Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Belfast rape trial - all 4 found not guilty Mod Note post one

1238239241243244316

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭ShowMeTheCash


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    One of the definitions of culture in the Oxford dictionary is as follows:

    "The attitudes and behaviour characteristic of a particular social group.
    the emerging drug culture’"


    The particular social group that engages in rape culture is young men, not exclusively, but usually.

    All of the following are attitudes and/or behaviour characteristics and all are elements of rape culture.
    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    A belief that if a woman doesn't fight or scream, it can't be rape.

    I think only you believe this, if you think there is a subset of men that have this belief then provide some evidence.
    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    A belief that it's just fine to perform a sex act on a person who is asleep.

    Made up - Show stats on men who think this?
    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    A belief that a woman cannot withdraw consent at any point during sex.

    Made up - Show stats on men who think this?
    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    Deliberately and mendaciously twisting the verdict of a trial to make out that a jury has found a complainant's allegations of rape to be lies.

    Equally twisting the verdict of a trial to make out the defendant was guilty but just not enough evidence to convict.
    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    Calling to vilify and publicly out a complainant in a rape trial.

    I think most on this thread agree on the Irish way of doing things, the defendants and the victim should remain anonymous until a verdict is reached. But on the flip side you refuse to see the balance. In Ireland feminists have outed defendant on social media before they have had a chance at a fair trial and in the UK "victims" are still protected even if they are found to be lying. Both cases have been highlighted in this thread but you seem to have no issue when it suits you.
    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    A belief that a woman desperately asking a man to "at least use a condom" constitutes consent.

    In the context of a rape? I think you have been watching too many movies. Who thinks this - Again provide evidence?
    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    A belief that a woman entering a man's bedroom equals consent.

    No one thinks this - Argument has always been about proving a rape to a court of law.
    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    A belief that "no" doesn't mean no.

    No body is arguing this - Yet another made up nonsense that exists in your crazy little head...
    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    Using the utterly bogus argument of "personal responsibility" to mitigate the heinous crime of rape. There is no such a thing as the responsibility of a person to not be the victim of a crime, only the responsibility of a person to not commit a crime.

    A belief that women who wear certain clothes or get drunk are in any way at all responsible if they are raped.

    Being influenced by porn that explicitly degrades women.

    Referring to women as animals in language.

    Referring to sex as something a man does to a woman, and in violent terms.

    Calling women sluts, whores, brasses or other deliberately degrading terms.

    Denying that there is a problem with any of this.

    I have never had to waste so much time on the rambling of something so nonsensical and void of facts or basic logic....
    There is nothing here to argue but things you have made up off the top of your head, you do not provide studies or polls just a whole load of complete nonsense!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,596 ✭✭✭Hitman3000


    hill16bhoy wrote:
    Could you imagine the Government denying there is a crisis on hospital waiting lists or a housing crisis because "it's worse in Libya".


    Are you actually believing the crap and nonsense you are writing?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,718 ✭✭✭upandcumming


    hill16bhoy wrote:
    Any chance even one of the rape culture deniers could even address one of the examples I gave?


    Here lad there's been a lot said since you made this list of stuff, and a few have addressed some points in this great list. I myself have responded to part of your post, and I admitted that our definitions of 'culture' are different.
    I would really like to ask about that - when you say rape culture, who are you including in that? You mentioned following the League of Ireland is a culture, a really small one, but a culture. Fair enough, I can see where you're going. But rape culture? Who does that include? Is it a tiny subsection of people, or it is larger than that? Can you tell me more about the, for want of a better word, members of this culture?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭ShowMeTheCash


    hill16bhoy wrote: »


    I have read it the 1990 legistlation refers to the "act" if you read up it defines the principle act as:

    “the Principal Act” means the Criminal Law (Rape) Act, 1981 ;

    Which states A man commits rape if—

    It does not include woman....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭ShowMeTheCash


    I have read it the 1990 legistlation refers to the "act" if you read up it defines the principle act as:

    “the Principal Act” means the Criminal Law (Rape) Act, 1981 ;

    Which states A man commits rape if—

    It does not include woman....


    Also even if we are to take:

    (b) penetration (however slight) of the vagina by any object held or manipulated by another person.

    This part which is the only inclusion of the word "person" can only happen in the even that a "person" penetrates the vagina.

    So a best the only time a women could be seen as a rapist is if they rape another women.....

    Legally a woman cannot rape a man.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭hill16bhoy


    I'm not going to quote that list, because it's far too long, and that's one of the problems with how you identify and define what you call 'rape culture'. Literally anything you can think of, you can now say that it is endemic or indigenous to young men and identify it as part of 'rape culture'. You can add infinitely to that list and ascribe any attitude or behaviour you like and identify it as an indication of what you call 'rape culture', to the effect that the term loses all meaning as it doesn't describe any particular attitude or behaviour that specifically identifies 'rape culture' as distinct from other cultures, because anything men do, or say, or even think, is now a contributing factor to 'rape culture'.

    What does your identification of 'rape culture' do to address the issues of rape and sexual assault in society? If you agree that rape is a crime committed by individuals, then why do you try and suggest that rape and sexual assault are a cultural issue? Why call it 'rape culture' when in spite of the fact that the list of factors you identify as attributable to rape culture are so endemic among men, yet there are only a tiny minority of men in any given society who actually commit rape?

    There are an infinite number of reasons as to why an individual would commit rape and sexual assault, and your list does nothing to identify any of those reasons, nor does the term 'rape culture' itself identify any of those reasons. You have nothing but correlations to back up your assertions, yet if you were to take a minute to engage your critical faculties, you wouldn't try and brush anyone who questions your ideology off with this crap -





    You're suggesting that anyone who questions your ideology is contributing to the perpetuation of it, circular logic which makes absolutely no sense, but to you it makes your argument infallible. Why should anyone who doesn't agree with you actually then take your argument seriously? I just have to accept that I am part of rape culture and I contribute to people being raped and sexually assaulted, because you say so?

    Just how arrogant and up their own orifice does one have to be to buy into that horseshít?
    Individuals are more likely to commit a crime when there is a culture where they feel they can get away with it.

    Fr. Brendan Smyth was an individual who for years raped, abused and destroyed lives because there was a culture of tolerance of sexual abuse, institutional closing ranks and cover up within the Catholic Church.

    The same with Jimmy Savile and the BBC.

    Drink driving used to be widespread. That culture of acceptance changed and road deaths went down.

    But in rural areas some people still drink drive, which is a criminal offence, let's remember, because they feel it's not a big deal because there is still a culture which has a certain level of tolerance of it in rural areas.

    There was a culture of homophobia in this country. There were regular "gay bashing incidents" and people felt they couldn't come out. There still is a culture of homophobia to an extent, but it's much less than it was because people fought against it.

    Years ago people in Britain (and here) couldn't figure out what was wrong with labelling black people the n word or other racist epithets because the culture tolerated it. People fought against that too and that culture changed.

    Changing all those cultures was necessary to changing people's behaviour.

    Right here on this thread we had two posters who couldn't figure out what's wrong with carrying out a sex act on a sleeping person, a person who could not give consent. A prima facie case of sexual assault at best.

    All of the elements I listed are part of rape culture. Every single one of them displays a degrading attitude to women.

    When there is a culture among men that women are fair game to be degraded, don't be surprised when men do so - and rape and sexual assault are the most serious manifestations of that.

    You can't change attitudes without changing the culture. Admitting there is such a culture is the first step towards changing attitudes. Changing attitudes changes behaviour.

    It seems a lot of terminally arrogant men can't accept there is such a culture of degradation.

    Rapists tend to be misogynists. Misogynism, like clerical sex abuse, racism and homophobia, is about power too.

    And as the complainant during the Belfast trial so accurately said, rape (and sexual abuse) is a game of power.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭hill16bhoy


    I have read it the 1990 legistlation refers to the "act" if you read up it defines the principle act as:

    “the Principal Act” means the Criminal Law (Rape) Act, 1981 ;

    Which states A man commits rape if—

    It does not include woman....

    The legislation is quite clear. A woman can commit a rape.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 262 ✭✭emeraldwinter


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    Individuals are more likely to commit a crime when there is a culture where they feel they can get away with it.

    Fr. Brendan Smyth was an individual who for years raped, abused and destroyed lives because there was a culture of tolerance of sexual abuse, institutional closing ranks and cover up within the Catholic Church.

    The same with Jimmy Savile and the BBC.

    Drink driving used to be widespread. That culture of acceptance changed and road deaths went down.

    But in rural areas some people still drink drive, which is a criminal offence, let's remember, because they feel it's not a big deal because there is still a culture which has a certain level of tolerance of it in rural areas.

    There was a culture of homophobia in this country. There were regular "gay bashing incidents" and people felt they couldn't come out. There still is a culture of homophobia to an extent, but it's much less than it was because people fought against it.

    Years ago people in Britain (and here) couldn't figure out what was wrong with labelling black people the n word or other racist epithets because the culture tolerated it. People fought against that too and that culture changed.

    Changing all those cultures was necessary to changing people's behaviour.

    Right here on this thread we had two posters who couldn't figure out what's wrong with carrying out a sex act on a sleeping person, a person who could not give consent. A prima facie case of sexual assault at best.

    All of the elements I listed are part of rape culture. Every single one of them displays a degrading attitude to women.

    When there is a culture among men that women are fair game to be degraded, don't be surprised when men do so - and rape and sexual assault are the most serious manifestations of that.

    You can't change attitudes without changing the culture. Admitting there is such a culture is the first step towards changing attitudes. Changing attitudes changes behaviour.

    It seems a lot of terminally arrogant men can't accept there is such a culture of degradation.

    Rapists tend to be misogynists. Misogynism, like clerical sex abuse, racism and homophobia, is about power too.

    And as the complainant during the Belfast trial so accurately said, rape (and sexual abuse) is a game of power.

    Degrading comments are not rape.. Jesus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,706 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    All of the elements I listed are part of rape culture. Every single one of them displays a degrading attitude to women.

    When there is a culture among men that women are fair game to be degraded, don't be surprised when men do so - and rape and sexual assault are the most serious manifestations of that.

    You can't change attitudes without changing the culture. Admitting there is such a culture is the first step towards changing attitudes. Changing attitudes changes behaviour.

    It seems a lot of terminally arrogant men can't accept there is such a culture of degradation


    You don't imagine it's terribly arrogant to insist that such a thing as 'rape culture' exists in spite of all evidence to the contrary? You live in a society where the vast majority of men do not degrade women, where there is no culture among men that women are fair game to be degraded, where the only commonality among rapists is that they have committed rape.

    You have a ways to go before you can show any indication of a link between the attitudes and behaviours of the vast majority of men and women in Irish society, and the tiny minority of men and women in Irish society who commit rape and sexual assault. I shouldn't have to explain to you that correlation does not imply causation, and yet that's exactly what you are attempting to do with your list.

    RAINN suggests that the term 'rape culture' is unhelpful in tackling the issue of rape and sexual assault. Are they now perpetuating and contributing to 'rape culture' too because they have a problem with it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,499 ✭✭✭Carlos Orange


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    The legislation is quite clear. A woman can commit a rape.

    The opposite seems fairly explicitly true. Which part of the legislation linked to includes women raping men or women?

    Your entire description of rape culture seem gender specific. Is women raping [in an ethical non legal sense] men part of rape culture?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 94 ✭✭veronymus


    psinno wrote: »
    The opposite seems fairly explicitly true. Which part of the legislation linked to includes women raping men or women?

    Your entire description of rape culture seem gender specific. Is women raping [in an ethical non legal sense] men part of rape culture?

    A woman cannot commit rape at law as illogical as that is. A woman can commit 'rape under section 4' (Criminal Law (Rape)(Amendment) Act 1990, which is technically a sexual assault. The law is an ass in this regard and I say that as a female.

    I think as humans most of us might except that it is absolutely possible for a woman to rape a man.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 262 ✭✭emeraldwinter


    You don't imagine it's terribly arrogant to insist that such a thing as 'rape culture' exists in spite of all evidence to the contrary? You live in a society where the vast majority of men do not degrade women, where there is no culture among men that women are fair game to be degraded, where the only commonality among rapists is that they have committed rape.

    You have a ways to go before you can show any indication of a link between the attitudes and behaviours of the vast majority of men and women in Irish society, and the tiny minority of men and women in Irish society who commit rape and sexual assault. I shouldn't have to explain to you that correlation does not imply causation, and yet that's exactly what you are attempting to do with your list.

    RAINN suggests that the term 'rape culture' is unhelpful in tackling the issue of rape and sexual assault. Are they now perpetuating and contributing to 'rape culture' too because they have a problem with it?

    Just like better sex ed (I agree with) and consent classes (don't agree with). Will do nothing to stop Rape. All the don't drink and drive yet people still do. Don't smoke People do. The list is endless. Saying something is illegal for example when it's self explanatory with Rape.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭hill16bhoy


    Here lad there's been a lot said since you made this list of stuff, and a few have addressed some points in this great list. I myself have responded to part of your post, and I admitted that our definitions of 'culture' are different.
    I would really like to ask about that - when you say rape culture, who are you including in that? You mentioned following the League of Ireland is a culture, a really small one, but a culture. Fair enough, I can see where you're going. But rape culture? Who does that include? Is it a tiny subsection of people, or it is larger than that? Can you tell me more about the, for want of a better word, members of this culture?
    It's a culture that at worst, doesn't understand what rape is, ie. the tropes about "if a woman doesn't scream, it can't be rape", which the defence QCs in the Belfast trial implied, or implying the non-existence of spousal rape, as George Hook did.

    It's a culture that mitigates rape by attaching blame to a victim - again George Hook did this, many, many posters on this website and elsewhere expressed total agreement with him.

    It's a culture that makes light of consent issues - for instance, on this very thread we've had posters declaring that if a woman enters the bedroom of a man, it amounts to consent. We've had posters declare that there's nothing wrong with performing a sex act on a sleeping person (hello Francie Brady and RuMan). The idea that no doesn't mean no, either when it comes to sex or continued unwanted pursual and pestering anywhere else.

    It's a culture that degrades through language - referring to or symbolising women as animals, ie. as a pig in "spit roast", or a dog or cow or a bitch, or in violent terms - "ruined her, destroyed her, pumped her, smashed her, ploughed her", or in degrading terms - "sluts, whores, brasses, slags" etc., while referring to men as "legends", "top shaggers", "swordsmen" etc.

    It's a culture that misunderstands sex as something a man does to a women rather than as something man does with a woman. The language I referenced in the previous paragraph feeds into this.

    It's a culture of humiliation - the "Love Belfast Sluts" meme Blane McIlroy sent around, the demands to publicly out the complainant (again, plenty of such calls on this thread). The sickening feasting on the Slane Girl video and the attempt to publicly out her.

    It's a culture that assumes male power and male primacy. The ridiculing of female protest as crazy, irrelevant and illegitimate.

    Subscribing to or engaging with any one of those notions is subscribing to and engaging with rape culture. Obviously the more elements one subscribes to, the more entwined with such a culture one is.

    Such a culture is perpetuated, amazingly enough, by males, primarily, but by no means exclusively, younger males, who don't know a lot about about the world.

    Such a culture is by no means exclusive to alt-right-minded people, but it is a culture which is synonymous with alt-right thinking - the idea of the pick up artist movement that women are effectively robots there to be manipulated and "won" like trophies, the notion that a woman's place is in the home, that women should not do certain jobs or play certain sports. I think you'll find a great deal of crossover between men who subscribe to any or all elements of rape culture and those who oppose the repeal of the 8th Amendment.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 262 ✭✭emeraldwinter


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    It's a culture that at worst, doesn't understand what rape is, ie. the tropes about "if a woman doesn't scream, it can't be rape", which the defence QCs in the Belfast trial implied, or implying the non-existence of spousal rape, as George Hook did.

    It's a culture that mitigates rape by attaching blame to a victim - again George Hook did this, many, many posters on this website and elsewhere expressed total agreement with him.

    It's a culture that makes light of consent issues - for instance, on this very thread we've had posters declaring that if a woman enters the bedroom of a man, it amounts to consent. We've had posters declare that there's nothing wrong with performing a sex act on a sleeping person (hello Francie Brady and RuMan). The idea that no doesn't mean no, either when it comes to sex or continued unwanted pursual and pestering anywhere else.

    It's a culture that degrades through language - referring to or symbolising women as animals, ie. as a pig in "spit roast", or a dog or cow or a bitch, or in violent terms - "ruined her, destroyed her, pumped her, smashed her, ploughed her", or in degrading terms - "sluts, whores, brasses, slags" etc., while referring to men as "legends", "top shaggers", "swordsmen" etc.

    It's a culture that misunderstands sex as something a man does to a women rather than as something man does with a woman. The language I referenced in the previous paragraph feeds into this.

    It's a culture of humiliation - the "Love Belfast Sluts" meme Blane McIlroy sent around, the demands to publicly out the complainant (again, plenty of such calls on this thread). The sickening feasting on the Slane Girl video and the attempt to publicly out her.

    It's a culture that assumes male power and male primacy. The ridiculing of female protest as crazy, irrelevant and illegitimate.

    Subscribing to or engaging with any one of those notions is subscribing to and engaging with rape culture. Obviously the more elements one subscribes to, the more entwined with such a culture one is.

    Such a culture is perpetuated, amazingly enough, by males, primarily, but by no means exclusively, younger males, who don't know a lot about about the world.

    Such a culture is by no means exclusive to alt-right-minded people, but it is a culture which is synonymous with alt-right thinking - the idea of the pick up artist movement that women are effectively robots there to be manipulated and "won" like trophies, the notion that a woman's place is in the home, that women should not do certain jobs or play certain sports. I think you'll find a great deal of crossover between men who subscribe to any or all elements of rape culture and those who oppose the repeal of the 8th Amendment.

    Oh do tell. What alt right culture in Ireland.

    Edit.

    I hope all sane people will quite happily mock a protest that includes all men are scum or what ever it was. Sign was left unharmed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,732 ✭✭✭Arne_Saknussem


    veronymus wrote: »
    A woman cannot commit rape at law as illogical as that is. A woman can commit 'rape under section 4' (Criminal Law (Rape)(Amendment) Act 1990, which is technically a sexual assault. The law is an ass in this regard and I say that as a female.

    I think as humans most of us might except that it is absolutely possible for a woman to rape a man.

    Yep a woman can rape another woman in the eyes of the law but not a man, the most she could be charged with in that case would be aggravated sexual assault.

    4.—(1) In this Act “rape under section 4 ” means a sexual assault that includes—

    (a) penetration (however slight) of the anus or mouth by the penis, or

    (b) penetration (however slight) of the vagina by any object held or manipulated by another person.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 94 ✭✭veronymus


    Yep a woman can rape another woman in the eyes of the law but not a man, the most she could be charged with in that case would be aggravated sexual assault.

    4.—(1) In this Act “rape under section 4 ” means a sexual assault that includes—

    (a) penetration (however slight) of the anus or mouth by the penis, or

    (b) penetration (however slight) of the vagina by any object held or manipulated by another person.

    Which was precisely my point?? A woman will not be charged with plain old 'rape' under our laws as they stand as sucky as that is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,706 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    Such a culture is perpetuated, amazingly enough, by males, primarily, but by no means exclusively, younger males, who don't know a lot about about the world.

    Such a culture is by no means exclusive to alt-right-minded people, but it is a culture which is synonymous with alt-right thinking - the idea of the pick up artist movement that women are effectively robots there to be manipulated and "won" like trophies, the notion that a woman's place is in the home, that women should not do certain jobs or play certain sports. I think you'll find a great deal of crossover between men who subscribe to any or all elements of rape culture and those who oppose the repeal of the 8th Amendment.


    As I suggested previously - you can, and indeed have, just added things to that list which have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with rape and and sexual assault. Your identification of 'rape culture' is simply an attempt to denigrate men and try and use the issue of rape and sexual assault to further your own ideology, completely ignoring the fact that men, women and children can be raped and sexually assaulted, yet your focus is solely on demonising young men and implying that they are more likely to be rapists because they do not share your politics.

    It's an abhorrent and useless ideology, and thankfully it is only confined to the.fringes of feminist politics, for damn good reason too - because it's utter nonsense.

    That's the last I will say on this particular subject as I feel I've veered far enough away from the topic of the thread by entertaining the idea that your notions of 'rape culture' are actually worthy of any legitimacy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,732 ✭✭✭Arne_Saknussem


    veronymus wrote: »
    Which was precisely my point?? A woman will not be charged with plain old 'rape' under our laws as they stand as sucky as that is.

    Yep, was agreeing with you, hadn't noticed it was spelled out earlier


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,618 ✭✭✭erica74


    In relation to Gilroy's text "any sluts get fucked?", I suppose the issue with it for the IRFU is that it does make it sound like the activity the rugby players engaged in on the night in question is a regular occurrence. While I have no problem with people having group sex or whatever else as long as everyone is willing participants, it's obviously something the IRFU don't want to be associated with, from the point of view of sponsors and that sort of thing.
    Gilroy took the best approach, I'm sorry, I'll be better, end of story.

    It'll be interesting to see what else comes out of this whole thing from the point of view of the IRFU and their own investigation into everything.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,085 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    Can anyone tell if the same outrage is going on in Belfast, Derry etc in NI, or is it just the bandwagon down here?
    Thanks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,662 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    Listowel got a right bashing over it at the time if memory serves me right.

    The mad thing is though, if he hadn't been captured on CCTV carrying the woman out of the niteclub, and if the guards hadn't come across him, the chances are there would have been no conviction and we'd all have been calling her a lier!!

    And he was convicted-and guilty. And knowing the town, many were horrified by the actions of those men and women. Complete ****ing idiots was what most said-and that's the polite form. (and it wasn't about rape-it was about ppls coming out to support a tosser who got himself convicted. they would have done the same if it was a stolen tv).

    If you want to talk bizarre-how about thousands of people protesting a non-crime in the capital? That didn't even happen in our country, or jurisdiction.
    Or Leo's comments on a case that could potentially perjure the jury, while it was on trial.

    The law convicted that guy-in Ireland. Not Northern Ireland. Under Irish law. If you saw 50 men and women shaking a rapists hand, you failed to see the over 4 million Irish people who supported the young woman.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,820 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    From what I've heard a lot of the outrage over some of the messages was the use of the word slut.
    I just noticed somebody was murdered(Some questions suicide) in Fair City last week and the word slut was written on a fridge in blood.
    Soaps general steer away from bad language/etc but they didn't see any problem with the use of this word on out national soap.


  • Subscribers Posts: 43,264 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    From what I've heard a lot of the outrage over some of the messages was the use of the word slut.
    I just noticed somebody was murdered(Some questions suicide) in Fair City last week and the word slut was written on a fridge in blood.
    Soaps general steer away from bad language/etc but they didn't see any problem with the use of this word on out national soap.

    Didn't the accuser herself use the word sluts....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,022 ✭✭✭anthonyjmaher


    Four high profile people are found innocent of rape, and there are marches around the country with the full support of the media. Actual three time convicted rapist is released on to the streets and there is not a dicky bird from the protestors or the media ?

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/serial-rapist-homeless-in-dublin-following-early-release-from-prison-36633890.html

    It's a funny world we live in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,662 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    Four high profile people are found innocent of rape, and there are marches around the country with the full support of the media. Actual three time convicted rapist is released on to the streets and there is not a dicky bird from the protestors or the media ?

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/serial-rapist-homeless-in-dublin-following-early-release-from-prison-36633890.html

    It's a funny world we live in.

    Ah, shur, he's learned his lesson-ie don't get caught.

    Yeah, of course nobody's paying attention-sure go after the non-crimes that have been decided in court.

    Larry Murphy's nowhere to be found either, but he doesn't sync up with the 'male toxic masculinity robot who fights godzilla' mentality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,820 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    Didn't the accuser herself use the word sluts....

    I'm unsure the point off my post was it shows how some people consider the word to be socially acceptable. Soaps would still stay away from toxic words.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,618 ✭✭✭erica74


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    Didn't the accuser herself use the word sluts....

    I think the complainant said there were girls downstairs acting slutty or something to that effect. I'm not defending her use of the word, it's a word I don't use nor do I find the use of it by anyone acceptable, but the point of Gilroy having to apologise for his use of the word is that he's representing the IRFU and they don't want supporters or sponsors to think they condone that language or degradation of women (that's probably how a lot of the public view it).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,820 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    erica74 wrote: »
    I think the complainant said there were girls downstairs acting slutty or something to that effect. I'm not defending her use of the word, it's a word I don't use nor do I find the use of it by anyone acceptable, but the point of Gilroy having to apologise for his use of the word is that he's representing the IRFU and they don't want supporters or sponsors to think they condone that language or degradation of women (that's probably how a lot of the public view it).

    If you were a Fair City fan would you complain to them about the use of the word slut if you don't find the use of it acceptable?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,022 ✭✭✭anthonyjmaher


    erica74 wrote: »
    I think the complainant said there were girls downstairs acting slutty or something to that effect.
    Yeah but as has become apparent from this case, only men bear responsibility for their drinking and promiscuous behaviour, so I suppose it's a natural extension that only men are responsible for the bad words they use as well.


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 43,264 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    erica74 wrote: »
    I think the complainant said there were girls downstairs acting slutty or something to that effect. I'm not defending her use of the word, it's a word I don't use nor do I find the use of it by anyone acceptable, but the point of Gilroy having to apologise for his use of the word is that he's representing the IRFU and they don't want supporters or sponsors to think they condone that language or degradation of women (that's probably how a lot of the public view it).

    Gilroy certainly wasn't representing the Irfu, or ulster rugby, when he used that word in a private message group. There's no way that employment law or Gilroy contract could be used as a means to sanction him in this event. It will be a slap on the wrists to him.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement