Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

So,Infinity.

2

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭Jack Kanoff


    Avatar MIA wrote: »
    Yes, the Big Crunch, I should have capitalised.

    Why do you think the universe will continue to expand and then go into reverse? Is everything going to bounce off a wall and come back? :D

    Per Newton's first law there would need to be a force to first slow it down and then make it go into reverse, and what would that be?

    Gravity my good fellow, gravity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,611 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Avatar MIA wrote: »
    Yes, the Big Crunch, I should have capitalised.

    Why do you think the universe will continue to expand and then go into reverse? Is everything going to bounce off a wall and come back? :D

    Per Newton's first law there would need to be a force to first slow it down and then make it go into reverse, and what would that be?


    How was it compressed to a single point in the first place?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    In reality infinity is a mathematical concept not a physical one. So the age of the universe is not that relevant.

    In mathematics there’s different infinities. Countable and uncountable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭Avatar MIA


    Gravity my good fellow, gravity.

    Oh right, never heard of gravity before, do please continue...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭Avatar MIA


    kneemos wrote: »
    How was it compressed to a single point in the first place?

    God, obvs.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    Avatar MIA wrote: »
    Oh right, never heard of gravity before, do please continue...

    He’s saying that the expansion due to the Big Bang will slow or stop and gravity will continue to exist as an attractive force and therefore the universe will contract.

    Perfectly sound in theory but the observations don’t show that the expansion is slowing, instead it is accelerating.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭Avatar MIA


    He’s saying that the expansion due to the Big Bang will slow or stop and gravity will continue to exist as an attractive force and therefore the universe will contract.

    Perfectly sound in theory but the observations don’t show that the expansion is slowing, instead it is accelerating.

    I know that's what he's saying and I'm disagreeing with him because of what you're saying. :pac:

    If there was enough matter in the universe (regular and dark) it would never have started to accelerate. Which concludes we continue into the very far (but not infinite) future and the heat death of the universe. Don't worry, there's plenty of them around.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,736 ✭✭✭Irish Guitarist


    They changed the meaning of a billion a few years ago too. In America it meant a thousand million. In the British isles it was a million million. Now the American definition is the official meaning in the British isles too.

    What confuses me is I remember this happening during my lifetime. In school I was taught a billion was a thousand million. I was sure this happened sometime in the late eighties or early nineties. But apparently the definition was changed in 1975, the year before I was born.

    https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,5753,-61424,00.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    They changed the meaning of a billion a few years ago too. In America it meant a thousand million. In the British isles it was a million million. Now the American definition is the official meaning in the British isles too.

    What confuses me is I remember this happening during my lifetime. In school I was taught a billion was a thousand million. I was sure this happened sometime in the late eighties or early nineties. But apparently the definition was changed in 1975, the year before I was born.

    https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,5753,-61424,00.html

    Your original schoolbooks were probably first printed before you were born though :-p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭Avatar MIA


    Waits for it...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    Avatar MIA wrote: »
    Waits for it...

    You waiting for infinity? Not happening today.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭Avatar MIA


    You waiting for infinity? Not happening today.

    Still waiting, but this will happen today. It's a universal boards.ie constant. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,793 ✭✭✭tritium


    Tazio wrote: »
    Its simple really ... take 1 apple... and divide it between 0 people.. :p

    That’s not infinity, it’s undefined. It tend to infinity and the denominator gets smaller but it’s not defined at 0


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    kneemos wrote: »
    Apparently infinity isn't an endless amount continuing on and on into the immeasurable distance.
    Apparently it's just a very big number,or all there is of something.

    Somebody should have sent out the memo on this as I like most folk have always assumed infinity was the former.
    Can anybody explain the concept in 60 characters or less?

    I'm hearing Rick Sanchez's voice in my head when I read this...
    Pac1Man wrote: »
    It's a quarter to three in the morning.

    ... and Morty's when I read this.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    Avatar MIA wrote: »
    Still waiting, but this will happen today. It's a universal boards.ie constant. :D

    I gave your ma infinite pleasure?


  • Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What do you get if you divide infinity by two


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭Avatar MIA


    I gave your ma infinite pleasure?

    I'm sure she loved it, but keep a careful watch, necrophilia can be frowned upon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭Avatar MIA


    What do you get if you divide infinity by two

    Stick it into your calculator there and let us know :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    Avatar MIA wrote: »
    I'm sure she loved it, but keep a careful watch, necrophilia can be frowned upon.

    Reminds me of the same mistake I made in school.

    Anyway I was trying to work out what the AH reply was, not referencing any particular mother.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    What do you get if you divide infinity by two

    Infinity. Which also means that you can’t divine infinity by infinity and get 1.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,611 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    What do you get if you divide infinity by two


    It would need to have a limit to divide it by two.

    And apart from a few nerdy types we all know infinity is limitless


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 763 ✭✭✭FFred


    Chuck Norris counted to infinity ..... twice


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭RiderOnTheStorm


    If you had an infinite number of toilet rolls, and you rolled out the paper and laid it in a line, end to end, and also laid the cardboard tubes in a line end to end, then the paper line would be longer than the cardboard line, yet both are infinite .... how can one infinity be longer (bigger) than the other?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,611 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    If you had an infinite number of toilet rolls, and you rolled out the paper and laid it in a line, end to end, and also laid the cardboard tubes in a line end to end, then the paper line would be longer than the cardboard line, yet both are infinite .... how can one infinity be longer (bigger) than the other?


    If they're infinite they're endless,so one can't be longer than the other.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭RiderOnTheStorm


    kneemos wrote:
    If they're infinite they're endless,so one can't be longer than the other.


    But they clearly are .... So maybe infinity is just a very large number, and the number for paper is larger than cardboard....but both are "infinite"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,611 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    But they clearly are .... So maybe infinity is just a very large number, and the number for paper is larger than cardboard....but both are "infinite"


    The literal definition of infinite is endless.

    The mathematicians however have decided off their own backs and without any consultation to have infinite as just a big number.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    kneemos wrote: »
    The literal definition of infinite is endless.

    The mathematicians however have decided off their own backs and without any consultation to have infinite as just a big number.

    Nobody can trust mathematicians with mathematics.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭Avatar MIA


    Nobody can trust mathematicians with mathematics.

    Not to go off on a tangent, but at the risk of being obtuse, it would be a sine that you're mad if you did.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,687 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    A fully booked infinite hotel can fit infinitely more guests
    It can fit the guests of an infinite number of buses each of which can hold an infinity of people and still have rooms over.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 502 ✭✭✭Pero_Bueno


    Imagine a steel ball the size of Earth.

    Once every ten million years a fly alights on the ball.

    When that ball has worn away to nothing by friction from the fly - infinity hasn't even started yet.


Advertisement
Advertisement