Werewolf XVI - Star Trek

04-09-2017 07:30PM

quickbeam wrote: »

Oh Mick! This is as clear as I can be.

I never said that???????????? I said no lynch for the first few days.

The risk today is far far greater then ever before, we never had the chance to lose a game on day 1 before with a no lynch option.

Necro · 04-09-2017 07:31PM

Jayop wrote: »

Can someone share the lynch form for me please. My link ain't working.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdRlgyflR8V3VRHJaHFoex_BBXtLcog5C_XpYfsvGYYzgnZlQ/viewform

04-09-2017 07:31PM

quickbeam wrote: »

Posting at exactly 7:30 so there's no accusation of screwing the figures. Analysis will follow shortly:

Top 3:
MicksJaguar 10
partyjungle 6
y0ssar1an22 4

So we cant get the other info? who were the rest????

Necro · 04-09-2017 07:33PM

Deleted User wrote: »

So we cant get the other info? who were the rest????

I had 2 anyways. Kolido and Strawbs with 2 or 3 as well? Lordy with 1? I think she's gonna post the stats shortly

quickbeam · 04-09-2017 07:33PM

Full list of #FFA1s:

Player FFA1 vote FFA1 vote FFA1 vote Post No(s)
patrickSTARR Lord TSC Necrominus Guffy 538
Necrominus MicksJaguar partyjungle Quickbeam 666
beakerjoe The_Valeyard MicksJaguar Tritium 736
Kolido MicksJaguar Strawberry Milkshake MrsFlushdraw 760
Barney92 MicksJaguar partyjungle y0ssar1an22 783
quickbeam partyjungle Tritium MicksJaguar 788
sKeith MicksJaguar Kolido grumpylumpy 790 & 798
Lord TSC partyjungle MicksJaguar 800
Guffy partyjungle MicksJaguar grumpylumpy 802
sullivlo MicksJaguar partyjungle Necrominus 808
Tritium mahamageehad Strawberry Milkshake y0ssar1an22 825
Ectoplasm The_Valeyard Strawberry Milkshake y0ssar1an22 840
Strawberry Milkshake CrosstownK Kolido Tritium 849
Digital Solitude y0ssar1an22 MicksJaguar CrosstownK 854 & 860
partyjungle beakerjoe mahamageehad Guffy 866
y0ssar1an22 did not vote for FFA
Jayop did not vote for FFA
Micksjaguar did not vote for FFA
Mahamageehad did not vote for FFA
The_Valeyard did not vote for FFA
Crosstownk did not vote for FFA
Grumpylumpy did not vote for FFA
Drumpot did not vote for FFA
MrsFlushdraw did not vote for FFA

Full tally:

Player Total Votes
MicksJaguar 10
partyjungle 6
y0ssar1an22 4
Strawberry Milkshake 3
Tritium 3
grumpylumpy 2
Necrominus 2
The_Valeyard 2
Guffy 2
Kolido 2
mahamageehad 2
CrosstownK 2
Lord TSC 1
MrsFlushdraw 1
Quickbeam 1
beakerjoe 1

Jayop · 04-09-2017 07:35PM

Thanks guys.

quickbeam · 04-09-2017 07:35PM

Deleted User wrote: »

I never said that???????????? I said no lynch for the first few days.

The risk today is far far greater then ever before, we never had the chance to lose a game on day 1 before with a no lynch option.

And I said there's always a risk. I even capitalised "always" for emphasis, see?. And we could lose the game any day that Q is lynched. Today is no different.

Anyway, I'm not labouring the point any more. We disagree on tactics. Fair enough. But you can't say I didn't give reasons, just because you disagree with my reasons.

Guffy · 04-09-2017 07:36PM

[Deleted User] wrote: »

#FFA1

Mahama - need more info on her but something is rotten in the state of denmark

Ah hang on now. I had assumed from your response that you spotted something and thought she was good and didnt want to reveal it so didn't push it. This makes your pull back earlier even more confusing??

Coupled with your other evasive posts its just strange. Im beginning to worry that you are Q now but as i said im not to fussed about the Q prize.

quickbeam · 04-09-2017 07:37PM

Deleted User wrote: »

So we cant get the other info? who were the rest????

Am I on some sort of partial block with you?????

quickbeam wrote: »

Posting at exactly 7:30 so there's no accusation of screwing the figures. Analysis will follow shortly:

If I'd done it all together I'd not have got it out at 7:30.

Necro · 04-09-2017 07:37PM

I suppose the three nominated have between now and 8.59pm to convince us who to vote for now??

04-09-2017 07:38PM

Kolido wrote: »

1. Please see post #841
2. Sound more like revenge than a reason I'm bad
3. I'm a he

1) yeah, you say it was sarcasm on my part. It wasn't sarcasm, it was a genuine question about a strategy for taking out Q.
2) I'm a red shirted NRV. Of course I'm going to look at who's accusing me. And when their reasons are complete lies..... only players who will be lying are????
3) My apologies. I thought you had just forgotten your beauticians appointment to get the fur waxed off.

04-09-2017 07:38PM

quickbeam wrote: »

And I said there's always a risk. I even capitalised "always" for emphasis, see?. And we could lose the game any day that Q is lynched. Today is no different.

Anyway, I'm not labouring the point any more. We disagree on tactics. Fair enough. But you can't say I didn't give reasons, just because you disagree with my reasons.

But you didnt give reasons you said we shouldnt do it untill the end I never said that. Saying something is always a risk isn't a reason against.

When you are in a good position to win the game i.e 50/50 giving urself a chance to lose is a bad idea especially when its more or less random. That being said Im glad the ffa went ahead and it wasn't a blind vote so thats something at least.

04-09-2017 07:39PM

quickbeam wrote: »

Am I on some sort of partial block with you?????

If I'd done it all together I'd not have got it out at 7:30.

Hurry up ffs :P:P:P That one I did reply to mid sentence but I read the rest of your posts

Kolido · 04-09-2017 07:41PM

If anyone thinks Q could be any of the top 3, shout now.

FWIF, I think Vale is Q

Drumpot · 04-09-2017 07:42PM

The_Valeyard wrote: »

Hmmmmm....Be wary of Borg claiming to be Q. Could be a desperate way to survive another day.

Deleted User wrote: »

So just it was a bad idea, the only thing you argued against was something I said not to do with was no lynch untill the end. You gave no reasoning why its a bad idea for the first few nights

Sometimes , when I try to understand a persons motives I play a little game. I assume the worst. What's the worst reason they could possibly have for saying what they say.

Then I ask myself , how well does that reason explain what they say.

So tell me, what's the worst reason why you might want no lynchs?

Why might it be in your interest to not have lynchs?

Why might you place so much emphasis on this strategy?

Ahh no, just F**king with you , was during to post that GOT dialogue and you gave me the opportunity!

crosstownk · 04-09-2017 07:42PM

I stated earlier that I was between two minds about Patrick*. He seemed very pushy earlier for whatever reason but it smelt to me like a wolf trying to be villagery. At other times I wasn't so sure.

PJ is also suss at the moment flip-flopping back and forth on mahama but he seems a tad confident - so maybe he's Q. I can't be sure, obviously.

For now, my vote will most likely go on Patrick*, although I may change my mind if something else comes up.

04-09-2017 07:42PM

So, mick, party, yosser. What say you?

Drumpot · 04-09-2017 07:43PM

Accidentally quoted vale aswell but can't edit out!

Baggly · 04-09-2017 07:43PM

Drumpot wrote:

Accidentally quoted vale aswell but can't edit out!

Gold star.

y0ssar1an22 · 04-09-2017 07:44PM

if i did get lynched, at the very least i could appreciate the irony:

yoss: vote no lynch cos there's a 75% chance of getting a villager
others: hey, thats a bad reason not to vote, i'm gonna vote you

yoss gets lycned.

yoss is a red shirt

Necro · 04-09-2017 07:44PM

Strawberry Milkshake wrote: »

So, mick, party, yosser. What say you?

I think there's a wolf within those 3 actually. This worked out well in my opinion.

04-09-2017 07:44PM

Strawberry Milkshake wrote: »

So, mick, party, yosser. What say you?

Go way and pelt **** at yourselves

y0ssar1an22 · 04-09-2017 07:45PM

i will now be voting sully for the following post...

Necro · 04-09-2017 07:46PM

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

if i did get lynched, at the very least i could appreciate the irony:

yoss: vote no lynch cos there's a 75% chance of getting a villager
others: hey, thats a bad reason not to vote, i'm gonna vote you

yoss gets lycned.

yoss is a red shirt

We can't ALL be red shirts though.

What are your thoughts on PJ and Mick??

Also interested to hear PJ and Mick's thoughts on their fellow racees

y0ssar1an22 · 04-09-2017 07:46PM

sullivlo wrote: »

Wanting to be lynched? Q?

Or wolfy chats with Michael in the wolfs den? So who are you yoss, the queen?

that there. just dont sit right with me

quickbeam · 04-09-2017 07:48PM

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

i will now be voting sully for the following post...

What??

Necro · 04-09-2017 07:49PM

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

that there. just dont sit right with me

Actually... good point this. Sully's FFA was...

sullivlo MicksJaguar partyjungle Necrominus

y0ssar1an22 · 04-09-2017 07:49PM

Necrominus wrote: »

We can't ALL be red shirts though.

What are your thoughts on PJ and Mick??

Also interested to hear PJ and Mick's thoughts on their fellow racees

pj was fairly forceful today in his wanting everyone to do a ffa

mick wanted no votes, for a different reason to me (i think)

i dont find anything too sus about them

04-09-2017 07:51PM

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

pj was fairly forceful today in his wanting everyone to do a ffa

mick wanted no votes, for a different reason to me (i think)

i dont find anything too sus about them

I agreed with your reasons too, I think I mentioned them in one of my posts but everyone kept fighting me on the q side of it so I ended up talking about that mainly.

y0ssar1an22 · 04-09-2017 07:54PM

Jayop wrote: »

I only quick read up till I showed up. Not really got anything other than Patrick being ott with his posting.

I don't know who to vote for tonight so I think I'm going no vote.

people using the 'no vote' reason for the lynch, why not include jayo? where's the consistency? again, wolves just looking for token reasons to include people in their FFA

Werewolf XVI - Star Trek

Comments