Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The 8th amendment(Mod warning in op)

1…299300302304305…332

Comments

  • #9032
    david75
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    applehunter wrote: »
    Sound like the premise for a great Superhero movie.

    Have Marvel the rights?

    Now there is a movie that would break box office records.

    But of course Hollywood would block such a movie being made.

    Wrong franchise. Pro life campaign are living between Narnia and Jurassic Park. Music provided by la la land.


  • #9033
    Oldtree
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,109 ✭✭✭Oldtree


    applehunter wrote: »
    Sound like the premise for a great Superhero movie.

    Have Marvel the rights?

    Now there is a movie that would break box office records.

    But of course Hollywood would block such a movie being made.

    More like some B horror movie from the eighties.
    "It came from the bucket!"


  • #9034
    applehunter
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,056 ✭✭✭applehunter


    If you didn't laugh you'd cry.


  • #9035
    applehunter
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,056 ✭✭✭applehunter


    Fred Swanson wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    Does that include in utero?


  • #9036
    Oldtree
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,109 ✭✭✭Oldtree


    applehunter wrote: »
    If you didn't laugh you'd cry.

    Levity is perhaps out of place, but it does give a short recess, in what is going to be a traumatic time for everybody.


  • Advertisement
  • #9037
    david75
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    applehunter wrote: »
    If you didn't laugh you'd cry.

    Spares us your tears. Crocodiles can’t vote in Ireland either.

    They’re from a totally different part of the world in fact! Mad coincidence.


  • #9038
    Oldtree
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,109 ✭✭✭Oldtree


    applehunter wrote: »
    Does that include in utero?

    Is that in your view, from insemination on?


  • #9039
    applehunter
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,056 ✭✭✭applehunter


    Oldtree wrote: »
    Is that in your view, from insemination on?

    I believe life starts at conception.

    Those IONA billbouds are lovely to look at but the horror of one of the posters by the Daniel O'Connell statue on Saturday is undoubtedly more a true reflection of the issue.


  • #9040
    Yer Da sells Avon
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,737 ✭✭✭Yer Da sells Avon


    applehunter wrote: »
    I believe life starts at conception.

    Just to be absolutely clear, do you believe that, from the very moment of conception, the foetus is a person, as much a human being as you or I?

    A yes/no answer will suffice.


  • #9041
    _Dara_
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    tretorn wrote: »
    That was an enormous crowd today and a surprising number of young people.

    The media have got it all wrong about the amendment and the public appetite for change, whether this is deliberate or not is hard to know. The media should be objective but they are partisan regarding this issue and when people come together to march you can clearly see how wrong the media is.

    It was the same with Brexit and the same with Donald Trump.
    Ismisejack wrote: »
    The media couldn’t be more bias should they try, so much for impartial news. Ud be forgiven for thinking the pro choice side fund them;)

    Actually, I’ve found that RTÉ is much more likely to run pro-life marches as a main news story than pro-choice ones. Reporting of the pro-choice march I attended in 2016 was buried a good bit down the RTÉ News homepage. Not so for the pro-life march this weekend. So lose the victimhood complex.


  • Advertisement
  • #9042
    applehunter
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,056 ✭✭✭applehunter


    Hapax Legomenon wrote: »
    Just to be absolutely clear, do you believe that, from the very moment of conception, the foetus is a person, as much a human being as you or I?

    A yes/no answer will suffice.

    "Just to be absolutely clear"

    Who do you think out are, Jeremy Clarkson?

    Take it that I believe life begins at conception.


  • #9043
    Yer Da sells Avon
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,737 ✭✭✭Yer Da sells Avon


    applehunter wrote: »
    "Just to be absolutely clear"

    Who do you think out are, Jeremy Clarkson?

    Take it that I believe life begins at conception.

    No, I don't think I'm Jeremy Clarkson.

    And on that bombshell... I'll ask you again. Is that newly implanted clump of cells a person?


  • #9044
    applehunter
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,056 ✭✭✭applehunter


    Hapax Legomenon wrote: »
    No, I don't think I'm Jeremy Clarkson.

    And on that bombshell... I'll ask you again. Is that newly implanted clump of cells a person?

    I don't play games.

    I believe life begins at conception.

    Get out canvassing Hapax. We need you out there on the doorsteps for the repeal movement.


  • #9045
    Yer Da sells Avon
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,737 ✭✭✭Yer Da sells Avon


    applehunter wrote: »
    I don't play games.

    I believe life begins at conception.

    Get out canvassing Hapax. We need you out there on the doorsteps for the repeal movement.

    I'm not trying to catch you out. It's a simple question. Is that cluster of cells a person?


  • #9046
    applehunter
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,056 ✭✭✭applehunter


    Hapax Legomenon wrote: »
    I'm not trying to catch you out. It's a simple question. Is that cluster of cells a person?

    Take this yes/no gameshow quiz to the doorsteps.

    Please.


  • #9047
    Yer Da sells Avon
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,737 ✭✭✭Yer Da sells Avon


    applehunter wrote: »
    Take this yes/no gameshow quiz to the doorsteps.

    Please.

    Oh well, it was a simple question. No idea why you don't want to answer it.


  • #9048
    Edward M
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,837 ✭✭✭Edward M


    No guarantee the 12 week legislation will pass a dail vote according to the indo, the numbers aren't stacking up, so its down to SF it looks like.
    Who'd ever have thought that?
    https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/abortion-referendum/uncertainty-over-whether-12week-abortion-legislation-will-pass-dil-vote-as-top-tds-refuse-to-disclose-their-views-36694547.html


  • #9049
    nice_guy80
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,722 ✭✭✭nice_guy80


    Edward M wrote: »
    No guarantee the 12 week legislation will pass a dail vote according to the indo, the numbers aren't stacking up, so its down to SF it looks like.
    Who'd ever have thought that?
    https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/abortion-referendum/uncertainty-over-whether-12week-abortion-legislation-will-pass-dil-vote-as-top-tds-refuse-to-disclose-their-views-36694547.html

    they don't want to reveal views as it will stop canvasing for the vote
    I also hope it is a secret ballet in the Dail chamber


  • #9050
    JupiterKid
    Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 13,532 Mod ✭✭✭✭JupiterKid


    The anti choice brigade love to roll out the attractive looking young women at the front of their marches. But take a closer look at the demographic when said marches wind up at the Dail or disband and you get a truer picture of those pulling the strings.


  • #9051
    baylah17
    Closed Accounts Posts: 790 ✭✭✭baylah17


    nice_guy80 wrote: »
    they don't want to reveal views as it will stop canvasing for the vote
    I also hope it is a secret ballet in the Dail chamber
    the Dail cannot have "Secret Ballots", TDs have to vote publicly and their vote is recorded, as it should be.


  • Advertisement
  • #9052
    Will I Am Not
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭Will I Am Not


    Hapax Legomenon wrote: »
    Oh well, it was a simple question. No idea why you don't want to answer it.

    When is the “clump of cells” no longer a clump of cells? Simple question.


  • #9053
    JupiterKid
    Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 13,532 Mod ✭✭✭✭JupiterKid


    realitykeeper wrote: »
    blah, blah, blah. A clout from a Christian Brother never did anyone a bit of harm and all this nonsense about abuses by the Catholic Church is just an excuse not to get up on a Sunday morning and go to mass. Is it any wonder that the slothful are the poorest in society.


    Despicable views. Utter contempt for others. Do you know just how many lives were ruined by the twisted ideology of judgemental religious doctrine and the lust for control over the rights of others? Ireland is on the cusp of thanking a step into social normality for the rest of the developed world. Very soon the power of the views of you and your ilk will be considered to the dustbin of history.


  • #9054
    swampgas
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,614 ✭✭✭swampgas


    applehunter wrote: »

    Take it that I believe life begins at conception.


    Are you also against the morning after pill (MAP), the coil, and the pill?

    Do you think IVF is wrong?

    Or is it just abortion (when it happens in Ireland) that bothers you?


  • #9055
    Yer Da sells Avon
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,737 ✭✭✭Yer Da sells Avon


    Will I Am Not wrote: »
    When is the “clump of cells” no longer a clump of cells? Simple question.

    I don't know. See, it's actually really easy to give an honest answer to these questions. When we're talking about a gradual 9-month process, none of us will ever agree on an exact point at which the unborn becomes an actual human being whose right to life matches that of an already-born woman. Suggesting that it happens at the point of conception is no better than suggesting it happens at birth, or some other arbitrary point in between. Which is why I think it's important to be pragmatic and accept that if abortion must happen, it should really happen as early as possible. And I don't think retention of the 8th Amendment is conducive to that.


  • #9056
    nozzferrahhtoo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,363 ✭✭✭nozzferrahhtoo


    Will I Am Not wrote: »
    When is the “clump of cells” no longer a clump of cells? Simple question.

    That has been discussed A LOT on this thread so far. But at nearly 10,000 posts on the thread now I can not fault you for not having seen it.

    In short though the answer to that question is contextual. It really depends on what differences you are looking for, defining, or consider relevant to the current context as to what answer you give.

    In the context of abortion I think we are talking about when a biological mass of cells attains rights. Or more specifically when it stops being any old entity and starts being an entity towards which we can or should hold moral and ethical concern.

    And I have argued (at nauseating length some will assure you) that this occurs when the fetus attains the basic faculty of human consciousness/sentience. And I think that because WITHOUT such a faculty I can see no basis for affording any entity, of any kind, moral or ethical concern.

    The near totality (usually up around 98%) of abortions done purely by choice (not for medical necessity etc) occur in or before week 16 of gestation. Nothing operating at that point in the process even begins to suggest the fetus has attained the aforementioned faculty.

    I hope that answers your question somewhat. If not, feel free to ask questions.


  • #9057
    Zubeneschamali
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    statesaver wrote: »
    This is a thread about Repealing the 8th not about the many sins of the Catholic Church.

    The 8th IS one of the sins of the Catholic Church.

    Every other Christian church in Ireland was opposed to passing it back in 83. It is a piece of Catholic dogma slapped into our Constitution by catholic ideologues as a last measure before they lost their majority.


  • #9058
    Zubeneschamali
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    applehunter wrote: »
    This referendum could legalise killing our unborn.

    The 8th already made it legal.

    By accident, admittedly, but legal all the same.


  • #9059
    Zubeneschamali
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    Hapax Legomenon wrote: »
    Suggesting that it happens at the point of conception is no better than suggesting it happens at birth, or some other arbitrary point in between.

    Everyone knows it is not at birth. Babies are often delivered by section before birth, and they are clearly human beings. Birth is just a legal line in the sand.

    Nobody really believes it happens at conception either, apart from some real looney tunes who imagine angels handing out tiny souls to single-celled organisms. That's why the pro-lifers put up so little fight when the courts decided the 8th only applies from implantation on.

    This is part of why the Citizen's Assembly came up with proposals more radical than any politician was likely to: away from all the screaming and campaigning and insults and gory posters, reasonable people can agree that the current legal regime is wrong, and that a move to a more typical framework like that in Germany is a sensible move.


  • #9060
    Will I Am Not
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭Will I Am Not


    nozzferrahhtoo wrote: »
    That has been discussed A LOT on this thread so far. But at nearly 10,000 posts on the thread now I can not fault you for not having seen it.

    In short though the answer to that question is contextual. It really depends on what differences you are looking for, defining, or consider relevant to the current context as to what answer you give.

    In the context of abortion I think we are talking about when a biological mass of cells attains rights. Or more specifically when it stops being any old entity and starts being an entity towards which we can or should hold moral and ethical concern.

    And I have argued (at nauseating length some will assure you) that this occurs when the fetus attains the basic faculty of human consciousness/sentience. And I think that because WITHOUT such a faculty I can see no basis for affording any entity, of any kind, moral or ethical concern.

    The near totality (usually up around 98%) of abortions done purely by choice (not for medical necessity etc) occur in or before week 16 of gestation. Nothing operating at that point in the process even begins to suggest the fetus has attained the aforementioned faculty.

    I hope that answers your question somewhat. If not, feel free to ask questions.

    It seems to me that it’s totally dependent on whether someone plans on seeing it through or not.

    My wife miscarried at 9 weeks. She has a tattoo with the date on her leg, she releases a balloon on that date every year. Try telling her it was just a clump of cells and she would probably take your head off.

    Someone who unwillingly falls pregnant may obviously think it to be just a clump of cells but then would they say the same when they get their first scan pic on a baby they planned for?
    The ‘it’s just a clump of cells’ argument is arbitrary.


  • Advertisement
  • #9061
    Zubeneschamali
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    Will I Am Not wrote: »
    The ‘it’s just a clump of cells’ argument is arbitrary.

    I have always believed that I am just a clump of cells, and so are you and so is everyone else. What else would I be? A ghost from an invisible dimension somehow controlling a clump of cells by magic, that flies up into the clouds when I "die"?

    Ha ha.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement