Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Hungary Scrap Gender Studies Indoctrination Courses

1192022242542

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,593 ✭✭✭LLMMLL


    Brian? wrote: »
    Is it me, or do most of the objections around accepting trans people come down to sharing changing rooms or toilets?

    I genuinely find the taboos around nudity bizarre. Now, I go along with them as a matter what of politeness to other peoples comfort levels. But honestly, why are we so hung up on nudity? Why is it so import to hide?

    I get that in our culture people have hangups about nudity and this isn’t Germany. What I find bizarre is this “rapists are everywhere” mentality.

    It comes from the same people who think feminists are demonising men, yet they seem to be the ones who are afraid of men.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭Malayalam


    LLMMLL wrote: »
    What’s your concern there?

    An unknown lady with a penis checking my vagina or rectum for drugs. I have narrowly avoided a stout lady police officer trying that on once at the Swiss border in the old days, but if it was a woman with all male presentation...hmmm.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,214 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Malayalam wrote: »
    The toilets thing is not such a big deal with me, toilets are omnisex in every home, and if I am at an event I will often enough use the men's loos because, damn, those queues for the ladies are unreal. Though if I consider more widely than me, perhaps elderly ladies with continence problems might find it awkward to have a bunch of young fellas larking about in the loos. Or younger women experiencing the 1 in 5 pregnancies that end in miscarriage, and very often in a public toilet, might feel a tad uneasy with elder gents in the queue. Don't know. It's possible, I would say. Why not have all three options? Male, female, and however you are feeling yourself?


    I see what you’re saying. And maybe that is the answer to it. I still feel the right will make an issue out of it and the left will over react.

    I’m hoping by the time my kids are grown, this will all seem silly. The way the anti gay laws and discrimination of my childhood seem silly now.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭Malayalam


    Brian? wrote: »
    Is it me, or do most of the objections around accepting trans people come down to sharing changing rooms or toilets?

    I genuinely find the taboos around nudity bizarre. Now, I go along with them as a matter what of politeness to other peoples comfort levels. But honestly, why are we so hung up on nudity? Why is it so import to hide?

    Sure lookit, we should all ride the bus to work in the nude. I think it would be beneficial for children so they would have no hang ups about personal space at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭fattymuatty


    LLMMLL wrote: »
    Talk about red herrings.


    So you are just going to make a smart arse comment and ignore the other points? Sounds about right.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 636 ✭✭✭7aubzxk43m2sni


    The bathrooms are brought up because they're a simple example of gender being relevant in gaining access to certain facilities. A better example perhaps is women's shelters. Or women's sports.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,214 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    LLMMLL wrote: »
    I get that in our culture people have hangups about nudity and this isn’t Germany. What I find bizarre is this “rapists are everywhere” mentality.

    It comes from the same people who think feminists are demonising men, yet they seem to be the ones who are afraid of men.

    Ha. Never thought of that, but you’re right. The same people who attack the likes of the MeToo movement are the ones worrying about rapists and paedophiles masquerading as trans women.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭fattymuatty


    LLMMLL wrote: »
    I just looked into the Target thing.

    Seems it was mostly men videoing themselves being allowed to use the bathrooms to prove a point.

    Of the voyeur incidents some were before the gender neutral policy was announced, and one of the men responsible for an incident after the gender neutral policy was announced had a conviction from before the policy.

    Nothing to do with trans issues at all.

    Yeah, yeah nothing to do with trans issues at all.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/us/target-transgender-idaho-voyeurism.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭Malayalam


    Brian? wrote: »
    I see what you’re saying. And maybe that is the answer to it. I still feel the right will make an issue out of it and the left will over react.

    I’m hoping by the time my kids are grown, this will all seem silly. The way the anti gay laws and discrimination of my childhood seem silly now.

    Meet you back here in 10 years time and we will see what way it pans out and what seems silly then :)


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,214 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Malayalam wrote: »
    Sure lookit, we should all ride the bus to work in the nude. I think it would be beneficial for children so they would have no hang ups about personal space at all.

    I know you’re joking, but why wouldn’t that be better than having all these hang ups about nudity?

    Weather permitting of course.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭Malayalam


    Brian? wrote: »
    I know you’re joking, but why wouldn’t that be better than having all these hang ups about nudity?

    Weather permitting of course.

    Hahah :) (answer = sticky bums ;) )


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    Brian? wrote: »
    Is it me, or do most of the objections around accepting trans people come down to sharing changing rooms or toilets?

    I genuinely find the taboos around nudity bizarre. Now, I go along with them as a matter what of politeness to other peoples comfort levels. But honestly, why are we so hung up on nudity? Why is it so import to hide?

    I can walk around naked easily enough in a male dressing room. In a mixed dressing room that kind of thing is not acceptable.

    Identity politics is pushing in two different directions on this - safe spaces for women, interaction with female doctors or police for intimate searches or medical reasons. Even Islamic ideologies have been accommodated in some segregated swimming pools.

    (And no they aren’t going to accept a trans woman biological male as a woman).

    Something has got to give.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,214 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Malayalam wrote: »
    Meet you back here in 10 years time and we will see what way it pans out and what seems silly then :)

    I have an inkling I’ll be on the right side of this one. Still plenty of homophobes around, but they no longer get their way. I see the same happening with trans issues.

    I don’t know what age you are, but I remember the backlash against “the gays”, looking exactly like this. The church have less influence now though, praise allah.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 636 ✭✭✭7aubzxk43m2sni


    LLMMLL wrote: »
    I get that in our culture people have hangups about nudity and this isn’t Germany. What I find bizarre is this “rapists are everywhere” mentality.

    It comes from the same people who think feminists are demonising men, yet they seem to be the ones who are afraid of men.

    It's nothing got to do with "rapists are everywhere".

    If you acknowledge the fact that perverts / rapists / men with bad intentions exist, then you must also acknowledge that allowing anyone to identify as any gender and access the same facilities of their chosen gender, it will increase access of these people to their targets.

    Identity politics aren't healthy. It's clear you're wrapped up in your ideology when you're immediately assuming that anyone who raises a concern about arbitrary gender identification is a right winger who hates the metoo movement.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,214 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    I can walk around naked easily enough in a male dressing room. In a mixed dressing room that kind of thing is not acceptable.

    I know it’s not acceptable. I’m asking why though? I think I know why, but it’s a convoluted theory based on religious oppression of the masses. Mainly the Abrhamic religions.

    Shouldn’t it be questioned?
    Identity politics is pushing in two different directions on this - safe spaces for women, interaction with female doctors or police for intimate searches or medical reasons. Even Islamic ideologies have been accommodated in some segregated swimming pools.

    (And no they aren’t going to accept a trans woman biological male as a woman).

    Something has got to give.

    Something should give. Religions should no longer be accomadated in public institutions for a start.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    Brian? wrote: »
    I know you’re joking, but why wouldn’t that be better than having all these hang ups about nudity?

    Weather permitting of course.

    These hang ups are probably inate. Every human society has clothing, and the genitalia are covered in even the most (whatever the modern word for) primitive society.

    You see, we stand up and thus expose the genitalia. That’s something that makes us vulnerable and, well, in the male case broadcasts fairly obvious semi signals that maybe we don’t want broadcast when the hot woman gets on the bus.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,214 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Malayalam wrote: »
    Hahah :) (answer = sticky bums ;) )

    Seriously though. Why the taboo? Have you actually given it any thought?

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭Malayalam


    Brian? wrote: »
    I have an inkling I’ll be on the right side of this one. Still plenty of homophobes around, but they no longer get their way. I see the same happening with trans issues.

    I don’t know what age you are, but I remember the backlash against “the gays”, looking exactly like this. The church have less influence now though, praise allah.

    The issue's not trans per se, it's stupid identity politics that will not admit or address with its own internal incoherence. Simply ''identifying'' as a gender with no further action is always going to throw up contradictions and anomalies.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭PlaneSpeeking


    Brian? wrote: »
    I have an inkling I’ll be on the right side of this one. Still plenty of homophobes around, but they no longer get their way. I see the same happening with trans issues.

    I don’t know what age you are, but I remember the backlash against “the gays”, looking exactly like this. The church have less influence now though, praise allah.

    There may have been more idiotic postings but

    I've been a staunch advocate for LGBT rights since as long as I can recall, and going to Catholic school that was not easy.

    I've seen a young woman in my College go through a painful transition, mentally; physically and emotionally painful. Her family largely disowned her. We supported her.

    Where I draw the line is a person where absolutely zero physical changes have taken place declaring they are the opposite gender and demanding unsupervised access to places where

    What is to stop an abusive male partner declaring as female and accessing a women's shelter ? We have already had male rapists who are still anatomically and hormonally men being placed in a women's prison.

    We are sacrificing the vulnerable to be politically correct.

    And anyone defending that freak who wants to dress up and have "play dates" with six year old girls ? He should be jailed and you should be ashamed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 636 ✭✭✭7aubzxk43m2sni


    Brian? wrote: »
    I know it’s not acceptable. I’m asking why though? I think I know why, but it’s a convoluted theory based on religious oppression of the masses. Mainly the Abrhamic religions.

    Shouldn’t it be questioned?



    Something should give. Religions should no longer be accomadated in public institutions for a start.

    More of the oppressor vs victims mentality Brian.

    I don't believe religions are primarily responsible for people not going everywhere nude, although to be fair I've done very little research on the matter. I'd be inclined to say it's for protection from the elements to a large extent.

    How does religion come into a discussion about safe spaces for women (e.g the swimming classes for women only) potentially allowing transgender women (or men identifying as women) into their safe spaces? Its completely irrelevant to the discussion.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    Brian? wrote: »
    I know it’s not acceptable. I’m asking why though? I think I know why, but it’s a convoluted theory based on religious oppression of the masses. Mainly the Abrhamic religions.

    Shouldn’t it be questioned?

    nothing to do with abramhabic religions because the nudity taboo is fairly ancient and universal. Adam and Eve was explaining a taboo already there.
    Something should give. Religions should no longer be accomadated in public institutions for a start.

    It’s not accommodating a religious act, like a mass or a mosque sermon. It’s locally democratic councillors who listening to concerns from their voters who happen to be religious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,593 ✭✭✭LLMMLL


    It's nothing got to do with "rapists are everywhere".

    If you acknowledge the fact that perverts / rapists / men with bad intentions exist, then you must also acknowledge that allowing anyone to identify as any gender and access the same facilities of their chosen gender, it will increase access of these people to their targets.

    Identity politics aren't healthy. It's clear you're wrapped up in your ideology when you're immediately assuming that anyone who raises a concern about arbitrary gender identification is a right winger who hates the metoo movement.

    Nah I think if someone was likely to rape a woman in a female changing room they wouldn’t need to pretend to be trans to do it.

    The example that someone gave of incidents in Target with gender neutral changing rooms in the US proved the point. Incidents were already happening before the rooms became gender neutral, and a guy caught after they became gender neutral had convictions from before hey became gender neutral.

    Pervs be perving.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,214 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    These hang ups are probably inate. Every human society has clothing, and the genitalia are covered in even the most (whatever the modern word for) primitive society.

    You see, we stand up and thus expose the genitalia. That’s something that makes us vulnerable and, well, in the male case broadcasts fairly obvious semi signals that maybe we don’t want broadcast when the hot woman gets on the bus.

    I think we get excited by naked women because of the taboo though. If everyone is naked constantly, would the sight of a naked woman visibly excite a man?

    I don’t think the hang ups are anything inate. Look ate the societies in Papua New Guinea, the Amazon and so on. Nudity is not taboo.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭Malayalam


    Brian? wrote: »
    Seriously though. Why the taboo? Have you actually given it any thought?

    I have of course. I even lived in a nudist colony for a month a long time ago in Turkey. But I think Mr Von Peppercorn expressed quite succinctly my overall appraisal of being buck naked on the bus or in the bank.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭PlaneSpeeking


    More of the oppressor vs victims mentality Brian.

    I don't believe religions are primarily responsible for people not going everywhere nude, although to be fair I've done very little research on the matter. I'd be inclined to say it's for protection from the elements to a large extent.

    How does religion come into a discussion about safe spaces for women (e.g the swimming classes for women only) potentially allowing transgender women (or men identifying as women) into their safe spaces? Its completely irrelevant to the discussion.

    I'm Catholic, went to Mass just last Sunday, prayed this morning.

    I support LGBT rights and always have, I support TRUE trans rights.

    I think the "gender identity/being female during the week, male at weekends and both on a bank holiday/73 different genders" nonsense has gone too far but my faith has zero to do with that decision.

    Common sense does.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 636 ✭✭✭7aubzxk43m2sni


    LLMMLL wrote: »
    Nah I think if someone was likely to rape a woman in a female changing room they wouldn’t need to pretend to be trans to do it.

    The example that someone gave of incidents in Target with gender neutral changing rooms in the US proved the point. Incidents were already happening before the rooms became gender neutral, and a guy caught after they became gender neutral had convictions from before hey became gender neutral.

    Pervs be perving.

    You keep jumping to rape.

    Let's take the simple example of a man called John, who is a bit lonely and happens to be a bit of a pervert. Normally he will just stare inappropriately at women in public, but that's a bout the limit because he can't reasonably gain any other access to women.

    Now, all of a sudden, when John goes to the gym, he realises he can say "hey, I identify as a woman", and have access to the women's facilities, with no questions asked.

    Do you see how that might be problematic?


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,214 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    nothing to do with abramhabic religions because the nudity taboo is fairly ancient and universal. Adam and Eve was explaining a taboo already there.

    So simply reinforcing an existing taboo? Have you any suggestions on where I can read more about that.
    It’s not accommodating a religious act, like a mass or a mosque sermon. It’s locally democratic councillors who listening to concerns from their voters who happen to be religious.

    It’s accommodating religious beliefs though.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭PlaneSpeeking


    I'm not religious at all, I'm often vocal in my opinions against the church, but even I'm getting tired of everything getting blamed on religion.

    It seems the fashionable thing to do for some!

    Two lovely pals of mine actually had their civil partnership blessed by a priest - cool dude he is, and did in the side aisle of the church.

    Meant the world to them, one day that will be done openly. At least I hope so.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 636 ✭✭✭7aubzxk43m2sni


    Brian? wrote: »
    So simply reinforcing an existing taboo? Have you any suggestions on where I can read more about that.



    It’s accommodating religious beliefs though.

    So ideas/beliefs which are religious should be ignored on the basis of them being religious, regardless of their merit?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,214 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    More of the oppressor vs victims mentality Brian.

    I don't believe religions are primarily responsible for people not going everywhere nude, although to be fair I've done very little research on the matter. I'd be inclined to say it's for protection from the elements to a large extent.

    How does religion come into a discussion about safe spaces for women (e.g the swimming classes for women only) potentially allowing transgender women (or men identifying as women) into their safe spaces? Its completely irrelevant to the discussion.

    I wasn’t the one who brought religion up.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



Advertisement
Advertisement