Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ulster Team Talk Thread III: Les Miserables SEE MOD WARNING POST #1924 + #2755

1193194196198199336

Comments

  • Administrators Posts: 55,733 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    bilston wrote: »
    We need a LH, and out half and a back three player. I suppose a lot depends on Payne's future.

    I've no idea where we will get a LH from but if Carbery doesn't come then I'd be investigating the idea of bringing CL back from Australia if he doesn't make the Qantas team this summer. I'm not sure that the IRFU would sanction it though. But the point is he'd be coming as a 12/15 (I think he can play 15?) who can back up McPhillips at 10, rather than coming to be first choice 10.

    To be honest, unless deals have been done, I don't think it will be easy bringing anyone in at this stage.

    I'd maybe added Matthew Agnew to the back row options next season, although I don't think he is in the Academy at the moment. Curtis Jnr may be a scrum half option at some stage as Well?

    Payne has retired. Yet to be announced, but it’s done.

    Will be a coach next year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,405 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    Donald Trump has started following Ulster? :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,161 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    stephen_n wrote: »
    bilston wrote: »
    We need a LH, and out half and a back three player. I suppose a lot depends on Payne's future.

    I've no idea where we will get a LH from but if Carbery doesn't come then I'd be investigating the idea of bringing CL back from Australia if he doesn't make the Qantas team this summer. I'm not sure that the IRFU would sanction it though. But the point is he'd be coming as a 12/15 (I think he can play 15?) who can back up McPhillips at 10, rather than coming to be first choice 10.

    To be honest, unless deals have been done, I don't think it will be easy bringing anyone in at this stage.

    I'd maybe added Matthew Agnew to the back row options next season, although I don't think he is in the Academy at the moment. Curtis Jnr may be a scrum half option at some stage as Well?

    Will someone of CL’s standard be prepared to come in as a benchwarmer though?

    He wouldn't be a benchwarmer. He'd be starting at 10/12/15.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,161 ✭✭✭✭bilston




  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    bilston wrote: »
    He wouldn't be a benchwarmer. He'd be starting at 10/12/15.


    That's the problem though. You sign someone like Lealiifano and he's going to start. So neither Carbery nor McPhillips is getting any game time, in a World Cup year. That would be absolutely criminal and the IRFU can't allow that to happen.

    Unless Ulster sign an absolute duffer whose only redeeming quality is the ability to fill a jersey and convert oxygen to CO2 and who presents no threat to McPhillips, they'll have to sign an IQ out-half.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭Utah_Saint


    bilston wrote: »
    He wouldn't be a benchwarmer. He'd be starting at 10/12/15.


    That's the problem though. You sign someone like Lealiifano and he's going to start. So neither Carbery nor McPhillips is getting any game time, in a World Cup year. That would be absolutely criminal and the IRFU can't allow that to happen.

    Unless Ulster sign an absolute duffer whose only redeeming quality is the ability to fill a jersey and convert oxygen to CO2 and who presents no threat to McPhillips, they'll have to sign an IQ out-half.

    Carbery?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,161 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    bilston wrote: »
    He wouldn't be a benchwarmer. He'd be starting at 10/12/15.


    That's the problem though. You sign someone like Lealiifano and he's going to start. So neither Carbery nor McPhillips is getting any game time, in a World Cup year. That would be absolutely criminal and the IRFU can't allow that to happen.

    Unless Ulster sign an absolute duffer whose only redeeming quality is the ability to fill a jersey and convert oxygen to CO2 and who presents no threat to McPhillips, they'll have to sign an IQ out-half.

    He wouldn't be signed as a 10, he'd be signed as a 12 who can provide back up to McPhillips at 10. The fact he can also (I think) play 15 means that over the season McCloskey is still getting plenty of gametime.

    Personally I'm happy to take Carbery, just not at the expense of McPhillips development. But then Ireland comes first.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,161 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    It's interesting that in the whole will he won't he saga regarding Carbery that the forgotten man (outside Ulster) has been McPhillips.

    I wonder if his performances have surprised even Joe a little bit. If your stick McPhillips behind what on paper should be a much stronger Ulster pack next season might we suddenly have a potential WC bolter on our hands?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    bilston wrote: »
    He wouldn't be a benchwarmer. He'd be starting at 10/12/15.

    But if he’s starting at 10, it’s at the expense of McPhillips at 12 it’s McCloskey. I’m just talking about the bigger games there. If CL came back, I’d imagine McPhillips would end up getting about as much game time as last season, which wouldn’t be good for him or Ulster.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    stephen_n wrote: »
    But if he’s starting at 10, it’s at the expense of McPhillips at 12 it’s McCloskey. I’m just talking about the bigger games there. If CL came back, I’d imagine McPhillips would end up getting about as much game time as last season, which wouldn’t be good for him or Ulster.

    I'd be happier with a 15 who can cover 10 than a 12 who can do so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,816 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    I'd be happier with a 15 who can cover 10 than a 12 who can do so.

    Hmmmm I wonder where you'd find someone who's been playing 15 and covering 10 also.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭wp_rathead


    Hmmmm I wonder where you'd find someone who's been playing 15 and covering 10 also.

    Haha imagine Joey goes North and he's played 15


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    wp_rathead wrote: »
    Haha imagine Joey goes North and he's played 15


    That would be just fine IMO.

    If Carbery goes north and can't displace McPhillips, then at least we know that he's not good enough. It's one thing not to be able to displace Sexton, but if he can't displace McPhillips, well that's all we'd need to know.

    As things stand, we just don't know how good Carbery is or can be. We don't really know how good McPhillips is either.

    But Joe seems to see a lot in Carbery and he has to do something to bring him along ahead of September 2018.

    McPhillips, Ulster, Ulster fans, everything else takes a back seat. That is how it has to be. Ulster simply cannot sign anyone at 10 who is not Irish qualified.

    BTW. John Cooney is Ulster's player of the year and he never had half the talent or potential of Carbery, but getting regular game time in meaningful matches was the making of him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭Utah_Saint


    wp_rathead wrote: »
    Haha imagine Joey goes North and he's played 15


    That would be just fine IMO.

    If Carbery goes north and can't displace McPhillips, then at least we know that he's not good enough. It's one thing not to be able to displace Sexton, but if he can't displace McPhillips, well that's all we'd need to know.

    As things stand, we just don't know how good Carbery is or can be. We don't really know how good McPhillips is either.

    But Joe seems to see a lot in Carbery and he has to do something to bring him along ahead of September 2018.

    McPhillips, Ulster, Ulster fans, everything else takes a back seat. That is how it has to be. Ulster simply cannot sign anyone at 10 who is not Irish qualified.
    Joey can't displace Byrne either....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    Utah_Saint wrote: »
    Joey can't displace Byrne either....


    Well, that's unclear, but even if it is the case, it's all the more reason to send him north.


  • Administrators Posts: 55,733 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    That would be just fine IMO.

    If Carbery goes north and can't displace McPhillips, then at least we know that he's not good enough. It's one thing not to be able to displace Sexton, but if he can't displace McPhillips, well that's all we'd need to know.

    As things stand, we just don't know how good Carbery is or can be. We don't really know how good McPhillips is either.

    But Joe seems to see a lot in Carbery and he has to do something to bring him along ahead of September 2018.

    McPhillips, Ulster, Ulster fans, everything else takes a back seat. That is how it has to be. Ulster simply cannot sign anyone at 10 who is not Irish qualified.

    BTW. John Cooney is Ulster's player of the year and he never had half the talent or potential of Carbery.


    Does he?

    If we are honest, Joey Carbery would probably have zero Irish caps if it were not for Paddy Jackson's off field issues. The guy certainly has something about him, and the hype is definitely there, but it's not really based on a whole lot of substance.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    awec wrote: »
    Does he?

    If we are honest, Joey Carbery would probably have zero Irish caps if it were not for Paddy Jackson's off field issues. The guy certainly has something about him, and the hype is definitely there, but it's not really based on a whole lot of substance.


    But Jackson's off-field issues aren't going away between now and September 2019, so we have to play the hand we've been dealt. It's like saying Jackson wouldn't have as many caps if Madigan hadn't moved abroad, it's just the way of things.

    Yes, Joe does see a lot in Carbery. He wouldn't be (allegedly) driving this move if he didn't.

    I agree we've very little hard evidence to go on, but I do know that a) Joe is a better judge of players than us and b) he's a much better judge of players than anyone at Ulster. If he thinks this is worthwhile, I think he's earned the right to move on it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 ✭✭✭launish116


    Really don’t think this move is good for Ulster! Still think he’ll take Munster and I wouldn’t blame him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,437 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    awec wrote: »
    Does he?

    If we are honest, Joey Carbery would probably have zero Irish caps if it were not for Paddy Jackson's off field issues. The guy certainly has something about him, and the hype is definitely there, but it's not really based on a whole lot of substance.

    Yeah that issue is a bit of a moot point. He's the 2nd choice at this stage and whether that's due to other circumstances is just the way it is.

    Agree on the hype thing but maybe it goes back to the ''you're never as good as they say you are or never as bad either'' mantra. I think at times some in media and some fans can swing wildly from hyping up player X and saying player Y is awful.

    I do think Carberry is a decent player, some of the breaks he's made in games have been brilliant. Whether he has all the required skills to be an out and out 10 is another thing but I don't think he will develop fully behind Sexton as for one he's brought into Irish camp anytime Sexton is called in also, so doesn't get the benefit of starting games when JS is on international duty.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Ulster need an experienced 10 for depth. Keatley ticks that box, Carbery does not. Many NIQs tick that box also. They absolutely need someone anyway.

    The double switch makes most sense to me. An NIQ signing makes sense after that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,437 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    Ulster need an experienced 10 for depth. Keatley ticks that box, Carbery does not. Many NIQs tick that box also. They absolutely need someone anyway.

    The double switch makes most sense to me. An NIQ signing makes sense after that.

    So Keatley to Ulster and Carberry to Munster? Whatever about 1 of those happening, chances of both seem slim..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Eod100 wrote: »
    So Keatley to Ulster and Carberry to Munster? Whatever about 1 of those happening, chances of both seem slim..

    Right, but it’s a current rumour

    https://www.rugbypass.com/news/provincial-switch-deal-see-carbery-go-new-province-not-ulster/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,437 ✭✭✭✭Eod100



    It's an interesting one. Don't know much about Carberry or Keatley's contracts is there some 'flexibility' about going to another province? Presume both are currently contracted to their current provinces..


  • Administrators Posts: 55,733 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Yes. McPhillips and Carbery just leaves us with two inexperienced 10s of a very similar standard. McPhillips isn't going to learn much from Carbery and vice versa.

    Keatley would be a fairly mediocre signing but he might be a better signing than Carbery. Though the thoughts of actually signing Ian Keatley just depresses me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,816 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    Has Keatley proven to be a good mentor for anyone though, I know he's experienced and all but have any 10s that've been in the same team as him actually improved from when they joined Munster? I mean he tends to break down under pressure, I'd say one of his main flaws is that when the spotlights shone on him is when he's made some of his biggest blunders.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    awec wrote: »
    Yes. McPhillips and Carbery just leaves us with two inexperienced 10s of a very similar standard. McPhillips isn't going to learn much from Carbery and vice versa.

    Keatley would be a fairly mediocre signing but he might be a better signing than Carbery. Though the thoughts of actually signing Ian Keatley just depresses me.

    What would actually please you? Apart from signing a 35 year old half back from Monty.


    Ulster are in bits. Backline alone Jackson bowe Olding Payne trimble Piatau all gone. Ulsters first objective is to get a squad together for next season capable of a 3rd place finish. The longer term is completely different scenario which requires major long term planning.

    Signing some 33 or 34 year old journey man who phones it in for a season is not the solution. We saw a bit of hunger about Ulster yday. With a very young side out. That should tell you something.


  • Administrators Posts: 55,733 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    What would actually please you? Apart from signing a 35 year old half back from Monty.


    Ulster are in bits. Backline alone Jackson bowe Olding Payne trimble Piatau all gone. Ulsters first objective is to get a squad together for next season capable of a 3rd place finish. The longer term is completely different scenario which requires major long term planning.

    Signing some 33 or 34 year old journey man who phones it in for a season is not the solution. We saw a bit of hunger about Ulster yday. With a very young side out. That should tell you something.
    And signing another young, inexperienced guy with limited experience at 10 who plainly doesn't want to be here is?



    A 35 year old journeyman who can no longer play 80 minutes every week is exactly what Ulster need. Someone to mentor McPhillips and who will come off the bench at the 60 minute mark to see games through.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,405 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    awec wrote: »
    And signing another young, inexperienced guy with limited experience at 10 who plainly doesn't want to be here is?
    To be fair, if he goes it will be because he wants to. The IRFU can't force him.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    awec wrote: »
    And signing another young, inexperienced guy with limited experience at 10 who plainly doesn't want to be here is?



    A 35 year old journeyman who can no longer play 80 minutes every week is exactly what Ulster need. Someone to mentor McPhillips and who will come off the bench at the 60 minute mark to see games through.

    Nope. Ulster need competition and hunger in the squad.

    What if McPhillips might soon realise he isnt under pressure from the disinterested hasbeen for his place and his performances drop off as a result? From what I have seen of him, he needs gametime. Not mentoring. He executed a few poor kicks yesterday but his decision making looked fine.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement