would be people arguing that they should be allowed to retain custody of their kids despite being complete and total scumbags.

    Remember this video from a few months ago?



    You had people in threads here on Boards genuinely arguing that she's fit to look after that poor kid in the pram, while she's obviously off her head and flying into a violent, uncontrolled, destructive rage and engaging in wanton anti social behaviour.

    If we as a society are tolerant of people like that being parents, then how can we be surprised when kids grow up with scumbag tendencies? I'm assuming the kids in this case never had much of a chance to become anything other than scumbags themselves, given the description of a "family feud" - they've probably grown up seeing their parents resort to violence and vandalism as a solution to problems. Kid see, kid do.

    Incredibly depressing stuff.

    Find an alternative is the issue. Where do all the kids (who I agree are with unfit parents) go?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    Find an alternative is the issue. Where do all the kids (who I agree are with unfit parents) go?

    I agree that this is a problem, but that wasn't the angle taken by those opposed to their removal, it was more this ridiculous ideological idea that behaving like this doesn't automatically make a person an unfit parent. In my view, it 100% does, no ifs, no buts.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,676 ✭✭✭strandroad


    I agree that this is a problem, but that wasn't the angle taken by those opposed to their removal, it was more this ridiculous ideological idea that behaving like this doesn't automatically make a person an unfit parent. In my view, it 100% does, no ifs, no buts.

    I agree with you. We can't take them away but by leaving them in the care of obviously unfit parents we acknowledge that we're failing them.
    Many countries try to help through schools; if the parents are not there for a child, the child will still have school clubs, activities, afterschool assisted homework and solid meals. We just give cash benefit to the parents instead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,427 ✭✭✭RustyNut


    I'm going to say we can assume a particular background to the "feuding clans" ?

    What's this assumption based on, bigotry or telepathy?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement