Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2017

1161162164166167332

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭bangkok


    Adamocovic wrote: »
    I'd love for us to get Barkley. Once touted as next big thing. Still only 23 and if we could bring him in with a chip on his shoulder and a manger that can work with him he could be back to his best.

    Has the talent just seems to have lost the confidence and consistency lately.

    where would you play him? not good enough for a start at man utd imo


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,292 ✭✭✭Adamocovic


    So people still hold hope Barkley can be top drawer :eek:

    23 years old.
    6 years experience in PL.
    150 caps in PL.
    22 English caps.

    6 goals and 8 assists in a season where majority of fans seem to think he's a lost cause and playing terribly.

    I certainly put myself in the category that Barkley can be a top drawer player. He has time on his side and shown enough flashes to suggest he's capable of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,292 ✭✭✭Adamocovic


    bangkok wrote: »
    where would you play him? not good enough for a start at man utd imo

    He's capable of playing centre mid, right, left or further forward. Versatile.

    I agree on current form he wouldn't be starting but if we could get him at a decent price and work with him he could turn out to be some very good business. Could go the other way too.

    All hypothetical, and truth be told I don't see us making a move for him, he'll probably go to someone like Spurs, end up having a blinder and us all scratching our heads :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,726 ✭✭✭posturingpat


    He hasn't got anything resembling footballing intelligence and is at his level currently, how anybody can consider him a good signing i don't know.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭bangkok


    Adamocovic wrote: »
    23 years old.
    6 years experience in PL.
    150 caps in PL.
    22 English caps.

    6 goals and 8 assists in a season where majority of fans seem to think he's a lost cause and playing terribly.

    I certainly put myself in the category that Barkley can be a top drawer player. He has time on his side and shown enough flashes to suggest he's capable of it.

    theo walcott....

    11 years experience in pl
    264 caps in pl
    47 English caps

    19 goals last season

    ask the majority of Arsenal supporters and they would be glad to see the back of him.

    Another english player just like Barkley who was all hype, no substance


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭bangkok


    Mendy done deal to city.... brilliant signing for them, class player


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,493 ✭✭✭Quandary


    I know he's not a DM but I'd love to see us get Renato Sanches on a loan deal with an option to buy. I thought he was incredible at the Euros. Still only 19 too!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,292 ✭✭✭Adamocovic


    bangkok wrote: »
    theo walcott....

    11 years experience in pl
    264 caps in pl
    47 English caps

    19 goals last season

    ask the majority of Arsenal supporters and they would be glad to see the back of him.

    Another english player just like Barkley who was all hype, no substance

    Walcott is 28. Barkley 23. How can you predict Barkley will follow in Theo Walcotts path? Think it's a bit of a stretch of an example of what can go wrong and way too early in Barkley's career to talk as if he's done. Walcott truth be told hasn't been that bad at times, just never lived up to the potential, has very little to do with Barkleys career.

    We are straying off topic a little here but the final thing I will say is that while we both are entitled to our opinions and truth be told you can argue either side for Barkley, valid points on both ends whether he will make it, I think bringing Walcott's career into this as a reason for Barkley to fail is quite a stretch and I'm afraid I can't get behind that argument at all.

    Sure Walcott is a cautionary tale but is Barkley destined to emulate his career due to the fact they are both English and a highly rated youngster? You talk about Barkley as if he is already finished "all hype, no substance". If we want to say Walcott and Barkley are just alike surely give Barkley another 5 years to catch up on him.

    Truth be told can go either way. But I'm going to bookmark this and see how he compares.
    Long haul baby.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 42,996 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lord TSC


    Lads, for whatever reason, tensions are running high for the last 24 hours, so I'll ask both sides to take a breather, and get back to talking about United, not each other.

    And I stress, this is for both sides; anyone who took initial "shots" and people who want to vent about them. Both sides are entitled to ignore the others, but drop the petty childishness of "He said, she said", and the likes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,726 ✭✭✭posturingpat


    So... Arda Turan? What's the story with him? Surely he's done at Barca? Imagine getting him at a low price and him going back to his Atletico form :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭bangkok


    Adamocovic wrote: »
    Walcott is 28. Barkley 23. How can you predict Barkley will follow in Theo Walcotts path? Think it's a bit of a stretch of an example of what can go wrong and way too early in Barkley's career to talk as if he's done. Walcott truth be told hasn't been that bad at times, just never lived up to the potential, has very little to do with Barkleys career.

    We are straying off topic a little here but the final thing I will say is that while we both are entitled to our opinions and truth be told you can argue either side for Barkley, valid points on both ends whether he will make it, I think bringing Walcott's career into this as a reason for Barkley to fail is quite a stretch and I'm afraid I can't get behind that argument at all.

    Sure Walcott is a cautionary tale but is Barkley destined to emulate his career due to the fact they are both English and a highly rated youngster? You talk about Barkley as if he is already finished "all hype, no substance". If we want to say Walcott and Barkley are just alike surely give Barkley another 5 years to catch up on him.

    Truth be told can go either way. But I'm going to bookmark this and see how he compares.
    Long haul baby.


    Barkley is a good player, no question about it, but he is not good enough for Man Utd, decent squad player but for the prices quoted, no thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,559 ✭✭✭bryangiggsy


    bangkok wrote: »
    team that will probably start opening day of the season......


    de gea


    valencia
    smalling
    bailly
    darmian


    herrera----fellaini----pogba


    mkhitarayan


    rashford
    lukaku


    still lacking that something imo, balance isnt quiet right yet

    Still lacking something imo???!!! its the same team as last year plus lukaku!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Adamocovic wrote: »
    23 years old.
    6 years experience in PL.
    150 caps in PL.
    22 English caps.

    6 goals and 8 assists in a season where majority of fans seem to think he's a lost cause and playing terribly.

    I certainly put myself in the category that Barkley can be a top drawer player. He has time on his side and shown enough flashes to suggest he's capable of it.

    I think Barkley could turn it around BUT...

    For an attacking role we already have Pogba, Herrera and Pereira - as well as Feillain, Lingard, Mata, Mkhitaryan who can play that role. I just don't see the need for him.

    Sanches, while even less proven and more of a risk is more of a combative central midfielder, and would fit in the squad needs (imo) of United, where Barkley does not.

    I don't think either sort out the defensive midfield requirement United need to sort as a priority (imo) but if we were looking at adding an additional midfield option then Sanches would be a far better pick (position/role wise) than Barkley - though there are question marks over both in terms of actual performances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,292 ✭✭✭Adamocovic


    So... Arda Turan? What's the story with him? Surely he's done at Barca? Imagine getting him at a low price and him going back to his Atletico form :D

    What about Strootman ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Feillain... what on earth were my fingers with that one!?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,726 ✭✭✭posturingpat


    Adamocovic wrote: »
    What about Strootman ;)

    I was actually thinking about him the other day,still a good player(not that i'm suggesting we should go for him)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭bangkok


    Still lacking something imo???!!! its the same team as last year plus lukaku!!!

    Lindelof will be centre back, not sure he will start opening day of season, also another signing or 2 could come in so the starting 11 could change


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,758 Mod ✭✭✭✭DM_7


    At this stage, unless a player arriving would be an immediate first choice, what is the point?

    Its grand for a Bayern or Real to fill out the squad but United need to improve he first choice options.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,292 ✭✭✭Adamocovic


    DM_7 wrote: »
    At this stage, unless a player arriving would be an immediate first choice, what is the point?

    Its grand for a Bayern or Real to fill out the squad but United need to improve he first choice options.

    I think the initial conversation started while considering Herrera getting injured. If he does what are our options for that position.

    Talk of Carrick and Fellaini being the only real options. Can throw Jones into that too. But Phil can play anywhere if needed.

    That's why a discussion of CM options in market is floating around. But I think I just ended it.
    Phil Jones the unbreakable object to anchor the midfield.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    DM_7 wrote: »
    At this stage, unless a player arriving would be an immediate first choice, what is the point?

    Its grand for a Bayern or Real to fill out the squad but United need to improve he first choice options.

    The squad, imo, is lacking, as much as the first team is.

    I would certainly say we need a first choice defensive midfielder signed before anyone else - no argument there imo - but I would also say there is room in the squad for additions beyond the first team. Also, a player like Sanches, you would hope, would develop towards the potential they showed, which would put them bang in line for a first team spot.

    A couple of years ago if you had said our midfield would be Matic (for example) Pogba and Sanches we'd have been delighted. Maybe Sanches won't reach the levels people though - but if he was a supplementary signing to improve the options (and hopefully quality) in midfield I'd be all for it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Adamocovic wrote: »
    I think the initial conversation started while considering Herrera getting injured. If he does what are our options for that position.

    Talk of Carrick and Fellaini being the only real options. Can throw Jones into that too. But Phil can play anywhere if needed.

    That's why a discussion of CM options in market is floating around. But I think I just ended it.
    Phil Jones the unbreakable object to anchor the midfield.

    I'd see Pereira as the most obvious replacement for Herrera, if we can get a proper DM (As I don't want to see either Herrera or Pereira there).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,766 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I wouldn't touch Sanches we have our own young midfielder actually coming off a good season abroad rather than a sh*t season. I'd give Pereira a chance over signing Sanches all day long.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,609 ✭✭✭xtal191


    Bailly got a 3 match ban from Europe, will miss the Super Cup and opening Champions League match.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,325 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    bangkok wrote: »
    team that will probably start opening day of the season......


    de gea


    valencia
    smalling
    bailly
    darmian


    herrera----fellaini----pogba


    mkhitarayan


    rashford
    lukaku


    still lacking that something imo, balance isnt quiet right yet

    A defensive midfielder who can sit and protect the defense. If there isn't one signed by the time the league starts we should go with 3 center backs to cover for the fact we don't have a defensive midfielder. Whatever happens Fellaini shouldn't be starting anyway.

    I'd go

    De Gea


    Bailly---Lindelof----Smalling

    Valencia
    Darmian

    Herrera
    Pogba


    Mkhitarayan


    Lukaku
    Martial

    That side could really do with a bit of attacking threat down the left as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    pjohnson wrote: »
    I wouldn't touch Sanches we have our own young midfielder actually coming off a good season abroad rather than a sh*t season. I'd give Pereira a chance over signing Sanches all day long.

    I think we lack numbers in central midfield and could do with both.

    If we went with a standard three man midfield with a DM we would have, imo, a first choice of:

    DM
    ---Herrera
    Pogba.

    Backing that up - 36 year old Carrick, Fellaini and Pereira. I think you could add Sanches to that. Pereira could also play a more attacking role. With a DM behind them I could see Pereira and Sanches complimenting each other. I don't think it would need to be an either/or scenario.

    If Sanches worked out, you would then have your replacement for Carrick ready to go for next season, when I assume Carrick will be gone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    xtal191 wrote: »
    Bailly got a 3 match ban from Europe, will miss the Super Cup and opening Champions League match.

    Its amazing that has only been confirmed now... what is it? 3 months later?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,140 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    So people still hold hope Barkley can be top drawer :eek:

    Should be specific in saying it's not people, it's just me.

    It's not a justifiable opinion either, just can't shake the idea there is a class midfielder in there that has just been horribly mismanaged.

    Not that I believe Jose is the man to do it, just think he's a quality player that if he learned consistency and some decision making, could be a gem.

    But I appreciate it's against the grain and against popular theory at this stage considering the evidence there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,140 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    bangkok wrote: »
    where would you play him? not good enough for a start at man utd imo

    For me while yes, he wouldn't get into the team, I'd hope he'd learn in a stronger environment and take grasp of his opportunities. It's essentially a big step up that would be somewhat undeserved many would say, but there is incredible talent there.

    In my head, that wonderful place, if many variables clicked he would form a midfield three with Pogba and a holding DM, replacing Herrera.

    It's all pie in the sky stuff from me, with no tangible evidence or hypothesis apart from my own feelings towards him, but sure isn't that all part of it. For no logical reason becoming infatuated or considered to a player that you want to do well or think can do well.

    Potentially a part of it is me getting to sit back, legs reclined and giving a lovely look of "told you so" when he turns into a monster player, but all evidence suggest that is unlikely to this point.

    Do think he is being harshly treated by Koeman last season, him being dropped from England was extreme and that the critique he gets is a bit overblown in the general media, which feeds its way into the narrative. He had a pretty good season all round last year, and he is a very good player. Problem he endures is that he was cast as the next best thing, and anything but is being viewed as poor, him not harnessing his potential, or not being good enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,140 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    Adamocovic wrote: »
    What about Strootman ;)

    ****ing Fergie, could have had Strootman wrapped up for a bargain and our deep holding midfielder problem sorted for years.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,140 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    The squad, imo, is lacking, as much as the first team is.

    I would certainly say we need a first choice defensive midfielder signed before anyone else - no argument there imo - but I would also say there is room in the squad for additions beyond the first team. Also, a player like Sanches, you would hope, would develop towards the potential they showed, which would put them bang in line for a first team spot.

    A couple of years ago if you had said our midfield would be Matic (for example) Pogba and Sanches we'd have been delighted. Maybe Sanches won't reach the levels people though - but if he was a supplementary signing to improve the options (and hopefully quality) in midfield I'd be all for it.

    Our midfield has been garbage for years in fairness, so it's not going to take much to make things look better.

    Bringing in Schneiderlan and Schweinsteiger in that summer window felt like a godsend. It's incredible how neglected our midfield has been and either shows it's an overvalued position in the modern game (Ferguson could have addressed it many times but instead would target strikers or wide players) or it's actually really difficult to find brilliant ones.

    I'd say it's the latter, cause I'll never not think the centre of the pitch is the most important function in a team


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement