Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

How did Stephen Cluxton "revolutionise the game"?

2

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭danganabu


    Bonniedog wrote: »
    Bring back Eoin Kelly... or Mick Roche!

    To be fair Kelly for all his brilliance was actually terrible at them, Declan Ryan probably the last good pen taker we had and he used to steal a few yards as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭flasher0030


    blanch152 wrote: »
    The thread title says it all.

    We are not having a debate about how David Clarke or Brian Kelly revolutionised the game. Why? Because they didn't.

    Cluxton is a once-in-a-lifetime player, captaining his team to three All-Irelands in a row, four in all. A goalkeeper scoring the winning point in the All-Ireland victory he didn't captain the team. Wow, just wow.

    He doesn't kick the ball over the sideline in the last minute of the All-Ireland final like Clarke did and cost his team a chance to equalise, he doesn't miss the free in injury time to win the All-Ireland like Cillian O'Connor did, he has demonstrated the ability to close out those situations.

    Sure, he has had occasional meltdowns or cracks in his technique, but when do they ever make the difference between winning and losing - hardly ever. Much was made of Mayo's success in the first half of the All-Ireland final this year on his kick-outs, but I can't remember the last time they handed out medals at half-time. By the end of the game, Cluxton's kick-out success rate was far superior to Clarke's and he nailed the ones that mattered. The same is seen on the other occasions.

    Why do we now have a new rule that kick-outs have to cross the 20m line? Stephen Cluxton.

    Why did we have a new rule that kick-outs must travel a certain distance? Stephen Cluxton.

    Why did we have the introduction of the mark? Stephen Cluxton.

    And despite those rule changes to curtail his influence, Dublin are still favourites to win next year.

    Cluxton deserves to be considered in a debate not just about the greatest goalkeeper to play the game, but also about the greatest footballer to play the game. And he is not done yet.

    That’s it in a nutshell. Rather than just basing it on opinions, if we consider the hard facts – the impact that one man has on the game of football. How can it be said that he hasn’t changed the way it is played. The main talking point when Dublin come up against any of the top teams is what are the opposition going to do for Cluxton’s kick-outs – press, hold back, kick the ball of the tee etc. Many people just think that kicking the ball sideways to unmarked corner back, big deal. Shure I can do that myself. Completely missing the picture. Cluxton has revolutionised the keeper’s role, which in turn impacts on the entire team. Or in fact, both teams – the opposition as well. Tyrone tried the press for the first 10 minutes of semi-final, but Cluxton had the ability to ping the ball long over the press, resulting in Dublin powering ahead, and Tyrone retreating to Plan B (unfortunately they had no Plan B). Against Mayo couple of years back, he was going short one minute, then hitting Paul Flynn, D Connolly etc. in the half forward the next minute. Kept A O’Shea running around in circles, getting nowhere until he became exhausted and had no impact on the game. His ability to hit the ball high enough to bypass whatever standers are in his way, long enough to reach his target, and accurate enough that the player can just run on to the ball has revolutionised how the game is played. And in a good way in my opinion.

    And good point made about the rule changes. If you have the hierarchy in GAA meeting together to bring in rules to counteract one man’s attributes, to try to introduce a leveller playing field, I think that says it all.

    I’m from Mayo, but I find it baffling how it’s considered that David Clarke has been ahead of Stephen Cluxton for All-Stars in the past 2 years. I’m delighted for Clarke, but that’s just bias. If Mayo had Cluxton and Dublin had Clarke, I’d be pretty confident that it would be the Green and Red of Mayo belting out of the speakers after the final whistle in the last 2 years. But that is just subjective.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,202 ✭✭✭✭castletownman


    Sure the only reason Clarke hit that last kick-out over the sideline in the last minute, was because all of Mayo's outfielders and "out-balls" were unceremoniously dragged down by their respective Dublin markers in the most unashamedly unsporting and cynical act ever seen in September. Hard to find a target then


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,665 ✭✭✭Bonniedog


    Sure the only reason Clarke hit that last kick-out over the sideline in the last minute, was because all of Mayo's outfielders and "out-balls" were unceremoniously dragged down by their respective Dublin markers in the most unashamedly unsporting and cynical act ever seen in September. Hard to find a target then


    :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭flasher0030


    Sure the only reason Clarke hit that last kick-out over the sideline in the last minute, was because all of Mayo's outfielders and "out-balls" were unceremoniously dragged down by their respective Dublin markers in the most unashamedly unsporting and cynical act ever seen in September. Hard to find a target then

    Not sure if you're writing that comment tongue in cheek, but if you are serious, its a bit dramatic. It's hardly like Clarke saw couple of Mayo defenders in wrestling match and decided "Oh heck, I'll just kick it over the sideline".

    I would have loved if ref had the b@lls to black card the 3 Dublin players, but I don't think any ref would. Would be putting themselves in the direct line of media scrutiny. He gave the card to Kilkenny, so he had made his token "dealt-with" gesture. Would have been fun for the next play anyway - 14 against 11, to see if Mayo could conjure up a score. Anyway, ifs buts and maybes.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Sure the only reason Clarke hit that last kick-out over the sideline in the last minute, was because all of Mayo's outfielders and "out-balls" were unceremoniously dragged down by their respective Dublin markers in the most unashamedly unsporting and cynical act ever seen in September. Hard to find a target then

    So you didn't watch the match then? There was no one dragged down when Clarke ballooned that kick over the line, and he had men free on the other side

    In fact, on all his dire kick outs in extra time the only mayo player who was dragged down was leeroy in retaliation for "the most unashamedly unsporting and cynical act ever seen in September".

    Clarke **** himself, plain and simple.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭danganabu


    Bambi wrote: »
    So you didn't watch the match then? There was no one dragged down when Clarke ballooned that kick over the line, and he had men free on the other side.

    While Castletown was slightly over the top and dramatic in his claim, the bolded statement is completely false. So you didnt watch the match either I gather :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,775 ✭✭✭✭Slattsy


    Bambi wrote: »
    So you didn't watch the match then? There was no one dragged down when Clarke ballooned that kick over the line, and he had men free on the other side

    In fact, on all his dire kick outs in extra time the only mayo player who was dragged down was leeroy in retaliation for "the most unashamedly unsporting and cynical act ever seen in September".

    Clarke **** himself, plain and simple.

    Apparently, you can still get the smell in Croker.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Jaden


    Sure the only reason Clarke hit that last kick-out over the sideline in the last minute, was because all of Mayo's outfielders and "out-balls" were unceremoniously dragged down by their respective Dublin markers in the most unashamedly unsporting and cynical act ever seen in September. Hard to find a target then

    This is, quite simply, a complete fabrication. Footage shows nothing of the sort happened. Anyone who thinks otherwise, needs to (re)watch the last few minutes of the game (youtube is your friend here).


    73:00 - Dermo takes a pot shot that goes a mile wide.
    Both Dublin and Mayo make a substitution.

    74:20 - Clarke's Kickout goes straight to Dublin who work it to Connolly, who is taken down.
    Mayo make two more substitutions.

    76:02 - Dean points the free, despite having a GPS tracker thrown by Keegan, in an attempt to put him off.

    76:12 - Clarke restarts. Play is blown up for a tussle between Keegan and Kilkenny. Everyone else is on their feet.
    Kilkenny is Black Carded to make it 14 Vs 13.

    77:10 - Clarke restarts again. Everyone is still on their feet. Ball goes straight out of play.
    Mayo don't touch the ball again for the rest of the game.

    78:54 - Game is blown up, just as Brogan appears to be about to get through for a 1:1 with Clarke.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    danganabu wrote: »
    While Castletown was slightly over the top and dramatic in his claim, the bolded statement is completely false. So you didnt watch the match either I gather :D


    You don't say?

    bNK0x54.jpg

    5 mayo players inside the 45 to two Dublin lads who aren't even near their men let alone dragging, and he sends into the crowd :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    that image is so big because some people obviously have problems with their eyesight :)


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 4,149 Mod ✭✭✭✭bruschi


    imagine, the thread already descending into another Mayo/Dublin farce.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,665 ✭✭✭Bonniedog


    Sure the only reason Clarke hit that last kick-out over the sideline in the last minute, was because all of Mayo's outfielders and "out-balls" were unceremoniously dragged down by their respective Dublin markers in the most unashamedly unsporting and cynical act ever seen in September. Hard to find a target then


    More unsporting than throwing something at a player taking a free? Or did you miss that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Jaden


    Bambi wrote: »
    that image is so big because some people obviously have problems with their eyesight :)

    No no no. The Dublin Meeja replaced the live video feed with a doctored version to hide the TRUTH of what happened.

    They have the technology - developed at the cost of millions of Euro, diverted from development funds to a shady company operating out of DCU.....

    Honestly, I don't even know how this fabrication got any traction at all, and yet it is quoted as Gospel in places.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,946 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Powerhouse wrote: »
    The corollary of the 'revolutionisation' of the game with the short kickout is that midfielders should probably become smaller more compact and mobile players but this hasn't happened yet.

    I think it has, there are now very few teams that can carry the big, lumbering midfielder in there for his aerial prowess. They can still be tall, but if they aren't also very athletic then they are in big, big trouble.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,202 ✭✭✭✭castletownman


    I was being sarcastic lads.

    Didn't mean to descend the thread into a Mayo/Dublin debate, and I apologise for doing so. Very touchy subject :D

    Anyway back on track, while I outlined my opinion on it earlier, I would echo a previous posters contention that it was DUBLIN itself rather than Cluxton individually that revolutionised the game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I was being sarcastic lads.

    Didn't mean to descend the thread into a Mayo/Dublin debate, and I apologise for doing so. Very touchy subject :D

    Anyway back on track, while I outlined my opinion on it earlier, I would echo a previous posters contention that it was DUBLIN itself rather than Cluxton individually that revolutionised the game.

    If it was DUBLIN itself that revolutionised the game, how come all the other counties haven't been able to replicate it and beat them? Answer: because they don't have another Stephen Cluxton.

    At the end of the day, it was Cluxton's ability that revolutionised the game, the team took advantage of that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Jaden


    I was being sarcastic lads. Didn't mean to descend the thread into a Mayo/Dublin debate, and I apologise for doing so. Very touchy subject :D

    Awwww. /puts away pitchfork and flaming torch.
    I was being sarcastic lads.
    Anyway back on track, while I outlined my opinion on it earlier, I would echo a previous posters contention that it was DUBLIN itself rather than Cluxton individually that revolutionised the game.

    Bang on. However, I would add that while it is the team that wins, Cluxton is more often than not, the one pulling the strings.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭danganabu


    blanch152 wrote: »
    If it was DUBLIN itself that revolutionised the game, how come all the other counties haven't been able to replicate it and beat them? Answer: because they don't have another Stephen Cluxton.

    At the end of the day, it was Cluxton's ability that revolutionised the game, the team took advantage of that.

    Hi Stephen nice to meet you!

    Cluxton has been in goals for Dublin for 16 seasons, Dublin have won 5 of those so the claim that no one has been able to beat them is a little disingenuous wouldn't you say?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,202 ✭✭✭✭castletownman


    blanch152 wrote: »
    If it was DUBLIN itself that revolutionised the game, how come all the other counties haven't been able to replicate it and beat them? Answer: because they don't have another Stephen Cluxton.

    At the end of the day, it was Cluxton's ability that revolutionised the game, the team took advantage of that.

    Well I would argue that Dublin have a once in a generation panel of players too now. Hardly just Cluxton. I mean the graphic shown after the Tyrone game of the forwards that didn't start the semi shows their strength in depth.

    I argued earlier that Durcan's kickouts were equally as effective and key to Donegal's system. And incidentally they shut down Cluxton in 2014, the last time Dublin lost in championship. So there's one example of it being beatable. I admit that it's harder to come up with other examples as they have generally swatted away all comers in the last three years (when the importance of his restarts are hardly that important when they are exceeding the handicap spread at the other end).

    Now I get Cluxton is an icon of Dublin GAA, and is undoubtedly one of the greatest goalkeepers of all time, but lord some of the fawning over him is overboard.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    danganabu wrote: »
    Hi Stephen nice to meet you!

    Cluxton has been in goals for Dublin for 16 seasons, Dublin have won 5 of those so the claim that no one has been able to beat them is a little disingenuous wouldn't you say?

    The kickout strategy really only dates back to Gilroy and only first had real effect in 2011. Since then, it has rarely been beaten. Some have cited the Donegal game, but that was down to poor play and panic by all-out attack and some wasteful wides.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭danganabu


    blanch152 wrote: »
    The kickout strategy really only dates back to Gilroy and only first had real effect in 2011. Since then, it has rarely been beaten. Some have cited the Donegal game, but that was down to poor play and panic by all-out attack and some wasteful wides.

    Ah I'm only rising you, look he is a brilliant brilliant player and a huge part of the juggernaut that is Dublin Senior Football team but I think the question or the debate was as to whether this gets overstated at times and to be perfectly honest I think it does. I get why some will disagree with that but I think its quite insulting to the rest of the players and Gilroy etc. to suggest that it was/is all down to Cluxton. And that's not a slight in Cluxton either, merely a recognition that no one player no matter how inventive or talented can single handedly ''revolutionise'' sport of 125 years plus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,163 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    Free taking goal keeper and the short kick outs. The recently introduced rule was called by some the Cluxton Rule. It can't recall anyone who this happened too.


    https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.balls.ie/amp/gaa/jarlath-burns-cluxton-rule-374766
    Sean Cavanagh, AKA the Black Card.
    Black card may have eventually come in, but was rushed in as a result of Cavanagh's rugby tackle and Brolly losing his **** over it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭ArielAtom


    Nothing sly about the title of the thread, it opens it up to both the pro and the anti Cluxton folk.
    I am firmly in the pro brigade so there is no confusion. He has with the help of a great team and tactical coaching changed the role a keeper plays. I don't think there was a sly dig at any other county, most if not all would take him in a heartbeat. He's that good, not sure what Dublin will do when he hangs up the boots.
    Like the Gooch his talent should be celebrated. Like it or lump it the game has changed and he was a major factor in it.

    For those who want all kickouts beyond the 45 and contested by midfielders, think what the game would end up as!!! Two 6' 8" midfielders looking for a mark on every kick out, I love high fielding as much as the next man but when a team has a ball the want to retain it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,665 ✭✭✭Bonniedog


    All team ball games - gaelic football, rugby, soccer, nfl, basketball and even hurling of late - have evolved into possession based games. If you look at stats for any winning team in any of the above, then having most of possession is the key factor. Off top of my head only losing team in an AI final that had most of the ball was Mayo in 2013. Not by much.

    So Cluxton's kickouts are a massive part of Dublin's success. Of course the way outfield players make space is crucial, but he is the playmaker.

    As the video above of Clarke's last kickout in final shows, there were lots of free Mayo players but he got a dose of the head staggers. Cluxton has done that about five times in 17 years....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,436 ✭✭✭Gael85


    blanch152 wrote: »
    The kickout strategy really only dates back to Gilroy and only first had real effect in 2011. Since then, it has rarely been beaten. Some have cited the Donegal game, but that was down to poor play and panic by all-out attack and some wasteful wides.

    Ger Brennan was a huge lose that day too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 272 ✭✭kopkidda


    Cluxton best GAA keeper ever, close thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭danganabu


    kopkidda wrote: »
    Cluxton best GAA keeper ever, close thread.

    But that has nothing to do with the thread :rolleyes:

    Besides Tony Reddin was the best :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,665 ✭✭✭Bonniedog


    Gael85 wrote: »
    Ger Brennan was a huge lose that day too.


    Indeed. No way Ger would have left that gap down the centre of defence.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,428 ✭✭✭Powerhouse


    Obliviously it was but now keepers stop shots and do so much more. But I have a feeling you know what I meant and are just being argumentative.


    This is what you wrote: "When I was growing up your goalkeeper was just a shot stopper. Now your goalkeeper is one of the most important players on the pitch."

    I assumed that you meant what you actually wrote which draws a clear distinction between goalkeepers now (one of the most important players on the pitch) and those when you were growing up (when presumably they weren't - otherwise).

    If it were something different you had in mind fair enough, but assumptions by people of some clandestine plot on my part to start a row are wide of the mark. We are all guilty of clumsy phrasing from time to time but you shouldn't assume people always deep down know what you mean.


Advertisement