Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Room to Improve.

1262263265267268332

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,060 ✭✭✭Daisy78


    Wombatman wrote: »
    She knows what she wants and how to get it. Fair play to her. Dermot's 'professional opinion' is not the word of God FFS. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that.

    Then why did she bother hiring an architect! Her ideas were fairly pedestrian to be fair, it was a straight forward renovation, she didn't need to hire an architect to do that just a decent builder. She had very fixed ideas about what she wanted so why bother hiring someone who is not going to tell you what you want to hear?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭Wombatman


    Daisy78 wrote: »
    Then why did she bother hiring an architect! Her ideas were fairly pedestrian to be fair, it was a straight forward renovation, she didn't need to hire an architect to do that just a decent builder. She had very fixed ideas about what she wanted so why bother hiring someone who is not going to tell you what you want to hear?

    You hire an architect to produce a design based on your requirements. The upstairs was mostly his ideas, the downstairs hers. Did you really expect them to look at the first draft and go..... sure that's grand, you're the pro, go ahead and build it?

    It's like some people would be afraid to express what they want for fear of upsetting the authority figure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,407 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    Daisy78 wrote: »
    Then why did she bother hiring an architect! Her ideas were fairly pedestrian to be fair, it was a straight forward renovation, she didn't need to hire an architect to do that just a decent builder. She had very fixed ideas about what she wanted so why bother hiring someone who is not going to tell you what you want to hear?

    So what you are saying is if you hire an architect your giving them carte blanche?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,773 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie


    So what you are saying is if you hire an architect your giving them carte blanche?

    No. You research an architect who's style matches the style in which you are looking for. Simple


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,407 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    recipio wrote: »
    Some of Katie's requests were unreasonable - who needs a downstairs bedroom at their age ? I think however Dermot was seriously stung by the '0 out of 10' remark . He clearly came close to quitting the whole project.
    Did we ever hear who won the tiles or timber floor argument ? Lastly, the room off the kitchen had a TV so open plan would probably not be a good idea ?

    My brother if I ever come as I am in a wheelchair plus as someone else has posted I think its in the reg's now. Imagine if a parent had to be cared for and needed a bedroom downstairs for ease


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    Quazzie wrote: »
    No. You research an architect who's style matches the style in which you are looking for. Simple

    You keep saying that. Makes no sense. There aren’t styles of architects.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,407 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    Quazzie wrote: »
    No. You research an architect who's style matches the style in which you are looking for. Simple

    Really and here is me thinking I am the customer employing them. If they can't follow a couple of parameters such as a down stairs bedroom or not open plan and listening to the customer then they are in my opinion bad at there job.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭screamer


    Wombatman wrote: »
    Daisy78 wrote: »
    Then why did she bother hiring an architect! Her ideas were fairly pedestrian to be fair, it was a straight forward renovation, she didn't need to hire an architect to do that just a decent builder. She had very fixed ideas about what she wanted so why bother hiring someone who is not going to tell you what you want to hear?

    You hire an architect to produce a design based on your requirements. The upstairs was mostly his ideas, the downstairs hers. Did you really expect them to look at the first draft and go..... sure that's grand, you're the pro, go ahead and build it?

    It's like some people would be afraid to express what they want for fear of upsetting the authority figure.

    Not any architect.... Dermot Bannon who has a big TV series too. Oh, being on de telly is so important......
    Now for the billionth time no one has a problem with her getting what she wanted, it's the way she went about it that was all wrong. Manners cost nothing as dear old departed nan used to say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,407 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    screamer wrote: »
    Not any architect.... Dermot Bannon who has a big TV series too. Oh, being on de telly is so important......
    Now for the billionth time no one has a problem with her getting what she wanted, it's the way she went about it that was all wrong. Manners cost nothing as dear old departed nan used to say.

    I would re read the thread there are a few on here who have a problem with it Quazzie for 1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,192 ✭✭✭mrsdewinter


    You keep saying that. Makes no sense. There aren’t styles of architects.

    But in Ireland, anybody who is familiar with Room To Improve is by now well aware that Dermot has a signature style. So if she didn't want large, open-plan spaces, the couple made a mis-step in approaching an architect like Bannon.
    Oh.
    Unless all Katie wanted was to get on TV... But that couldn't be right, could it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,257 ✭✭✭BettePorter


    The fact she's a teacher means nothing . As in any profession you get nice people / difficult people.
    Nothing hides the fact that she was just pure ignorant to the guy.
    Now I understand that things of course go on behind the scenes that we don't see. But the fact is we all have a so called 'telephone voice ' in certain situations. Being on TV is surely one of them. And if that is her putting her best self forward then I'd hate to see what she was holding back.

    There have been annoyed clients before but they still all managed to maintain a semblance of humour /banter in putting across their views /disdain for his ideas.

    She was just utterly condescending and disrespectful. And THAT was her 'telephone voice'!


  • Subscribers Posts: 43,446 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    You keep saying that. Makes no sense. There aren’t styles of architects.

    There ABSOLUTELY are different styles of architects.
    Its essentially an art form, so there are a myriad of different architects who work to their own styles.


  • Subscribers Posts: 43,446 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Wombatman wrote: »

    It's like some people would be afraid to express what they want for fear of upsetting the authority figure.

    And you see, this is the big issue.

    You can only "want" what you know..... You cannot want what you do not know.

    Its an architects job to challenge the clients brief to enhance the final product. Dermot, as an architect, has over 25 years experience in designing and fitting out build projects. He has already seen where the mistakes happen, what aspects work well etc. Most clients are first timers so wouldn't have a clue about these things.

    Really, if you have a singular 'non for changing' idea of the design you want then you don't hire an architect.... Because an architect is a "design" professional. Not allowing them to design is completely counter productive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,705 ✭✭✭Mountainsandh


    I rewatched it last night, as I thought maybe the people assassinating her character on here were right, and she insulted him.
    I take on board people's views, and so I checked it out. I even took down snippets of dialogues just to have an objective view, you know, when it's written down.

    - She absolutely 100% does not insult Dermot.
    - There is great banter between the two for most of the program, and in the end they both say they got on well in spite of the disagreements.
    - she is tongue in cheek most of the time, and Dermot gets that.
    - Dermot plays the "hurt feelings" "why is she giving out to me" little boy card a lot, I think it's obviously directions from productions.
    - she plays the "I'm a tough, demanding cookie" card. In fact, after the zero out of ten dialogue, she concludes "back to the drawing board D", and she checks/looks at whoever (production) is at the back of camera for reassurance. That's how that interaction ends, her checking with producers if she was bitchy enough with a goofy laugh.

    - she does get narky towards the end, in particular in 3 instances :

    ~ colour of window frames, it's the same colour says D, but it isn't, she says, but it is, says D, little back and forward, and D gets the last word.

    ~ she's a bit abrupt when, after trying to convince her for the umptiethst time about the open plan, D is going on and on about it and the floor.
    They have 3 tiles on the floor, she asked him to pick one, he must have gone on about his gripes a while (edited), and she says :
    "D you're waffling, pick a tile".
    and she tells him she likes the opposite one.

    ~ the stairs discussion is where she is the narkiest. He's rubbishing their choice, apparently said in an email it was excessive, and is now saying :

    "Look, all the things going inside the house, they're not farmhousey.

    She says : I know, maybe you need to share your vision of this farmhouse you're trying to create.

    D: I told you, dark tiles, dark tiles in the kitchen timber...

    her : are you going to bring in some hens and throw them around the place as well ?"

    That's it.
    That's the extent of her "bullying".
    Meanwhile, D is pushing the open plan thing about 5 or 6 times on camera, and every time she says "this is not what we want", "I don't like open plan", and various explanations of why she does not like it, and how "personally", for herself, she just does not want it, there was open plan in her own house growing up and it's noisy, they want privacy, etc...
    Every time she makes her point she makes it clearly and firmly, and I think this gives the perception to people on here that she's rude or bullying.

    I'm a sad case but I do have a lot of that dialogue scripted if anyone would like to see, it would just take a lot of space here, while you can just re-watch the thing for yourself. Really other than what's up there it's all just stating her preferences in a respectful way.



    Also this myth about Padraic being meek and having no say in this, "poor guy hasn't a hope with her", that's wrong.

    He's well able and willing to speak his mind throughout, and she is listening and respectful every time he does so, like in the instance of the size of the window going to the front of the house, the types of cabinets for the kitchen, the colour of the kitchen...

    There is characterization going on on the part of production, with many off camera contributions setting them up in their parts :
    - she's the tough cookie, very demanding, confrontational, "war" suggestion.
    - D is the poor guy who really wants to help but whose feelings get hurt.
    (even though he's the one pushing his agenda intensely on 5 or 6 occasions throughout to very patient rebuttal)
    - Padraic is the bumbling idiot who talks to his cows.

    There are no insults, she does not treat him like rubbish.
    By the time she gets a bit narkier as in, above, they know each other well and a lot of banter has already gone on, D has pushed his agenda numerous times, and she has patiently explained her point numerous times.
    It is simply not fair and it is disingenuous or knee-jerk to paint her as a thundering B.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,898 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    I rewatched it last night, as I thought maybe the people assassinating her character on here were right, and she insulted him.
    I take on board people's views, and so I checked it out. I even took down snippets of dialogues just to have an objective view, you know, when it's written down.

    - She absolutely 100% does not insult Dermot.
    - There is great banter between the two for most of the program, and in the end they both say they got on well in spite of the disagreements.
    - she is tongue in cheek most of the time, and Dermot gets that.
    - Dermot plays the "hurt feelings" "why is she giving out to me" little boy card a lot, I think it's obviously directions from productions.
    - she plays the "I'm a tough, demanding cookie" card. In fact, after the zero out of ten dialogue, she concludes "back to the drawing board D", and she checks/looks at whoever (production) is at the back of camera for reassurance. That's how that interaction ends, her checking with producers if she was bitchy enough with a goofy laugh.

    - she does get narky towards the end, in particular in 3 instances :

    ~ colour of window frames, it's the same colour says D, but it isn't, she says, but it is, says D, little back and forward, and D gets the last word.

    ~ she's a bit abrupt when, after trying to convince her for the umptiethst time about the open plan, D is going on and on about it and the floor.
    They have 3 tiles on the floor, she asked him to pick one, he must have gone on about his gripes a while (edited), and she says :
    "D you're waffling, pick a tile".
    and she tells him she likes the opposite one.

    ~ the stairs discussion is where she is the narkiest. He's rubbishing their choice, apparently said in an email it was excessive, and is now saying :

    "Look, all the things going inside the house, they're not farmhousey.

    She says : I know, maybe you need to share your vision of this farmhouse you're trying to create.

    D: I told you, dark tiles, dark tiles in the kitchen timber...

    her : are you going to bring in some hens and throw them around the place as well ?"

    That's it.
    That's the extent of her "bullying".
    Meanwhile, D is pushing the open plan thing about 5 or 6 times on camera, and every time she says "this is not what we want", "I don't like open plan", and various explanations of why she does not like it, and how "personally", for herself, she just does not want it, there was open plan in her own house growing up and it's noisy, they want privacy, etc...
    Every time she makes her point she makes it clearly and firmly, and I think this gives the perception to people on here that she's rude or bullying.

    I'm a sad case but I do have a lot of that dialogue scripted if anyone would like to see, it would just take a lot of space here, while you can just re-watch the thing for yourself. Really other than what's up there it's all just stating her preferences in a respectful way.



    Also this myth about Padraic being meek and having no say in this, "poor guy hasn't a hope with her", that's wrong.

    He's well able and willing to speak his mind throughout, and she is listening and respectful every time he does so, like in the instance of the size of the window going to the front of the house, the types of cabinets for the kitchen, the colour of the kitchen...

    There is characterization going on on the part of production, with many off camera contributions setting them up in their parts :
    - she's the tough cookie, very demanding, confrontational, "war" suggestion.
    - D is the poor guy who really wants to help but whose feelings get hurt.
    (even though he's the one pushing his agenda intensely on 5 or 6 occasions throughout to very patient rebuttal)
    - Padraic is the bumbling idiot who talks to his cows.

    There are no insults, she does not treat him like rubbish.
    By the time she gets a bit narkier as in, above, they know each other well and a lot of banter has already gone on, D has pushed his agenda numerous times, and she has patiently explained her point numerous times.
    It is simply not fair and it is disingenuous or knee-jerk to paint her as a thundering B.

    Maybe people who didn't like her are right and maybe your right. People have a difference of opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,662 ✭✭✭✭The Princess Bride


    @Mountainsandh

    Have to agree.
    She knew what she/they wanted from the start.
    And just because she wasn't malleable, and stuck firmly to her wish list, she was branded as difficult.

    Yes-She was easily identifiable as a teacher, but so what.
    I'm sure lots of us have traits which are relevant to our careers.
    But the criticism she received on twitter was terrible.
    Jeez, you wouldn't want to be sensitive going on TV, you'd fall apart.

    I think it's one of the nicer finished homes on RTI.
    Perhaps not exciting enough for some of our posters here, but the clients got their dream home within budget, and it doesn't look like every other DB house in the country.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    There ABSOLUTELY are different styles of architects.
    Its essentially an art form, so there are a myriad of different architects who work to their own styles.

    Really. So people have to research the open plan vs the traditional architect? Or do they say it on their website. I’ve just gone to Dermot Bannon website and it doesn’t say “open plan only”

    And even if that’s what he likes and the client disagrees then the architect has to change or they move on.

    This is where the restaurant analogy disintegrates. Restaurants do advertise their type so you won’t get, or expect, an Italian meal in a Chinese restaurant.

    Hiring an architect is more like hiring a chef, who cooks for you. The chef may like to produce a fish dish as his speciality but if you want chicken you get chicken ( or either party can end the relationship at the discussion phase, which didn’t happen here).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,545 ✭✭✭jooksavage


    You keep saying that. Makes no sense. There aren’t styles of architects.

    I wouldnt agree with that. Bannon definitely has a signature style. I've said before that I actually think he's a bit limited aesthetically but at least prospective clients should have a fair idea of what to expect at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,705 ✭✭✭Mountainsandh


    Maybe people who didn't like her are right and maybe your right. People have a difference of opinion.

    I may post some of these dialogues where she is just assertive later on, Fresh popcorn.
    The above is genuinely all that can be said about her. There is forming an opinion on someone saying "you're an asshole", and then there is slating someone for saying " this is not what I like", "this is 100% not what we want".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭vicwatson


    Jebus this thread has turned into a train wreck :eek:

    Overanalysis people


  • Posts: 1,732 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I am renovating and extending a house at the moment and someone gave my wife a loan of Dermot Bannon's book last night.

    When you remove the drama and deliberate showmanship of RTI, some of what he has written tells you a lot about his style

    "Never give people what think they want. People don't know what they want until you show them."

    However, he also adds this on open plan living, something he seems to have broken in Sunday's show:

    "When my clients outline their problems, often the solution is an open plan family space - although they can take some persuasion. I would never persuade a client to do something they really didn't want to do."

    It looks like Dermot is compromising his own rules for the sake of creating drama on the show.

    For what it's worth, I gave my architect a brief a few weeks ago and he came back with a plan that is pretty much exactly what we asked for and are delighted with. After a few tweaks, we'll have our planning application in by the end of the week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,898 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    I may post some of these dialogues where she is just assertive later on, Fresh popcorn.
    The above is genuinely all that can be said about her. There is forming an opinion on someone saying "you're an asshole", and then there is slating someone for saying " this is not what I like", "this is 100% not what we want".

    I think a lot of people's main issue with her was why they they hired Dermot in the first place to be honest.
    One of my sibling did a Dermot Bannon style house a few years ago. So, when in the search for architects they viewed work/portfolios that suited them and they ended up with somebody very similar to Dermot.
    A neigbhour of mine waned a bigger living room and kitchen but didn't want anything open plan/etc so they hired a more traditional person.


  • Posts: 1,732 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think a lot of people's main issue with her was why they they hired Dermot in the first place to be honest.
    One of my sibling did a Dermot Bannon style house a few years ago. So, when in the search for architects they viewed work/portfolios that suited them and they ended up with somebody very similar to Dermot.
    A neigbhour of mine waned a bigger living room and kitchen but didn't want anything open plan/etc so they hired a more traditional person.

    How does it work? Do you apply to be on the show or do you hire Dermot Bannon and then they ask you do you want to go on the show?

    If she hired Dermot Bannon for the job she wanted then that was a mistake on her part...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,705 ✭✭✭Mountainsandh


    vicwatson wrote: »
    Jebus this thread has turned into a train wreck :eek:

    Overanalysis people

    Isn't it great you don't have to read it ?

    I happen to have a bit of spare time right now and I think it's worth debating. There's a young lady possibly feeling crap now because people are quick to judge and publish their thoughts, with the added bonus of what it is exactly that we can expect from an architect, and a good dash of "assertiveness is fine if you word it up really really delicately so as not to offend".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭Wombatman


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    And you see, this is the big issue.

    You can only "want" what you know..... You cannot want what you do not know.

    Its an architects job to challenge the clients brief to enhance the final product. Dermot, as an architect, has over 25 years experience in designing and fitting out build projects. He has already seen where the mistakes happen, what aspects work well etc. Most clients are first timers so wouldn't have a clue about these things.

    Really, if you have a singular 'non for changing' idea of the design you want then you don't hire an architect.... Because an architect is a "design" professional. Not allowing them to design is completely counter productive.

    You are confusing design imperatives, like compromising structural integrity, with taste. Architects do not have monopoly on the concept of beauty.

    On the contrary people who don't have a strong idea of what they want should just let a builder build based on an off the self plan.

    An architect brings the 'non changing idea' to life for the client. It's not like she had plans already done up for each room. Dermot was give a few simple parameters and he wasn't creative enough to meet them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,705 ✭✭✭Mountainsandh


    I think a lot of people's main issue with her was why they they hired Dermot in the first place to be honest.
    One of my sibling did a Dermot Bannon style house a few years ago. So, when in the search for architects they viewed work/portfolios that suited them and they ended up with somebody very similar to Dermot.
    A neigbhour of mine waned a bigger living room and kitchen but didn't want anything open plan/etc so they hired a more traditional person.

    Well yes, and that's fair enough, that's the whole : "what can you expect of an architect" debate.
    Myself I don't think they thought about it that deeply beforehand, they might have thought that he was a great architect and would come up with something great for their house while remaining functional, it just didn't occur to them that the open plan may be mandatory with D.

    But people have been describing her as a bully and rude, and it is simply not fair, and this is clear when you re-watch it for accuracy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,587 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    The lengths you're going to trying to defend her, I'm beginning to think you are Katie, Mountainsandh! :p

    Her behaviour on the show was stereotypical schoolyard bully. Passive aggressive, condescending and passed off as "sure it was just a bit of banter" or "but I was only messing". Perhaps she is just utterly oblivious to normal social interaction and thought she was being funny by belittling the professional they'd asked to work (for free) for them. Her sense of humour was well off if so. Even her mother seemed embarrassed by her behaviour!

    You can be assertive and polite. Rolling your eyes dismissively at the opinion of an expert in an area you're an amateur is not a polite way to assert oneself. We really need to stop excusing such behaviour as "assertiveness" in young women on the basis of their gender as it really does them no favours (as the vast majority of social media response to this episode highlights).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,967 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    And you see, this is the big issue.

    You can only "want" what you know..... You cannot want what you do not know.

    Its an architects job to challenge the clients brief to enhance the final product. Dermot, as an architect, has over 25 years experience in designing and fitting out build projects. He has already seen where the mistakes happen, what aspects work well etc. Most clients are first timers so wouldn't have a clue about these things.

    Really, if you have a singular 'non for changing' idea of the design you want then you don't hire an architect.... Because an architect is a "design" professional. Not allowing them to design is completely counter productive.

    While I mostly agree syd, I don't think she had a 'non for changing' idea of the design she wanted, but there were certainly specific things she wanted and specific things she didn't want. Everything else was malleable and she did seem open to ideas on many things, and took his advice on a lot of things. But those specific things she wanted and didn't want were largely ignored in his original concept. There's challenging the client's brief, and then there's ignoring it.

    She wanted his design ideas and expertise, but in a concept that would deliver the functions they wanted. His initial concept didn't achieve that for them. I think most architects are aware that open plan doesn't suit all families. There are alternative and innovative design ideas Dermot could have used rather than a wall with doors to separate the spaces and allow it to function as both open and separate as needs be but ultimately the budget didn't allow for that.

    And as persons not familiar with design and costs, that's why they needed an architect. Sometimes you want an architect to give you a fantastic design, but sometimes you need the architect to tell you you can't afford it and have to make the choice between design and their own preferences for functionality. They chose the latter.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,705 ✭✭✭Mountainsandh


    Sleepy wrote: »
    The lengths you're going to trying to defend her, I'm beginning to think you are Katie, Mountainsandh! :p

    Her behaviour on the show was stereotypical schoolyard bully. Passive aggressive, condescending and passed off as "sure it was just a bit of banter" or "but I was only messing". Perhaps she is just utterly oblivious to normal social interaction and thought she was being funny by belittling the professional they'd asked to work (for free) for them. Her sense of humour was well off if so. Even her mother seemed embarrassed by her behaviour!

    You can be assertive and polite. Rolling your eyes dismissively at the opinion of an expert in an area you're an amateur is not a polite way to assert oneself. We really need to stop excusing such behaviour as "assertiveness" in young women on the basis of their gender as it really does them no favours (as the vast majority of social media response to this episode highlights).

    Oh no you found me out ! :D:D:D

    Please, just rewatch it.
    She is not passive aggressive, condescending, and belittling D.
    Her mother does not seem embarrassed by her, in fact she is very proud of what her daughter can achieve.

    Just shed this first hand feeling you got because of the music, the production and the characters they want you to buy into, and watch it simply for the dialogue that is in it.

    Her impatience at times is well matched to how pushy Dermot is. On two occasions he digs to push the open plans not once but twice in a short space of time, if anything he is sometimes the one who borderline belittles, in a "joking" manner, the couple's interests and preferences. (Chaise Longue, China, cows, closed room, stairs, tiles ...)


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement