Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The 8th Amendment Part 2 - Mod Warning in OP

1163164166168169324

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,655 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    (I also can't edit, since we're discussing technical issues now! I can click on edit but it doesnt open.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    Where are the graphic, hard hitting messages from the Yes side

    When the debate is calm and fact-based, as at the Citizens Assembly, Repeal wins by a mile. Let Youth defense do the shock tactics - my wife would not be a militant pro-choicer, but I have seen her physically recoil from some of those Join the Rebellion posters.

    Let's leave the graphic, hard hitting messages to the mad people.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,898 ✭✭✭✭Ken.


    volchitsa wrote: »
    (I also can't edit, since we're discussing technical issues now! I can click on edit but it doesnt open.

    You need to take that to the help desk. https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=30

    A couple of things.

    If you are using an old skin it could be the problem.
    If your using the new responsive sh!te that could be the problem.
    On editing, if the post is older than 48 hours you can't edit it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    volchitsa wrote: »
    See here's the thing (one of them anyway), you seem to be claiming that you were in direct contact with a London lab that advised you differently from your own doctor in Dublin. Are you really saying that a lab technician told you to terminate your pregnancy, or do you mean you contacted a doctor in the UK after (or before??) the doctors in Ireland gave you this diagnosis, and if so, did the UK doctors really advise you to terminate without a consultation and before a placenta mosaic had been ruled out?
    That's not been my experience of antenatal testing.

    Mine neither. And neither is it that of anyone I know.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,036 ✭✭✭wheresmahbombs


    I believe that the 8th Amendment should be repealed.

    People favour choice as to if they should continue pregnancy or abort it. Some women may have made the wrong decision to give birth and thus may want to abort their pregnancy.

    It's understandable why people are against repealing the 8th Amendment, but freedom of choice ultimately wins out in this scenario.

    I don't want Ireland having a Malta situation where abortion is outright banned under all circumstances.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,137 ✭✭✭horseburger


    JDD wrote: »
    Hi Robert KK and horse-burger. I’ve posted the below question before to pro-lifers on this thread, to Bertieinexile and pleas advise. Bertieinexile has neglected to answer (even though he/she said they were trying to get the time to answer in between posting other detailed posts). Pleas advise said the he/she would be happy for me to import the termination pill and was against me being criminalized for it - but was still going to vote no.

    I’d appreciate your honest view. Please don’t make me constantly check your profiles to see if you’ve posted elsewhere while completely ignoring my question.

    Previous post:

    During my last pregnancy it was suspected I had placenta accretia (google it). Very luckily, in the end, I did not. However, I was informed that should I get pregnant again, I would have a 70% chance of it occurring.

    Statistics on placenta accretia are hard to come by as it is historically a rare complication latterly on the rise. From my own research and from the discussions with my consultant I was told the condition has a 7% mortality rate, a 30% chance of permanent injury to my non-uterus internal organs and an 80% chance I would lose my uterus.

    As a result I had a tubal ligation. But no contraceptive is a fail safe. What do YOU advise as my current course of action:

    A. Refrain from having sex with my husband until go through the menopause;

    B. Have sex with my husband but, should my contraception fail, accept that I would have a 1 in 20 chance of dying, and a 1 in 5 chance of suffering a serious life debititating injury should I bring the pregnancy to full term.

    Bear in mind that I have three young children who would be left without a mother if the 1 in 20 chance came to pass.

    Your beliefs mean my choice has to be A or B.

    I think the procedure of abortion should be available to you, as you have outlined that if you become pregnant that it could result in a risk to your life.

    You have mentioned that abortion is not legally available to you in Ireland, due to it being a 1 in 20 chance, and not higher than that.

    I think that if there is a risk to your life, and you have outlined that there is a risk, that it should be available to you.

    Perhaps because abortion in the case of a risk to life of the mother is accepted in Ireland in different cases, that it should also be available in your case?

    On the issue of abortion in cases of a risk to suicide, I am wondering, is it very hard for psychiatrists and physicians to confirm with certainty, that a suicide would be carried out, if a pregnant woman presents to doctors stating that she is suicidal?

    Do psychiatrists and physicians err on the side of caution by permitting the abortion procedure in the case of a risk of suicide, in order to reduce the risk of a suicide, if there was refusal to permit an abortion.

    If there are cases where psychiatrists and physicians erred on the side of caution in the case of a possibility of suicide, then perhaps the argument could be made for the procedure to be available for your circumstance, where you have stated that currently, because the risk to life is a lower statistic, that the option of abortion is not available to you?

    Could a guideline of erring on the side of caution could be made in your case, due to the risk to your life upon becoming pregnant?

    Here is an item by Kitty Holland in The Irish Times, and two item in the Irish Independent by Shane Phelan, about a case where abortion was refused, in a case of a girl who presented as suicidal.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/girl-sectioned-after-psychiatrist-ruled-out-abortion-1.3116111

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/now-suicidal-pregnant-women-in-fear-of-detention-35819886.html

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/girls-case-leaves-many-unanswered-questions-35819887.html

    Here is an item in the Journal, about a 2015 Department of Health Report, stating that three abortions were carried out in 2014, relating to the risk of suicide. It states in the report that there were nine cases of a risk to suicide, and that three abortions were carried out:

    http://www.thejournal.ie/abortions-ireland-26-2188298-Jun2015/

    http://health.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/annual-report-2014-Protection-of-Life-During-Pregnancy1.pdf

    This item cites arguments for and against permitting abortion where there is a stated risk of suicide:

    http://www.irishhealth.com/article.html?id=22130

    This item, by Patricia Casey suggests that there is a possibility that psychiatrists might use caution and grant approval for abortion.

    She wrote that "Moreover when a woman insists she is suicidal and the doctors disagree, they may nevertheless acquiesce in granting an abortion so as to err on the side of caution".

    If it could be shown that caution is considered in the case of a risk of suicide and procedures granted approval, could the argument then be made - even though your circumstance is a 1 in 20 risk - that, in order to be cautious about the risk to your life, that it if you sought an abortion, could it be permitted on grounds of caution?

    https://www.oireachtas.ie/parliament/media/committees/healthandchildren/PatriciaCaseySubmission.pdf



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    You are pretty good at ignoring points yourself.

    What point did I ignore?
    You state that Anthony Levatino, who, as a doctor, carried out abortions, is not in a position to speak in an official capacity, about the referendum.

    Yes exactly
    Do you also argue that organisations that provide abortion services should not give opinions on current Irish laws on abortion?
    They can have whatever opinions they want. Just not as a side on the referendum
    I don't argue that people from outside Ireland shouldn't give opinions on Irish laws on abortion in an official capacity.

    Good for you? I didn't say they couldn't have opinions. In fact, I specifically said they had a freedom of speech. Just not on an official level on a referendum that has nothing to do with their country.

    The organization BPAS has commented on Irish laws on abortion:
    This item below, posted by the Abortion Rights Campaign in 2013, includes the following paragraphs:


    https://www.abortionrightscampaign.ie/2013/11/15/bpas-serves-notice-to-the-irish-government/

    The BPAS spokesperson, Dr Patricia Lohr Medical Director, who addressed the Oireachtas Committee and the Citizens' Assembly, in an official capacity, to detail the services provided by BPAS, is from neither Ireland or the UK. She is from America, as is Anthony Levatino.

    Have you a problem with Dr Patricia Lohr being from America, speaking in an official capacity about British laws on abortion, where she detailed how Irish citizens avail of the BPAS services in Britain?

    Yes actually, I do.
    Would you have argued that she should not have addressed either the Citizens' Assembly on the Eight Amendment or the Oireachtas Committee on the Eight Amendment, on the basis that she was not from Britain or Ireland and she was speaking in an official capacity representing BPAS?

    Actually, no. I don't believe she should.


    Now, can you please answer the rest of my questions? Nice pulling it off topic in order not to answer by the way


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 96 ✭✭Madscientist30


    That person providing the care can be anyone who (obviously subject to approval) volunteers to. In the case of a pregnancy there can be no transfer of responsibility, it the unborn are entirely dependent on a specific person, its a massively invasive undertaking to force on someone who does not want it

    Yes but if the argument is on the contention that the unborn are burdensome, are born children not also burdensome, in terms of the way raising children affects the daily routine and financial circumstances of the people who care for them?
    Yes, children are hard work. That is why children should generally be wanted, loved and welcomed into the world. To me that is a basic human need we all have. If you are in early pregnancy and not in a position to provide that to a child then what is forcing the situation going to achieve except misery and suffering?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 102 ✭✭John DoeReMi


    When the debate is calm and fact-based, as at the Citizens Assembly, Repeal wins by a mile. Let Youth defense do the shock tactics - my wife would not be a militant pro-choicer, but I have seen her physically recoil from some of those Join the Rebellion posters.

    Let's leave the graphic, hard hitting messages to the mad people.

    That's all very well in the cloistered environment of the Citizen's Assembly, but that's not where the referendum will be won or lost. That'll be in conservative rural areas where the anti-repeal "shock, horror" messages will have the most impact. I don't see why pointing out the hard facts of why we need to repeal the referendum is sinking to Youth Defence level. Tip toeing around the issue is only going to hand victory to the anti - repeal side. Have we learned nothing from the previous campaigns - not to mention the Brexit and Trump horror shows?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,137 ✭✭✭horseburger


    What point did I ignore?



    Yes exactly


    They can have whatever opinions they want. Just not as a side on the referendum



    Good for you? I didn't say they couldn't have opinions. In fact, I specifically said they had a freedom of speech. Just not on an official level on a referendum that has nothing to do with their country.






    Yes actually, I do.



    Actually, no. I don't believe she should.


    Now, can you please answer the rest of my questions? Nice pulling it off topic in order not to answer by the way

    So you don't think those views with concern about abortion should address the Oireachtas Committee and Citizens' Assembly, but a group advocating abortion should?

    The organization BPAS has commented on Irish laws on abortion.

    I included an item that showed that BPAS has criticized the Irish Government, in 2013 with regard to laws on abortion, so it has given an opinion on the question of abortion being made available in Ireland. You can well assume that BPAS would advocate a yes vote in the referendum.

    It has a website www.abortion.ie. Why would it register with a .ie web address if it wasn't interested in advocating on the issue of abortion being made available in Ireland?

    BPAS isn't as neutral as you are suggesting.

    https://www.abortionrightscampaign.ie/2013/11/15/bpas-serves-notice-to-the-irish-government/


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,972 ✭✭✭captbarnacles


    kylith wrote: »
    I think I got it. PGD got a horrible diagnosis. Some bloods were sent to England who said on the basis of those results they would recommend abortion. A doctor in Crumlin said ‘hang on a bit; we’ll do an amnio’, at which point the diagnosis was overturned (hoorah!). Not that it actually mattered either way because PGD wouldn’t have been travelling even if the original diagnosis held. Therefore the 8th saved her baby because she wouldn’t have bothered with the amnio if she’d had the means to travel.

    ETA: if it weren’t for the 8th she’d have refused the early induction necessary to save the baby.

    Yeah?

    Thought I had it but nope still confused. How was the 8th a positive thing here?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    So you don't think those views with concern about abortion should address the Oireachtas Committee and Citizens' Assembly, but a group advocating abortion should?

    I included an item that showed that BPAS has criticized the Irish Government, in 2013 with regard to laws on abortion, so it has given an opinion on the question of abortion being made available in Ireland. You can assume that BPAS would advocate a yes vote in the referendum.


    I said the complete opposite. :confused::confused: I said nobody outside of the country should be meddling in the referendum of that country, unless they can bring something to the table that nobody in the country can. They are perfectly allowed to have and state their opinions but I don't believe those opinions should have anything to do with a referendum at an official level.

    How on earth did you come to the conclusion you did?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    Thought I had it but nope still confused. How was the 8th a positive thing here?

    I don't understand why a doctor in Crumlim got involved. All Dublin maternity hospitals have experts in foetal medicine who are involved in cases where possible or probable abnormalities are identified.
    And the eighth amendment saves no babies, FFA or otherwise. My decisions regarding my babies were what "saved" them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,137 ✭✭✭horseburger


    I said the complete opposite. :confused::confused:I said nobody outside of the country should be meddling in the referendum of that country, unless they can bring something to the table that nobody in the country can. They are perfectly allowed to have and state their opinions but I don't believe those opinions should have anything to do with a referendum at an official level.

    How on earth did you come to the conclusion you did?

    How can you state that BPAS has not stated anything regarding advocating for the provision of abortion services in Ireland.

    It criticized the Irish government in 2013.

    It recently registered the www.abortion.ie web address.

    You seem to be now suggesting that BPAS can provide abortion services in Ireland, that doctors here would be unable to provide, if there is a yes vote.

    BPAS criticized the Irish government in 2013 regarding abortion provision in Ireland.

    Is that not getting involved in the debate?

    This item is titled BPAS serves notice to the Irish Government

    https://www.abortionrightscampaign.ie/2013/11/15/bpas-serves-notice-to-the-irish-government/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    How can you state that BPAS has not stated anything regarding advocating for the provision of abortion services in Ireland.

    It criticized the Irish government in 2013.

    It recently registered the abortion.ie web address.

    You seem to be now suggesting that BPAS can provide abortion services in Ireland, that doctors here would be unable to provide, if there is a yes vote.

    BPAS criticized the Irish government in 2013 regarding abortion provision in Ireland.

    Is that not getting involved in the debate?

    This item is titled BPAS serves notice to the Irish Government

    https://www.abortionrightscampaign.ie/2013/11/15/bpas-serves-notice-to-the-irish-government/


    What?! I didn't even say that!


    Okay, well, I'm going to stop replying to you now. You haven't answered a single question given to you, you jump around the topic like a madman to try and avoid anything you don't want to answer, a mod had to tell you to cut out the other crap you were at, and now your tactic is to completely and utterly (and it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if it was purposely) misread posts.

    If another poster wants to answer you, good luck to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,655 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    I said the complete opposite. :confused::confused:I said nobody outside of the country should be meddling in the referendum of that country, unless they can bring something to the table that nobody in the country can. They are perfectly allowed to have and state their opinions but I don't believe those opinions should have anything to do with a referendum at an official level.

    How on earth did you come to the conclusion you did?

    How can you state that BPAS has not stated anything regarding advocating for the provision of abortion services in Ireland.

    It criticized the Irish government in 2013.

    It recently registered the abortion.ie web address.

    You seem to be now suggesting that BPAS can provide abortion services in Ireland, that doctors here would be unable to provide, if there is a yes vote.

    BPAS criticized the Irish government in 2013 regarding abortion provision in Ireland.

    Is that not getting involved in the debate?

    This item is titled BPAS serves notice to the Irish Government

    https://www.abortionrightscampaign.ie/2013/11/15/bpas-serves-notice-to-the-irish-government/
    I think BPAS and thr NHS etc are in a very different position from a random American though, no matter how many abortions he himself has carried out - they ar after all providing a health service that I have heard (and read on here) prolifers use as an explanation for why the law in Ireland doesnt need to change!

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    A service thousands living in Ireland use every year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,598 ✭✭✭robarmstrong


    Hi horseburger,

    Do you feel a woman should be forced to contend with an unwanted pregnancy to satisfy your personal beliefs/morals?
    If your answer is yes:

    Do you feel that a woman who has fallen pregnant due to rape should be forced to continue that pregnancy to satisfy the personal beliefs/opinions/morals of those against abortion?
    If your answer is yes:

    Women travel abroad for abortion every year in Ireland, because of the 8th, these women will not receive proper aftercare and support after the abortion is performed and will have to travel back home and pretty much carry on with their lives. Would you not prefer that if they absolutely HAD to have an abortion, it would be a lot safer in their own country, so they may receive the appropriate aftercare and support that would be required?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 726 ✭✭✭The Legend Of Kira


    If the poster campaign in Dublin so far is anything to go by then the Repeal campaign have already lost the referendum. The anti - Repeal campaign have had their posters up for about a month now and of course they’re what you’d expect – simple, graphic no nonsense, fear-based messages claiming that repeal is a licence for wholesale baby murder. So far, so predictable. Only in the last fortnight have the pro - Repeal posters begun to appear. It’s bad enough that the pro-Repeal side were behind the ball in launching their campaign but the quality of the messages so far have been dreadful. The Labour party’s two posters – “For Compassion in a Crisis” and “For Women’s Health” are typical of the kind of bland, wishy washy, “let’s not offend anyone” approach common now in all establishment election and referendum campaigns. The worst I’ve seen so far though is the Together For Yes campaign poster – an awful yoke proclaiming “Sometimes a private matter needs public support”.

    WTF ? I’m no idiot and I had to read that thing twice to make sense of it. This drivel was obviously dreamed up by some goateed chin stroking intellectual college students sitting in Starbucks over a few latte mochaccino’s along with their adoring doe eyed girlfriends. Does anyone in their right mind really think that this type of nonsense is going to win over floating/doubtful voters who haven’t decided yet?

    Where are the graphic, hard hitting messages from the Yes side pointing out that it’s time we stopped forcing 5,000 women a year abroad? Where are the posters declaring that it could be YOUR daughter, girlfriend, sister or mother who might be forced into this awful journey? Where are the posters asking WHY WOULD YOU FORCE A RAPE VICTIM TO BEAR HIS CHILD? When are we going to learn that the “nicey, nicey” approach doesn’t woiork when you’re up against the religious right?
    You are right in your analysis,, the yes posters are very kinda soft compared to the no posters- & just incase anyone asks me no Im not referring to any graphic imagery or anything, for example take this new no poster, its hard hitting blunt & getting right to the point a lot better compared with the soft approach of the yes posters.

    448199.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,739 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    Thought I had it but nope still confused. How was the 8th a positive thing here?

    Not a clue.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,391 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    You are right in your analysis,, the yes posters are very kinda soft compared to the no posters- & just incase anyone asks me no Im not referring to any graphic imagery or anything, for example take this new no poster, its hard hitting blunt & getting right to the point a lot better compared with the soft approach of the yes posters.

    448199.jpg
    I am honestly not that sure poster's will make a huge difference, I think and hope people will do their own research into claims being made before deciding how to vote.

    Also the bookies, polls and analysis point to a repeal... So we will see... There have been lots of upsets recently like trump and brexit so every vote important


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,056 ✭✭✭applehunter


    Who are the YES going to put forward for debates?

    They may unite under "Together for Yes" but that is a very large umbrella ranging from those that would favour restrictive abortion to those that believe there should be no restrictions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,137 ✭✭✭horseburger


    Hi horseburger,

    Do you feel a woman should be forced to contend with an unwanted pregnancy to satisfy your personal beliefs/morals?
    If your answer is yes:

    Do you feel that a woman who has fallen pregnant due to rape should be forced to continue that pregnancy to satisfy the personal beliefs/opinions/morals of those against abortion?
    If your answer is yes:

    Women travel abroad for abortion every year in Ireland, because of the 8th, these women will not receive proper aftercare and support after the abortion is performed and will have to travel back home and pretty much carry on with their lives. Would you not prefer that if they absolutely HAD to have an abortion, it would be a lot safer in their own country, so they may receive the appropriate aftercare and support that would be required?

    I never stated anything about stopping people from having abortions. I never said that people shouldn't have abortions.

    I has asked questions relating to how people advocate for abortion and the language that they use to describe abortion in ways that avoid dealing with what abortion involves.

    For example describing abortion as a termination of a pregnancy is not accurate, Every birth coincides with a termination of a pregnancy.

    Describing abortion as the ending of a pregnancy isn't accurate considering every birth coincides with the ending of a pregnancy.

    I find that it defies logic to argue that a foetus is less of a human than humans who develop later.

    Why is a foetus considered less of a human just because it happens to be at an earlier stage of human life cycle growth and development?

    A five year old child isn't considered any less of a human than a 60 year old adult.

    How is something that is created by two separate humans, not human at every stage of its existence?

    In this video, around the 14 minute mark, a repeal campaigner has difficulty trying to avoid conceding that the life being ended in an abortion, is a human life. She describes that what is being called for is healthcare, but doesn't seem to want to concede, to the interviewer, that the healthcare sought is a procedure that intentionally ends a human life. The interviewer asks her about use of euphemisms:



    Recently on Tonight with Matt Cooper and in this case Gavan Reilly, the reporter Donal Lynch, who is supporting a repeal of the Eight Amendment, addresses the issue, of abortion being described in a way, that he stated is denying the human status of the foetus being aborted.

    He mentioned this in an episode of The Claire Byrne Show on RTE One in 2016, by saying that language used by advocates for repeal meant that "the humanity of the foetus is denied even by people who want abortion on demand".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,598 ✭✭✭robarmstrong


    That's all well and good but try extra hard to answer the questions I've actually asked, rather than share YouTube links.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,279 ✭✭✭NuMarvel


    lazygal wrote: »
    My experience of having tests done in Ireland which were processed in the UK was that the results were sent to my consultant who advised me that further testing ie amniocentesis was required. No mention of termination at that stage. Just the % odds of a possible FFA. I never heard from the lab directly.

    I've never heard of a lab contacting a patient directly, and I definitely have never heard of them recommending a particular course of action. I can't see how it would be appropriate either, considering they wouldn't have the patient's medical history. That's why results will usually go back to the patient's doctor, so they can be the ones to discuss the results and the patient's options.
    lazygal wrote: »
    I don't understand why a doctor in Crumlim got involved. All Dublin maternity hospitals have experts in foetal medicine who are involved in cases where possible or probable abnormalities are identified.

    The only reason I can think of is that perhaps the doctor also works out of Crumlin. In general, it's not uncommon for doctors to work out of multiple hospitals, though I'm not sure what type of fetal medicine would be on offer in both a maternity hospital and a children's hospital
    Who are the YES going to put forward for debates?

    John McGuirk. He's really a double agent. I can't believe the No side fell for it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,137 ✭✭✭horseburger


    What?! I didn't even say that!


    Okay, well, I'm going to stop replying to you now. You haven't answered a single question given to you, you jump around the topic like a madman to try and avoid anything you don't want to answer, a mod had to tell you to cut out the other crap you were at, and now your tactic is to completely and utterly (and it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if it was purposely) misread posts.

    If another poster wants to answer you, good luck to them.

    You said that BPAS could speak at the Citizens' Assembly and the Oireachtas Committee on the Eight Amendment, as long as it didn't take a position with regard to the laws on abortion in another country.

    BPAS made criticisms of the Irish government in 2013, with regard to abortion laws in Ireland.

    Considering it has made criticisms of abortion laws in Ireland, one can well assume that BPAS would be taking a definite position on the upcoming referendum.

    https://www.abortionrightscampaign.ie/2013/11/15/bpas-serves-notice-to-the-irish-government/

    If BPAS isn't taking an interest in the upcoming referendum, why has it registered the website www.abortion.ie that diverts to the official BPAS website?

    The Abortion Rights Campaign item above includes the following text:

    "For many of our followers the BPAS notice was an act of solidarity with women in Ireland who have travelled, or who will be obliged to travel to one of their clinics to access abortion services. For other supporters BPAS were directly calling our Government to action, questioning it’s ability to care for women in Ireland by saying – ‘We’ll care for your women until your government does’".

    "Those who hold opposing anti-choice views were naturally outraged by the BPAS Notice. They questioned its legality, given Ireland’s strict abortion laws, and in particular – those laws governing access to information on Abortion services. They demanded to know what gave BPAS the right to comment on Irish abortion laws? They declared that the only possible motive for BPAS’ involvement in the Irish abortion debate was financial gain".

    "With regards the legality – the BPAS notice was perfectly legal. As the notice did not contain a phone number, an invitation to donate money or details about the services it provides – it is not what the Advertising Standards Authority for Ireland (ASAI) would class as an advertisement nor does it break any laws by providing information on abortion services.
    As to BPAS’ right to comment – many of the 4,000 women a year who travel to the UK to have an abortion do so in a BPAS clinic. BPAS are a registered charity in the UK which provides reproductive health services".

    "These services include – contraception advice and vasectomy, pregnancy testing and counselling and abortion treatments. The staff in BPAS clinics meet women who have travelled from Ireland every day, and are thus uniquely positioned to comment on situation. They have an insight into the extra burden of stress travelling places on those coming from Ireland compared to the ‘normal’ stresses faced by those who access abortion services from within the UK".

    "BPAS have stated publicly that they would prefer it if people in Ireland who want to access abortion services could do so in Ireland. They see the hardship travelling to the UK inflicts on those in their care and they hear first hand the extraordinary logistical difficulties people are required to navigate in order to travel. Be it accessing money; time off work or organising child-care – the stresses heaped on people in an already stressful situation are exacerbated by having to travel from Ireland . BPAS are also acutely aware that many will face difficulty accessing the follow up medical care they need".

    You stated:

    I said the complete opposite. :confused::confused:I said nobody outside of the country should be meddling in the referendum of that country, unless they can bring something to the table that nobody in the country can. They are perfectly allowed to have and state their opinions but I don't believe those opinions should have anything to do with a referendum at an official level.

    How on earth did you come to the conclusion you did?

    You stated:
    What point did I ignore?



    Yes exactly


    They can have whatever opinions they want. Just not as a side on the referendum



    Good for you? I didn't say they couldn't have opinions. In fact, I specifically said they had a freedom of speech. Just not on an official level on a referendum that has nothing to do with their country.

    The organization BPAS has commented on Irish laws on abortion:



    Yes actually, I do.



    Actually, no. I don't believe she should.


    Now, can you please answer the rest of my questions? Nice pulling it off topic in order not to answer by the way


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,771 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    The Gardai are investigating after lots of No posters were illegally taken down.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,771 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    This post has been deleted.

    Are they involved in illegal behaviour?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement