Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Theresa May to honour Irish republican Countess Markievicz

13

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,611 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,299 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    elperello wrote: »
    I was more thinking about the reaction of the present day London Met Police who guard the Palace of Westminster.

    But seeing as you ask.

    Just picture your average Dublin policeman out and about on that fateful day.
    He's watching out for overloaded carts, beggars, or maybe young scallywags stealing bulls eyes from a sweet shop.
    Suddenly someone rushes up and plugs him shouting War or whatever.
    There he is, gone for all eternity and the other side get redemption and commemoration.

    That's the beauty of history it's multi-faceted.

    I had no idea London was under occupation today.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man


    Dublin or London, Wittenberg or Rome, never seen a crying shower of hoors that deserved each other more.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Jawgap wrote: »
    In 1916?

    How do you think he'd have managed that and just how long would they have taken to arrive.....and if there was such a cadre of armed men available how come it took the authorities and the Brits so long to organise a response to any of the occupied sites around the city?

    .....never mind that Malin's command numbered over 100 and was well on its way to digging in - you really think a single unarmed police officer could have whistled up 300 armed men (assuming the usual ratio of 3:1 was required to dislodge an entrenched adversary?)

    Also the nature of his injuries - one bullet passed through both lungs and his left arm - suggests more a bushwhacking than a confrontation (as some accounts suggest there was).....sounds like she had the jump on him but was unwilling to take him prisoner.....since she ran back to the rest of the garrison shouting trimuphantly (in the words of one witness) "I got him" before accpeting the congratualtions of others.

    Although at that point its unclear if she knew whether she left Lahiff for dead, or thought she had just wounded him.
    But what's the source for all this? One diary page written over a year after the event iirc. With quite a few holes in the story if you look through it which has been done, repeatedly, especially last year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,910 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    Who are my lot?
    What murderers?
    Whose throats?
    Which sport?
    Just what do you mean?

    So many questions.

    Anyhow to carry on.
    I wasn't condemning anyone just having a civilised discussion.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,910 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    I had no idea London was under occupation today.

    You may have missed some of the discussion.
    The proposed commemoration which is the subject of this thread is to take place in London.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    But what's the source for all this? One diary page written over a year after the event iirc. With quite a few holes in the story if you look through it which has been done, repeatedly, especially last year.

    I don't think I ever suggested anything except that it was reputed that she shot the officer - what might Fitzgerald's motive be to lie about what she saw?

    And Markievicz herself mentioned shooting a police officer in the arm - I don't believe she said which arm, but Lahiff was shot in the left arm.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Jawgap wrote: »
    I don't think I ever suggested anything except that it was reputed that she shot the officer - what might Fitzgerald's motive be to lie about what she saw?

    And Markievicz herself mentioned shooting a police officer in the arm - I don't believe she said which arm, but Lahiff was shot in the left arm.
    Who knows, but the flaws are there

    https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/1916/just-who-was-constance-the-misunderstood-countess-34555881.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap



    Indeed, but if you don't mind I'll stick with the monograph written by the historian as opposed to the Indo piece written by the novelist ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,587 ✭✭✭✭Collie D


    Can't wait to see the DUP reaction to this. The pram won't have any toys left in it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,499 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    May disappointed me in many ways. I wanted to her to be like Maggie, a true leader and implenter. The greatest ever British PMs were Churchill and Thatcher.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,875 ✭✭✭A Little Pony


    Should have been  hanged for her crimes against Irish policemen.

    You realise that shortly after 1916 it was generally recognised that shooting the leaders was considered to be a grave strategic error. You get the prize for being the slowest learner yet as regards Irish history.
    Actually it wasn't enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,910 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Collie D wrote: »
    Can't wait to see the DUP reaction to this. The pram won't have any toys left in it.

    The more I think about it this might be a little land mine she is helpfully leaving behind for her successor.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    May disappointed me in many ways. I wanted to her to be like Maggie, a true leader and implenter. The greatest ever British PMs were Churchill and Thatcher.

    Not Gladsone?

    Or Campbell-Bannerman - hugely, hugely under-rated, imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Jawgap wrote: »
    Not Gladsone?

    Or Campbell-Bannerman - hugely, hugely under-rated, imo.

    I think a reaction was sought rather than an informed discussion TBF. I don't know much about Campbell-Bannerman, can you tell us why you think he should be better remembered?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,203 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    May disappointed me in many ways. I wanted to her to be like Maggie, a true leader and implenter. The greatest ever British PMs were Churchill and Thatcher.

    What made you think that? Her previous work shows she was far from a decisive leader.
    Like Thatcher she has found a way to divide and wreck her country though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    What made you think that? Her previous work shows she was far from a decisive leader.
    Like Thatcher she has found a way to divide and wreck her country though.

    There are still families up t'north (how Northerners say up north in England) who wont talk to each other over people voting for her.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,875 ✭✭✭A Little Pony


    Jawgap wrote: »
    May disappointed me in many ways. I wanted to her to be like Maggie, a true leader and implenter. The greatest ever British PMs were Churchill and Thatcher.

    Not Gladsone?

    Or Campbell-Bannerman - hugely, hugely under-rated, imo.
    Gladstone didn't know what he believed, shifting parties all the time. Maybe he gets more respect due to him not being Jewish like Disraeli.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Gladstone didn't know what he believed, shifting parties all the time. Maybe he gets more respect due to him not being Jewish like Disraeli.

    Disraeli was Anglican since the age of twelve though.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,875 ✭✭✭A Little Pony


    Not that it makes much difference to some people though.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    steddyeddy wrote: »
    I think a reaction was sought rather than an informed discussion TBF. I don't know much about Campbell-Bannerman, can you tell us why you think he should be better remembered?

    I'd recommend reading Hattersley's biography of him.

    Arguably, the only true radical to serve as the UK's PM.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Not that it makes much difference to some people though.

    Ah some people are ejjits.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,043 ✭✭✭Berserker


    steddyeddy wrote: »
    Thanks to people like her we're not in the sinking ship that is Brexit.

    Given the level of dependency that the RoI has on the UK when it comes to trade, I would hold fire on statements like that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Berserker wrote: »
    Given the level of dependency that the RoI has on the UK when it comes to trade, I would hold fire on statements like that.

    No I wouldn't. The UK we trade with now will be long gone once they leave the single market. Prior to joining they were calling on the IMF will help. Doubtlessly Brexit will hit us bad, but Id much rather be Irish and in the EU, than British and leaving the biggest single market in the world.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,887 ✭✭✭Atoms for Peace


    The peelers weren't exactly favour of the month at the time of the rising.

    The RIC was an armed paramilitary force despised by tenent farmers following their actions in the landwar, likewise the Dublin met's heavy handed tactics during the lock-out. It's not hard to imagine some wanted retribution.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Jawgap wrote: »
    Indeed, but if you don't mind I'll stick with the monograph written by the historian as opposed to the Indo piece written by the novelist ;)

    A monograph that relies on a testimony that couldn't stand up in a court of law? That twas typed up a year afterwards and disagrees with the DMP report and other witnesses?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,203 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    A monograph that relies on a testimony that couldn't stand up in a court of law? That twas typed up a year afterwards and disagrees with the DMP report and other witnesses?

    If it tallies with your general view...bingo...hang em!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    The peelers weren't exactly favour of the month at the time of the rising.

    The RIC was an armed paramilitary force despised by tenent farmers following their actions in the landwar, likewise the Dublin met's heavy handed tactics during the lock-out. It's not hard to imagine some wanted retribution.

    If the DMP were so bad, why did the AOH support their campaign for better wages and conditions?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    A monograph that relies on a testimony that couldn't stand up in a court of law? That twas typed up a year afterwards and disagrees with the DMP report and other witnesses?

    Actually, I was referring to Arrington's monograph on ethics her subsequent book was based written a sight longer than a year after the events described......but yeah, if your Indo account suits you go with it ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    If it tallies with your general view...bingo...hang em!

    As usual......a day late and a dollar short :D


Advertisement
Advertisement