Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Off The Ball Official Thread <Mod Note - Post #1, #533, #6651>

1147148150152153334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,779 ✭✭✭✭Ol' Donie


    So no discussion of the Pat Hickey interview on OTB??

    I wonder was that part of the conditions of the interview.

    Ah relax. That massive, massive scandal is small potatoes compared to Sky changing the names of their channels.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭PeterTheNinth


    Ol' Donie wrote: »
    Ah relax. That massive, massive scandal is small potatoes compared to Sky changing the names of their channels.

    From memory didnt they nearly have a Sky Sports OCI channel when the whole thing was happening.

    What's your read of it Donie, strange that they are not making even a token comment about the interview. Seems like a decision has been made not to comment on it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,779 ✭✭✭✭Ol' Donie


    Jesus, the first hour of the show is effectively about what should have been a note at the end of any sports bulletin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,779 ✭✭✭✭Ol' Donie


    From memory didnt they nearly have a Sky Sports OCI channel when the whole thing was happening.

    What's your read of it Donie, strange that they are not making even a token comment about the interview. Seems like a decision has been made not to comment on it.

    Well, my lawyers have advised me to wait until the court case before commenting.

    Now, as it happens, I missed the Paul Williams interview, partially because I thought the two hour sports show in the evening might cover it better than he would have conducted it.

    I expect that Joe and the rest of them would refuse to cover it if they can't at least be honest about it, which is convenient, because they've probably been told not to cover it at all.

    Bad luck for them trying to ignore it, as it happened on the slowest sports news day of the year.

    Then again, they might find room for it after today's Lions laughs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭PeterTheNinth


    Remember when OTB used to give out about all those journalists who shunned David Walsh because it was easier for them to be friends with Lance Armstrong and get the story. I think they have just crossed that line themselves.

    I can't believe that there wasn't even a token reference, even just to hit off curmudgeons like me at the pass.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,779 ✭✭✭✭Ol' Donie


    Given that the number one thing Newstalk does at every possible opportunity is talk about it's own shows - see OTB getting a mention on every single sports bulletin throughout the day - the decision not to cover it is undoubtedly deliberate.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,470 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    I wouldn't be surprised if Hickey stipulated that they can't talk about it. Hickey doing an interview with the breakfast show on newstalk is pretty strange as it is.

    Edit: Having just read some of the reviews of the interview on the Newstalk Breakfast show on here I think there were a lot of stipulations by Pat put in place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,940 ✭✭✭ballsymchugh


    what's the big deal on telling Joe how great an interviewer he is lately?

    he mentioned it himself that Barry Davies said he gave him a good interview, and the others are saying it about other ones he's done too. are they ripping the piss out of a fragile ego??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭PeterTheNinth


    Just wondering why they haven't uploaded the rugger love in that they were promoting the other night. They played a preview on the show on Friday (I think), by which stage they had bleeped the life out of all the curse words. They said that it would be up on the site but I cant see it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 209 ✭✭monstermag


    The paper review has gone down the toilet. Can someone tell Cliona Foley to let someone else speak, yes she knows her stuff but my goodness does she hog the microphone


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 11,028 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog


    I think Cliona hogs the mic more when there's a straight forward sports journalist on with her but I find her less noisy and more interesting when the other guest is a columnist, physio, etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭PeterTheNinth


    monstermag wrote: »
    The paper review has gone down the toilet.

    It's really dependent on who is on the show. Not a fan of Cliona Foley either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,001 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    humberklog wrote: »
    I think Cliona hogs the mic more when there's a straight forward sports journalist on with her but I find her less noisy and more interesting when the other guest is a columnist, physio, etc.

    She was on with Kimmage a couple of times and wasn't so bad as she had to fight to get air time, listened to her a couple of other times with different panelists than Kimmage and she was dreadful imo


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 11,028 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog


    siblers wrote: »
    She was on with Kimmage a couple of times and wasn't so bad as she had to fight to get air time, listened to her a couple of other times with different panelists than Kimmage and she was dreadful imo


    Yeah. I wanted to say "with Kimmage" but thought to keep it a bit broader.
    When she's on with someone with something to say she's good at listening and asks good questions.
    Unfortunately NT and {Off The Ball} Papers see her as a lead character.

    Personally I'd like more of the occasional Rosenstock, Arthur Mathews et al but that knda fun is less and less these days. Or dare I say- it's because it's GAA season?

    I don't want a comedic sideways look at sports all the time but it did (and can) add to the formula of The Papers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 908 ✭✭✭Jayesdiem


    I previously didn't mind her but she's even finishing people's sentences for them.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,367 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7


    She absolutely ruined it yday, talk about loving the sound of her own voice!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭Badabing


    Big black hole in otb today. No live gaa. Really shows up today when there is so many games on. Over doing the golf a bit.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,470 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    With the Lions series over now it's lean pickings for sports media for the next month or so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭Badabing


    How? The games are over by 10.30 in the morning


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,470 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    I'm fairly sure they would have had a few slots during the week and after the game today talking about the game. Monday is usually a review, Wednesday a preview, they would have had a review slot of the game today, and might have even had something on last night about it.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,367 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7


    Only got to listen to the paul kimmage special, have to say I really enjoyed it. Would like to see them do a few more shows like that with one guest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,266 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    pc7 wrote: »
    Only got to listen to the paul kimmage special, have to say I really enjoyed it. Would like to see them do a few more shows like that with one guest.

    Is that the one where we learn that the teenage Mutant Ninjia Turtle Raphael was pronouncing his name incorrectly? :rolleyes:



    0003867516528_500X500.jpg


    It should have been pronounced Ray-fill apparently.... :D

    I actually tried to do an internet search on 'Rayfill Kimmage'

    Nothing.

    Then 'Rayfield Kimmage'.

    A fella called Raphael Kimmage showed up, which confused me.

    Paul Kimmage's wikipedia page finally put me on the right track....

    It is even more amusing considering Paul Kimmage is great for pronouncing French words/names/placenames with a French accent, and the whole nine yards.

    Domestique etc etc

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,752 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    I remember a Raphael Kimmage doing a bit of cycling years ago. Raphael is pronounced Ray fee el.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,266 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I remember a Raphael Kimmage doing a bit of cycling years ago. Raphael is pronounced Ray fee el.

    Not on the Podcast it wasn't!

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭PeterTheNinth


    Not on the Podcast it wasn't!

    I listened to the podcast and Paul pronounced his brother's name the same way that he always pronounces it Ray Fee All. I was very surprised when I first heard him say his brother's name on a documentary on the telly a few years ago, as I would have thought it would have been pronounced the same as the Ninja Turtle. But I'm sure Paul would know!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,001 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    Is Rough Ride north a rad? Listened to around half of the Kimmage interview and its really good, especially when his starts talking about the 87 tour


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,524 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    siblers wrote:
    Is Rough Ride north a rad? Listened to around half of the Kimmage interview and its really good, especially when his starts talking about the 87 tour

    Yes. Shows that Paul knows what he's talking about. Relatively small book, you'll read it in a week easy.

    Can be hard reading if you like to believe dopers ultimately are small in number and the fight is being won against them.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,470 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    Yeah it's a very excellent book.

    I've read it a few times over the years and every time I think it's great.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,266 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    CatFromHue wrote: »
    Yeah it's a very excellent book.

    I've read it a few times over the years and every time I think it's great.

    Yeah, it's great you feel tired after just reading about all the physical barriers he pushed himself through.

    You don't have to be into cycling to read it either.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,940 ✭✭✭ballsymchugh


    screw that link, it's on the OTB facebook page, interview with Donal Og Cusack

    they've managed to bring up the Martin O'Neill comments from last year again.

    who'd have thunk it!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement