Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

If Germany had of won the war, what would Ireland look like now infrastructure wise?

2456

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Would all the Irish gingers not be locked up?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,887 ✭✭✭Atoms for Peace


    Sleeper12 wrote: »
    Would all the Irish gingers not be locked up?

    I'm sure that due to their more Nordic/Aryan appearance your assumption would be wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,573 ✭✭✭badabing106


    EdgeCase wrote: »
    This thread doesn’t even make any sense.

    Ireland would have been an irrelevance in a military-industrial dictatorship, so not much would have been different except maybe being turned into a handy air base and missile testing facility.

    I think Ireland is quite a strategic land mass maybe? And quite an important one too!, seeing as it is the gateway to the whole of Europe and beyond !


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,466 ✭✭✭EdgeCase


    I think Ireland is quite a strategic land mass maybe? And quite an important one too!, seeing as it is the gateway to the whole of Europe and beyond !

    So they put a couple of air bases and missile systems on it?

    It’s not the gateway to anywhere, as it’s hundreds of miles from continental Europe and only connected by maritime or air links.

    From a military point of view, it might be a bit of a staging post but that’s about it.

    If you look at Iceland, Keflavik NATO airbase was there for years and it really didn’t create much economic activity. Everything was flown in/out and the locals had little interaction, other than with drunk and disorderly military personnel causing issues in Reykjavik. The relationship wasn’t great.

    If we’d been invaded by Germany, it would have been a few very hostile airbases staffed entirely by Germans. Then we would have been the location for a major conflict as the allies tried to liberate us again.

    It really wouldn’t have been a very pleasant existence. Have a look at how Belgium was impacted by being the stage for major conflicts and that was a country with a major industrial base and a minor (and not very pleasant) imperial power in its own right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 564 ✭✭✭shakeitoff


    Ireland would have probably been a getaway for Germans to enjoy the simple pleasures of life. Autobahns? They probably would have literally taken in the roads and promoted Ireland as the mythical land where those living in industrial cities and towns could go for a few weeks go back in time.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 564 ✭✭✭shakeitoff


    I think Ireland is quite a strategic land mass maybe? And quite an important one too!, seeing as it is the gateway to the whole of Europe and beyond !

    It couldn't be less strategic, well maybe except Iceland


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 523 ✭✭✭Sal Butamol


    Patww79 wrote: »
    For all the infrastructure we'd have had, I'm still glad the Americans saved us.

    You mean the Russians. The Yanks showed up late to the party. Even the Brits did more.


  • Posts: 31,828 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    YFlyer wrote: »
    I'm sure our native language would still be a difficulty.
    It would probably have been wiped out, along with English,
    Von uns allen wird erwartet, dass sie Deutsch sprechen oder sonst


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,573 ✭✭✭badabing106


    EdgeCase wrote: »
    So they put a couple of air bases and missile systems on it?

    It’s not the gateway to anywhere, as it’s hundreds of miles from continental Europe and only connected by maritime or air links.

    From a military point of view, it might be a bit of a staging post but that’s about it.

    [/QUOTE


  • Posts: 4,896 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Taytoland wrote: »
    Well seeing as you licked the arse of Nazi Germany at the time probably great infrastructure.

    Surely you would have been happy round the Twelfth every year? Wider straighter roads so even more columns of wide ars*d bowler hat wearing twits could march down. You would have got on well with your Nazi overlords since they shared that same habit of going places where they weren’t wanted either........


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 31,828 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You mean the Russians. The Yanks showed up late to the party. Even the Brits did more.
    If Hitler didn't invade eastwards, Russia would have settled for the stalemate and Nazi Germany would probably still be in existence.


    Britain would still be undefeated but too weak to overthrow Germany, Germany would also concede that Britain could not be invaded, not even via Ireland as one plan stated.
    Britain being forced to concede that they couldn't win and come to some arrangement.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,466 ✭✭✭EdgeCase


    I was in Keflavik bass in Iceland a few years ago at a music festival and it’s a very strange place that would give you an idea of just how disconnected the base was from the country.

    If you could imagine a site that’s a bit like Shannon airport but place it on the edge of the Burren. Then scatter bland, 1950s style utility buildings and housing blocks around it all about half a kilometer apart from each other and link it up by wind swept roads. It’s a bit like an old Irish industrial estate that has seen better days way out on the wilds of Donegal.

    The buildings were entirely American fit out. Every detail was American right down to the appliances, taps, electrics, windows. All of the street details were American too. It looks like the Burren with NYC style fire hydrants installed along the roads. It was a weird looking juxtaposition. The landscape is remarkably similar to the West of Ireland and, at least in summer, the weather in western Iceland isn’t very different to Ireland.

    They’re in the process of converting the disused buildings to Icelandic civilian use but there’s no real purpose they can find for most of them. They’re being used for bits of the equivalent of rural institutes of technology and hosting startup businesses, social housing, budget tourist accommodation (as its near the airport) and so on.

    Even reclaiming them involves replacing all the fittings, fixtures, appliances, wiring, plumbing, making sure they’re asbestos free and bringing them up to Icelandic building regulations.

    What’s weird it also shows how European Ireland is in some ways as the relics of American stuff seemed very “alien” whereas the refitted units with the Icelandic materials felt very much like what you’d expect in modern buildings here.

    Anyway, to cut a long story short, a build up of military bases in Ireland from foreign powers including NATO would really see almost no economic advantages, if the Icelandic experience were anything to go by. Militaries are self sufficient by design and just operate to their own systems and agendas. If we had had NATO bases, I’m sure it would have been very similar.

    An invasion by a hostile and oppressive power like 1930s Germany would have been a complete disaster.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭archer22


    Did we ever need saving? If yes, than it was the red army who saved us.
    We were damn lucky and so were the Brits that the Red Army didn't 'save us'.
    Every female in the British isles between 8 and 80 would have been raped and everything that could be moved would have been stolen...and millions sent to slavery in the Gulags
    Fats Churchill nearly brought hell on earth to those islands with his homo like love for Stalin...while Stalin conned him up to the eyeballs.
    We should be thankful for the nuclear bomb..that was the reason the Soviets did not continue their march across Europe..without that its almost certain their steamroller would have continued steaming westwards.

    Nearly all the older east Europeans I ever spoke to said they had only one wish in 1945....that was that the Germans would come back!.


  • Posts: 31,828 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Similar to US bases in Germany & the UK, I have family who live neat Mildenhall, an RAF airfield that is leased to the USAF, the base is almost entirely self contained, they even bring in food from the US.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Pkiernan


    There'd be no sulky carts on our roads if Germany had won.


  • Posts: 31,828 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    archer22 wrote: »
    We were damn lucky and so were the Brits that the Red Army didn't 'save us'.
    Every female in the British isles between 8 and 80 would have been raped and everything that could be moved would have been stolen...and millions sent to slavery in the Gulags
    Fats Churchill nearly brought hell on earth to those islands with his homo like love for Stalin...while Stalin conned him up to the eyeballs.
    We should be thankful for the nuclear bomb..that was the reason the Soviets did not continue their march across Europe..without that its almost certain their steamroller would have continued steaming westwards.

    Nearly all the older east Europeans I ever spoke to said they had only one wish in 1945....that was that the Germans would come back!.


    Churchill actually wanted to invade north of Poland, to cut off the Russian advance into Europe but that plan was dropped as the US were against it as well as being very difficult to achieve. He was no fan of Stalin either, but had no other options at the time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 564 ✭✭✭shakeitoff


    I don't think we would all be speaking German either btw, don't think they had any short term plans for that anyway. Maybe over the course of the 1,000 years Reich they may have got around to it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,895 ✭✭✭sabat


    shakeitoff wrote: »
    It couldn't be less strategic, well maybe except Iceland

    FlightRader-InLine2.jpg

    Transatlantic flights on one day in January this year-that's pretty strategic looking to me.


  • Posts: 31,828 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Pkiernan wrote: »
    There'd be no sulky carts on our roads if Germany had won.
    There would be no one to drive then either, they would have been given one way tickets to the Irish equivalent of Belson.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 117 ✭✭Danny Donut


    Etc wrote: »
    Britain didn't engage in fighting in Europe after the Dunkirk disaster until 44 as they didn't have strength, they were limited to a bombing campaign. The African campaign was the only location they put soldiers on the ground.

    Russia fought the European war until 1944.


    Was Italy in Europe at that time?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 4,896 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    archer22 wrote: »
    We were damn lucky and so were the Brits that the Red Army didn't 'save us'.
    Every female in the British isles between 8 and 80 would have been raped and everything that could be moved would have been stolen...and millions sent to slavery in the Gulags
    Fats Churchill nearly brought hell on earth to those islands with his homo like love for Stalin...while Stalin conned him up to the eyeballs.
    We should be thankful for the nuclear bomb..that was the reason the Soviets did not continue their march across Europe..without that its almost certain their steamroller would have continued steaming westwards.

    Nearly all the older east Europeans I ever spoke to said they had only one wish in 1945....that was that the Germans would come back!.

    I doubt if such sentiments were widespread amongst the Poles and the Czechs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,466 ✭✭✭EdgeCase


    Honestly, we don’t know how lucky we were not to have been dragged into that conflict. Any country that was badly touched by WWII suffered horribly as a result.

    We had very minor taste of it with the nazi air raids they were probably a message to Ireland to butt out after we helped with the aftermath of the raids on Belfast and so on.

    I’ve a lot of family connections in France and WWII was an an absolutlyawful period that still scars the country today both physically and psychologically. The generations who experienced it directly are only starting to fade now really. When people born in the 1940 who experienced the 50s still felt the aftermath in terms of physical damage to places, initial food shortages and so on.

    Rural western France is extremely like rural Ireland and I can assure you, life under the nazi invasion was brutal, totally oppressive and very unpleasant and there would have been no choice but to use the full infrastructure of Irish resistance against them and you probably would have seen thousands of Irish people systematically killed.

    It’s also likely, I suspect that Ireland would have lost its then only recently gained independence as the new state wouldn’t have had time to form properly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,466 ✭✭✭EdgeCase


    I doubt if such sentiments were widespread amongst the Poles and the Czechs.

    Well from an Eastern European perspective, WWII didn’t really end for them until the collapse of the USSR. They were invaded by the nazis, had their countries torn apart and were then more or less handed over to the Soviets as collateral damage.

    They really didn’t get to restore any sort of normality until the 1990s.

    If you’re Polish, Czech, Estonian or from any of those countries, it must have felt pretty awful to be just dragged out of mainstream “western” style liberal politics and economics and to be put on the other side of the Iron Curtain, without ever having had any communist revolution. I mean Russia had a revolution and became communist. Many others were basically abandoned and expected to just become part of the wider Soviet system whether they agreed or not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭archer22


    Churchill actually wanted to invade north of Poland, to cut off the Russian advance into Europe but that plan was dropped as the US were against it as well as being very difficult to achieve. He was no fan of Stalin either, but had no other options at the time.

    Churchill gave Stalin everything he wanted and more...there was a reason the Kremlin staff used to refer to Churchill as "Joe's fat Poodle".
    The love for Stalin displayed by western leaders at that point is astounding and of course never mentioned now.

    The only person in the west in 1945 who saw the real picture was general Patton..and he conveniently got silenced in a bizarre car accident.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 564 ✭✭✭shakeitoff


    EdgeCase wrote: »
    Honestly, we don’t know how lucky we were not to have been dragged into that conflict. Any country that was badly touched by WWII suffered horribly as a result.

    We had very minor taste of it with the nazi air raids they were probably a message to Ireland to butt out after we helped with the aftermath of the raids on Belfast and so on.

    I’ve a lot of family connections in France and WWII was an an absolutlyawful period that still scars the country today both physically and psychologically. The generations who experienced it directly are only starting to fade now really. When people born in the 1940 who experienced the 50s still felt the aftermath in terms of physical damage to places, initial food shortages and so on.

    Rural western France is extremely like rural Ireland and I can assure you, life under the nazi invasion was brutal, totally oppressive and very unpleasant and there would have been no choice but to use the full infrastructure of Irish resistance against them and you probably would have seen thousands of Irish people systematically killed.

    It’s also likely, I suspect that Ireland would have lost its then only recently gained independence as the new state wouldn’t have had time to form properly.

    We love to paint our history in very bleak yet romantic terms. We've all grown up hearing about how awful Ireland was but compared to our mainland Europeans, lives for our parents and grandparents were relatively bliss.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,043 ✭✭✭Berserker


    Etc wrote: »
    Many Irishmen did and died doing it.

    And were treated like dirt back here because they did. The men who went away were great men. The RoI should be really proud of them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,608 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    There ya go, fixed.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Taytoland


    Patww79 wrote: »
    For all the infrastructure we'd have had, I'm still glad the Americans Russians saved us.

    There ya go, fixed.
    Who gave the Russians the weapons? The materials? The United States of course, which Khrushchev is on record saying they would have lost without it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭archer22


    I doubt if such sentiments were widespread amongst the Poles and the Czechs.

    I agree with you about the Czechs..but it's not so clear cut with the Poles.
    You may have noticed on the news recently a controversy about Poles helping the Germans, and the Polish government trying to make mentioning this an offence.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 232 ✭✭jcorr


    The Oktoberfest would have been brought to Ireland....


    Oh wait.....


Advertisement
Advertisement