Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Newstalk bans Irish Times Journalists

245678

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    There was an orchastred campaign from some media outlets to keep the story alive. The Journal with Niall Brophy and his ex workmate at UTV Chris Donoghue were involved too.

    I think this could be related to the politics.ie post that claimed to be an insider saying journalists were ringing up Hooks advertisers about pulling their sponsorship.

    Remember, this was a media campaign and not a campaign of public outrage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 348 ✭✭Donutz


    It's all a bit childish really. If communicorp are in the habbit of banning anybody that gives them criticism, they're gonna run out of decent contributors fairly quickly.

    Fintan O Toole on the other hand though....
    How come he didn't raise his sexism concerns any of the previous times he appeared on the station.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,818 ✭✭✭Bateman


    Hook..Mullally...glad I don't have to listen to either of these


  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Does this mean we are not subjected to Gerry Thornley's annoying voice on Off The Ball's Monday night rugby, Tuesday night rugby, Wednesday night rugby etc. etc.

    I'll take it. Marred a good sports show.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,311 Mod ✭✭✭✭mzungu


    Pointless of Newstalk to do that. One journalist from the IT writes an article they don't like, so they decide to ban all IT journalists? Petty. Very petty. I don't get where they are coming from at all. O'Toole had already ruled himself out so it won't be any skin off his back, so why ban other journalists?

    Plus, not exactly a good image for a media company to ban journalists they have disagreements with.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,647 ✭✭✭lazybones32


    I can see why NT are pi$$ed at the guy who made an ott remark but an opinion is an opinion and this crap of demanding an apology?...go fcuk yourself. Nearly everyone who demands an apology isn't seeking it to heal any hurt caused but is using it as a ploy or is on a power trip.

    I haven't listened to NT since the manufactured offense and outraged-bandwagoners had their last victory and i don't buy the IT, so they can rage against each other until they poison themselves with bile.

    There is no attack of free speech or freedom of expression here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,827 ✭✭✭AnneFrank


    VinLieger wrote: »
    I wouldnt call Fintan O Toole mature either tbh

    His surname is very apt, a new age softy offended by the slightest controversial opinion. I agree with George and newstalk, and I like Mr trump.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,723 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,687 ✭✭✭andekwarhola


    A very defensive move from Newstalk but in no way is it a free speech issue. Newstalk are absolutely free to provide, or deny, their platform to anyone they wish. The Irish Times can say what they want, Newstalk is under no obligation to provide them a platform for them to do so.

    While I generally agree with that in terms of pure business, it's a bit more problematic when it's the news media, and in particular, it's being done by somebody who controls a disproportionate amount of the media.

    I didn't agree with hook being hounded off air either, although I don't agree with him.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,236 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    This post has been deleted.

    Looks like they shoved her out tbh

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 843 ✭✭✭pjproby


    It shows that the problem at NewsTalk goes deeper than just George Hook. It is a systemic attitude. I for one intend boycotting NewsTalk until they reverse this nonsense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭Badabing


    Can't see Matt Cooper being very happy about this. Hugh Linean is a reqular on the show for example.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,249 ✭✭✭ Holly Full Tightwad


    Dil has left NewsTalk.

    Her 12 listeners must be devastated


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,723 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 726 ✭✭✭The Legend Of Kira


    The op fails to take into account that there no mob that sought to pressure Newstalk to ban people from the Irish times, unlike what we seen from the other side in recent weeks, I disagree with Newstalks move to ban others from the Irish times based on what one of their writers said saying " he d refuse to appear on newstalk " .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    Correct me if I'm wrong but I think IT ran a story or 2 nearly every day about hook for about a week so I wouldn't blame NT for saying feck em. Dill tied her own noose, you don't bad mouth your employer without consequences


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    The op fails to take into account that there no mob that sought to pressure Newstalk to ban people from the Irish times, unlike what we seen from the other side in recent weeks, I disagree with Newstalks move to ban others from the Irish times based on what one of their writers said saying " he d refuse to appear on newstalk " .

    What other side? This whole sides thing is so childish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,249 ✭✭✭ Holly Full Tightwad


    Least she has her ‘comedy’ career to fall back on ....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 79 ✭✭Uosdwis R. Dewoh


    AnneFrank wrote: »
    I like Mr trump.
    This thread isn't about "Mr" (it's actually "President") Trump whatsoever, so that's a bit of a random one!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,898 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Wheels coming off the Newstalk wagon.
    Expect a change of ownership.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,984 ✭✭✭Venom


    Least she has her ‘comedy’ career to fall back on ....


    Is that the new term for busking :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Donoghue next :D

    This is very important for Communicorp to send a message to the upstarts about trying to get people sacked again.

    The less than 20 signatures will be very worried too :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,610 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    The op fails to take into account that there no mob that sought to pressure Newstalk to ban people from the Irish times, unlike what we seen from the other side in recent weeks, I disagree with Newstalks move to ban others from the Irish times based on what one of their writers said saying " he d refuse to appear on newstalk " .

    He dis more than that, he made some pretty outrageous claims about sexism in NT, a station where 10 out of 11 producers are women and so is the director of the station, the on air talent is not indicative of the makeup of the station behind the scenes but Fintans never let the facts get in the way of hisnown indignation.

    The whole dill thing is hilarious


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,047 ✭✭✭Rumpy Pumpy


    Like two blind mice on the Titanic arguing about which way to get to the lifeboats.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,782 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    Newstalk is upping it's quality.

    Surprised people still pay for the Irish Times, it is too PC and preaches on certain topics.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,977 ✭✭✭HandsomeBob


    Donutz wrote: »
    It's all a bit childish really. If communicorp are in the habbit of banning anybody that gives them criticism, they're gonna run out of decent contributors fairly quickly.

    Fintan O Toole on the other hand though....
    How come he didn't raise his sexism concerns any of the previous times he appeared on the station.

    Oul Fintan has already banned himself from Newstalk. He finally made a "stand" on the issue a couple of weeks ago......but I've no doubt he'll milk this for another article now.

    I'm sure some of the IT journos will be delighted anyway.....now they don't have to come up with some sort of excuse for refusing to take part in live debates (well on Newstalk at least).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,638 ✭✭✭Teyla Emmagan


    I don't think I have ever heard Una Mulally on radio. Bit of a pathetic move by DOB anyway.

    Do you get paid to go on air an contribute to radio shows or are all these people just doing it for their profile?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    pilly wrote: »
    So why were a large proportion of posters saying George Hook was denied free speech?

    That's my point. He wasn't denied free speech he was denied a platform.

    Great point actually!

    Newstalk can do this if they want, as I said in the George Hook thread, he wasn’t silenced. He could still get his POV across via other platforms. This is the same.

    Now whether this makes anyone look hypocritical depends on whether they thought Hook was silenced and simultaneously agree with this move by Newstalk. If anyone simultaneously holds these two viewpoints then, yes, that makes them hypocritical.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,610 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    _Dara_ wrote: »
    Great point actually!

    Newstalk can do this if they want, as I said in the George Hook thread, he wasn’t silenced. He could still get his POV across via other platforms. This is the same.

    Now whether this makes anyone look hypocritical depends on whether they thought Hook was silenced and simultaneously agree with this move by Newstalk. If anyone simultaneously holds these two viewpoints then, yes, that makes them hypocritical.

    George hook was removed from his job for something he said that was hurtful, fintan said something moronic, ridiculously hyperbolic and factually untrue and he as well as his employer refuse to apologise for or retract that, however George did apologise..... several times. The two situations as much people would like to believe are entirely different.


Advertisement
Advertisement