Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Harvey Weinstein scandal (Mod warning in op.)

11314161819127

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭Biggest lickspittle on boardz


    An entertainment site is reporting that Weinstein's wife, Georgina Chapman, is being consoled by none other than...Huma Abedin.

    As I have been repeating in this thread, there is absolutely a political angle to this. There is a cartel that has been covering up, and protecting the rich and powerful sexual abusers. And I would suspect actively promoting abusers to positions of power, so that they can be easily controlled and blackmailed if necessary.

    So let's take a moment to examine the links here.
    • Harvey Weinstein-rich and powerful movie producer, enthuasitic fundraiser for liberal causes and most especially Hillary Clinton. And now admitted sexual abuser and suspected rapist.
    • Georgina Chapman-trophy wife, fashion designer, and enabler of husband, Harvey Weinstein.
    • Huma Abedin-personal aide to Hillary Clinton. Recent wife of convicted paedophile and disgraced, jailed senator, Anthony Weiner.
    • Hillary Clinton-former Secretary of State, wife of suspected serial sex abuser, ex-president Bill Clinton.

    And wouldn't you just know it, here they are playing best of friends at some fundraiser.

    hillary-clinton-harvey-weinstein.jpg?w=720&quality=85

    How many clues do you need about the Clintons before the penny finally starts to drop?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,397 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    I posted the original video, and I'll admit I messed up the video links. I had assumed that was the video people were referring to when they were talking about Affleck groping a reporter.

    The first video in now a confirmed spoof/joke between the two, and I'm happy to clarify that I was wrong. In fact, the video showing the REAL groping was this one, and Affleck has since apologised for the incident:





    For anyone interested in the rumours and scandal, there is a website below that lists various celebrities and their allegations. Some of the allegations are sexual, others involve physical abuse i.e. Charlie Sheen, Mickey Rourke etc.

    I would stress that some of the accusations are merely that; accusations.
    Some are absolutely historically proven, but it is important to remember that paper doesn't refuse ink either.
    So use your own discretion and do your research, unless you want to end up looking like an idiot like I did above.

    https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/brad-pitt-at-26-with-his-underaged-teen-girlfriends.577453/



    In the meantime, Kevin Spacey is the subject of persistent rumours regarding aggressive, sleazy sexual behaviour towards other men.

    170px-Kevin_Spacey_%40_San_Diego_Comic-Con_2008_-_b.jpg

    Gawker has a list of confidential emails from random people who have allegedly been harassed by Spacey:
    http://defamer.gawker.com/people-keep-telling-us-about-kevin-spacey-s-aggressive-1686507320

    Looking at that video Ben Affleck must have the longest arms in the world to do what she's saying.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    tara73 wrote: »
    most probably not true. she's lying, either for money or because she doesn't want to be involved in all this media hype and a life ruining court battle.
    everybody can see how uncomfortable she feels and how she's trying to wriggle herself out of this scumbag. it's not an act.

    and for which show was this creepy stuff produced? a porn show? absolute BS.

    The show was on Canadian (I would assume French Canadian) TV and was called Box-Office. I couldn't find any other videos of the show on Youtube, but she does similar here in what appears to be a parody at 6:00. Does anyone have good French here?



    Her other IMDB credits include 'Sex-Shop', 'Hot Parade', 'SeXstar', 'Striptease', 'Strip Club' so her story that this is how the show was set would seem to have a good bit of merit. Affleck's MTV video is still creepy without doubt and the story of his brother on the set of I'm Still Here appears very credible so I'm far from saying he's innocent here, just referring to this particular video.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,793 ✭✭✭brevity


    If the rumours about Schneider are true, he deserves to be boiled in oil....

    His nickname says it all.


  • Posts: 6,025 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    An entertainment site is reporting that Weinstein's wife, Georgina Chapman, is being consoled by none other than...Huma Abedin.

    Wouldn't surprise me if Harvey catches the Arkansas flu.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    An entertainment site is reporting that Weinstein's wife, Georgina Chapman, is being consoled by none other than...Huma Abedin.

    As I have been repeating in this thread, there is absolutely a political angle to this. There is a cartel that has been covering up, and protecting the rich and powerful sexual abusers. And I would suspect actively promoting abusers to positions of power, so that they can be easily controlled and blackmailed if necessary.

    So let's take a moment to examine the links here.
    • Harvey Weinstein-rich and powerful movie producer, enthuasitic fundraiser for liberal causes and most especially Hillary Clinton. And now admitted sexual abuser and suspected rapist.
    • Georgina Chapman-trophy wife, fashion designer, and enabler of husband, Harvey Weinstein.
    • Huma Abedin-personal aide to Hillary Clinton. Recent wife of convicted paedophile and disgraced, jailed senator, Anthony Weiner.
    • Hillary Clinton-former Secretary of State, wife of suspected serial sex abuser, ex-president Bill Clinton.

    And wouldn't you just know it, here they are playing best of friends at some fundraiser.

    hillary-clinton-harvey-weinstein.jpg?w=720&quality=85

    How many clues do you need about the Clintons before the penny finally starts to drop?

    The pennys stilll dropping I suppose.

    Donald+Trump+Harvey+Weinstein+New+York+Premiere+cb8oOG4XzZUl.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,793 ✭✭✭brevity


    An entertainment site is reporting that Weinstein's wife, Georgina Chapman, is being consoled by none other than...Huma Abedin.

    As I have been repeating in this thread, there is absolutely a political angle to this. There is a cartel that has been covering up, and protecting the rich and powerful sexual abusers. And I would suspect actively promoting abusers to positions of power, so that they can be easily controlled and blackmailed if necessary.

    So let's take a moment to examine the links here.
    • Harvey Weinstein-rich and powerful movie producer, enthuasitic fundraiser for liberal causes and most especially Hillary Clinton. And now admitted sexual abuser and suspected rapist.
    • Georgina Chapman-trophy wife, fashion designer, and enabler of husband, Harvey Weinstein.
    • Huma Abedin-personal aide to Hillary Clinton. Recent wife of convicted paedophile and disgraced, jailed senator, Anthony Weiner.
    • Hillary Clinton-former Secretary of State, wife of suspected serial sex abuser, ex-president Bill Clinton.

    And wouldn't you just know it, here they are playing best of friends at some fundraiser.

    hillary-clinton-harvey-weinstein.jpg?w=720&quality=85

    How many clues do you need about the Clintons before the penny finally starts to drop?

    Everyone is caught up in it imo. Trump and the Clinton's ran in the same circles. They both had links to Epstein too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    brevity wrote: »
    Everyone is caught up in it imo. Trump and the Clinton's ran in the same circles.

    Yeah, check out Trump and the Clintons’ friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,812 ✭✭✭✭sbsquarepants


    dogbert27 wrote: »
    Looking at that video Ben Affleck must have the longest arms in the world to do what she's saying.

    I couldn't see it either after watching the video I have to say.
    But he did apologise so I suppose he must have done something!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    TBH given that Weinstein is (was) one of the biggest names in the Entertainment industry, then every political/power figure in America likely associated or connected with him on some level.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Yeah, check out Trump and the Clintons’ friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.
    “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey [Epstein] enjoys his social life.”
    - Donald Trump

    You see that's the funny thing here, for all the talk of how Weinstein was a long time Democrat donor (which is true and raises a lot of questions), Trump was also one at the same time. He was also heavily involved in the entertainment industry, both in television and film (and beauty pageants where he had a habit of inviting himself in to the women's dressing rooms), and so would surely have known about this if it was such a widely known secret as to who the culprits have been down the years. We've also got people saying Clinton and Obama would have had information to intelligence services which is absolutely true... and Trump has had that exact same access himself. It's also curious how deathly silent he has been on this given his propensity to interject himself on Twitter, and especially given how eager he is in recent times to deflect attention to whatever he can, away from his Russian scandal.

    There is absolutely no way to claim Clinton must have known about this without saying the exact same about Trump, and vice-versa.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,602 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    In fairness to the picture of Trump with Weinstein, it doesn't indicate anything more than they met once or twice and got a picture taken. I'd say it happens all the time at events and Trump was in the entertainment industry (still is in many respects) rather than political at the time. I don't think it's a good comparison to use when photos of Hillary (of which there are many more and closer links between them) with Weinstein are shown. Not to say Hillary knew or could have known what Weinstein was doing.

    It's Trump's links to Epstein that are more troublesome, but it all already came out before the election anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    Penn wrote: »
    In fairness to the picture of Trump with Weinstein, it doesn't indicate anything more than they met once or twice and got a picture taken. I'd say it happens all the time at events and Trump was in the entertainment industry (still is in many respects) rather than political at the time. I don't think it's a good comparison to use when photos of Hillary (of which there are many more and closer links between them) with Weinstein are shown. Not to say Hillary knew or could have known what Weinstein was doing.

    It's Trump's links to Epstein that are more troublesome, but it all already came out before the election anyway.

    Trump professes to be amazed by his blockbuster success. One afternoon, as we were standing on the steps of the Trump International Hotel and Tower at Columbus Circle, he said, apropos of I don't know what: "Harvey Weinstein calls -- he's a friend of mine; you know, he's the head of Miramax -- and he says, 'Donald, you know you're the biggest star in Hollywood.' I say, 'What are you talking about?' He says, 'You're the No. 1 star; you're a superstar on the No. 1 show in television [No. 4, actually]. You saved NBC.' I never thought of it, because the rest of the time I'm negotiating with contractors. So I said: 'You know what? It's true."'

    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/12/magazine/trumpologies.html?_r=0


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,977 ✭✭✭HandsomeBob


    optogirl wrote: »
    funny now these creeps only need counselling when they're caught. He didn't realise he was a sex pest, despite numerous payouts and women explaining to him that they were uncomfortable with his behaviour? Now that the wider media have gotten hold of it though he realises he has a problem that needs to be addressed. He's a criminal but 'oh I'm sorry, I'll talk to a therapist' is supposed to cut it. Fook him.

    It's straight forward enough to understand. A **** will be a **** for as long as they can get away with it. As sad as it is, widespread condemnation is the only thing that can shame the likes of Weinstein into getting help.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,602 ✭✭✭✭Penn



    It's Trump. I wouldn't consider that event to have happened anywhere other than the empty space under his hair.

    They may be friends, they may not be. But the only link I've seen between them so far is one photo. I'm just saying compared to the known links between Hillary and Weinstein, it's barely proof of anything.

    Though I still don't see why discussion about Clinton keeps coming up at all anyway. It's trying to make this a political issue when it shouldn't be. No one knows if Clinton was aware of any such allegations about him. I doubt it was ever something which came up in conversation between them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,144 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    Apparently 3 more people are about to exposed as abusers - dan Schneider, the Nickelodeon producer that everyone knows about, Bryan singer and a "billionaire Mogul"

    Remind me, how much is Trump worth? I'm just asking questions...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,026 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Penn wrote: »
    It's Trump. I wouldn't consider that event to have happened anywhere other than the empty space under his hair.

    They may be friends, they may not be. But the only link I've seen between them so far is one photo. I'm just saying compared to the known links between Hillary and Weinstein, it's barely proof of anything.

    Though I still don't see why discussion about Clinton keeps coming up at all anyway. It's trying to make this a political issue when it shouldn't be. No one knows if Clinton was aware of any such allegations about him. I doubt it was ever something which came up in conversation between them.

    Trump doesn't need to associate with Weinstein and the like, he's more than capable of engaging in that sort of behaviour himself, he could probably hold a master class on it.

    You really have to be a dolt to try and cast aspersions on the Clinton's by association when the champion you seek to compare and contrast against is Trump. Own goal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,846 ✭✭✭take everything


    Unpleasant that we're here in the first place, but since it exists - Thankfully the dark, seedier, life-ruining side of Hollywood is finally getting a mainstream light shone on it. The casting couch culture didn't start with Harvey Weinstein and probably won't end with him, but his uncovering might put off at least some other men in the future from engaging in such behaviour wilful abuse so easily.

    It's amazing to see some of the actors who are clamouring to save their own skin here, rather than using their knowledge to further galvanise the movement to banish this behaviour from Hollywood. The likes of George 'We actors are often accused of being out of touch' Clooney and Meryl 'Harvey is a God, Roman is my mate' Streep with their "We're shocked, we never knew, this is reprehensible" routine. These pontificators, it's so fúcking obvious what they are doing.

    Around a year ago, I was on a drive and there was an interview with Meryl Streep on Newstalk radio. It was in relation to the release of her then latest movie, Suffragette. Rather than it just being a one on one interview, the Newstalk presenter was in a press room with other interviewers for 'An audience with Meryl' type of set-up over in London. All of the interviewers were fawning in Meryl's presence, and the whole thing made for some sickly-sweet listening at times.

    Listening to Meryl speaking from her chair pedestal, it was as if she was one of the suffragettes herself. Like her starring in this movie and using her name to shine a light on their plight was some huge humanitarian effort akin to the work of Gandhi. As if some other actor just wouldn't have played her part if she didn't. During the interview, Meryl mentioned a few times that she felt it a privilege and her duty to tell the story of these afflicted women from a century ago.

    This all was after she called Harvey Weinstein a God at an awards ceremony. After she made her latest unwavering gesture of support for the unrepentant Roman Polanski. Never mind 100 years ago in England, what's wrong with highlighting the plight which women in Hollywood have been going through and still are in the modern day?

    Don't get me wrong, these men are fully to blame for their actions and Meryl Streep isn't. However, Harvey Weinstein was enabled by the likes of her and a room full of megastars regularly giving him a standing ovation and high approval at awards ceremonies. If you're the pig of a specimen that is Harvey Weinstein and you are constantly getting that adornment from your peers, you are hardly going to think "Geez, maybe I am hurting a lot of people and should have a hard look at myself'.

    So many observers and colleagues knew, and never mind kept quiet which would be somewhat understandable given Weinstein's ruthless reputation, they continued to praise him. Now many of them are suddenly so concerned and are scurrying to distance themselves from him, not for the victims or the personal offence they feel, but for their own profile, image and/or stock.

    The Weinstein board - Fúck off, you all fúcking knew and probably enjoyed Harvey's stories.

    Harvey Weinstein's 'wife' and his defense attorney - They put up with it and profited from it until the press came in force to their doors.

    Meryl Streep, George Clooney and the rest of the "That's a bad Harvey, I honestly never knew myself even though I knew" brigade - Fúck off and please continue to just be good at pretending to be someone else in front of a camera.

    These actors, who knew, chiming in now to save their own faces. I wouldn't mind if they were regular acclaimed directors, screenwriters, songwriters, or anyone who puts pen to paper regularly to express an original vision or opinion. Or if they didn't like to regularly pontificate from their awards podiums. However, I don't need to know what Madeline from Death Becomes Her or Danny Ocean have to think on this lurid matter. Not once it's just a hollow quote to try save their own public image, rather than meaningful information or opinion to further highlight the Hollywood problem.

    And there is a Hollywood problem. The industry in that town was unfortunately built on the likes of what Harvey Weinstein practiced in. Harvey didn't invent the sleazy wheel, he was just one of its biggest spinners in the modern day. At this stage, such behaviour has been long normalised and is now just 'part of the game'.

    Moving pictures and their commercialisation were a great thing. But this was also something which gave great power to a few individuals over the hordes of hopefuls who wanted to be in these moving pictures. 100 years later, we have the world coming together on social media to out the likes of predators like Harvey Weinstein and wannabes like Harry Knowles. To shine a light on the horrific possibilities which linger with Digital Network and that whole crew (watch the documentary An Open Secret for more on that) and we're starting to see that this Silver Screen is made up of some very dark fabric indeed.

    Hollywood and the American film industry have produced some amazing stories onscreen, some genuinely awe-inspiring experiences over its lifetime. However, the millions of (mostly young) people's real lives who were exploited, damaged and/or ruined in the process of producing this 'magic' and driving the industry is the ultimate story itself. One which deserves far more attention, and these latest developments are a start.



    Great post.
    What gets me is the hypocrisy around it.
    Those actors who enabled this are monuments of bull****.
    "You're gorgeous" by Babybird is also apt here.

    Note to self: listen to more System of a Down.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭B0jangles


    cnocbui wrote: »
    Trump doesn't need to associate with Weinstein and the like, he's more than capable of engaging in that sort of behaviour himself, he could probably hold a master class on it.

    You really have to be a dolt to try and cast aspersions on the Clinton's by association when the champion you seek to compare and contrast against is Trump. Own goal.

    It's pretty much hopeless to try to counter such claims by pointing out that Trump did pretty much the same - the accepted standards for Trump vs. pretty much every other politician in the US are so wildly skewed that as long as there isn't a tape of Trump actively egging Weinstein on while he assaults someone, or even participating in the assault*, Trump's good name goes unsullied.

    *even if there were, it'd probably be handwaved away as just locker-room games.

    The bottom line at the moment is that rules, laws and ethics are for Other People, not Trump.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It always seems so funny when Trump gets mentioned here - the guy publicly admitted to sexually assaulting women numerous times.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    What gets me is the hypocrisy around it.
    Those actors who enabled this are monuments of bull****.
    I guess it's hard to separate the wheat from the chaff in cases like Weinstein's.

    His wife is a good example. She's filing for divorce now because she can't deal with his "unforgivable actions". It's beyond ridiculous to suggest that she was unaware of anything. There is no way that a serial scumbag like Weinstein could act like this and his wife thinks the sun shines out of his hole.

    But it's also very easy to see how she would be afraid to walk away from him. She has a career, she has kids. If she were to call him out on his behaviour and/or divorce him, he had not only the money, but the local clout (with judges and other legal professionals), to absolutely destroy her. Ruin her credibility, ruin her career, take away her kids. If necessary, make her "disappear". Now that he's messed up, she can sh1t on him from a height without fear of a backlash.

    And it's easy to see how you can expand this fear beyond just his wife. Even a seasoned and respected actress like Streep could potentially find herself destroyed if she were to speak out.

    So it's really hard to separate out who was an enabler, and who was a victim - directly or through simple intimidation.

    With the amount other stuff starting to drip out, it would seem that Weinstein may have been a pillar of a community of Hollywood scumbags, using his substantial influence to protect others. Hopefully this is the case and with Weinstein disgraced it will bring a lot of other crap to light.

    Though I wouldn't rely on anything Gawker published. They were just as bad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,854 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Remind me, how much is Trump worth? I'm just asking questions...

    in fairness its movie mogul and business tycoon ;)

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,854 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    seamus wrote: »
    I guess it's hard to separate the wheat from the chaff in cases like Weinstein's.

    His wife is a good example. She's filing for divorce now because she can't deal with his "unforgivable actions". It's beyond ridiculous to suggest that she was unaware of anything. There is no way that a serial scumbag like Weinstein could act like this and his wife thinks the sun shines out of his hole.

    But it's also very easy to see how she would be afraid to walk away from him. She has a career, she has kids. If she were to call him out on his behaviour and/or divorce him, he had not only the money, but the local clout (with judges and other legal professionals), to absolutely destroy her. Ruin her credibility, ruin her career, take away her kids. If necessary, make her "disappear". Now that he's messed up, she can sh1t on him from a height without fear of a backlash.

    And it's easy to see how you can expand this fear beyond just his wife. Even a seasoned and respected actress like Streep could potentially find herself destroyed if she were to speak out.

    So it's really hard to separate out who was an enabler, and who was a victim - directly or through simple intimidation.

    With the amount other stuff starting to drip out, it would seem that Weinstein may have been a pillar of a community of Hollywood scumbags, using his substantial influence to protect others. Hopefully this is the case and with Weinstein disgraced it will bring a lot of other crap to light.

    Though I wouldn't rely on anything Gawker published. They were just as bad.

    they have the wind in their sails now, I think it would be fair to question their integrity going forward if they keep shtum

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,798 ✭✭✭goose2005


    On another note, it makes you wonder if our own former child star Saoirse Ronan is being protected properly in Hollywood? God knows what sort of weirdos she has been working with...
    That's why I really don't find it funny when ex-child stars exhibit bizarre or out-of-control behaviour - often it's acting out after abuse


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,854 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    goose2005 wrote: »
    That's why I really don't find it funny when ex-child stars exhibit bizarre or out-of-control behaviour - often it's acting out after abuse

    shia labeouf comes to mind

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    silverharp wrote: »
    shia labeouf comes to mind
    Britney Spears, Macauley Culkin, Lindsay Lohan, Amanda Bynes, Corey Haim, Corey Feldman, to name but a few.

    The media like to dress these things up as "children who were never allowed have a childhood - fame ruined them!", when it seems far more likely that fame wasn't the issue as opposed to what they had to endure at the hands of those who made them famous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,984 ✭✭✭Venom



    Twitter trying to silence people going against the narrative more likely.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    seamus wrote: »
    Britney Spears, Macauley Culkin, Lindsay Lohan, Amanda Bynes, Corey Haim, Corey Feldman, to name but a few.

    The media like to dress these things up as "children who were never allowed have a childhood - fame ruined them!", when it seems far more likely that fame wasn't the issue as opposed to what they had to endure at the hands of those who made them famous.

    Brad Renfro, who was the title character in Bryan Singer's Apt Pupil that someone pointed out earlier has a very disturbing lingering shot on him showering naked as about a 15 year old. The accusations against Singer seem to have some merit and they're on a whole different level to Weinstein's (which says something given how rotten as Weinstein's are themselves). In the year or so after the filming of Apt Pupil (1998) he came heavily involved in substance abuse, crime and eventually died of an overdose in 2008 aged 25.

    Jonathan Brandis was another highly prolific child actor in the late 80s/early 90s who is alleged to have been the subject of a lot of sexual abuse. Sadly we won't know as the acting roles began drying up when he 'came of age' and he hung himself aged 27 back in 2003.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,784 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    B0jangles wrote: »
    It's pretty much hopeless to try to counter such claims by pointing out that Trump did pretty much the same - the accepted standards for Trump vs. pretty much every other politician in the US are so wildly skewed that as long as there isn't a tape of Trump actively egging Weinstein on while he assaults someone, or even participating in the assault*, Trump's good name goes unsullied.

    *even if there were, it'd probably be handwaved away as just locker-room games.

    The bottom line at the moment is that rules, laws and ethics are for Other People, not Trump.

    I saw a joke the other day. "Harvey Weinsteins reputation has taken such a hit that the only career option is to run for president"


Advertisement