Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Overtourism

2

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 502 ✭✭✭Pero_Bueno


    I was in Lisbon last Easter, we went to Sintra and it was the worst touristic experience I have had in my life, it was so packed it was just impossible to enjoy.
    I was in Iceland aswell in September and it was bad - but was easy to find your own spot and escape from the droves of idiots*.

    My fear is that even these out of the way areas that you can find some space will become packed, thanks to apps like tripadvisor, instantly they get tagged and some
    travel blogger tosser writes a hit piece on it and it goes viral - always find it amazing when someone who bloggs about the hidden unspoilt places is actually spoiling them
    by ****ing writing about them.

    In the Grand Canyon years ago (2014) I noticed too that the village was packed - but - take a 10 minute walk and you can easily by alone ... again - how long this will last ??

    And Ireland - I am afraid to return to the west , the place where I had my best childhood holidays in the 80s and 90s - I was at the cliffs of Moher in 2006 and nearly cried when I saw the
    tacky **** they have put up - I remember when it was a dirt track up there and you would be the only visitors to the place.
    Now its coach after coach of Americans who think they are visiting their ancestral homeland.
    And Skellig Micheal !! f*ck that ... it's Star Wars now ... isn't it great that Disney left Luke Skywalkers huts on the island though - just to make the selfies cooler ??

    **** this I can't wait till the next crash.



    *Yes I am one of those idiots.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Im not personally bothered by being around other tourists or going to 'tourist traps', Id only find it annoying if there was crowds so big that it was actually uncomfortable to move or very loud . Many people seem to be really put out by being around other tourists even if they are one themselves. I don't get it,the tourist traps are usually interesting even if overpriced or a little overrated, they're attracting tourists for a reason

    I find it a lot more cringy seeing people going over to somewhere and trying to be like a local, or something, when they're jus like every other uncultured tourist :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    wakka12 wrote: »
    Im not personally bothered by being around other tourists or going to 'tourist traps', Id only find it annoying if there was crowds so big that it was actually uncomfortable to move or very loud . Many people seem to be really put out by being around other tourists even if they are one themselves. I don't get it,the tourist traps are usually interesting even if overpriced or a little overrated, they're attracting tourists for a reason

    I find it a lot more cringy seeing people going over to somewhere and trying to be like a local, or something, when they're jus like every other uncultured tourist :P

    Some of the places in Lisbon were at that uncomfortable level. The aquarium was absolutely brutal. I can’t believe they let so many people in. The Timeout market was stressful too and tbh, I regret going there because it is a purpose-built tourist trap.

    Whereas in Iceland, the level of the September crowds was grand. There was lots of tourists but these were in wide open spaces.


  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    wakka12 wrote: »
    Im not personally bothered by being around other tourists or going to 'tourist traps', Id only find it annoying if there was crowds so big that it was actually uncomfortable to move or very loud . Many people seem to be really put out by being around other tourists even if they are one themselves. I don't get it,the tourist traps are usually interesting even if overpriced or a little overrated, they're attracting tourists for a reason

    I find it a lot more cringy seeing people going over to somewhere and trying to be like a local, or something, when they're jus like every other uncultured tourist :P
    For me it's just about money. :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    wakka12 wrote: »
    I find it a lot more cringy seeing people going over to somewhere and trying to be like a local, or something, when they're jus like every other uncultured tourist :P

    Well, at least they are trying to gain some understanding of the local culture. I doubt anyone would call themselves an expert after a short holiday either.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,267 ✭✭✭joeysoap


    My last post on this (promise)

    Off peak season I find all the ‘usual’ tourist destination to be fine, ok haven’t been to Venice, but the rest were fine, Sintra was not bad at all (that was Easter). Istanbul was fairly packed alright (October) but that was mostly locals. One street was like Henry Street on Christmas Eve- all the time. Near Taxim Square. What I did learn in Istanbul is that when they celebrate a holiday (end of Ramadan) all public transport is (or was) free, including ferries across the Bosporus , and that little cable car spin. Can’t wait for that to happen here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 ameirecan


    Why do tourists take photos of the famous landmarks when they travel? It's utterly pointless. There are literally millions of photos of the Eiffel tower online, taken from every conceivable angle and viewpoint, and done by professionals at a much higher quality than the ones you took on your iPhone. I remember watching a Chinese tourist spend about 15 minutes setting up his tripod and adjusting his camera lens to get the perfect photo of the Eiffel tower. What do people gain from this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,461 ✭✭✭Bob Harris


    ameirecan wrote: »
    Why do tourists take photos of the famous landmarks when they travel? It's utterly pointless. There are literally millions of photos of the Eiffel tower online, taken from every conceivable angle and viewpoint, and done by professionals at a much higher quality than the ones you took on your iPhone. I remember watching a Chinese tourist spend about 15 minutes setting up his tripod and adjusting his camera lens to get the perfect photo of the Eiffel tower. What do people gain from this?

    I remember thinking the same in the Louvre. People were 3 or 4 deep around the Mona Lisa clambouring for a postion to take a photo of it so they could have it buried deep in their memory card never to be looked at again. Buy a postcard on the way out for 50c. Perfect image of the painting. And you have a postcard.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭irishguitarlad


    _Dara_ wrote: »
    Some of the places in Lisbon were at that uncomfortable level. The aquarium was absolutely brutal. I can’t believe they let so many people in. The Timeout market was stressful too and tbh, I regret going there because it is a purpose-built tourist trap.

    Whereas in Iceland, the level of the September crowds was grand. There was lots of tourists but these were in wide open spaces.

    I'm heading there during holy week to avoid the madness of Seville. I can't get over with what you said about the tarts, the monastery is a UNESCO world heritage sight like. Anyways when I was in Florence I didn't enjoy the Ufizzi as there was two many chinese tourists blocking the paintings and taking photos of them. The only good part was the non Italian painters as it was off to the side and not many people went in there, so one could relax and enjoy the art.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 775 ✭✭✭Skedaddle


    I can fully understand why cruise ships are annoying. Effectively, you're sailing a huge hotel into often a very historic area or places like Iceland and the Scottish islands which have extremely low populations and very little physical infrastructure to deal with vast numbers of people.

    Then those tourists don't spend any money as they have everything on the ship and are in all-in packages. So they just arrive, walk around like a herd of sheep, clog the place up and use all the facilities and spend little or nothing.

    Effectively, the destination is subsidising the cruise operator and setting far less benefit than they would from a normal tourists.

    Iceland will probably choke on tourism tbh. They need it to get money in to the economy after the crash but at the same time they're finding it irritating due to the scale and it's also becoming eye wateringly expensive again.

    I could see Iceland managing it back down again over the next few years, particularly as other aspects of their economy spin back into action.

    You can also kill a tourism destination by over commercialising it too. That's where Iceland I think needs to keep the balance.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,932 ✭✭✭The J Stands for Jay


    I'm heading there during holy week to avoid the madness of Seville. I can't get over with what you said about the tarts, the monastery is a UNESCO world heritage sight like. Anyways when I was in Florence I didn't enjoy the Ufizzi as there was two many chinese tourists blocking the paintings and taking photos of them. The only good part was the non Italian painters as it was off to the side and not many people went in there, so one could relax and enjoy the art.

    TBH, when I went to Florence I didn't go into any of the galleries. Didn't see the point of queuing up to join a queue to squint through a crowd at a painting. It was much nicer wandering round the place.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    I'm heading there during holy week to avoid the madness of Seville. I can't get over with what you said about the tarts, the monastery is a UNESCO world heritage sight like. Anyways when I was in Florence I didn't enjoy the Ufizzi as there was two many chinese tourists blocking the paintings and taking photos of them. The only good part was the non Italian painters as it was off to the side and not many people went in there, so one could relax and enjoy the art.

    Oh, at peak times the monastery has similar queues. We didn’t bother with the monastery, the queues were so formidable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    Skedaddle wrote: »
    I can fully understand why cruise ships are annoying. Effectively, you're sailing a huge hotel into often a very historic area or places like Iceland and the Scottish islands which have extremely low populations and very little physical infrastructure to deal with vast numbers of people.

    Then those tourists don't spend any money as they have everything on the ship and are in all-in packages. So they just arrive, walk around like a herd of sheep, clog the place up and use all the facilities and spend little or nothing.

    Effectively, the destination is subsidising the cruise operator and setting far less benefit than they would from a normal tourists.

    Iceland will probably choke on tourism tbh. They need it to get money in to the economy after the crash but at the same time they're finding it irritating due to the scale and it's also becoming eye wateringly expensive again.

    I could see Iceland managing it back down again over the next few years, particularly as other aspects of their economy spin back into action.

    You can also kill a tourism destination by over commercialising it too. That's where Iceland I think needs to keep the balance.

    And Iceland has a very delicate natural environment. Off-road driving is illegal there because of that but people do it anyway, damaging the environment. They also are having problems with tourists getting into car crashes because they can’t handle the roads that are gravelly and many travel in winter to see the Lights but can’t hack the winter driving conditions. Landowners have also been closing off roads due to issues with tourists.

    It’s such a special place though and I can see why people want to go there. I loved it!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,260 ✭✭✭TomSweeney


    I remember being in Rome once - Christ the Cistine chapel was a ****ing nightmare!!!!

    Could not enjoy it !

    St Peters sq and church was fine, we went really early and again - open spaces is grand.
    Same for the colleseum, but Cistine chapel I would never ever set foot in again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭irishguitarlad


    _Dara_ wrote: »
    Oh, at peak times the monastery has similar queues. We didn’t bother with the monastery, the queues were so formidable.

    Balls


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭irishguitarlad


    McGaggs wrote: »
    TBH, when I went to Florence I didn't go into any of the galleries. Didn't see the point of queuing up to join a queue to squint through a crowd at a painting. It was much nicer wandering round the place.

    The Bargello was worth it though;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,979 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    I must be lucky with my travels. Was at Lake Garda at height of summer and never a problem getting a place in a restaurant nor were the towns particularly full. Also been a few times over easter and also grand, accommodation relatively cheap and no crowds anywhere.
    Was also in Bruges in mid summer and not an issue.
    Windsor castle was busy in England to see some poxy dolls house, but in around the place was grand.
    London city, grand.
    The cotswolds in peak summer season, grand.
    Galway in mid august, grand.
    Anywhere I've been in Germany or Austria during the peak summer holidays, grand.

    I've seen yanks on trip advisor asking how to avoid "the crowds" during the holidays, but really theres so many places that arent overran that I do wonder if its really only the few places like Lisbon, Barca, Amsterdam and Venice that are overran and everywhere else is grand.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    Balls

    Another poster was there off peak and said it was empty, so you might be fine! :) I was there in August.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    swift18 wrote: »
    barcelona
    3322313A00000578-0-image-a-8_1460574871188.jpg

    Barcelona is a wonderful city.

    But note that it is also the European epicentre of contrarian ne'er-do-wells and student marxists.

    Ignore them and enjoy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 775 ✭✭✭Skedaddle


    _Dara_ wrote: »
    And Iceland has a very delicate natural environment. Off-road driving is illegal there because of that but people do it anyway, damaging the environment. They also are having problems with tourists getting into car crashes because they can’t handle the roads that are gravelly and many travel in winter to see the Lights but can’t hack the winter driving conditions. Landowners have also been closing off roads due to issues with tourists.

    It’s such a special place though and I can see why people want to go there. I loved it!

    We encountered a bit of a weird issue with what was obviously tourists in a rental car, driving up close behind us and flashing because we were driving at or below the 70km/h speed limit!!?

    Given the road conditions, that kind of stuff is crazy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,074 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    I was in a Dublin hotel recently and the lobby was full of “day trips” to places like the cliffs of moher, giants causeway and such.

    Image how little of anything you would see on one of these trips and the local area gets essentially nothing from these bus loads who clog up the roads and then move on.

    It’s a really scummy tactic to hold all the tourism money in the capital while using some of the most scenic and interesting areas of our country as “day trips”, implying that one just couldn’t spend any time in those rural areas.


  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    _Brian wrote: »
    I was in a Dublin hotel recently and the Kinney was full of “day trips” to places like the cliffs of moher, giants causeway and such.

    Image how little of anything you would see on one of these trips and the local area gets essentially nothing from these bus loads who clog up the roads and then move on.

    It’s a really scummy tactic to hold all the tourism money in the capital while using some of the most scenic and interesting areas of our country as “day trips”, implying that one just couldn’t spend any time in those rural areas.
    :rolleyes:
    "Hey guys, we know you're using Dublin as a base but if you want to go to the cliffs of Moher you'll have to spend a few nights over there."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 140 ✭✭Huexotzingo


    I think the best solution is to bring in a tourist tax per day.(I know many cities already have this) The more popular the location the bigger the tax.

    I think Dublin should bring in a charge per night as this will help deal with the strain on infrastructure that mass tourism inevitably brings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,260 ✭✭✭TomSweeney


    I think the best solution is to bring in a tourist tax per day.(I know many cities already have this) The more popular the location the bigger the tax.

    I think Dublin should bring a charge per night as this will help deal with the strain on infrastructure that mass tourism inevitably brings.

    Nah the tax will only be stuffed into corrupt politicians pockets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,498 ✭✭✭Wheety


    _Dara_ wrote: »
    Oh yeah, Santorini is actually one of the destinations that has imposed restrictions!

    In Lisbon, the real eye-opener for me was seeing a queue snake down the street in Belem in the noon heat for the famous pastelaria there. Insane. Those are the box-ticking tourists, the bucket listers. Meanwhile there was a pastelaria on my hotel’s street that sold pastel de natas that were as highly rated but no queues.

    They are amazing Pastéis de Natas though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,279 ✭✭✭Dr Brown


    swift18 wrote: »
    barcelona
    3322313A00000578-0-image-a-8_1460574871188.jpg

    Insane...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,819 ✭✭✭Aglomerado


    _Dara_ wrote: »
    Oh yeah, Santorini is actually one of the destinations that has imposed restrictions!

    In Lisbon, the real eye-opener for me was seeing a queue snake down the street in Belem in the noon heat for the famous pastelaria there. Insane. Those are the box-ticking tourists, the bucket listers. Meanwhile there was a pastelaria on my hotel’s street that sold pastel de natas that were as highly rated but no queues.

    Yes I saw that too in November one year when I was there. Insanity.
    I couldn't be bothered. After visiting the monastery and the tower I hopped back on the tram, while waiting at the stop across the street, I was horrified by the queues!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,029 ✭✭✭Rhys Essien


    NZ gets pretty low tourism relative to is size. Both islands are bigger than Ireland and the country gets one third of our numbers.

    Relative to their size European countries get huge number of tourists. France gets 70-80M. Italy about 60M.

    Relative to population we get a lot - about 10M (all Ireland figures). One place in Dublin that feels over touristy is Howth midsummer when warm. Weekends particularly.

    Nothing against Dublin but it probably gets 9m out of the 10m and it seems very few traveling around the West of the country.Cork,Kerry and Donegal are undoubtedly the most beautiful parts of the country and should be getting a lot more tourists.That plonker Paschal Donahue was responsible for the whole ‘Ireland’s Ancient East’ when there was no need for it because the ‘Wild Atlantic Way was created to balance up tourism here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    I wonder why those people in barcelona hate tourists. Personally Id be proud so many people come to visit the city Im from


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,946 ✭✭✭✭Neyite


    Years ago we were visiting a Greek island where I picked up a local newspaper. It was in English, and written by visitors to the island. We didn't know it at the time but the island was a haunt of occasional rich yachting types and far more wannabe yachters. The paper was mainly stuff about where you could find foodstuffs from home, articles about charmingly eccentric locals who were so friendly despite their broken English, you could almost understand them perfectly, that sort of thing.

    But one article by an American tourist with serious Notions who visited often bemoaned the fact that the island got visited by 'tourists' and that they could all breathe a sigh of relief when 'the daytrippers' finally left 'their' island so they could relax without all the tourists in their face or spoiling their holiday. There were about 50 visitors daily, if that. The irony was utterly lost.

    It entertained us the whole evening as we'd missed our ferry back to our base, we were stuck there the night and therefore we were by that happy accident, real tourists, not the daytripping riff raff. :pac: Which we took the piss out of with each other. "I say, Dahling. Isn't it simply wonderful here when those pesky daytrippers have finally buggered orf"

    I really wish I'd kept that paper. It was a howl.


Advertisement
Advertisement