Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Issue with the 77A

  • 07-09-2017 06:15PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1


    Today i was waiting 20 mins on the 77a and when the bus arrived he said he is isnt driving through killinarden because of kids throwing stones at buses but then i had to walk home from the square and i seen a 77a drive past me in killinarden im very dissopointed with this bus sevice bus men are a joke nowadays. I am so annoyed i was told the 77a wasnt traveling through killinarden and i seen less than 10 mins later i see a 77a drive through killinarden. :( trasport for ireland ;) hahahaha divers justy want a easy job just not stopping in certain places. yous should stop the 27 from going through jobstown since ur buses are getting stoned at but no divers still go up there but refuse to go through killinarden. Just to say i hope divers nowadays that dnt take proper routes should get fired but im sure that wont happen hope all customers that use trasport for work and stuff stop getting busses and start using luas because at least they go to the designated routes.


«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Tickityboo


    cianb78 wrote: »
    Today i was waiting 20 mins on the 77a and when the bus arrived he said he is isnt driving through killinarden because of kids throwing stones at buses but then i had to walk home from the square and i seen a 77a drive past me in killinarden im very dissopointed with this bus sevice bus men are a joke nowadays. I am so annoyed i was told the 77a wasnt traveling through killinarden and i seen less than 10 mins later i see a 77a drive through killinarden. :( trasport for ireland ;) hahahaha divers justy want a easy job just not stopping in certain places. yous should stop the 27 from going through jobstown since ur buses are getting stoned at but no divers still go up there but refuse to go through killinarden. Just to say i hope divers nowadays that dnt take proper routes should get fired but im sure that wont happen hope all customers that use trasport for work and stuff stop getting busses and start using luas because at least they go to the designated routes.

    You do realise that buses are on GPS trackers and drivers can't just go where they like!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭KD345


    Very often they pull buses from an area for an hour or two until Gardai patrol the route. It was more than likely the bus behind yours was given the all clear to run the normal route.

    You'd be better off directing your anger at the parents of these kids and your local representatives who need to do more to protect your bus service.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭patrickbrophy18


    I had my first and only experience of this route today (or technically yesterday given that it was Thursday). Anyway, my issue with this route is the amount of detours it takes. It was all good up until turning left onto Castletymon Road. From here, it zigzagged through Avonmore Road, Seskin View Road, Old Bawn Road, Belgard Square North, Belgard Square West, Alderpark Court etc. :mad:

    All I can say is that I feel very sorry for those who frequently rely on it for getting to town. Some of the roads are heavily traffic calmed, not to mention the fact that there were plenty of tight junctions where the front of the bus ended up on the other side of the road. Having said that, it was a once off. So, it was a bit of an adventure! :rolleyes::D

    Bottom line, this route should be split into 2 or 3 dedicated variations!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,387 ✭✭✭brokenarms




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭howiya


    At the last Dublin Bus/Luas Community Forum held last Friday, NBRU representatives called the lack of community attendance at the meeting ‘atrocious’.

    Who are they expecting to attend on behalf of the "community"?

    54a also serves Killinarden. No mention of it in the article


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,387 ✭✭✭brokenarms


    howiya wrote: »
    Who are they expecting to attend on behalf of the "community"?

    54a also serves Killinarden. No mention of it in the article

    Probably local councillors . Plenty of them around there.

    Out in force for the water demonstration. Not bothered now by the looks of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭howiya




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭howiya


    brokenarms wrote: »
    Probably local councillors . Plenty of them around there.

    Out in force for the water demonstration. Not bothered now by the looks of it.
    What does plenty of them around there mean? Doesn't every area have local councillors?

    In another article Dublin Bus differentiate between local councillors and the community

    http://www.thejournal.ie/dublin-bus-tallaght-anti-social-behaviour-3586699-Sep2017/
    “Dublin Bus is committed to serving the area of west Tallaght and is working closely with An Garda Síochana, local elected representatives and the community through the community forum in the area.”

    Another article refers to an incident on Maplewood Road which could only involve the 56a, yet this route is not part of the union's action. 54a serves part of Killinarden and is not mentioned.

    Blessington Road has also seen trouble yet the 65 will not be curtailed.

    A lot of these incidents including today's curtailment have occurred before 6pm yet the union will cease driving in these areas from 6pm and on only three days of the week.

    The union's approach is quite bizarre. Either it's safe or it's not. If they decide it's not then that has to be respected. Safety at work and using public transport has to be paramount but this selective approach by the union is bizarre.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭KD345


    howiya wrote: »
    Who are they expecting to attend on behalf of the "community"?

    54a also serves Killinarden. No mention of it in the article

    The elected representatives of the area. Politicians, community leaders and local Gardai. They should be more active on this issue which is affecting thousands of commuters almost daily.

    The 54a and 65 do not directly travel through Killinarden. It is far easier for Gardai to monitor main roads than housing estates which is why they can continue a service on the N81 rather than through Killinarden Heights. I'm guessing patrolling the area in daylight is also easier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,863 ✭✭✭Xterminator


    I know for a fact the bus stops in tallaght had notices on them advising that anti social behaviour was threatening the service and asking locals to please make sure their children were not involved. Saw notices with my own eyes.

    IMO DB have to provide a safe work environment for their employees and customers, and this means they are justified in withdrawing services if repeated attacks occur.

    Where were the counsellors and parents when the anti social behaviour was not addressed? I have sympathy with affected residents, but they have a collective responsibility too to identify the gurriers and report them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,347 ✭✭✭GhostyMcGhost


    Same ****e is going on in Neilstown

    It's just not good enough and it's beyond time the parents were brought to task over their beloved angles


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,177 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Reduced dole for offences of the children would focus minds pretty bloody quick.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭howiya


    KD345 wrote: »
    The elected representatives of the area. Politicians, community leaders and local Gardai. They should be more active on this issue which is affecting thousands of commuters almost daily.

    The 54a and 65 do not directly travel through Killinarden. It is far easier for Gardai to monitor main roads than housing estates which is why they can continue a service on the N81 rather than through Killinarden Heights. I'm guessing patrolling the area in daylight is also easier.

    Gardai and councillors were at the meetings. Who are these community leaders? I'm living in Tallaght (not an affected part) 30 years and I don't know who the community leader is.

    I'm pretty sure the posters on bus stops another poster has referred to are something to do with councillors as I've seen them at their constituency office in Tallaght village too.

    If they're able to provide a service along the N81 surely they can keep the 77a and 65b going as far as Citywest without going through Killinarden.

    The 54a serves stops beyond the Square and serves Killinarden estate.

    56a has had trouble in Springfield but won't be pulled according to the article.

    The point I'm making is the union's approach seems a bit half and half. Either it's safe or its not. If they decide it's unsafe then they are well within their rights to stop driving past the Square but yet they are happy to let their colleagues drive in these same areas. IMO they should pull all the routes until the situation is resolved.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,387 ✭✭✭brokenarms


    howiya wrote: »
    Gardai and councillors were at the meetings. Who are these community leaders? I'm living in Tallaght (not an affected part) 30 years and I don't know who the community leader is.

    .

    Im not 100 percent sure on this but read that only 2 councillors showed up.

    I dont know how many are in the area but going by the link, there are more than two. http://www.sdcc.ie/council/councillors

    There are also lots of stand up people in that community from youth groups church groups and so on who need to be there the next time around. No bus in an area like that is nothing short than devastating and does not seem to be getting the attention it deserves.

    I think the stance the unions are taking is to cause least disruption the to working residents by stopping at 6pm. Hopefully most of those that do a 9 to 5 are home by then.
    My opinions by the way. Not anyone elses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,773 ✭✭✭SteM


    cianb78 wrote: »
    Today i was waiting 20 mins on the 77a and when the bus arrived he said he is isnt driving through killinarden because of kids throwing stones at buses but then i had to walk home from the square and i seen a 77a drive past me in killinarden im very dissopointed with this bus sevice bus men are a joke nowadays. I am so annoyed i was told the 77a wasnt traveling through killinarden and i seen less than 10 mins later i see a 77a drive through killinarden. :( trasport for ireland ;) hahahaha divers justy want a easy job just not stopping in certain places. yous should stop the 27 from going through jobstown since ur buses are getting stoned at but no divers still go up there but refuse to go through killinarden. Just to say i hope divers nowadays that dnt take proper routes should get fired but im sure that wont happen hope all customers that use trasport for work and stuff stop getting busses and start using luas because at least they go to the designated routes.


    Not sure what you're talking about the 27 for, I've seen lots of social media messages from DB where the 27 gets curtailed due to antisocial behaviour. Happens pretty frequently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭KD345


    howiya wrote: »
    Gardai and councillors were at the meetings. Who are these community leaders? I'm living in Tallaght (not an affected part) 30 years and I don't know who the community leader is.

    I'm pretty sure the posters on bus stops another poster has referred to are something to do with councillors as I've seen them at their constituency office in Tallaght village too.

    If they're able to provide a service along the N81 surely they can keep the 77a and 65b going as far as Citywest without going through Killinarden.

    The 54a serves stops beyond the Square and serves Killinarden estate.

    56a has had trouble in Springfield but won't be pulled according to the article.

    The point I'm making is the union's approach seems a bit half and half. Either it's safe or its not. If they decide it's unsafe then they are well within their rights to stop driving past the Square but yet they are happy to let their colleagues drive in these same areas. IMO they should pull all the routes until the situation is resolved.

    The two articles I read spoke of the disappointment from both Dublin Bus and Luas of a lack of representation at recent meetings. Tallaght has a great community spirit and lots of activists, this was evident at the recent water protests and bin disputes. I'm just shocked that an issue which affects thousands of people in their locality is not getting the same response from these people.

    The 54a operates beyond The Square turning at Whitestown Cross towards Kiltipper. It passes Killinarden but does not operate through the estate of Killinarden Heights. This area is served by the 65b and 77a.

    The 56a operates once an hour, it might be a case they can patrol this route by the time next bus is due. This is different to the 27 and 77a which operate every 10 minutes at times.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭howiya


    KD345 wrote: »
    The two articles I read spoke of the disappointment from both Dublin Bus and Luas of a lack of representation at recent meetings. Tallaght has a great community spirit and lots of activists, this was evident at the recent water protests and bin disputes. I'm just shocked that an issue which affects thousands of people in their locality is not getting the same response from these people.

    The 54a operates beyond The Square turning at Whitestown Cross towards Kiltipper. It passes Killinarden but does not operate through the estate of Killinarden Heights. This area is served by the 65b and 77a.

    The 56a operates once an hour, it might be a case they can patrol this route by the time next bus is due. This is different to the 27 and 77a which operate every 10 minutes at times.

    The bin and water charges were political issues and are entirely different. Do you think that Joe Bloggs on a water march has the power to stop these vandals? Maybe if the Gardai policed these bus routes with the same resources they gave to these marches those involved would be caught and stopped.

    You don't need to explain to me where the buses serve and don't serve.

    The 77a does not operate every 10 minutes at any time of the day.The 65b runs every hour similar to the 56a.

    Do you think these vandals won't touch the 54a when it suddenly becomes the nearest bus to them, a couple of minutes walk away at most??

    It's the inconsistency that gets me. A union is supposed to be for all its members, not a select few. What if one of their members is seriously hurt on one of the routes that is left running?

    As I said before all routes should be stopped at the square until problem goes away or is dealt with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 756 ✭✭✭liger


    howiya wrote: »
    Who are they expecting to attend on behalf of the "community"?

    54a also serves Killinarden. No mention of it in the article

    Estate management would be the local representatives, people that work out of the community centres and have lots of dealing with the councillors, gardai and management in DB.

    54A operate from Donnybrook while the 77a, 65b, 65 and 27 are Ringsend. (some 27s from clontarf)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,905 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    In reality buses shouldn't be taken out of these areas. They should place an enforced ban on loitering ie hanging around without good purpose after 6pm in these areas. Those found doing should be sent home or taken to the station that would certainly help solve the issue. I predict a Republican vigilante group to pop up and patrol the area if the guards don't don't do their job nip this in the bud. Might be the only way to get the word to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,347 ✭✭✭GhostyMcGhost


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    In reality buses shouldn't be taken out of these areas. They should place aneforced ban on loitering ie hanging around without good purpose after 6pm in these areas. Those found doing should be sent home or taken to the station that would certainly help solve the issue. I predict a Republican vigilante group to pop up and patrol the area if the guards don't don't do their job nip this in the bud. Might be the only way to get the word to them.

    So a curfew?

    But hang around in the city centre all you want at night?

    Maybe they should carry their public services card while they're at it


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,905 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    So a curfew?

    But hang around in the city centre all you want at night?

    Maybe they should carry their public services card while they're at it

    Not a curfew as such. If you've got a purpose to be out you can stay out and go about business if you don't you then you go home.

    A curfew infers that all minors should be at home by a certain time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,905 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    Not only is this dangerous for passengers and drivers and staff surely it costs DB quite a lot of money. All those windows smashed and buses vandalised. The money could surely be spent better off elsewhere.

    A thats has stones thrown at probably will only 3 or 4 passengers on it if its late at night paying what €2.60 with a leap card or €3.30 cash or is free on a pass. Is what €10 to €20 made at the most. A broken window would cost a few hundred to replace. So surely its in DBs interest not to run these routes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,773 ✭✭✭SteM


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    Not only is this dangerous for passengers and drivers and staff surely it costs DB quite a lot of money. All those windows smashed and buses vandalised. The money could surely be spent better off elsewhere.

    A thats has stones thrown at probably will only 3 or 4 passengers on it if its late at night paying what €2.60 with a leap card or €3.30 cash or is free on a pass. Is what €10 to €20 made at the most. A broken window would cost a few hundred to replace. So surely its in DBs interest not to run these routes.

    Dublin Bus are probably not even loosing that money to be honest. If someone pays €2.60 to go from Kevin's Street to jobstown but has to get off at the square they're still paying the €2.60. No one is going to not get the bus just because it terminates early.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 12,022 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    SteM wrote: »
    Dublin Bus are probably not even loosing that money to be honest. If someone pays €2.60 to go from Kevin's Street to jobstown but has to get off at the square they're still paying the €2.60. No one is going to not get the bus just because it terminates early.

    Remember that Dublin Bus won't get paid for journeys that they do not run.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭KD345


    devnull wrote: »
    Remember that Dublin Bus won't get paid for journeys that they do not run.

    Whilst this is the case, the Dublin Bus contract with the National Transport Authority clearly details the obligation on the company to operate their buses safely without risk to passengers. The ongoing problems on these routes, to which the NTA are aware, would certainly override the loss of service penalty.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,905 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    devnull wrote: »
    Remember that Dublin Bus won't get paid for journeys that they do not run.

    Does a curtailed or diverted service count as service not operated. Say if a bus is diverted due to roadworks or a parade etc. does this count as not operated. The 77a hasn't stopped operating its just been curtailed/diverted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭KD345


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    Does a curtailed or diverted service count as service not operated. Say if a bus is diverted due to roadworks or a parade etc. does this count as not operated. The 77a hasn't stopped operating its just been curtailed/diverted.

    There are penalties for not operating a full route, however there are exclusions for events such as roadworks, diversions and poor weather conditions.

    The company is also required to report security incidents and times/locations where buses have been curtailed because of incidents. The NTA would be very aware of these ongoing issues in Tallaght.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 12,022 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    KD345 wrote: »
    Whilst this is the case, the Dublin Bus contract with the National Transport Authority clearly details the obligation on the company to operate their buses safely without risk to passengers. The ongoing problems on these routes, to which the NTA are aware, would certainly override the loss of service penalty.

    If services are curtailed or diverted then I think that funding should still be supplied by the NTA in the most part, I was simply refering to the fact that if services were not running altogether then the company should not be funded for them.

    Certainly these services also should not be counted towards performance metrics and indicators however because that wouldn't be fair since it is due to factors outside the control of Dublin Bus and they need to run a safe service for their passengers and staff as you say.

    The problem with anti-social behaviour however is bigger than just a few buses being hit by stones and ridden on the back of, it's a problem throughout society in Ireland as a whole and needs to be tackled as so rather than being tackled as just a problem on a couple of bus routes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,905 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    So a curfew?

    But hang around in the city centre all you want at night?

    Maybe they should carry their public services card while they're at it

    Also a curfew in this sense generally only apllies to minors this would apply to minors. However my plan would to apply to anyone hanging around without good intent whether they 15 or 50.

    I would suggest that DB deploy security similar to the Luas on these routes to help curb this. While this may not curb the stone throwing issue in would deter on board incidents. As for stone throwing many security companies provide cars which could escourt buses through areas with high levels of anti social behavior. Fit the cars with CCTV and loudspeakers which would play something like "Gardai are on route please leave the area immediately".

    Prosecute the b@stards through CCTV evidence if over 18 if under 18 give them and their 'parents' the fright of their lives.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,833 ✭✭✭✭ThisRegard


    A police state is what you're suggesting, but only in certain areas?

    Your suggestions are bizarre, fit for dystopian movies is about it.


Advertisement
Advertisement