Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Do you think kids need parents of opposite sex?

1246728

Comments

  • Posts: 26,219 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Murrisk wrote: »
    "Shouting down" - sigh. The most misused and most overused expression on boards. Don't be such a martyr. You put some controversial comments out there. Own them. Be prepared for the attendant responses.

    "outrage"

    "hysterical"

    "offended"

    "snowflake"

    All used to sanctify and martyr the owner of the unpopular comments and make anyone who calls them out sound like a headcase.


  • Posts: 19,178 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    How does a gay couple naturally get pregnant?

    I know full well how they do it in practise - and every single method involves depriving the child of one biological parent.

    Are you also against scientific help for couples (hetro) who cannot get pregnant?
    What about IVF, sperm donation, or egg donation?
    Do you have the same opinion on these ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    How does a gay couple naturally get pregnant?

    I know full well how they do it in practise - and every single method involves depriving the child of one biological parent.

    Probably by one of them having sexual inetercourse with a member of the oppositre sex, I would imagine.

    Interesting point though: if one of the parents was bisexual, would that make people more comfortable with the idea?

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭Syphonax


    Science says that its Man and a Woman which is the natural order of creation. This isnt some religious dogma talking only the biology humanity. Man/Man Woman/Woman is fine but you cannot conceive a child naturally and I would not like to be a child of such creation be it by some other science or adoption.


  • Posts: 17,847 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Maybe not necessarily a parent of both sexes, but a role model, like a uncle/auntie to look to for guidance.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    From what I can see, their children are perfectly happy and healthy children, but you didn't ask for my opinion of their childrens welfare or their parenting skills, you asked has anyone saying that you need a parent of both gender ever actually seen a child come out worse for wear due to the lack of a particular gendered parent?


    I mean if they know of any children who have grown up to be dysfunctional and/or with mental health issues etc as a direct result of them being raised by a single gender


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,048 ✭✭✭.......


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    sup_dude wrote: »
    I mean if they know of any children who have grown up to be dysfunctional and/or with mental health issues etc as a direct result of them being raised by a single gender

    ... would just be a case of correlation not being causation. I mean, there are plety of examples of chidlren who grew up with paretns of both gerders and were dysfunctional.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    Syphonax wrote:
    Science says that its Man and a Woman which is the natural order of creation. This isnt some religious dogma talking only the biology humanity. Man/Man Woman/Woman is fine but you cannot conceive a child naturally and I would not like to be a child of such creation be it by some other science or adoption.

    So you agree with some science but not other science? Science isn't the bible, it is what it is. You don't get to pick the bits you like best in order to justify your opinion. If you don't like the idea of homosexual couples, then say so but don't misuse science in order to justify your warped opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Syphonax wrote: »
    Science says that its Man and a Woman which is the natural order of creation. This isnt some religious dogma talking only the biology humanity. Man/Man Woman/Woman is fine but you cannot conceive a child naturally and I would not like to be a child of such creation be it by some other science or adoption.

    Science has actually gone out of its way to prove the exact opposite to what you have just posted.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    ... would just be a case of correlation not being causation. I mean, there are plety of examples of chidlren who grew up with paretns of both gerders and were dysfunctional.


    Exactly my point. If there was a high enough correlation, there would be cause for looking at it as a source of causation, which is why I said "directly".


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,695 ✭✭✭gizmo81


    You've spoken to every same sex couple with children in the world?

    Many gay couples maintain a relationship with the surrogate/donor.

    And still children don't need a biological parent. Many don't have one or both and turn out fine.

    Stop trying to create hierarchies in the quality of parenting/families.

    Parenting has nothing to do with ones ability to have a child.

    How does a gay couple naturally get pregnant?

    I know full well how they do it in practise - and every single method involves depriving the child of one biological parent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,101 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    sup_dude wrote: »
    I mean if they know of any children who have grown up to be dysfunctional and/or with mental health issues etc as a direct result of them being raised by a single gender


    Ohh right, I get you now.

    I've known a few adults who attribute their dysfunction and ill mental health to their being raised in a same sex household (and before anyone is skeptical of that - there were children being raised in same sex households before the marriage referendum ever raised the issue of same sex parenting!), but I know far more adults who attribute their dysfunction and ill mental health to their being raised in an opposite sex household.

    Purely by virtue of their numbers alone, the number of adults who attribute their dysfunction/ill mental health to being raised in an opposite sex household is going to be far greater than the number of adults who attribute their dysfunction/ill mental health to being raised in a same sex household.

    I don't think there's going to be any great "evening out the numbers" any time soon either - the number of families where the parents are of the same sex will always pale in comparison to the number of families where the parents are of the opposite sex.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,476 ✭✭✭neonsofa


    Takes a village to raise a child. I think once they have loving people in their life, male and female, who genuinely care for them and teach them, they will be ok. I'm a single parent and I earn more now than myself and the ex did together, she is no longer around an abusive man and she is happy and loved and provided for. I think I'm doing a good job considering; but I do it with the help of all around me- her school, my friends and family, my dad and brother are role models and show her what a good man is. Her father is a terrible example of a man.

    Ideally she would have a lovely man to help me raise her and we would have a combined salary that sees us never go without, but as it stands we make do with what we have, which is more than many families have and we love each other and have support from many lovely men and woman in our community and that's what matters- not my marital status or the lack of a man in our house on a day to day basis. The more love a child has the better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,782 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Given that having parents of opposite sex doesn't guarantee anything, then I think not.

    I think it is important for children to have strong positive male and female role models. those role models should be consistent, especially when the child is young. This cold be provided by grandparents, aunts, uncles, etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭Syphonax


    ....... wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    Im not talking about the benefits to health that science can provide, the topic is very specific to the upbringing of children in society and in that regard I am not an advocate of wasting the valuable time of the scientific profession for which people have studied for. Id rather they used their time curing cancer as opposed to turning a man into a woman and vice versa and letting them create offspring in some absurd manner. But thats just me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,853 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    it depends what "need" means but part of being a dad is being male so I'd like to think my male perspective adds something that would otherwise be missing.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Posts: 26,219 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Syphonax wrote: »
    Im not talking about the benefits to health that science can provide, the topic is very specific to the upbringing of children in society and in that regard I am not an advocate of wasting the valuable time of the scientific profession for which people have studied for. Id rather they used their time curing cancer as opposed to turning a man into a woman and vice versa and letting them create offspring in some absurd manner. But thats just me.

    We can only hope so.

    Science has enabled many couples to parent children who would otherwise never have had the chance to exist. They are not absurdities.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,308 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    For the fcuks who say yes; what is your opinion of single parent families?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,070 ✭✭✭LadyMacBeth_


    I'm bi-sexual so perhaps I'm a bit biased. I believe, as others have said, that having two loving parents is the most important thing, regardless of gender. I think that the child should have male influences in their life if the child has two mothers, and female influences in their life if the child has two fathers, but that can come from relatives, family friends, teachers etc.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,101 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    the_syco wrote: »
    For the fcuks who say yes; what is your opinion of single parent families?


    They're ok, but I wouldn't eat a whole one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭Will I Am Not


    the_syco wrote: »
    For the fcuks who say yes; what is your opinion of single parent families?

    The f*cks? For having a different opinion than you?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 ✭✭✭tiger55


    Some of the responses just show how brainwashed people have been by the media.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,633 ✭✭✭✭Widdershins


    We're not anything close to that in either Ireland, Europe, nor Western society.

    Thankfully.

    The thing is that we could evaluate parenting scenarios if all criteria were equal and if all parents thought the same and if all children thought the same, but they don't, because apart from their parents being their primary influencers (which is why most people automatically assume that it is more beneficial for a child or children to be raised in a two parent opposite sex family home), the children themselves aren't blank slates.

    You can even see the differences in how children are raised depending upon what type of neighbourhood they're brought up in. That's not to say one neighbourhood is better than the other if all you're trying to deduce is the outcomes for children. Whatever the outcome is, is only a matter of perspective, and most people don't wallow in their childhood as adults.

    You're right, we're not, and I'd agree that's a good thing in a way. I would just say that they're not so rigid and there's more of a crossover now than there used to be. Just one example off the top of my head, I would say not many dads these days are passing down mechanical skills and general manual skills to their boys. Which, imo, is a pity. Or to their girls, either, though generally it was the boys.
    Parents are filling the same kind of roles now regardless of gender.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,695 ✭✭✭gizmo81


    I just today watched a segment on BBC new Sunday morning news show of the winner of Champion Adopter of the Year. A single Gay man who has adopted 4 children with varying special needs.

    If straight people were such ideal parents then gay people wouldn't have children to adopt and wouldn't be winning Adopter of the Year, would they?

    Is this text-book homophobia? Fear that gay people will make better parents perhaps?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,853 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    gizmo81 wrote: »
    I just today watched a segment on BBC new Sunday morning news show of the winner of Champion Adopter of the Year. A single Gay man who has adopted 4 children with varying special needs.

    If straight people were such ideal parents then gay people wouldn't have children to adopt and wouldn't be winning Adopter of the Year, would they?

    Is this text-book homophobia? Fear that gay people will make better parents perhaps?

    ah here, parenting is on a curve like everything else. No one has said that the worst set of m/f parents are better than the best of any other combination.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,695 ✭✭✭gizmo81


    I was just asking. It's over two years since The Children and Families Bill was introduced but people are still querying the suitability of gay people to be parents.
    silverharp wrote: »
    ah here, parenting is on a curve like everything else. No one has said that the worst set of m/f parents are better than the best of any other combination.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,048 ✭✭✭.......


    This post has been deleted.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,695 ✭✭✭gizmo81


    I'd say there is a problem on boards.ie, two recent threads about the George Vandalism had to shut down.

    Every so often there's a thread about trans, gender, etc in thinly veiled homophobia. And that's only in the last couple of months since I joined.

    ....... wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,101 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    You're right, we're not, and I'd agree that's a good thing in a way. I would just say that they're not so rigid and there's more of a crossover now than there used to be. Just one example off the top of my head, I would say not many dads these days are passing down mechanical skills and general manual skills to their boys. Which, imo, is a pity. Or to their girls, either, though generally it was the boys.
    Parents are filling the same kind of roles now regardless of gender.

    You know I actually agree with all of your post, but that's because Western society has since the agricultural and industrial revolutions been moving away from manual labour and more into services industries, very much so here in Ireland where we have a booming tech sector, and farmers are having to be subsidised.

    There are still plenty of fathers who pass on manual skills to their children, just as there are many mothers who pass on skills to their children. I couldn't tell you anything about how to fix a car, but my child goes tinkering about with lorry engines at the weekend with his granddad and the mechanic, learns all sorts of stuff. I offered to teach him how to knit, and he told me where I could stick my needles :pac:

    Seriously though, before you lament the demise of cottage industries and traditional handcrafts and skills, have a look at maker culture, which is becoming a thing in the US, and though it's not quite the same as tinkering around under the hood of a car, there's plenty of things you can teach children with a laptop and a 3D printer and then let their imaginations go nuts!

    Both boys and girls btw, coderdojo is another good place to start, so it's not so much that traditional roles are changing, but that it's society as a whole is changing, and people are adapting as quickly as they can. The expected gender, stereotypes, conformities and roles and so on are still pretty much the same as they always were, but the mediums through which we're disemminating our ideas and children are picking up on them, got a whole lot faster and more influential with each generation.

    I don't think we'll end up at this point just yet though through our increasing dependence on services -




    *reaches for another donut* :pac:


Advertisement