Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Second Captains

1177178180182183338

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,137 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    dulux99 wrote:
    From reading your posts you seem to think that your opinion is the be all and end all.

    Reminds me of all the feminists on Twitter at the moment!


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,744 Mod ✭✭✭✭Say Your Number


    The pod on the Belfast rape trial/consent was excellent.

    Sorry for being a blinkered fanboy :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    The pod on the Belfast rape trial/consent was excellent.

    Sorry for being a blinkered fanboy :o

    They showed their age a bit when the Urban Dictionary stuff came up.

    They didn't seem to realise that they're all makey-uppy things added to Urban Dictionary by sniggering 13 year-olds and probably only the slow lad in the class (there's always 1) would think they were realistic and normal sexual activities.

    It's weird how it only takes a few years to get completely disconnected from younger generations. You'd think we'd remember, but ****ed if I can relate to young'uns and I'm only 28.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭buyer95


    Quick one for you here lads. I've been a patron since the boys went behind the pay wall(and love the show.) Recently I changed phones to an android. When I downloaded my podcast app and added I realised I did not know how to add my SC's subscription. I know I can go onto patreon and listen to it on there but it's very inconvenient. Any ideas anyone?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,590 ✭✭✭✭dastardly00


    The pod on the Belfast rape trial/consent was excellent.

    I also thought the podcast about the Belfast rape trial and sexual content was excellent. I've listened/watched a lot about it over the past few days (RTE News, Prime Time, Today FM, Newstalk and OTB) and I thought SC's podcast was the best. The insight from Richie was very interesting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,646 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    buyer95 wrote: »
    Quick one for you here lads. I've been a patron since the boys went behind the pay wall(and love the show.) Recently I changed phones to an android. When I downloaded my podcast app and added I realised I did not know how to add my SC's subscription. I know I can go onto patreon and listen to it on there but it's very inconvenient. Any ideas anyone?

    Log into Patreon. Go to the second captains page, click overview (https://www.patreon.com/secondcaptains/overview). There is an RSS link in the right hand menu, copy this and paste into your podcast app's feed thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,646 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I also thought the podcast about the Belfast rape trial and sexual content was excellent. I've listened/watched a lot about it over the past few days (RTE News, Prime Time, Today FM, Newstalk and OTB) and I thought SC's podcast was the best. The insight from Richie was very interesting.

    Agreed. Richie's workshops sound like a great idea for TY across the country..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,252 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    In bad taste I know, but did anyone else think the audio of Richie listing off the ludicrous sexual positions is dying to be made into a killer audio bed?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,534 ✭✭✭bren2001


    I thought the SC coverage of the consent conversation really outlined how much better they are than OTB. Hearing about Richies module, the response of children and just the general conversation between all involved was much better than the relatively boring slant OTB took on it. For me, it is the perfect example of why its worth subscribing.

    I don't think OTB did a bad job, just think SC was much much better.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,029 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    Arghus wrote: »
    In bad taste I know, but did anyone else think the audio of Richie listing off the ludicrous sexual positions is dying to be made into a killer audio bed?

    I must admit it did occur to me at the time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭buyer95


    That episode with Richie and the journalist from The Journal on consent has been made available for free. It's one of the best episodes of the year, well worth the listen for non subscribers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,527 ✭✭✭batistuta9


    buyer95 wrote: »
    That episode with Richie and the journalist from The Journal on consent has been made available for free. It's one of the best episodes of the year, well worth the listen for non subscribers.

    He's on ray Darcy's show tonight along with a rape victim & the head of the Dublin rape support centre


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,957 ✭✭✭Dots1982


    Did the journal writer actually say that asking consent can be “sexy”? And then act out a conversation where the man asks continuely for consent as ...he goes round that bases so to speak.

    Like in my humble opinion you would be laughed at by most modern women if you took this approach.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,907 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Dots1982 wrote: »
    Did the journal writer actually say that asking consent can be “sexy”? And then act out a conversation where the man asks continuely for consent as ...he goes round that bases so to speak.

    Like in my humble opinion you would be laughed at by most modern women if you took this approach.

    Like literally, "Can I take your bra off?" etc.?:eek: Well 'date rape' would certainly be a thing of the past if all men did this. So would almost all date sex though...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,957 ✭✭✭Dots1982


    Dots1982 wrote: »
    Did the journal writer actually say that asking consent can be “sexy”? And then act out a conversation where the man asks continuely for consent as ...he goes round that bases so to speak.

    Like in my humble opinion you would be laughed at by most modern women if you took this approach.

    Like literally, "Can I take your bra off?" etc.?:eek: Well 'date rape' would certainly be a thing of the past if all men did this. So would almost all date sex though...

    I’ll listen again to make sure.

    The real important conversations about the trial and issues of consent will occur between intelligent adults who are ordinary people and just want to understand the issue and not be biased. I don’t know about you guys but the conversations I have with my own friends are far more interesting and honest than what ive heard on the media. The media coverage ultimately have to dance around the hard questions in cases like these as it would be labeled as victim blaming.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,480 ✭✭✭Ivefoundgod


    Only one pod today, presume we’ll get the football pod tomorrow then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,436 ✭✭✭Beersmith


    buyer95 wrote: »
    That episode with Richie and the journalist from The Journal on consent has been made available for free. It's one of the best episodes of the year, well worth the listen for non subscribers.

    After all the hype of this episode I was a bit disappointed. Richie was asked about the dressing room and he sidestepped it and half the pod was about him teaching school kids about sex. Which is well and good but didn't really explore the issues in any depth. The only incite into that world was was richie talking about how women were basically lining up for footballers in night clubs etc but nothing was talked about regarding how these encounters were treated in the dressing room and the surrounding problems etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,957 ✭✭✭Dots1982


    I thought richie was good, better than he is talking about football, although it wasn’t really about the trial at all and the trial is what is interesting. Might be more interesting to people with kids who are aged 10+.

    I thought sinead ocarroll’s contribution was very twee. Like sometimes girls are called slutty because they act a bit slutty and it’s far from only men who brand girls as sluts. Far .. far from only men. Think she could have been asked about did she ever challenge men on language they used. Also did she ever hear women refer to other women as a slut or loose etc.

    Overall it was grand but I think media have their hands tied when discussing these issues. The real conversations will exist between intelligent people nowhere near microphones.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,799 ✭✭✭corwill


    Dots1982 wrote: »
    The real conversations will exist between intelligent people nowhere near microphones.

    And what is being said in these conversations?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,957 ✭✭✭Dots1982


    corwill wrote: »
    Dots1982 wrote: »
    The real conversations will exist between intelligent people nowhere near microphones.

    And what is being said in these conversations?

    To give an example someone might say why didn’t the compliant resist as there was no apparent threat of violence and someone might say do you ask mugging victims why they don’t resist. However the first question would never get asked on media because you would be victim blaming and no one gets to have an honest discussion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,799 ✭✭✭corwill


    Dots1982 wrote: »
    To give an example someone might say why didn’t the compliant resist as there was no apparent threat of violence and someone might say do you ask mugging victims why they don’t resist. However the first question would never get asked on media because you would be victim blaming and no one gets to have an honest discussion.

    Who, in an intelligent conversation, thinks there's no threat of violence in these situations?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,957 ✭✭✭Dots1982


    corwill wrote: »
    Dots1982 wrote: »
    To give an example someone might say why didn’t the compliant resist as there was no apparent threat of violence and someone might say do you ask mugging victims why they don’t resist. However the first question would never get asked on media because you would be victim blaming and no one gets to have an honest discussion.

    Who, in an intelligent conversation, thinks there's no threat of violence in these situations?

    You think the compliant feared violence?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,799 ✭✭✭corwill


    Dots1982 wrote: »
    You think the compliant feared violence?

    Your use of the word 'compliant' is a bit odd here, I had thought it a typo for 'complainant'. Using the French standard, just by way of example, I'm taking violence or the threat thereof to encompass constraint, threat, violence or surprise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 541 ✭✭✭Catmologen


    Barry Murphy's Jaws analogy was probably the moment of the year on SCs for me!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,957 ✭✭✭Dots1982


    corwill wrote: »
    Dots1982 wrote: »
    You think the compliant feared violence?

    Your use of the word 'compliant' is a bit odd here, I had thought it a typo for 'complainant'. Using the French standard, just by way of example, I'm taking violence or the threat thereof to encompass constraint, threat, violence or surprise.

    It’s an unfortunate misspelt. Don’t read anything into it. I’m far from thinking she was definitely compliant. I don’t honestly know. I do know that I would have voted not guilty personally as there were three reasonable doubts at least. In my opinion the case probably shouldn’t have been prosecuted as it was clear a month into evidence that a conviction was virtually impossible,

    Did the complainant fear violence? I don’t really understand what you mean with - “Using the French standard, just by way of example, I'm taking violence or the threat thereof to encompass constraint, threat, violence or surprise”

    Can you put forward your best guess why you believe the complainant didn’t resist initially when Jackson pulled down her jeans?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,799 ✭✭✭corwill


    Dots1982 wrote: »
    It’s an unfortunate misspelt. Don’t read anything into it. I’m far from thinking she was definitely compliant. I don’t honestly know. I do know that I would have voted not guilty personally as there were three reasonable doubts at least. In my opinion the case probably shouldn’t have been prosecuted as it was clear a month into evidence that a conviction was virtually impossible,

    Did the complainant fear violence? I don’t really understand what you mean with - “Using the French standard, just by way of example, I'm taking violence or the threat thereof to encompass constraint, threat, violence or surprise”

    Can you put forward your best guess why you believe the complainant didn’t resist initially when Jackson pulled down her jeans?

    Personally, I think the intelligent conversations begin and end with 'I wasn't in court to hear all of the evidence, so I'm not going to second guess the jury, regardless of what take I might otherwise have', but that's just me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,957 ✭✭✭Dots1982


    Ok, you don’t seem very familiar with the details of the case which is fair enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,784 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    So we get a whole two minutes of soccer coverage from the weekend. This fiver is really not going far these days. Quality has gone way way way down.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement