FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTICE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

LegallyBlonde2 · 19-03-2018 05:25PM

Fergalr2092 wrote: »

Hey, any help with topics for Equity...I am desparate.

So far I have covered:

Undue Influence
Resulting Trusts (w/ Advancement)
Constructive Trusts (New Model and Strangers)
Trusteeship
Proprietary Estoppel
Mareva and Quia Timet Injunctions
Strong v Bird
Donatio Mortis Causa

Does this sound like enough? I am seriously dreading this exam.

Maybe throw in charitable trusts if you have time? Don’t think it has come up in a few sittings

Supermax1988 · 19-03-2018 05:30PM

Gunslinger92 wrote: »

It was a problem question in October 2016 aswell!

Was it? Are you referring to the Tax Advisor Q? I thought that was a Professional Negligence Q rather than Negligent Misstatement?

Gunslinger92 · 19-03-2018 05:42PM

Supermax1988 wrote: »

Was it? Are you referring to the Tax Advisor Q? I thought that was a Professional Negligence Q rather than Negligent Misstatement?

Yeah that one. I have a manual yoke from one of those one day revision courses that a pal lent me, and the sample answer it gives discussed only negligent misstatement. My grid has it down as both though and the examiner report says it's professional negligence

Sorry :pac: I'm not gonna comment on topics I know nothing about anymore!!

Supermax1988 · 19-03-2018 05:59PM

Gunslinger92 wrote: »

Yeah that one. I have a manual yoke from one of those one day revision courses that a pal lent me, and the sample answer it gives discussed only negligent misstatement. My grid has it down as both though and the examiner report says it's professional negligence

Sorry :pac: I'm not gonna comment on topics I know nothing about anymore!!

haha I'm second guessing myself now. I was full sure it was just a professional negligence question but actually the grid I have says it's both as well.

I can't wait to get shot of this exam.

Supermax1988 · 19-03-2018 06:00PM

sapphire309 wrote: »

Does anyone have this problem/sample answer Q Oct 2013 on negligent misstatement? I only have past papers as far as Mar.'15 from the law society

I don't have any sample answers but can PM you the question if it's any use to you?

yournerd · 19-03-2018 06:06PM

sapphire309 wrote: »

Tort - does negligent care of children / negligence on the roads appear much? Is it worth knowing as a sub-topic within Negligence?

Doubt it.

Does anyone have any predictions for property?

If a beneficiary under a will is a witness to a codicil - are they both invalid?

BASHBAG · 19-03-2018 06:55PM

yournerd wrote: »

Doubt it.

Does anyone have any predictions for property?

The usuals!
SUCCESSION In essay form and Problem
Adverse Possession
Easements
Co ownership

I passed property twice with just them and licences (Due to lack of time to study). I wouldn't suggest just covering them but I'd say you'd be very unlucky not to get at least 3/4 questions from the above topics.

Leraf · 19-03-2018 07:02PM

yournerd wrote: »

Doubt it.

Does anyone have any predictions for property?

If a beneficiary under a will is a witness to a codicil - are they both invalid?

I dont think they are invalid. I think it means the witness cannot get their inheritance but the will remains valid for all other gifts.

Marie92 · 19-03-2018 09:26PM

I was signed up to do 3 exams, Company, Tort and Equity.
I'm not sitting Tort and I didn't turn up at Company on Friday. I will just be sitting Equity this Friday. Does anyone know if there's any issue with not turning up? I only emailed the Law Society to let them know over the weekend.

angela1711 · 19-03-2018 09:27PM

Property

Do you guys think I should be okay with just:
-Succession Law
-Easements
-Licences
-Adverse Possession
-Co-ownership

I still have loads of study left for equity and don't really have time to cover another topic for property.
Also,
Equity

Specific Performance
Estoppel
Tracing
Trustees
Express Trust
Charitable/purpose trust
Resulting Trust
Undue Influence
Rectification

Am I being really unwise by not covering injunctions ? I know they are a definite question but I just feel there is way to much study. Should I be okay with above without injunctions ?

Tony_TwoLegs · 19-03-2018 09:31PM

Marie92 wrote: »

I was signed up to do 3 exams, Company, Tort and Equity.
I'm not sitting Tort and I didn't turn up at Company on Friday. I will just be sitting Equity this Friday. Does anyone know if there's any issue with not turning up? I only emailed the Law Society to let them know over the weekend.

If this is your first sitting...... don't bother turning up for Equity. Otherwise, there's no issue. They just pocket your cash ( as if they need it).
I didn't show up for one in October, and result marked ABSENT. You don't need tell them.

Smurf777 · 19-03-2018 09:49PM

Can any kind soul shed some light on co ownership for me?

I thought I had it sorted today and then I looked at the March 2017 Problem Question One. :-/

Is anyone after working on this question/familiar with it that can shed some light on it for me?

It would be very much appreciated.

Tigerlilly18 · 19-03-2018 11:26PM

Hi All, I appreciate that EU was last week and eveyone is preparing for the remainder of the exams. For anyone who has EU under their belt, Im just wondering what your experience was with this exam in terms of how you felt you did, topics covered and results achieved etc. I felt the paper last week was ok and I was able to attempt five questions. I didnt do the case note. I dont usually dwell on these exams but as its my last one its on my mind and just hoping i did enough to get it. Any replies would be greatly appreciated

Pl1234 · 20-03-2018 12:16AM

I was convinced I failed EU last sitting. I felt like I had little or no case law and just worked out the questions when I was in there and heavily relied on the legislation. It was my highest grade. I am sure you will do very well.

Gunslinger92 · 20-03-2018 12:29AM

Anyone else feel awful about tort despite having loads covered? I just don't know if it's sticking in my head

just have to go hell for leather for one more day..

Sam675 · 20-03-2018 12:35AM

What are people focusing on for tort?

Marie92 · 20-03-2018 01:13AM

Tony_TwoLegs wrote: »

If this is your first sitting...... don't bother turning up for Equity. Otherwise, there's no issue. They just pocket your cash ( as if they need it).
I didn't show up for one in October, and result marked ABSENT. You don't need tell them.

Not my first sitting, I've already passed 3 so I'm going to sit Equity.
Thanks for that.

Redbay650 · 20-03-2018 09:12AM

Sam675 wrote: »

What are people focusing on for tort?

I’m doing;

Proof of Negligence
Limitations
Defences to an Action
Negligence
Professional Negligence
Employers Liability
Occupiers Liability
Vicarious Liability
Defamation
Trespass to the Person
Damages

I’d love to cut some out but don’t know which ones!

sapphire309 · 20-03-2018 09:18AM

Redbay650 wrote: »

I’m doing;

Proof of Negligence
Limitations
Defences to an Action
Negligence
Professional Negligence
Employers Liability
Occupiers Liability
Vicarious Liability
Defamation
Trespass to the Person
Damages

I’d love to cut some out but don’t know which ones!

I'm doing all the same as you except limitations! Feeling very underprepared though.
A lot of the big ones didn't show last year - defamation, occupiers, employers, professional - so I'm really hoping we'll have a nice paper.

Sam675 · 20-03-2018 09:42AM

Redbay650 wrote: »

I’m doing;

Proof of Negligence
Limitations
Defences to an Action
Negligence
Professional Negligence
Employers Liability
Occupiers Liability
Vicarious Liability
Defamation
Trespass to the Person
Damages

I’d love to cut some out but don’t know which ones!

I'm basically doing the exact same not sure whether to do any land though

Redbay650 · 20-03-2018 09:45AM

Sam675 wrote: »

I'm basically doing the exact same not sure whether to do any land though

Apologies, I left out Torts Re Land!

Sam675 · 20-03-2018 10:31AM

Redbay650 wrote: »

Apologies, I left out Torts Re Land!

I think I am too - not sure is it a big risk though..

Redbay650 · 20-03-2018 10:52AM

Sam675 wrote: »

I think I am too - not sure is it a big risk though..

Sorry, I left it out of the list of topics I am doing by mistake.

So I am doing Rylands V Fletcher and Nuisance etc.

Sorry for confusion!

Gunslinger92 · 20-03-2018 10:55AM

Sam675 wrote: »

I think I am too - not sure is it a big risk though..

I'd recommend doing nuisance it's handy enough

starbar91 · 20-03-2018 03:38PM

Does med neg ever come up as part of professional neg? Can it be left out?

Sam675 · 20-03-2018 04:56PM

starbar91 wrote: »

Does med neg ever come up as part of professional neg? Can it be left out?

I've definitely seen it as a problem question on one of the papers before!

sapphire309 · 20-03-2018 05:08PM

starbar91 wrote: »

Does med neg ever come up as part of professional neg? Can it be left out?

I think medical negligence is due a run, so wouldn't leave it out

yournerd · 20-03-2018 05:09PM

are people covering family home property? its so long...

Fergalr2092 · 20-03-2018 05:30PM

yournerd wrote: »

are people covering family home property? its so long...

I covered it but focused on legislative hanes to the protection of family property.
So i focused on Family Home Protection Act 1976, CPA 2010, Marriage Act 2015, Family Law Act 1995, Family Law (Divorce) Act 1996 and the Succession Act 1965.

Gunslinger92 · 20-03-2018 06:08PM

Tort:
Anyone any advice as to being sure its vicarious liability being asked and not employers liability? My grid is saying that a particular question one year was vicarious liability but the examiners report said it was employers.. I know pranks by a colleague would fall under vicarious.
I'm afraid I'll launch into one when it's the actually the other!

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTICE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

Comments