Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

So it's the 12th of July tomorrow. Will the North ever not be sectarian?

13468923

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,611 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,082 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    It doesn't affect us because some people can turn a blind eye.
    If half the energy put into undermining the nationalist/republican side was put into lobbying for genuine human rights and normality then we wouldn't have the problem.

    People thought that suprematist marching was an intractable problem, but with fair policing and adherence to the law that problem is diminishing.
    WE in the south have to lobby for this(politically supported expressions of racism and bigotry) to be stamped out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    The entire Unionist community is not bigoted and anti Irish - woman - and LGBT.
    No, but they are Unionist.
    Unification isn't like joining the EU, it involves an actual change of country; many (most?) people intertwine their their nationality into the very core of their identity and cannot separate them.

    For them, being told that their country is now Ireland and not the UK is as abhorrent as being told that they're now a girl and not a boy.

    This doesn't really apply to nationalists, because NI has always been part of the UK - they're not being asked to accept a change.

    It's exactly the kind of thing that has the potential to turn a reasonable unionist into an angry unionist and an extremist.

    Reunification worked in Germany because the time of separation was relatively short and practically everyone in E.Germany considered themselves German rather than Soviet. Those conditions don't apply in NI, a significant part of the population, perhaps even a majority, don't consider themselves or their land to be Irish.

    Any unification proposal needs to contain looong plans that satisfy as many people as possible and not just a majority.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,611 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    gooch2k9 wrote: »
    Sure up in the north there are areas where local GP centres have shut, reduced hours in others. Apparently money is there but because Stormont isn't up it can't be allocated.

    The money can be allocated by civil servants. The way NI is run results in it having an annual deficit if 9 billion. This isn't sustainable. Instead of building bonfires with effigies of ethicities they hate they could work on attracting investment?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,082 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    seamus wrote: »
    No, but they are Unionist.
    Unification isn't like joining the EU, it involves an actual change of country; many (most?) people intertwine their their nationality into the very core of their identity and cannot separate them.

    For them, being told that their country is now Ireland and not the UK is as abhorrent as being told that they're now a girl and not a boy.

    This doesn't really apply to nationalists, because NI has always been part of the UK - they're not being asked to accept a change.

    It's exactly the kind of thing that has the potential to turn a reasonable unionist into an angry unionist and an extremist.

    Reunification worked in Germany because the time of separation was relatively short and practically everyone in E.Germany considered themselves German rather than Soviet. Those conditions don't apply in NI, a significant part of the population, perhaps even a majority, don't consider themselves or their land to be Irish.

    Any unification proposal needs to contain looong plans that satisfy as many people as possible and not just a majority.

    Unionism is a political stance. Political stances can change and do change.
    Nationalism/republicanism is also a stance and was in a state of abeyance in northern Ireland.
    That has changed rapidly with the prospect of Brexit and increasing frustration with the failure of the GFA to deliver. (See recent elections and the disappearance of the SDLP)

    Unionism is not uniformly strong, if it was, the north would long ago have faced the Armageddon that unionist political leaders warn about.
    Most Unionists get on with it, see 'fleg' and marching issues. Most unionists are pragmatic in the end. 'Never, Never Never, well maybe' would be a more apt slogan for them.
    The collapse of the subsidised northern state will usher in a new way of looking at their position. Ask any 'unionist' farmer how they really view the future.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,611 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,006 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    seamus wrote: »
    Eh, no thanks.

    I don't want to force the other 49% to join a country they don't want to be part of. Peace and safety on the island is more important than the colour of some flags or where a border line is drawn.

    Come back to me with a two-thirds majority and then you might be onto something.


    no . 51% vote for a ui then it must happen. those who don't want to be part of ireland can go back to britain.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,082 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    There is nothing to fear in the assimilation of the real Orange culture. What has to be removed is the bigoted sectarian culture. Because it does affect us all. That is if we have any empathy for fellow islanders/citizens living with it.

    As I say, there has always been some who can turn a blind eye to that. A lot (and a significant amount) won't turn a blind eye.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭smurgen


    our own papers are so politically biased that we have to leave it to the Guaridan to report the true nature of last night's bonfires https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jul/12/northern-ireland-police-investigate-hate-crimes-over-loyalist-bonfires-12-july


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,256 ✭✭✭Yourself isit


    Bambi wrote: »
    TBH this is why loyalisms rabid hatred doesn't shock us, the media in the republic have desperately punted the "they're as bad as each other" line for as long as I've been around. It's only when loyalists direct their vitriol at gays, polish and such that your Irish Times reading punter becomes uncomfortable

    Yes. And this year the DUP exist for the first time in the conciousness of many in the "mainland".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    no . 51% vote for a ui then it must happen. those who don't want to be part of ireland can go back to britain.
    The other 49% didn't come from Britain. Northern Ireland is their homeland. Why should they be forced out? Isn't that exactly what happened during the plantations? How does repeating the past make the future better?
    Unionism is a political stance. Political stances can change and do change.
    Nationalism is also a political stance. I think you're understating what unionism is tbh. Many if not most unionists identify as British. Telling them they're no longer British and are now Irish is as horrifying to them as if I told you that you were no longer Irish and are now British.

    It's an attack on their core identity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    smurgen wrote: »
    our own papers are so politically biased that we have to leave it to the Guaridan to report the true nature of last night's bonfires https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jul/12/northern-ireland-police-investigate-hate-crimes-over-loyalist-bonfires-12-july
    I'm not sure that's solely the reasoning.

    On the one hand we're a bit jaded. We've always known that NI was stuck in the dark ages and that sectarian hatred, racism and bigotry is rife. So none of this is shocking.

    There's also a desire to not stir the pot. Anti-loyalist (or pro-Nationalist) reporting in the South has the potential to incite anger and violence. So media have for a long time done their best to tread the line rather than be accused of bias or incitement. Rightly or wrongly, it makes sense.

    Neither apply to the UK media. The DUP is only now relevant on the mainland because they're part of the Government and so the media is shining a spotlight on what the DUP and their supporters engage in. And for most of the UK it's shocking.

    And with no republican violence taking place, or even threatening, they have nothing to lose by being harsh and critical of loyalists.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,266 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    The entire Unionist community is not bigoted and anti Irish - woman - and LGBT.

    That may be the case, but the empty vessels make the most noise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭smurgen


    seamus wrote: »
    smurgen wrote: »
    our own papers are so politically biased that we have to leave it to the Guaridan to report the true nature of last night's bonfires https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jul/12/northern-ireland-police-investigate-hate-crimes-over-loyalist-bonfires-12-july
    I'm not sure that's solely the reasoning.

    On the one hand we're a bit jaded. We've always known that NI was stuck in the dark ages and that sectarian hatred, racism and bigotry is rife. So none of this is shocking.

    There's also a desire to not stir the pot. Anti-loyalist (or pro-Nationalist) reporting in the South has the potential to incite anger and violence. So media have for a long time done their best to tread the line rather than be accused of bias or incitement. Rightly or wrongly, it makes sense.

    Neither apply to the UK media. The DUP is only now relevant on the mainland because they're part of the Government and so the media is shining a spotlight on what the DUP and their supporters engage in. And for most of the UK it's shocking.

    And with no republican violence taking place, or even threatening, they have nothing to lose by being harsh and critical of loyalists.
    Could they not just report the facts and leave people down the south make up their own minds? If Sinn Fein were linked to open displays of biggotry like this it would be all over the independent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,365 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    smurgen wrote: »
    Could they not just report the facts and leave people down the south make up their own minds? If Sinn Fein were linked to open displays of biggotry like this it would be all over the independent.


    Is there anything new in what happened this year? its just the same old pig-headed bigotry from the unionists isn't it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    seamus wrote: »

    Nationalism is also a political stance. I think you're understating what unionism is tbh. Many if not most unionists identify as British. Telling them they're no longer British and are now Irish is as horrifying to them as if I told you that you were no longer Irish and are now British.

    It's an attack on their core identity.

    I do enjoy your willingness to lecture others on things you don't have a clue about

    In the event of a United Ireland the PUL types will remain British citizens as will their descendants if they choose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,365 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Bambi wrote: »
    I do enjoy your willingness to lecture others on things you don't have a clue about

    In the event of a United Ireland the PUL types will remain British citizens as will their descendants if they choose.


    Yes but they will have to answer to the government in dublin. not sure they would be too keen on that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Bambi wrote: »
    I do enjoy your willingness to lecture others on things you don't have a clue about

    In the event of a United Ireland the PUL types will remain British citizens as will their descendants if they choose.
    And the Sinn Fein "types" are Irish citizens now and their descendents if they choose. So why do they want a United Ireland at all?

    Have a think about that and you might realise why unionists wouldn't want a UI, regardless of what citizenship they get to keep.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    seamus wrote: »
    The other 49% didn't come from Britain. Northern Ireland is their homeland. Why should they be forced out? Isn't that exactly what happened during the plantations? How does repeating the past make the future better?

    Nationalism is also a political stance. I think you're understating what unionism is tbh. Many if not most unionists identify as British. Telling them they're no longer British and are now Irish is as horrifying to them as if I told you that you were no longer Irish and are now British.

    It's an attack on their core identity.

    They could still be British in a UI.

    There is nothing in the GFA that insists someone denounces or gives up their citizenship.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭6541


    Recently as a Southerner on holidays in a resort in Spain the following occurred. I was in a late bar ordering drinks standing next to some Northern people, people would have had a lot of beer on board at this stage. Anyway I ordered my drink, then this northern bird turns to me and asks me what part of Ireland I am from. I respond, she goes mental, tell me she is sick of ye Irish Fenian's etc. This abuse lasted a good 2 minutes. I am very spatially aware when it comes to violence, out of the corner of my eye I see big blokes in her company aligning themselves for a cheap knockout punch. I about turn and leave the bar ASAP.

    I have never experienced such hate, never. It was totally down to me being Irish.
    I am not used to dealing with filth like that and I also wonder if a few Northern Nationalist who are used to dealing with bigots were in the bar would it have worked out differently.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,611 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Rick Shaw wrote: »
    They could still be British in a UI.

    There is nothing in the GFA that insists someone denounces or gives up their citizenship.
    See my post above. Republicans are Irish in the UK. So why do they want a UI? The same reason why unionists wouldn't accept being British in a UI.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 210 ✭✭Ce he sin


    tigger123 wrote: »
    If I was a UK citizen I'd be pretty f*ckin pissed off at the Tory's chucking a billion pound bribe at the DUP to keep themselves in power.

    Was in Belfast last year for a bit. Weird vibe in the place, feels like part of it is moving on though. A lot of racist taxi drivers too.

    Taxi drivers the world over tend to be somewhat to the right of Genghis Khan and not enamoured of anyone of a different race to themselves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭Syphonax


    6541 wrote: »
    Recently as a Southerner on holidays in a resort in Spain the following occurred. I was in a late bar ordering drinks standing next to some Northern people, people would have had a lot of beer on board at this stage. Anyway I ordered my drink, then this northern bird turns to me and asks me what part of Ireland I am from. I respond, she goes mental, tell me she is sick of ye Irish Fenian's etc. This abuse lasted a good 2 minutes. I am very spatially aware when it comes to violence, out of the corner of my eye I see big blokes in her company aligning themselves for a cheap knockout punch. I about turn and leave the bar ASAP.

    I have never experienced such hate, never. It was totally down to me being Irish.
    I am not used to dealing with filth like that and I also wonder if a few Northern Nationalist who are used to dealing with bigots were in the bar would it have worked out differently.


    Wondering did you refer to her directly as a northern bird? Yes there are yobs like this on both sides and if there had of been similar nationalist yobs it might have turned out differently, like a mini riot with you as a tennis ball in the middle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭Syphonax


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    Huh?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 210 ✭✭Ce he sin


    False equivalence. Nationalists haven't created a summer-long celebrated culture around being anti-Protestant/Unionist/British.

    The north needs to be better regulated and policed. A simple law requiring planning permission for flags to placed on public property, or kerbstone painting, would push outward expressions of sectarianism, paramilitarism, territory marking, into controlled ghettos where it could be ignored by the wider population.


    There should also be a concerted move toward secular schools with a neutral curriculum.

    Failing that just get the +50% vote for unification and pull the plaster off quickly.

    How are you going to get your 50%+1 vote though? They hold opinion polls up there on the subject now and again and the number in favour of unification tends to be in the mid 30%s. Which would suggest a fair number of the supposedly nationalist community aren't!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    seamus wrote: »
    See my post above. Republicans are Irish in the UK. So why do they want a UI? The same reason why unionists wouldn't accept being British in a UI.

    My best guess is because theyre already 'British' residing outside of Britain.

    The North is a state that exists seperate to Britain (they can check their passports for verification of this)

    The harsh reality for many unionists is, that once they embark on a journey over to the UK mainland, they're broadly looked upon as 'Paddys' anyway.

    Green or blue, it's no matter to most of the UK mainland residents, you're simply Irish over there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭6541


    Syphonax wrote: »
    Wondering did you refer to her directly as a northern bird? Yes there are yobs like this on both sides and if there had of been similar nationalist yobs it might have turned out differently, like a mini riot with you as a tennis ball in the middle.


    No I just said hello to her, also earlier in another bar I was talking to some women who identified as east Belfast women, they had never met anyone from the south ! We haven't a hope of unity or friendship with these people. They are 50 years behind us.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,611 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


Advertisement
Advertisement